Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Home Defense, Geek Style?

Posted by timothy on Sun Sep 12, 2004 04:16 PM
from the night-vision-goggles-and-low-lights dept.
Yo Maing writes "So my mom got lives alone, and got her car broken into last night. We have a motion sensor light in the driveway, and the car has an alarm but apparently both of these deterrents were ineffective. Crime has been rising around her neighborhood, and only action the police can take is to file a report. So I ask you, Geeks of Slashdot, what tricks do you guys have to defend yours and your loved ones homes against crimes like this? Not looking for anything that would get someone injured, but more in the area of detection and repulsion. Anyone have a holographic Yeti generator to scare away intruders? :)"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by taxman_10m (41083) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:18PM (#10229456)
    Buy a gun.
    • by Randy Wang (700248) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:19PM (#10229474)
      Buy a phaser.
      • been debunked (Score:5, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:31PM (#10229586)
        dude that had been debunked time and time agien "This myth, stemming from a superficial "study" of firearm accidents in the Cleveland, Ohio, area, represents a comparison of 148 accidental deaths (including suicides) to the deaths of 23 intruders killed by home owners over a 16-year period. 2 Gross errors in this and similar "studies"--with even greater claimed ratios of harm to good--include: the assumption that a gun hasn't been used for protection unless an assailant dies; no distinction is made between handgun and long gun deaths; all accidental firearm fatalities were counted whether the deceased was part of the "family" or not; all accidents were counted whether they occurred in the home or not, while self-defense outside the home was excluded; almost half the self-defense uses of guns in the home were excluded on the grounds that the criminal intruder killed may not have been a total stranger to the home defender; suicides were sometimes counted and some self-defense shootings misclassified. Cleveland's experience with crime and accidents during the study period was atypical of the nation as a whole and of Cleveland since the mid-1970s. Moreover, in a later study, the same researchers noted that roughly 10% of killings by civilians are justifiable homicides. 3 The "guns in the home" myth has been repeated time and again by the media, and anti-gun academics continue to build on it. In 1993, Dr. Arthur Kellermann of Emory University and a number of colleagues presented a study that claimed to show that a home with a gun was much more likely to experience a homicide. 4 However, Dr. Kellermann selected for his study only homes where homicides had taken place--ignoring the millions of homes with firearms where no harm is done--and a control group that was not representative of American households. By only looking at homes where homicides had occurred and failing to control for more pertinent variables, such as prior criminal record or histories of violence, Kellermann et al. skewed the results of this study. Prof. Kleck wrote that with the methodology used by Kellermann, one could prove that since diabetics are much more likely to possess insulin than non-diabetics, possession of insulin is a risk factor for diabetes. Even Dr. Kellermann admitted this in his study: "It is possible that reverse causation accounted for some of the association we observed between gun ownership and homicide." Law Professor Daniel D. Polsby went further, "Indeed the point is stronger than that: 'reverse causation' may account for most of the association between gun ownership and homicide. Kellermann's data simply do not allow one to draw any conclusion." 5 Research conducted by Professors James Wright and Peter Rossi, 6 for a landmark study funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, points to the armed citizen as possibly the most effective deterrent to crime in the nation. Wright and Rossi questioned over 1,800 felons serving time in prisons across the nation and found: 81% agreed the "smart criminal" will try to find out if a potential victim is armed. 74% felt that burglars avoided occupied dwellings for fear of being shot. 80% of "handgun predators" had encountered armed citizens. 40% did not commit a specific crime for fear that the victim was armed. 34% of "handgun predators" were scared off or shot at by armed victims. 57% felt that the typical criminal feared being shot by citizens more than he feared being shot by police. Professor Kleck estimates that annually 1,500-2,800 felons are legally killed in "excusable self-defense" or "justifiable" shootings by civilians, and 8,000-16,000 criminals are wounded. This compares to 300-600 justifiable homicides by police. Yet, in most instances, civilians used a firearm to threaten, apprehend, shoot at a criminal, or to fire a warning shot without injuring anyone. Based on his extensive independent survey research, Kleck estimates that each year Americans use guns for protection from criminals more than 2.5 million times annually. 7 U.S. Department of Justice victimization surve
        • Re:been debunked (Score:5, Interesting)

          by Ubergrendle (531719) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:37PM (#10230224) Homepage Journal
          Asnwer this then: 1/5th the gun deaths in Canada compared to the US. We watch your shows, we listen to your music, we buy the same cars, food, etc. Except we have very strict handgun laws, and you don't. We even have the same % of rifle ownership as the US per capita, its just the limited access to handguns and assualt-style semi-automatics that makes up the difference.

          As for criminals being afraid of armed citizens, I am too -- and I'm not a criminal. That statistic has no relevance.

      • by BurritoWarrior (90481) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:30PM (#10230145)
        "A gun kept in the home is 22 times more likely to kill a family member or a friend than it is to be used against an intruder" - Arthur Kellermann, MD, New England Journal of Medicine, 1998

        So is a knife. And it is used more frequently to kill people in disputes.

        But that doesn't make for good drama (often called News), does it?

        You should keep your firearm properly secured, but loaded.
      • Circle of violence (Score:5, Insightful)

        by sokk (691010) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:01PM (#10229878)
        Killing someone because of trespassing? Someone that's almost surely unarmed!? That's the last solution I would've chosen, if at all.

        Flame me all you want, but deep down you know it's wrong. Guess Michael Moore was into something in the movie Bowling For Columbine.
        • In many countries you'll go to jail if you shoot an unarmed intruder. Kill them knowing they're unarmed and most European countries will see you on a murder charge.

          What? You don't keep any knives in your kitchen? Just put one in the dead guy's hand before you call the cops. Make sure you get left and right prints on it, in case the guy is a lefty. Unarmed problem solved. "He grabbed a knife from my barbeque/garage/sink and came after me. What else could I do?"
            • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:14PM (#10229993)
              No, he didn't set out intending to kill anybody at all. In response to repeated roberries, he set out to defend his business, which he has every right to do. Why the hell are you defending the robbers anyway, instead of the poor old man who was repeatedly victimized? Get your priorities straight!
  • by panic911 (224370) * on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:18PM (#10229458) Homepage
    First I would suggest watching Home Alone 1. That kid is pretty damn clever and easily fended off joe pesci and that ugly guy. Next I would buy an outdoor webcam with some motion detection software [deskshare.com].
    • by spellraiser (764337) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:30PM (#10229577) Journal
      I have just been asked to relay the following letter:

      Dear punk,

      I am NOT ugly. You sonnofabitch. Your geek ass better have some good home defense, because I am coming over there to KICK YOUR ASS!

      Sincerely,
      Daniel Stern

  • Ninja Style (Score:5, Funny)

    by ChopsMIDI (613634) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:18PM (#10229466) Homepage
    I wait on the roof dressed in all black with my ninja sword.

    That's worked pretty well for a few years.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:19PM (#10229469)
    I live on an air force base. No problems. :)
  • by w.p.richardson (218394) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:19PM (#10229475) Homepage
    and land mines in the front yard are effective deterrents, especially if advertised conspicuously.

    Geek it up some by controlling the shotgun trap with an old pentium running BSD.

  • Never fails (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:20PM (#10229479)
    drive a yugo
  • by Jeffv323 (317436) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:20PM (#10229480)
    the extra "got" in his first sentence. Now everybody move along now.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:20PM (#10229481)
    My cousin in Texas has outdoor motion sensors around his house, hooked up to a PA system than when activated, play a recording of a pump shotgun being cocked. It sounds real as hell, and you can't really tell where the sound is coming from.
  • by Anonymous Luddite (808273) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:20PM (#10229484)

    How bout a full sized cardboard cut-out of goatse in the front hallway? I'd run....
    • by rampant mac (561036) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:27PM (#10229538)
      "How bout a full sized cardboard cut-out of goatse in the front hallway? I'd run...."

      Depending on what was "cut-out", it could double as a mail drop too. Even oversized packages could easily fit. *shudder*

  • You'll get in a lot of trouble. I'm an IP attorney, but all of us have to learn about trespass & defense of property in law school. This blurb from the Utah Cooperative Wildlife Management Association [cwmuutahwildlife.org] sums up the law on this aspect pretty well.

    The duty of care owned by landowner or person in charge to a trespasser is to refrain from willfully, maliciously or recklessly injuring them. In other words, a landowner or person in charge cannot set traps for trespassers. A trap is a hazard that is known to the landowner or person in charge, but concealed to others. If a trespasser is injured by a trap, the landowner is open to liability for the injury, even though the trespasser violated he law by trespassing. The following have been held unlawful traps for which the landowner can be held responsible: (1) setting a spring gun, (2) creating obstacles on a public roadway, (3) installing a cable gate across a private road known to be used by he public. To reduce he liability risks for #3, the road should be posted as private access. If a cable or chain is used o close a road, it should be flagged with brightly colored flags or other materials.

        • by Glonoinha (587375) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:56PM (#10229837) Journal
          Your statement about property is state specific.

          Massachusetts residents are not allowed to use deadly force to protect property.

          Texas residents are allowed to use deadly force to protect property. It is perfectly legal to kill someone for spraypainting graffiti on the side of your building, assuming you catch them in the act and use deadly force to make them stop (as opposed to after they stop, which is retribution, which is not legal.) If someone is running away with your garden gnome and all the way down the block, and you have to decide between letting them go or shooting them in the back with a high powered rifle so you can get your garden gnome back - you can legally do either (your choice.)

          Spring guns (booby traps) are still a no-no.
  • Get a dog (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rustin_ross (146106) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:21PM (#10229494) Homepage
    Studies have shown a dog with a good bark scares away most would-be attackers. There have also been studies showing dog companionship actually lowers the blood pressure of seniors.

  • Go minimalist (Score:5, Insightful)

    by smoyer (108342) <<ten.roc-c> <ta> <reyoms>> on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:21PM (#10229496)
    If you don't have anything of value, then you don't have to worry about someone ripping off your valuables. The things in life that are worthwhile are rarely tangible. If you're living in the crossfire of someone else's greed ... Move!
  • Don't overthink (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Skyshadow (508) * on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:21PM (#10229502) Homepage
    IMO, this isn't an area where there's going to be some trick that's going to magically solve the problem. The best solutions are the time-honored solutions.

    It sounds like you're concerned primarily with property crime, yes? That's actually pretty darn easy to prevent if you think about it logically. Don't leave anything in your car if you park it outside. Keep your garage door closed even during the day so people can't see in. Plant thorney bushes under the windows. Put up a couple of flood lights to take out the shadows in your yard. Keep your yard neat so it's obvious somebody lives there.

    In terms of detection, nothing beats a well-trained dog. Train 'em to give a couple of barks whenever someone enters the yard (although just a couple so it doesn't get irritating).

    This isn't a complicated problem, but as with a lot of things the best solutions are the obvious solutions.

  • As always (Score:5, Funny)

    by yffe (187902) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:21PM (#10229503)
    netfilter.
  • by EngMedic (604629) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:23PM (#10229512) Homepage
    ... 10 guage loaded with rock salt seems to do the trick for me.
  • I vote (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ssclift (97988) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:29PM (#10229558)

    Recognizing that crime is often (not always, but often) a product of personal desperation I vote for candidates who will do things like:

    • Reduce the gap between rich and poor by progressive taxation and ensuring every working person has a living wage.
    • Reduce the incentive to steal to support drug habits by making programs such as doctor-prescribed methadone (or even heroin) available.
    • Reduce the incentive to commit crime by reducing the factors that force people into desperate poverty, like making medical care universally available.

    At first, it may seem that, economically, you are better off keeping more of your dollars in your pocket (especially if you need them to pay the fees for your gated compound or personal home defense equipment). There is another equilibrium, which does mean higher taxes but on the other hand, makes the streets safe and crime less common, which is to reduce the societal risk factors that promote crime. Most wealthy Americans, for whom gated life and home defense is a minor cost, call this "rampant tax and spend looney pinko socialism". Many Europeans call it "responsible government".

    Admittedly, shooting the "perp" and/or throwing him in jail does lead to a satisfied feeling that you have avenged, say, your Mum's honour. As many non-white citizens of your country can tell you, and good research has shown, your current system does actually promote, rather than prevent, the crime you wish to stop (cf. recent Cringly article as a starting point).

    Want a safer society? Make sure it's one where everyone has a genuine chance, which doesn't oppress you if you're poor/black/unlucky, which is based on sound research and reasoning about policy (not 4000-year old policies promulgated in middle-eastern nomadic herding societies). Keep the police around to keep the hard-core cases under control.

    It takes a little longer, and you guys nearly had it in the 60's, but it's worth it.

    • Re:I vote (Score:5, Insightful)

      by aelbric (145391) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:57PM (#10229852)
      Oh god, here goes my Karma.

      I am so sick and tired of people saying that, because I am successful, I need to be taxed ridiculously to carry people who aren't (more than a third of my income at last count). What the hell happened to personal accountability?

      I grew up inside the city of Detroit on the low side of the economic chain. My prospects getting a high-paying job handed to me or a college education as an entitlement were exactly zero. You know what I did? I joined the military at 17, got myself educated, Got a job at 22 making 16K a year, worked my ass off for over a decade and MADE SOMETHING OF MYSELF.

      You are now telling me that I have a social responsibility to "share" the fruits of my hard labor with some dumbass who made the poor decision to throw their life away on drugs or being too irresponsible?

      Now I agree that people who need healthcare and the elderly and very young need assistance. However, these able-bodied societal leeches that suck down money from those of us that are middle class can rot AFAIC. Lock them up and throw away the key. If they are illegal deport them. Quit acting like being stupid and irresponsible is some kind of disease.

      Want a safer society? Quit coddling our youth and giving them the idea that success will be handed to them. Teach them that you can only get ahead by trying your best and that there will always be someone out there better then you. Motivate them to reach their potential and not expect the government or anyone else to take care of them.

      The only way to improve society is to make human beings independent of the political structures that are likely to hold them down. Anyone who says differently has a hidden agenda.
  • by rtilghman (736281) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:35PM (#10229615)

    1. Motion sensing lights at proper heights placed for full coverage of important areas

    2. Motion detector webcam with pre-programmed scanning capabilities (the wireless Toshiba unit is superb http://www.toshiba.com/taisisd/netcam/index.htm)

    3. Alarm system securing all major entranced points, and if you can afford it all the screens as well

    4. Dog. Even if its a cuddly licker like a lab, dogs can hear and sense things no alarm system can handle. I'm constantly amazed how my lab KNOWS when someone is coming to the house, even when the car is still in the road!

    Under no circumstances get a gun. It is a stupid precaution that only serves to increase your risk substantially. Killing someone is a tough thing, and your more likely to get shot with your own weapon (or get sued by someone you shoot) than you are to successfully defend your home.

    Or as my friend always says, if you DO end up having to shoot an intruder make sure you finish the job... ;)

    -rt
  • True Story (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Duke Machesne (453316) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:42PM (#10229710)
    While living in downtown Miami, my passenger-side window was bashed out one night at a time when I lacked the funds to replace it.

    Nearly every night thereafter for several months, there were intruders into my vehicle. Bums slept in it, random shady passersby stuck their heads in for a look just in case anything good might have been forgotten there; the crappy broken CD player was ripped out of it (I should have thought to stick a little post-it on the thing that said 'only the radio works on this one, please ignore') which sucked because it left me to drive in silence (aside, of course, for the blaring wind and driving rain which couldn't be helped.)

    I was living, at this time, in an apartment directly above the busy street (Biscayne & 24th, for those familiar) on which I left the car parked, and became obsessed with running to the window to see if anyone was rooting through my poor little car, and dialing 911 and giving them descriptions of the people in the car right then.

    Anyway, I finally solved the problem (until I was able to replace the window, anyway) with a home-made, zero-cost, silly-as-fucking-shit system of my own device: I ran a piece of twine down from my window and around the opposite side of the car, such that it was tied to the inside door-handle of the passenger side. That way, if the passenger door were to be opened, the bag of loud things I tied the other end of the string to would jingle! Ingenious, I know! I did this every single night.

    Sure, the system could have been circumvented easily enough, but it wasn't! My car was never entered by another single foreign body. Which leads me to the MORAL OF THE STORY:

    Don't shy away from doing silly shit like this, because it doesn't even matter whether it would work or not: it's the psychology of the thing that's important. If you make people feel like they're being watched--especially if you're able to make them feel like they're being watched by a crazy, potentially violent person (as I no doubt did and possibly was)--then they will leave your shit alone.

    Insightful as all get-out, I know.
  • by WeirdKid (260577) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:43PM (#10229723)
    We had an attempted break-in this summer, and man did it freak me out. They didn't get in, but I could see the handprints on the windows they had tried to open. I called the police.

    When the cop arrived, he pointed out a few things that he said could make the house more inaccessible, but he said that in all his years of investigating break-ins that he's never seen anything taken from a house with a dog. Not a fuzzy laprat -- a dog of 40 pounds or more. In fact, he mentioned that the people across the street from me were broken into that night and had some cash and jewelry stolen. They don't have a dog.

    Then, a week later, I received a packet from the local police department, about 50 pages or so on how to protect your home. It included some very useful information. It showed the differences between cheap and useful locks on doors and windows. It showed how thieves try to circumvent most common types of doors, windows, and locks. It covered security lighting, alarms, realistic opinions of subscription security services (i.e. waste of money), landscaping considerations and patio furniture considerations.

    So, rather than ask a bunch of tech nuts, just call your local police department and see if they have such a packet. As much as we hate cops when we get speeding tickets or raided for warez ops, when it comes to protecting your family they're generally willing to help.

  • by kerskine (46804) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:46PM (#10229753) Homepage Journal
    I bet your Mom is a really nice person because she's got a son who cares about her. She should use that "momness" to get other people in her neighborhood looking out for one another. Here's what your Mom should do:
    1. Get a pencil and notebook
    2. Locate all the houses in sight of her own
    3. Knock on all the doors, introduce self
    4. She tells them her story - car broken into - and then tells them to be alert
    5. Then - most important step - she gets their name and phone number
    6. optional step for bonus bingo points - leave a plate of cookies

    The goal here is to get people aware, know that there's someone in the neighborhood who cares, and get them calling the police whenever something isn't right. Having known a number of police in my lifetime I can tell you that they don't mind checking out a "suspicious car/person" while their on duty. Just like Open Source, many eyes improves security.
  • by reallocate (142797) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:35PM (#10230203)
    To cut to the chase, about the only thing you can do is make certain the car alarm is working. Consider installing a good alarm system in your mother's house, since a car is expendable, but your mother is not.

    Ignore the testosterone-laden bozos who tell you to buy a gun for your mother. A gun will have no deterrent value. Criminals are not telepathic. They will not know there's a gun in the house they're about to break into.

    Once a criminal is in the house, of course, your mother can wave her gun around. That may, in fact, protect her. It may also involve her in months and months of legal anguish. If you do buy her a gun, be sure you also buy her some training so she doesn't shoot herself.

    Remember, too, that the cops' job is to catch people after they commit a crime. Unless you can talk the local town council into stationing a police patrol in front of your mother's house, I wouldn't expect too much from them.

    In the end, the real solution may be to move, if that is realistic.

    • Re:Dog (Score:5, Informative)

      by Veridium (752431) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:38PM (#10229659) Homepage
      I highly recommend this route. To avoid having to go through training issues and increasing demand on the puppy factories out there, seriously consider looking into a rescue dog. These are dogs that typically are taken from shelters before their time runs out. The volunteers who run rescues tend to pick dogs who have exceptional traits like intelligence, affectionate, etc...

      In the rescue system, they are typically potty trained, given obedience classes, speyed or neutered, screened for diseases, full immunizations, and are socialized with other dogs. I adopted a 2 year old pit bull a few years back(I went to see a germen shepherd but this dog suckered me). I couldn't have asked for a better dog. She came potty trained(mostly) with basic obedience training and she's extremely loyal. She does really good with my infant children and she scares the crap out of strangers.

      I highly recommend rescue dogs after this experience.
      • Re:Dog (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Binky The Oracle (567747) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:28PM (#10230119)

        I talked about my rescued German Shepherd earlier in this thread (up in the shotgun discussion) and what you say is very true. Our GSD was abandoned and possibly abused. Yet within 24 hours she was definitely my dog - she bonded with both me and my wife, and almost immediately started protecting the house.

        She was approximately 4-5 years old when we got her, and had seen some hard times (worn teeth, heartworms, etc.) but she's been a fantastic dog and everyone in my family keeps trying to steal her from me.

        Not too bad for a dog that we were just taking in to prevent having her put down while we looked for someone to adopt her.

    • by cjsnell (5825) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:40PM (#10229690) Journal

      If you decide to get a dog, PLEASE rescue one and do not buy a puppy. Too many great dogs are euthanized every day because nobody wants them.
    • by Draconix (653959) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:45PM (#10229740) Homepage
      I'm not kidding. Watch geese make a whole lot of noise when they spot an intruder, and they're aggressive, too. They also have the effect of confusing the hell out of some would-be criminals.
    • Re:Dog (Score:5, Funny)

      by pyros (61399) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:50PM (#10229787) Journal
      Dogs are for weenies. What you really want is a guard baboon. Seriously, who's going to mess with this [northrup.org]?
      • Cat (Score:5, Funny)

        by scruffyMark (115082) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:35PM (#10230204)
        Cats are meaner. Of course, the same thing goes - 50 lbs minimum.

        I mean, who's going to mess with your pet cougar, or puma?

    • by Skyshadow (508) * on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:39PM (#10229674) Homepage
      I prefer non-lethal approaches.

      Guns are problematic. First, there's the obvious safety issue of having a gun in the house. Second, there's the fact that if you miss (or even if you don't), you could toss a bullet through a wall and kill your kid sleeping in the next room or the neighbor down the block.

      Pepper spray is good stuff. It's effective over any range you'll encounter in your house. It's nonlethal, so you can use it without being 100% sure of your target (is that shadow an intruder or my 16 year old sneaking back into the house?). It's even effective if you don't have a clear shot -- spray it into the hall and you'll deny access to a section of the house while you dial 911. And if your kids find it, the worse that can happen is they'll spray themselves and need an eye wash. Painful, but beats a bullet in the head.

      Given the real risks of even keeping a handgun, in most realistic scenarios (aka, 35 gang members probably aren't going to rush your house), pepper spray is a far better solution given the overall risk/rewards.

    • by TheCaptain (17554) on Sunday September 12 2004, @04:47PM (#10229759)
      Yeah...that'll bring back your family after a botched home invasion.

      I live in an area where ALOT of people own firearms. That kind of thing doesn't happen here much...you'd have to be farking crazy.

      Check out a reputable, local gun shop and invest in some training on how to handle it responsibly. The NRA is pretty big on that kind of thing.
    • Re:Just Video (Score:5, Informative)

      by DaHat (247651) on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:07PM (#10229927) Homepage
      A couple of months ago I had a neighbor break into my house [brendangrant.com] and thought I wouldn't notice. As soon as I got home I did, and on consulting a camera in my living room I found pictures of her where she shouldn't have been.

      Video cameras are great, but require lots of tape and can wear out, even digital ones require large amounts of disk space.

      I was very happy that I was using a MemoCam that I had picked up in a thrift store back in December. I was very eager to use it as I had a pair of DVD's disappear the month before, and after many months of sitting idle it found my burglar (at least in this one case).

      As for the camera, it's a small B&W cam that uses IR to detect motion, when detected it starts snapping pictures to a MMC card. It even supports scheduling so I have it automatically enable motion detection soon after I leave for work and disable it again just before I get home.

      With such a device, there is always the risk that it could be stolen, along with the pictures it contains. To help prevent such an occurrence I have since improved my camera arrangement in my home... all I will say is that I now have more than one camera and not even a burglar setting fire to the place could prevent me from having good, usable pictures of the event.

      For those who didn't go to the link [brendangrant.com] above, my burglar initially denied everything until she was confronted with the pictures by the police. She's now facing charges of 2nd degree burglary and petty theft, charges that carry maximum jail terms of 10 years in the state pen and 30 days in the county jail respectively.

      We are now at 3 months to the day since the break in and still the wheels of justice are turning slow... but at least they are turning, all because I am paranoid enough to have a camera in my home.
    • Re:Microwave car (Score:5, Interesting)

      by clifyt (11768) <sonikmatter@COBO ... m minus language> on Sunday September 12 2004, @05:09PM (#10229948) Homepage
      Yeah, and if the thief got nuked, your friend would have been liable.

      I say this after being interrogated for 5 hours because I booby trapped my lil' Triumph Spitfire several years back when I was in college.

      I had gotten a removable cd player from a friend that owed me money -- he pulled it out of his car and said it was collateral. Turns out, he took off the week after that and never came back. So I had to figure out how to put the thing in my car and with the help of a friend that was an EE major...I don't think they were intended to work without the cage, but we got it working and build a new nonremovable enclosure for it and popped it in where the radio should have gone.

      Spitfires are convertibles and the locks never worked, so with the help of the same friend, we worked on a trap. Got two frames and embedded razor blades at a 45 degree angle inward on both sides. Very easy to put your hand in, but pulling it out is a little difficult. For added effect, we tinsnipped the blades to be a bit more jagged.

      For the final portion, Mike hooked in a charged capacitor to a bar in the middle...slap your hand up against it without discharging it and you are going to have a nasty shock. Most likely try to yank your hand out...hmmm...see where I'm going with this?

      Not less than two weeks later I come out to my Triumph to see the leather pulled off the front of the radio (I did try to conceal it by pimping out the console in leather -- looked really nice). and my radio was half pulled out...and a pool of congealing blood on the passenger side seat and floor.

      Turns out some neighborhood kid tried stealing it and ended up at the hospital (which was only 2 blocks from my dorm). There was still some skin on the blades...when I removed them (I started freaking out because I knew the possibility that this would come into use, but didn't think about what would happen if it was used).

      A few minutes after trashing the razor'd frames I get a knock on my dormroom door from the police asking me some questions.

      For the next 5 hours I was interrogated about trapping my vehicle and if I knew it was illegal. I claimed ignorance. One cop tried being the good guy while the other was the asshole. The good guy confided to me that in his day he too set some 'nigger traps'. His words not mine. I found it pretty appalling as most of my friends at the dorm were black including the EE that helped me set the trap. C'mon, he said, I'm a good ol' boy -- you can tell what you did. I simply told him I was going to file a complaint about his use of racial bigotry and that he shouldn't be a cop and that the fact that the video camera in the back of the room with the taped over record light was visible recording as you could still see the light and I thought his captain should know about this. A thief is a thief and I've had far more white people fuck with me than blacks ever have...so he really pissed me off with this line.

      His mood changed and the asshole cop came back with the boys mother. The 'boy' was 17 and it was said he almost lost his hand (doubtful) and that he had to get his arm required 60+ stitches and some vascular surgery on his vein. Poor baby...fucker tries stealing from me, and he is being coddled while I am being interrogated. Fuck him and fuck his mother...I told her point blank I hoped he did loose his fucking hand and maybe he could see what it really is like to go without for a while.

      5 hours of this alternating between police officers. it was bullshit. And it was 8 years ago, so I'm well past the statutes of limitations on this as charges were never files and I never made a statement :P Told them I'd make any statement they wanted once I was allowed to talk with my lawyer -- why do you need an attorney, they asked, unless you are guilty...well if I'm not being charged, let me go...if I'm being charged, I think I need to talk with someone. And thats how the entire conversation went...for 5 fucking hours.

      The fuck