×

Submission + - Google Workers Protest Cloud Contract With Israel's Government (wired.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Dozens of Google employeesbegan occupyingcompany offices in New York City and Sunnyvale, California, on Tuesday in protest of the company’s $1.2 billion contract providing cloud computing services to the Israeli government. The sit-in, organized by the activist group No Tech for Apartheid, is happening at Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian’s office in Sunnyvale and the 10th floor commons of Google’s New York office. The sit-in will be accompanied by outdoor protests at Google offices in New York, Sunnyvale, San Francisco, and Seattle beginning at 2 pm ET and 11 am PT. Tuesday’s actions mark an escalation in a series of recent protests organized by tech workers who oppose their employer’s relationship with the Israeli government, especially in light of Israel’s ongoing assault on Gaza. Since Hamas killedabout 1,100 Israelison October 7, the IDF has killedmore than 34,000Palestinians.

Just over a dozen people gathered outside Google’s offices in New York and Sunnyvale on Tuesday. Among those in New York was Google cloud software engineer Eddie Hatfield, who was fired days afterdisruptingGoogle Israel’s managing director at March’s Mind The Tech, a company-sponsored conference focused on the Israeli tech industry, in early March. Several hours into the sit-ins on Tuesday, Google security began to accuse the workers of “trespassing” and disrupting work, prompting several people to leave while others vowed to remain until they were forced out. The 2021 contract, known as Project Nimbus, involves Google and Amazon jointly providing cloud computing infrastructure and services across branches of the Israeli government. Last week,Timereported that Google’s work on Project Nimbus involves providingdirect services to the Israel Defense Forces. [...]

On March 4, more than600 other Googlerssigned a petition opposing the company’s sponsorship of the conference. After Hatfield was fired three days later, Google trust-and-safety-policy employee Vidana Abdel Khalekresignedfrom her position in opposition to Project Nimbus. Then, in late March, more than 300 Apple workers signed an open letter thatalleged retaliationagainst workers who have expressed support for Palestinians, and urged company leadership to show public support for Palestinians. Hasan Ibraheem, a Google software engineer, is participating in the sit-in at his local Google office in New York. “This has really been a culmination of our efforts,” he tells WIRED. Since joining No Tech for Apartheid in December, Ibraheem says, he has been participating in weekly “tabling” actions being held at Google office cafés in New York, Sunnyvale, San Francisco, and Mountain View, California. It involves holding a sign that says “Ask me about Project Nimbus” during lunch break, passing out flyers, and answering questions from coworkers. “It's actually shocking how many people at Google don't even know that this contract exists,” Ibraheem says. “A lot of people who don't know about it, who then learn about it through us, are reasonably upset that this contract exists. They just didn't know that it existed beforehand.”

Submission + - The IRS's New Tax Software: Rave Reviews, But Low Turnout (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Biden administration marked the close of tax season Monday by announcing it had met a modest goal of getting at least 100,000 taxpayers to file through the Internal Revenue Service’s new tax software, Direct File — an alternative to commercial tax preparers. Although the government had billed Direct File as a small-scale pilot, it still represents one of the most significant experiments in tax filing in decades — a free platform letting Americans file online directly to the government. Monday’s announcement aside, though, Direct File’s success has proven highly subjective.

By and large, people who tried the Direct File software — which looks a lot like TurboTax or other commercial tax software, with its question-and-answer format — gave it rave reviews. “Against all odds, the government has created an actually good piece of technology,” a writer for the Atlantic marveled, describing himself as “giddy” as he used the website to chat live with a helpful IRS employee. The Post’s Tech Friend columnist Shira Ovide called it “visible proof that government websites don’t have to stink.” Online, people tweeted praise after filing their taxes, like the user who called it the “easiest tax experience of my life.”

While the users might be a happy group, however, there weren’t many of them compared to other tax filing options — and their positive reviews likely won’t budge the opposition that Direct File has faced from tax software companies and Republicans from the outset. These headwinds will likely continue if the IRS wants to renew it for another tax season. The program opened to the public midway through tax season, when many low-income filers had already claimed their refunds — and was restricted to taxpayers in 12 states, with only four types of income (wages, interest, Social Security and unemployment). But it gained popularity as tax season went on: The Treasury Department said more than half of the total users of Direct File completed their returns during the last week.

Submission + - Amazon Board Member Andrew Ng Pushing States for CS+AI HS Graduation Requirement

theodp writes: "We're pleased to welcome Dr. Andrew Ng to our Board of Directors effective April 9, 2024," Amazon announced last week, noting that AI legend Ng is the Managing General Partner of AI Fund, a venture studio that supports entrepreneurs to build AI companies." Among AI Fund's investments is Kira Learning, a STEM-focused K-12 education publisher that aims to transform computer science and AI education for young learners. Kira, where Ng is Chairman, is partnering with the State of Tennessee to implement the state's new computer science high school graduation requirement. Tennessee lawmakers earned praise in a VentureBeat op ed (Schools Should Teach AI to Every Child) penned by Ng and Kira CEO and co-founder Andrea Pasinetti. Ng and Pasinetti were both signatories to a letter issued by the CEOs for CS, part of a campaign coordinated by tech-backed nonprofit Code.org that was credited with pressuring the nation's Governors into signing a compact agreeing to make their states' children more CS-savvy (signers included TN Gov Bill Lee). Ng's and Kira's efforts to convince state officials of the need to make CS a high school graduation requirement don't stop there.

News sites, state legislature websites, and social media have noted the lobbying efforts of CS Forward, an advocacy group that calls for "Computer Science Education In Every State" and notes it "unites non-profits, educators, companies, and community leaders in advocating for state computer science graduation requirements." On its About page, CS Forward explains, "Our mission is to ensure every K-12 student masters CS and AI coding. We're here to influence state legislation, budget allocations and shape public policy." A graphic on the page hints at the advocacy group's ties to Kira Learning, as does the presence of Kira Chairman Ng and Kira co-founder and Director of AI Applications Jagriti Agrawal on CS Forward's Advisory Board (Kira's Head of Public Affairs Dave Brown also does double-duty as the Director of CS Forward). CS Forward recently celebrated a legislative victory that saw the Louisiana House of Representatives vote 102-1 to pass a CS high school graduation requirement. A graphic circulated on Twitter alerting the LA Senate of the near-unanimous vote sported the logos of CS Forward, Kira, Code.org, and Code.org Platinum Supporters ($3+ million) Amazon & Microsoft. California State legislature records note that the same five groups registered support for requiring CS for high school graduation in CA. CS Forward LinkedIn posts cite additional efforts to pass bills expanding CS education and making it a high school graduation requirement in Indiana (mission accomplished), Washington (defeated, despite help from Code.org), Iowa, and Minnesota.

Ng has argued that "Laws to ensure AI applications are safe, fair, and transparent are needed." Which begs the question: Are laws also needed to ensure K-12 AI+CS education lobbying is transparent?

Submission + - New charger could double the service-life of Li-Ion batteries 1

NewtonsLaw writes: Lithium-Ion (LI) batteries are the backbone of much of our modern technology. They're in our phones, our laptops, our smartwatches and even the EVs that are increasingly appearing on our roads. One of the problems with LI technolgy however, is the very finite life of those batteries.

In the case of an EV, the battery pack represents a very significant portion of the total price you pay when buying one. Right now, the life of EV batteries is generally considered to be at least eight years, under normal use. But what if that could be doubled — simply by changing the way those batteries are charged?

This announcement by researchers in Europe indicates that the service life (ie: the number of charg/discharge cycles) of LI batteries could be as much as doubled, through the use of a pulsed current charging technology.

The standard charge method for LI cells is to deliver a constant direct current (DC) until the voltage of the cell rises to around 4.2 volts, at which time the voltage is maintained at a constant level and the charge current allowed to fall off. Once the charge current reaches a predefined minimum level, the cell is considered charged.

The new pulsed current method does not use DC but instead opts to recharge by way of intermittent pulses of current. This is not a new charging technology although it's not the norm for LI cells. Pulsed current chargers have been used on older chemistries such as nickel-cadmium in order to reduce/eliminate the formation of dendrites that would otherwise create short-circuits or significantly increase the self-discharge rate. Applying this tech to recharging LI cells seems to be a significant game-changer, if the lab results are duplicated in "the real world (TM)"

Doubling the life of your EV's battery or even your smartphone's battery is no small thing.

Submission + - Huawei building vast chip equipment R&D centre in Shanghai (nikkei.com)

AmiMoJo writes: Huawei Technologies is building a massive semiconductor equipment research and development centre in Shanghai as the Chinese tech titan continues to beef up its chip supply chain to counter a U.S. crackdown. The centre's mission includes building lithography machines, vital equipment for producing cutting-edge chips. To staff the new center, Huawei is offering salary packages worth up to twice as much as local chipmakers, industry executives and sources briefed on the matter told Nikkei Asia. The company has already hired numerous engineers who have worked with top global chip tool builders like Applied Materials, Lam Research, KLA and ASML, they said, adding that chip industry veterans with more than 15 years of experience at leading chipmakers like TSMC, Intel and Micron are also among recent and potential hires.

Submission + - Apple To Expand Presence In Florida With New Miami Office (9to5mac.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Following moves of other tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft, Apple is reportedly set to open a new office space in a Miami suburb. This won’t be the first corporate space for Apple in the city, but it will be larger than the existing office. Reported by Bloomberg, anonymous sources close to the matter say that Apple’s new Miami office will be 45,000 square feet in the affluent Coral Gables suburb of Miami. It’s not clear yet what part of Apple’s business the new office will focus on but it will be larger than its existing small Miami office that handles Latin America and advertising operations. The specific property of the new Apple offices will be at The Plaza Coral Gables.

Submission + - US Lawmaker Proposes a Public Database of All AI Training Material (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Amid a flurry of lawsuits over AI models' training data, US Representative Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) has introduced (PDF) a bill that would require AI companies to disclose exactly which copyrighted works are included in datasets training AI systems. The Generative AI Disclosure Act "would require a notice to be submitted to the Register of Copyrights prior to the release of a new generative AI system with regard to all copyrighted works used in building or altering the training dataset for that system," Schiff said in a press release.

The bill is retroactive and would apply to all AI systems available today, as well as to all AI systems to come. It would take effect 180 days after it's enacted, requiring anyone who creates or alters a training set not only to list works referenced by the dataset, but also to provide a URL to the dataset within 30 days before the AI system is released to the public. That URL would presumably give creators a way to double-check if their materials have been used and seek any credit or compensation available before the AI tools are in use. All notices would be kept in a publicly available online database.

Currently, creators who don't have access to training datasets rely on AI models' outputs to figure out if their copyrighted works may have been included in training various AI systems. The New York Times, for example, prompted ChatGPT to spit out excerpts of its articles, relying on a tactic to identify training data by asking ChatGPT to produce lines from specific articles, which OpenAI has curiously described as "hacking." Under Schiff's law, The New York Times would need to consult the database to ID all articles used to train ChatGPT or any other AI system. Any AI maker who violates the act would risk a "civil penalty in an amount not less than $5,000," the proposed bill said.

Slashdot Top Deals