Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

World's Most Annoying IE Toolbar

Posted by michael on Thu Jan 30, 2003 09:02 AM
from the someone-will-surpass-it-soon dept.
nautical9 writes "Following the same devious footsteps of the infamous Bonzi Buddy, Gator, and Comet Cursor "enhancements", Xupiter now has their own self-installing toolbar for IE. There are many claims that if you leave your security preferences at their default level, it will install itself without your express permission. And once on your system, it's gracious enough to reset your homepage to xupiter.com, forward all your searches to their search engine, download and automatically launch applications (like gambling applets), and blocks all attempts to set these back to normal. Removing it isn't trivial either - it automatically checks for updates upon reboot, where it constantly changes the registry settings it uses, making the jobs of spyware removal programs like AdAware or Spybot Search & Destroy much harder. No word yet if it collects and forwards personal data."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • My searches (Score:5, Funny)

    by govtcheez (524087) <govtcheez03@hotmail.com> on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:03AM (#5188542) Homepage
    to their credit, Xupiter's search engine returns the best quality squirrel porn I've ever seen.
  • no it won't (Score:5, Informative)

    by rnd() (118781) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:06AM (#5188557) Homepage
    No, if you leave your security preferences at their default level, things like this will not install. That is clearly FUD. Even if you have your security preferences a notch lower, it will still prompt you to confirm installation.

    People get into the habbit of clicking "OK" whenever something pops up. Next thing they know, they have Gator and all sorts of junk installed.
    • Re:no it won't (Score:5, Insightful)

      by sckeener (137243) <sterling@texa[ ]eners.org ['ske' in gap]> on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:21AM (#5188710)
      I don't know what you are talking about but Xupiter is known for taking over IE without prompting you.

      I just went through 20 minutes of deleting it!
    • Wrong (Score:5, Informative)

      by Tuxinatorium (463682) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:23AM (#5188716) Homepage
      In earlier versions of IE for windows (like the ones that come bundled with windows 98 or ME and maybe 2000) there is a very well-known security flaw that allows malicious code on a website to make the computer download and execute arbitrary files without confirmation from the user. Most people are too stupid to download the updates to fix that vulnerability, so they should blame themselves. But that's how spamware trojans like Xupiter often spread.

      And anyway, isn't that the digital equivalent of mugging and rape? I mean they either install the thing on your computer without permission and it totally fucks with everythig, or they trick you into installing it by outright lying about it and not telling you what a piece of shit spamware/spyware TROJAN HORSE it is. Couldn't they easily be sued for fraud and/or hacking people's computers?
        • Re:Wrong (Score:5, Insightful)

          by 0x0d0a (568518) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:53AM (#5188931) Journal
          Even if they copy everything off of your hard drive and send it to their own servers, according to most Slashdotters, that is only copyright infringement (not theft), provided they don't delete anything.

          Then those Slashdotters would be wrong. Federal law prohibits unauthorized access to a computer.

          Granted, you could argue that running IE and not installing the tons of patches MS has slapped over many of its plethora of holes is "granting authorization" to the remote site, but I don't think a judge's sense of irony would go that far. :-)
        • Re:no it won't (Score:5, Informative)

          by platypus (18156) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:48AM (#5188900) Homepage
          Even aside from that, why the hell does IE do installations directly from a web page? That's beyond idiotic

          So I guess you dislike mozilla too?

          Hint: Google for xpinstall or go to mozdev and install a browser expansion - directroly from the web page.

          • Re:no it won't (Score:5, Interesting)

            by 0x0d0a (568518) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:49AM (#5188907) Journal
            It's not much different than if someone downloads a file to the desktop and decides to double-click on it.

            I'd argue that it is. First they have to see a (familiar) file-dialog box pop up. They aren't just hitting "OK" in a box -- they know that they are saving a file somewhere. Even novice users are generally pretty familiar with the file open/save dialog boxes. Second, they have to navigate to their desktop. to save the file. Then they have to click "save", switch to Explorer, and then double-click the icon. Again, double-clicking is a fairly familiar action, and people are aware that yes, they are openin something. So we have many steps, including familiar steps that will tend to clue even a novice Windows user, rather than a single "OK".

            Ultimately, the user should read any warning message that pops up, whether it's from IE, your anti-virus software, or from your OS.

            Windows users are *innundated* by dialog boxes. Every time they delete a file. A whole slew of them when they install software. Four hours ago, my roommate was using a TV-viewing program that brough up a message box telling him that he'd "enabled option foo" each time he clicked a checkbox in the prefs dialog.

            In addition, Javascript can bring up message boxes (idiotically enough, this is enabled by default by MS). So most users (*especially* Internet Explorer users) run into a ton of message boxes while browsing. Yes, perhaps they should go through each dialog box and examine it, but that's very time-consuming. If you read through Apple's Human Interface Guidelines, you'll notice that the *vast* majority of rules for menus and modal dialogs are designed around one single goal -- letting the user *not* have to examine each dialog box once they're familiar with it or boxes in similar software. The point is that Windows users are sick and tired of dialog boxes, and *do not read them* in detail. And they shouldn't *have* to be screwed over if they skim or misread a box when simply web browsing. A Javascript should not be able to take malicious, destructive action just because someone clicked "OK" in one of a series of dialogs that a Javascript popped up. To set up IE to operate this was was irresponsible in the extreme by Microsoft.

  • THANKS (Score:5, Funny)

    by ematic (217513) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:06AM (#5188560)
    Thanks a lot. I clicked on the link, and now I have this stupid toolbar installed!
        • Re:THANKS (Score:5, Informative)

          by Anonym0us Cow Herd (231084) on Thursday January 30 2003, @11:35AM (#5189614)
          If I really wanted to be evil I could write a self installing applet to default IE to the goatse.cx page everytime it opened upon a vistor visiting my site with an earlier browser.

          You don't need an applet. Someone on slashdot has already done this. See this [slashdot.org] slashdot post, which, if you click the link in the posting, takes your browser on a carefully crafted roller coaster of 302 Object Moved across several different servers, eventually leading you to either the correct (advertised) New York Times article, or to goatse.cx if you are using IE. See my four replies under the post that explain how this was done. Note that the first of my replies was moderated as Troll because I was warning people about a goatse link.
  • by sdo1 (213835) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:07AM (#5188574) Journal
    No word yet if it collects and forwards personal data

    Oh yea... as if they're going to go through all of that trouble and deception and not collect and forward personal data.

    Right.

    -S

  • Pretty easy fix (Score:5, Insightful)

    by 0x0d0a (568518) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:08AM (#5188581) Journal
    It's pretty easy to use Moz or Opera, which never started going down the security-hostile path of automated installation from *web pages*. And bookmarking. And so forth.

    If you're using IE, you're running a piece of software *on your machine* which is advertising and providing the ability for a web page to basically screw your system up. If precisely this happens...well, you should have tried another browser. :-)

    (If you don't like the Moz suite approach, try Phoenix)
    • Re:Pretty easy fix (Score:5, Informative)

      by JimDabell (42870) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:40AM (#5188843) Homepage
      If you're using IE, you're running a piece of software *on your machine* which is advertising and providing the ability for a web page to basically screw your system up. If precisely this happens...well, you should have tried another browser. :-)

      At any given time there are a dozen or so security holes in Internet Explorer. Right now there are 19 security holes [pivx.com] in the latest version of Internet Explorer, with all patches and service packs applied.

      • by tjwhaynes (114792) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:07AM (#5189041)

        Hate to break it to you, but Mozilla does do automated installs from web pages. Just head on over to MozDev [mozdev.org] and see for yourself. Many projects, such as OptiMoz and Spellchecker, have automated install links right on the page.

        Which only work if a) you actually have software installation enabled in your preferences, b) have write access to the location where mozilla is installed and c) will prompt you BEFORE it installs the software, giving the web server and the package being installed.

        Automated installs are extremely useful - it's all a question of finding that balance between ease of use and ease of abuse.

        Cheers,

        Toby Haynes

        • by frleong (241095) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:52AM (#5189339)
          Which only work if a) you actually have software installation enabled in your preferences, b) have write access to the location where mozilla is installed and c) will prompt you BEFORE it installs the software, giving the web server and the package being installed.
          All of these are also available in IE. You can choose to disable downloading ANY ActiveX control (signed or not) and you'll be fine. That's what I do, after I installed the ActiveX controls I want: QuickTime and Flash.

          The basic problem is that it is easy and tempting to press "Yes" to every dialog, whether it is Mozilla or IE.

  • Help! (Score:5, Funny)

    by LucidityZero (602202) <sometimesitsalex@@@gmail...com> on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:09AM (#5188588) Homepage
    Help, help! My Bonzi Buddy is eating my Gator, and my Comet Cursor is header for a direct impact with Xupiter!!!
  • No it doesn't :) (Score:5, Informative)

    by Fnagaton (580019) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:10AM (#5188594) Homepage Journal
    I've got default security settings and while it certainly displayed a few popups nothing else got installed. If however the user clicks 'OK' to things being installed without checking what they really do first then you get what you expect. :) Rule of thumb: Never install anything while browsing when it pops up and says "Hi install me for extra wizzy things!!!".
      • Re:No it doesn't :) (Score:5, Informative)

        by Col. Panic (90528) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:17AM (#5189106) Homepage Journal
        If you are running IE, click Tools, Internet Options, select the Content tab, click Publishers and make sure nothing is in the list. If you have anything there, that company can automatically install apps via your browser without asking.
  • by Vapor8 (240870) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:10AM (#5188595)
    Isn't it ironic that the article states all the bad things that can happen to your browser/computer if you go to their site and the toolbar is installed, yet the link is provided to it? And many of us, the curious lemmings that we are, will simply click on it... ;)

    As far as I'm concerned, if you read the article and are dumb enough to go through the process of clicking the link and getting the software installed, maybe reading /. is a little over your head ;)

    Seriously folks, if you're going to want to check this think out for yourself, please have enough 'smarts' to do so with a 'non-IE' browser...
  • by eXtro (258933) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:11AM (#5188601) Homepage
    When I first started using IBM compatibles there were forms of software which would install themselves on your system and were written to evade removal as well as modify your system in ways that you may or may not have approved of. Writing these packages was considered bad, and propogating them was even considered illegal. These small applications were called viruses.


    If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck then it's usually pretty safe to say that it's a duck. In this case all of these enhancements sound like viruses to me, or at least a derivitave of a virus. Where viruses had to be cleverly coded in order to be as small as possible and avoid detection by a skilled hacker these new pieces of code are large and increasingly rely on being able to remove software that would remove it.


    If you modify my system without me requesting it then you've installed a virus on my system. I should be able to call the FBI computer crimes division and get proceedings underway that result in you getting some nice free government accomodations.

    • I agree. But it's interesting to note that if this software had been written by an individual, rather than a corporation, the FBI would already be looking for the culprit. For some reason, corporate misbehavior is below the FBI's radar.

      From the article:

      It's a browser toolbar that some swear is doing "drive-by downloads" -- installing itself without users' permission -- then taking over their systems and making it impossible to uninstall.

      Technically, this is a virus. And IIRC, "unauthorized alteration of a computer system" is punishable by 5 years in prison and up to a $250,000 fine.

    • by demon (1039) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:44AM (#5188871)

      Hm. Sounds suspiciously like a trojan horse to me. Doesn't anyone know the difference anymore?

      • A virus attaches itself to other executables, and propagates by having the executable it's attached to run. It can attach to most any executable, or some attach to the boot sector.
      • A worm uses networks to attack exploitable services, and propagates that way. It doesn't necessarily require human interaction to spread.
      • A trojan horse is a program that's designed to look legitimate, but has some ill intent. It propagates by people running it. It doesn't infect other executables, it depends on people passing it on.
  • by christurkel (520220) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:12AM (#5188619) Homepage Journal
    But...but...I want my browser taken over too! We Mac users never any get any of the cool stuff Windows does...::snifff::
  • For a while now (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dachshund (300733) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:14AM (#5188641)
    This little beastie's been around for a while now; when I first got infected with it, most of the removal sites I found on Google were in Asian character sets, so I suppose it was pretty big over there first.

    The problem with these damn things is that you never quite know how they got onto your machine. I'm always very careful about what I install, and which dialog boxes I say "OK" to, but there's always the possibility that I accidentally let something slip through. I suppose that's why people aren't 100% sure if it can install itself right from IE without confirmation.

    I'm getting increasingly sick of using IE, but I'm constantly running across sites that Mozilla just can't handle properly (or swiftly). And yes, I've cranked up the security level, though god knows why there exists any level of "security" that would allow unconfirmed installs.

  • A Temporary Fix... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by graphicartist82 (462767) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:15AM (#5188649)
    Would be to activate IE's "Disable 3rd Party Extensions" option (In IE6: Tools-> Internet Options-> Advanced -> 12th Option Under the "Browsing" section)..

    I was fixing somebody's computer that had this toolbar installed and it would crash IE every time you opened IE (Or tried browsing the web via windows explorer). But once I Disabled 3rd Party Browser Extensions, it worked fine...
  • by Boss, Pointy Haired (537010) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:15AM (#5188659)
    Here's an alternative way to use the Security Zones of Internet Explorer to protect you from crap like this.

    First, set the "Trusted Sites" zone to the "MEDIUM" level.

    THIS MAKES YOUR TRUSTED SITES ZONE THE SAME AS THE NORMAL INTERNET ZONE.

    (People seem to flame this idea as a security risk without understanding that last bit)

    Then, modify the "Internet Zone" and disable Active Scripting.

    Finally, add all your favourite sites to the "Trusted Sites" zone.

    You can now enjoy the full functionality of JavaScript etc. on your frequently visited sites including the usual protection of the Internet Zone.

    Any site not in the Trusted Sites list cannot use JavasSript and so prevents pop-ups and other nasties such as self installing spy-ware.
  • Auto-Install (Score:5, Informative)

    by Foxxz (106642) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:15AM (#5188661) Homepage
    I did get this toolbar without clicking yes to anything. I wasn't on xupiter's website. I was browsing and after i was done i closed explorer. When i opened it back up late there was the tool bar. I still dont know where i got it. It took me a while to figure out who it belonged to and how to rid myself of it. I flamed away afterwards.

    -Foxxz
  • Automatic downloads (Score:5, Informative)

    by Lumpish Scholar (17107) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:16AM (#5188666) Homepage Journal
    On my Windows 98 SE box, I now browse with Phoenix [mozilla.org] almost all the time. I've discovered, though, that some browser downloads Internet Explorer asks me about, Phoenix installs automatically. (Phoenix seems a little too promiscuous about accepting Java, and doesn't remove .class files when it flushes the cache. Check the %WINDIR%/.jpi_cache/ directory structure.)

    It's the kind of thing you might expect from a 0.5 release; unfortunately, it's not the kind of thing you should only expect from Microsoft.
  • by TheRaven64 (641858) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:18AM (#5188686) Homepage Journal
    In this country (UK) we have something called the 'Computer Missuse Act'. This is a very dull piece of legislation which says (among other things) that using someones computer without their consent is illegal. Any program which runs on your computer without your explicit consent therefore violates this. If you click 'Okay', on the other hand...
  • It's a monster (Score:5, Informative)

    by rudog (98586) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:21AM (#5188711) Homepage
    My wife was unfortunate enough to "click through" and victimize herself with this thing. I happened to notice 20-30 different sessions being generated every few minutes through our firewall and started tcpdump to find out what was happening.

    After finding that it did indeed have my wife's credit card number/home address/phone number I asked her what she used it for; She said that she didn't know where it came from but that it was causing her laptop to crash about every ten minutes ever since it added itself to her IE toolbar.

    I then spent about 3.5 hours hacking the WinME registry trying to peel this thing out of her laptop because it's 'uninstall' doesn't!
    • Re:It's a monster (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Rich0 (548339) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:36AM (#5189245) Homepage
      My wife was unfortunate enough to "click through" and victimize herself with this thing.

      This is my biggest nightmare at home. I have XP Home Edition - so I figured I finally have a solution to this problem - just make everyone else who uses the system a "limited user" - they finally figured out what unix did 20 years ago.

      Nope - turns out half the software out there doesn't run without administrator access. And it isn't just lousy shareware junk either - try running MS Flight Simulator 2002 Professional as a "limited user". So now I need an admin account for the kids to play games - I set up the ground rules as being "don't web browse when logged into the games account", but of course there is no way to enforce that. I have Mozilla installed, so that at least is a start, but IE is still out there, and even with mozilla a computer-illeterate user can download a hostile .exe.

      My only solution is to backup reasonably often. Still, I don't backup everything - just data - since it would use gobs of media. So if somebody hoses my system I'll be reinstalling everything - and that is quite a bit of junk - hundreds of megabytes of it having been downloaded from the web (redownloading over a 26k modem link isn't fun either).

      If MS would at least code their software to not require admin access I'd be happy... Then again, maybe I should find an old PIII somewhere for the kids to play games on - of course it wouldn't have the GeForce III Ti accellerated graphics...
      • Re:It's a monster (Score:5, Informative)

        by liquidsin (398151) on Thursday January 30 2003, @11:13AM (#5189484) Homepage
        You could probably remove the modem from the 'games' account hardware profile. At least that way they'd have to go into the hardware profiles and re-add it, so it kills the "I'm too lazy to logout of this acct and log back in to surf the web". Just a thought...
  • Prevention tactic (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dcavanaugh (248349) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:32AM (#5188790) Homepage
    Somewhere along the line, my browser must have been hijacked and I got stuck with this little piece of badware. I used Ad-Aware to detect and destroy, but I got a little creative. I kept the C:\Program Files\Xupiter directory, and set the attribute to read-only. I'm hoping that any future attempted hijackings will result in the installation failing due to the inability to create or write anything into the Xupiter directory.

    attrib +r "C:\Program Files\Xupiter"
  • by Necronomicant (520844) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:53AM (#5188932)
    I work for a fairly large tech support / helpdesk outsourcing company. Programs like this are de facto viruses from the point of view of the end user. 90% of the ones that I talk to have no idea what this is or how it works, and no idea how it got installed. I remember talking to this one person who'd had Xupiter installed and their story was "Well we clicked Yes by mistake once...."

    I find it hard to believe that it would install itself with everything set to default on a properly updated copy of IE 6.0 SP1. It's much more likely that Xupiter is just betting on people clicking yes to the security warning prompt.

    Taken from Xupiter's end user agreement [xupiter.com]: To further enhance your media viewing experience, Xupiter reserves the right to run advertisements and promotions based on URLs and/or search terms users enter when navigating the Internet. Other enhancements and to allow access, users web browser, start page, search page, auto search option, bookmarks and default error page will be changed, along with the Xupiter accessory toolbar added to the web browser. Active desktop panel will be installed on the users desktop which will enable active desktops on the system for special promotions. Our software license requires that users browser start page be set to Xupiter.com in order to continue use of the Xupiter toolbar, from time to time we verify that users start page url is set to Xupiter.com, if it is not we reserve the right to alter it back.

    Great - it enables active desktop too; what fun!
  • FUI Dialogs? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by davetrainer (587868) <slashdot@davetra[ ]r.com ['ine' in gap]> on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:56AM (#5188947)
    Healan said some installations probably occurred when people clicked "OK" in a pop-up box without really knowing what they had agreed to, or when they meant to close the pop-up window.

    Probably because the popup is a fake user interface dialog. How in God's name does even a novice user inadvertently grant permission for a software install when their original intent was to close the window? Or is it common knowledge these days that the X in the top right corner of a dialog box is synonymous with the OK button.

    Bonzi is being sued [slashdot.org] for this, and these scumbags deserve the same.

  • Ah hah! (Score:5, Informative)

    by Dannon (142147) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:00AM (#5188978) Journal
    So that's what this Xupiter thing is! I was visiting my family this weekend, and my sister asked me to fix her Win98 computer. IE was crashing every time she started it. I found this set of program files under this "Xupiter" directory and a bunch of load-on-startup registry items referencing them. Most of the files in this directory were locked by some running process, of course. Apparently, this Xupiter was not only self-installing but also Win98-unfriendly. And there was no uninstall program.

    Restarted at DOS prompt to delete all the files. Regedit to remove every registry entry containing "Xupiter". After that, everything worked just fine, and I cranked up the security settings before I left.
  • by bandit450 (118835) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:01AM (#5188991) Homepage
    Working at a university network tech support, I see a lot of this sort of thing happening. In fact, just the other day a girl came in complaining that IE was really slow and didn't work half the time. Turned out to be the Xupiter virus...not only had it commandeered IE, but it had corrupted her TCP/IP stack. Know what else we found on her computer? Gator, Ienhance (a similar toolbar that causes IE to not even load on any computer) and several other "download speeder uppers", "web enhancements", and "special offers". Security settings were set on medium, which should be plenty enough to block the installation of these toolbars, however, this girl is the type that sits on her computer and goes "ooh, I want THAT!".

    The funniest part: this is the second time she's brought her computer in with these toolbars. After we had removed them the first time, we explicitly told her NOT to download web enhancements and toolbars...here she was again.

    I have owned a computer since 1990, and since 1990, I have yet to use a passive virus scanner. Since 1990, I have yet to get a virus...this girl has had several in the past month, and she DOES have a virus scanner running.

    Less clicking, more reading.
  • by Wolfier (94144) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:03AM (#5189012)
    They treat it as a virus.
    I followed this on friend's computer and it works.

    http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99904.htm
  • by mao che minh (611166) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:08AM (#5189044) Journal
    My Windows partition is just a big heap of junk, I gave up on it a long time ago. I got me this purple bear that likes to hop at out me when I open the control panel. I got women that skate around on the title bars until I crash. There is some winsys32 process that sends my ICQ password (like I care) to a hotmail account everyday. My Internet Explorer is now more of a "Yahoo!" explorer. I even have these helpful little pop-ups that inform me of terrific new offers in internet gambling and travel - every 30 seconds.

    Actually, now that I think about it, my Redhat desktop is kind of boring.....

  • by gabe (6734) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:17AM (#5189110) Homepage Journal

    a thirteen year old kid writes a virus that emails itself to everyone in your address book. he's found, caught, sentenced and tossed in jail.

    a company comes along and writes a piece of "software" that installs itself on your computer without your knowledge, changes your preferences, watches your every move and reports it back to the marketeers, and digs itself into your system so the only way to get it out is to reinstall your entire computer... (oops, by the way, now that you're using Microsoft products, you may just have to buy a new version due to licensing BS) ... and the worst that happens to the company is some negative press (which, as we all know, bad press is better than no press at all).

    so, why the hell isn't the FBI busting these peoples' door down and arresting them? what is the damn difference between what they do and what script kiddies do?

    Disclaimer: I am aware that I am exaggerating, are you?

    • by stratjakt (596332) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:10AM (#5188592) Journal
      We need laws for everything!

      Every time I wiggle my mouse around or push my spacebar I need a law to clearly define what I'm doing, what my rights and responsibilities are, and what the punishments are if I wiggle that mouse a little bit too far to the left!

      Laws, laws, more laws! We dont have enough laws!

      People are too stupid to live lives themselves or take any sort of personal responsibility! We need laws and lawyers and lawsuits!

      More LAWS! Laws are the answer.

      I'm writing my congressman right now, demanding more and increasingly complicated laws!
    • by someguy42 (609667) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:14AM (#5188638)
      Stuff like this IS probably illegal in the US. However, the company programming this is in Hungary, according to the Wired article. Gonna be fairly tough to put any lawyers against them here. Legislation against this stuff won't do much good either. Foreign countries don't much care what our congress legislates and passes into law.
    • Re:This is old news (Score:5, Informative)

      by jbf (30261) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:18AM (#5188688)
      RTFA: many people find the uninstaller doesn't work. And do you really trust that the uninstaller will remove any spyware they may leave behind? I mean, such a company must have incredibly high moral standards. They wouldn't do anything like leave behind spyware like Kazaa...
    • Complete uninstall? (Score:5, Informative)

      by dachshund (300733) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:20AM (#5188700)
      Xupiter has been around for a while. And it's NOT hard to get rid off: http://www.xupiter.com/uninstall That's it. Way to overreact guys.

      I don't know about this week's version of the uninstaller, but previous versions were nice enough to leave behind big chunks of the program. Still running. Sort of the way a tick will leave its head behind if you yank it out with tweezers.

      This is a pretty common and ugly tactic among spyware developers.

    • Re:Ouch.. (Score:5, Informative)

      by tijnbraun (226978) on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:18AM (#5188689)
      I found this in while reading their terms [xupiter.com].. (which is quite scary, actually) But anyhow maybe this will help: http://www.xupiter.com/uninstall.html [xupiter.com]
      • Re:Ouch.. (Score:5, Informative)

        by interiot (50685) on Thursday January 30 2003, @10:04AM (#5189022) Homepage
        Some excerpts...
        • Our software license requires that users browser start page be set to Xupiter.com in order to continue use of the Xupiter toolbar, from time to time we verify that users start page url is set to Xupiter.com, if it is not we reserve the right to alter it back.
        It just gets worse and worse...
        • Due to the ever-changing nature of software distributed on the Internet, Xupiter has included an auto update feature to ensure that you have the most recently released version of the Xupiter software. You acknowledge that Xupiter or parties appointed by Xupiter may from time to time provide programming fixes, updates and upgrades to you, including automatic updates to Xupiter, upgrades may include installation of third party applications, through automatic electronic dissemination and other means. You consent to such automatic updates and agree that the terms and conditions of this Agreement will apply to all such updates.
      • We 0wn your system. We will do whatever we want to it that will make us money.

        Occasionally there will be software that stops our software. Our servers will report this back to us, and we will update our vir^h^h^hsoftware to shut this off. Software known to conflict with ours include Norton Antivirus, Symantec Antivirus, and several firewall utilities.

        If we can find any information that is incriminating about you, we will sell it back to you for a price that we decide is right. Or maybe we we'll just keep the info and charge you a monthly fee not to tell anybody.

        We may use your computer to propagate our software to other users by e-mailing everyone on your address book, and any IP addresses that you contact. We may also delete some of your programs to make more space for ours.

        Finally, if we decide to, we will use your computer to participate in a DDOS attack of anyone we want. Thank you for using Xupiter. We hope you enjoy using our software as much as we do.
    • Re:Ouch.. (Score:5, Informative)

      by Bob Ince (79199) <and@doxCOFFEEdesk.com minus caffeine> on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:27AM (#5188743) Homepage
      See here for info and manual removal instructions:

      http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/Xupiter.html

      Or use Spybot S'n'D to remove it - Ad-Aware 5 hasn't been updated and can't get rid of all variants of it properly.

      This page:

      http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/

      will test you for Xupiter and 60-odd other nasties, if you're using IE.
    • Re:Sympathy (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Idarubicin (579475) <allsquiet@[ ]mail.com ['hot' in gap]> on Thursday January 30 2003, @09:58AM (#5188958) Journal
      You know, I should have sympathy for the victims of this, but I don't. The solution is simple; don't use IE!

      And the woman who wears provocative clothing is asking to get raped.

      What about the poor sods who have to use IE at work? What about technical neophytes? Should nobody be allowed to use a computer until they've studied CS for a couple of years and know who RMS is? I use Opera--quite happily--at home but I'm posting this (unfortunately) from a machine at work with IE, on which another browser is not an option. Educating an employer is often a slow, painful, laborious process. I'm trying, but it takes time.