Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Firefox Reaches 10 Million Downloads

Posted by timothy on Sat Dec 11, 2004 08:54 PM
from the conflagration dept.
Samhain138 writes "It seems like Firefox has finally reached 10 million downloads, just a bit over a month after Firefox 1.0 was released. Congratulations!" My favorite extensions (not all of which worked when 1.0 first came out) are all working happily now, too; the latest nightly has been working flawlessly for me all of today.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Taking it back (Score:3, Insightful)

    by cghancock01 (790341) on Saturday December 11 2004, @08:56PM (#11063576)
    But the work's not over yet...
    • Re:Taking it back (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Eric Giguere (42863) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:32PM (#11063776) Homepage Journal

      No, the work's not over yet, and I think it's time to focus attention on Thunderbird, because Outlook Express is also a security risk. Just replacing IE on a machine won't be enough, in my opinion.

      Now, I've not had as good an experience with Thunderbird as with Firefox, so that's a problem. Large message databases that open very quickly with OE take on the order of 10-15 seconds with Thunderbird 1.0, which is a significant difference. That could give newbies a bad impression of TB, even though feature-wise it's way ahead of OE.

      Eric
      JavaScript is not Java [ericgiguere.com]
      • Re:Taking it back (Score:4, Interesting)

        by nolife (233813) on Saturday December 11 2004, @10:18PM (#11063992) Homepage Journal
        I have been using Thunderbird since about 0.4. It is my primary email and non binary usenet reader application and has been since I first started using it. At home, all of my accounts are IMAP and although I have some very large folders, it works very good and no difference in speed from OE, Eudora and several other IMAP capable readers I've used. At work I use on my Linux desktop to connect to our Exchange server via IMAP and it does seem to take a little long to open large folders (more then 1000 mails and some up to several 1000) that have not been accessed for a long time. Of course, I do not have an option to compare that exact setup to OE.
      • Re:Taking it back (Score:4, Insightful)

        by MrLint (519792) on Saturday December 11 2004, @11:15PM (#11064212) Journal
        IIRC thunderbird, like mozilla before it uses mbox, which is basically a flat mail file. I dont think any mail client quite handles large mbox files fast. OE and O are 'faster' for those things as they are in a proprietary database and indexing there of. So you have a plus with mbox as being portable, human readable, and 'repairable' with a text editor the con of being slow with large files.

        With a DB you have fast access, and compression capabilities, but its no longer human readable.

        Even if you index and mbox i think you are still going to get a lag reading a large text file.
  • Great! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 11 2004, @08:56PM (#11063580)
    Consumers will be the only ones to gain from this. Now either Microsoft attempts to get their act together or everyone (myself included) will just go for Firefox.
    • Re:Great! (Score:4, Interesting)

      by kai.chan (795863) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:47PM (#11063848)
      Now either Microsoft attempts to get their act together or everyone (myself included) will just go for Firefox.

      Everyone did. My site is as far from a tech-oriented site, and from the past few months of observation, Firefox has increase from ~9% of total visitor browser usage to the current 25+%.
    • Remember the days of the browser wars when so many people warned that if IE became the dominant browser MS would take over the Internet. Well it did and they didn't.

      Other then ASP.Net's smart navigation feature, MS would lose very little if everybody switched to Firefox.
        • XUL, XPCOM, excellent JS support, DOM Inspector, standards compliance. Mozilla has some great stuff too. You can't get everyone to switch from IE to Moz, but you can't get everyone to switch from Moz to IE either at this point.

          But those hardcore techs(XUL, XPCOM, etc... for Moz, and the ones you mentioned for IE) just rock for dev

  • Rollover (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 11 2004, @08:56PM (#11063583)
    Welcome to counter rollover day on slashdot. Please run out to your cars and see if you might reach some important milestone on your odometer, it may be worth a story.
  • how something that used to have updates every three to four months now causes people to wet their pants like this: "the latest nightly has been working flawlessly for me all of today."

    I mean, don't you all have something serious to occupy your time with? Like Half-Life 2 patches? Or writing the walkthrough?

    Or, something?

    • Because the nightlies have recently been a tad fucked up due to merging the Aviary branch back into the trunk.

      Also, there's an implied "and counting" there since it would be a little hard for the latest nightly to have been running for much longer than a day.
      • by mat catastrophe (105256) <matrophe.sdf@lonestar@org> on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:21PM (#11063718) Homepage

        no, AC, it's not a "pure troll" - I don't do "pure troll." I might, at times, speak some vague dialect of troll. But this was not one of those times.

        I was being serious.

        Ten million downloads is impressive. And it is nice to think that people might finally be looking at non-Microsoft ways of using the Web and Net. That's wonderful. But shit, it's been over three years since I was using Nightly Builds of anything. If shit ain't working by now...it probably isn't worth working on.

        Ah, now that was a wee bit offsides, now wasn't it? A bit trollish?

        Still, the more trollish posts are the "none of this matters! IE still 0wnZ the m0z!" Go flame them, Cowboy. And maybe even put some of your precious Karma at risk to do it.

        My post is based on ten years worth of waiting on Netscape updates. I remember being excited by 2.0. Those were the days. This is just candy for hyperactive neo-nerds of the new century. Fuck 'em. Call me at the major release dates and don't give me a shitty product, ok?

  • its nice... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by LilGuy (150110) on Saturday December 11 2004, @08:59PM (#11063601)
    but i've had a few complaints... one being it crashes a whole lot more than ie does, two it takes a bit longer to get it to start up for the first time - not a big deal, but a little annoying, and three embedded windows media files won't seem to play at all.
    • I don't believe I've ever seen IE itself crash. But when I was using Windows 2000 beta with IE 5.0, crashes were frequent. As soon as I upgraded to IE 5.5, crashes almost vanished. Remember, IE is part of the operating system on Windows, so any crash you experience might be an IE crash whether you realize it or not. And when Firefox crashes, it doesn't tend to take the whole OS down with it.
  • IE IS DEAD! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 11 2004, @08:59PM (#11063603)
    IE is dead! Netcraft confirmeth!
    • Re:IE IS DEAD! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Zocalo (252965) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:24PM (#11063731) Homepage
      Good fscking riddence if it is given the appalling implementation of CSS in IE that MS claims is "standards compliant". I've just put together a CSS based website using Firefox to do my initial development. OK, I'm a little on the cutting edge with the design, but Opera, Safari and Konqi all manage at least a passable stab at rendering it - nothing that you'd know was a problem unless you knew to look for it. IE, on the otherhand, is just so far out there you wouldn't believe with radically different renderings between platforms, IE versions, even Service Pack levels, and don't even get me started on "Quirks" and "Standards" modes...

      Total time to develop website - 1 week. Total time to hack the CSS/HTML about to get it working in at least a reasonable number of IE varients - five weeks and counting... Seeing Firefox stomp on IE's marketshare - priceless! To develop a standards compliant website, there's open source, for anything else there's Microsoft...

        • I have, from personal experience, found out that IE is the most CSS compliant of all browsers available.

          Provided that you only use those bits of CSS that IE actually does right, which is a fair amount to be fair, then it probably is. The same holds true for all the other rendering engines of course, each has their own quirks and issues, but at least they are getting stomped on with each successive release. Unless Microsoft changes its plans again (very possible) we're not likely to see much improvement

  • by Nadsat (652200) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:00PM (#11063605) Homepage
    I downloaded 8 million of them myself. So the numbers perhaps are slightly misleading.
    • by Zocalo (252965) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:10PM (#11063662) Homepage
      But by a similarly exaggerated amount I downloaded one copy and deployed it onto 8 million PCs, so it probably balances out. 10m downloads is all very impressive, but I don't see any way of converting that into the actual userbase that would be any more reliable than taking a guess. In addition to the above cases you've also got people that have since removed it (wait till the next IE exploit, fools!), installs onto multiuser systems, those that have installed from magazine cover disks, third party package archives or distro updates.

      Even so, I'd say it's pretty certain that the total number of people using Firefox v1.0 on a regular basis is *much* higher than 10m, and still growing...

  • Including... (Score:3, Informative)

    by laughingcoyote (762272) <barghesthowl&excite,com> on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:04PM (#11063620) Journal

    Three copies for me, one for each of my systems. Unfortunately still have to use IE at work, but working on that. :(.

    Before Firefox, I would routinely, between Ad-Aware and Spybot, be cleaning up 50-100 spyware/adware infections a week between the machines. (This was with IE set to high security.) After switching to Firefox, the highest weekly total (between all the systems) has been five.

    Firefox typically opens within a couple seconds of clicking whatever needs to use it. I routinely had IE take half a minute. If I needed any proof that Firefox is a superior, faster, more secure browser, this has certainly been it. I'll never use IE again.

    • Re:Including... (Score:5, Informative)

      by FyRE666 (263011) * on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:57PM (#11063900) Homepage
      Firefox typically opens within a couple seconds of clicking whatever needs to use it. I routinely had IE take half a minute.

      Ok, I use Firefox as my main browser on Windows, OSX and Linux. I rarely use IE on Windows for any reason any more, BUT it launches instantly when I do use it. This is much faster than Firefox, and understandable since much of it is already loaded after bootup. If you really were waiting for 30 seconds for IE to come up, then something is seriously screwed up on your system...
  • SessionSaver (Score:4, Interesting)

    by IO ERROR (128968) <error.ioerror@us> on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:04PM (#11063624) Homepage Journal
    And the most useful extension, SessionSaver, still isn't available for 1.0. The old version, if you can still find it, mostly works okay though. A site to grab it from is here [pikey.me.uk]. I hear a rumor that there's a SessionSaverPlus in the works which will fully work with 1.0, but I haven't seen any code yet. Any news on this?
  • Downloads of what? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by X0563511 (793323) <draeath&member,fsf,org> on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:04PM (#11063626) Homepage Journal
    In total? Im sure a good portion of those are redownloads. Lost backups, reformats, new versions released. Unless this is only counting the download of Firefox 1.0 What about mirrored downloads though? Im sure there are other places to download it, besides the mozilla website.
  • by bikerguy99 (650704) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:14PM (#11063683)
    is how Firefox works with "PDF browser plugin": opening a PFD doc in one tab kills wheel srolling in other tabs... The plugin works seamlessly in Safari otherwise I haven't seen any other problems
    • I don't get why FireFox even bothers messing with the pdf plugin. The damn plugin doesn't even work reliably with IE. They should do what Opera does and just hand over the pdf file to the OS so it can launch Acrobat Reader (or Ghostview, or whatever you got installed).
  • by Jugalator (259273) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:19PM (#11063712) Journal
    Firefox is not only still increasing in usage, but has been accelerating this entire year.

    See their statistics here [w3schools.com].

    They include the December statistics, and it has already increased more than in the past month, and it's still only 12th of December...

    It's interesting to compare to the usage in e.g. January 2004.

    Of course, W3Schools is a web site not really representing the Internet population at large, but it is a community that consists of a whole lot of web masters teaching themselves to code for the web we'll see tomorrow. I hope these are signs of what to come and we'll have less incompatible web sites in the future.

    2004 has truly been a year the Mozilla Foundation has been doing great, and it will be very interesting to see what will happen in 2005!
    • ...it will be very interesting to see what will happen in 2005

      OK, I'm bored and have a spreadsheet to hand, so I've dropped the data into a spreadsheet, generated a graph and added an exponential trendline to Mozilla. It tracks the recorded data quite nicely from January 2002 through to July 2004 at which point the recorded data actually starts to climb increasingly *above* the curve. Assuming that the current momentum is maintained, the trend line shows Mozilla passing 50% of total browser share aroun

      • And by 2007 there will be three people using Firefox for every two computers in the world, By 2008 there will be 14 billion people using Firefox. By 2015 there will be more copies of Firefox in use than protons in the observable universe. :-)

        MS has given up on IE. Someone is going to come up with the killer extension to Firefox and then it will gain even more momentum. Tabbed windows was a great start. At first I thought it was a stupid idea, and then I tried it and realized how wrong I was. IE hasn't
  • by Control-Z (321144) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:22PM (#11063721)

    I've been trying to download it on a crappy dialup connection. Sorry, sorry.

  • Some Perspective (Score:5, Interesting)

    by FlipmodePlaya (719010) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:24PM (#11063737) Journal
    Sourceforge's Top Downloads [sourceforge.net] eMule, the top project, has 80 million downloads. Gaim, for all its awesomeness, has about 5 million. I'm not farmiliar with how they track these statistics, but I assume that is for all versions over its entire lifetime. As with the FF downloads, this is easily skewed by people downloading it more than once, or from a different source.
  • Google Suggest (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:31PM (#11063771)
    Speaking of firefox. They already have an extension for google suggest Check it out:

    http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=1821 86 [mozillazine.org]

    i see some problems with it but it has potential..

  • Firefox is great! (Score:3, Informative)

    by zippity8 (446412) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:46PM (#11063838)
    Although I personally am responsible for about 10 of those downloads - a claim that I'm sure that most slashdotters can share.

    I really wish that the Extension Room [mozdev.org] was more carefully maintained though. As an example, I looked at the RSS extensions recently, and found that 2 out of 3 did not work. One was even version 0.0.1! With extensions that can't install, or even worse, cause problems, it really tarnishes the quality of the work that went into Firefox itself.
  • by GarfBond (565331) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:59PM (#11063906)
    Nightly builds are currently suffering from some instability after the recent branch merge (lots of features only lived on the branch until now, and only recently became available on the trunk, like extension/theme manager and find bar). If you're a happy 1.0.0 user, it might be advisable to stick with that for a while until the nightlies stabalize a bit more. A list of important bugs and fixes can be found here [nyud.net]
  • by KidSock (150684) on Saturday December 11 2004, @10:15PM (#11063981)
    Does anyone know where I can get a glibc 2.2 build? Will it even work on systems that weren't released within the last 2 years?

    As a side note, I find it pretty annoying that I'm getting left behind with my RH 7.3 system. I was getting by ok building .src.rpms but I'm starting to run into problems. I just wanna get s**t done but I'm going to have to "upgrade" now just because some bum thinks everyone has xft.
        • Going beyond that, most mainframes have software written in the 1970s (or maybe earlier) that runs unrecompiled on the latest release of the OS, and it does it transparently recompiling objects to take advantage of the new hardware (e.g., the IBM AS/400 went to 64-bit in 1995. All existing 48-bit code (that wasn't stripped) was transparently recompiled to use the 64-bit architecture.)

          • THe key is dynamic linking on exection and compiling time.

            Since gnu c/C++ did not do this that well until recently, all unix programs typically static link to a library or dependancy.

            Change a library or version and BAM! Signal 11 error or some other message appears about a missing dependancy.

            The key is to include the old libraries and programs and have the kernel link it to the correct ones at compile time.

            This is how Solaris and the BSD's to a limited extence work. They just use /compat directories for
  • by rich42 (633659) on Saturday December 11 2004, @10:23PM (#11064019) Homepage
    Firefox is generally better than IE for web surfing.

    But where it really shines is for surfing porn (or so I'm told). None of those dang active-x controls, and it handles the pop-ups better.

    don't forget why VHS won over Beta...

  • by Nice2Cats (557310) on Saturday December 11 2004, @11:08PM (#11064181)
    I probably am the last person here to figure this out, but in the last two weeks, I have grown to love two features of Firefox I wasn't aware of before:

    Open in Tabs. Make a bookmark folder of the websites you want to be open when you sit down and start browsing. When opening that folder the Bookmarks menu, use the last entry -- "Open In Tabs" -- and go get your coffee. When you come back, the browser is ready: All the sites are nicley pre-loaded in tabs.

    RSS Feeds. If you haven't tried this yet, do yourself a favour and do so. For those clueless people like me, what you do is click the little RSS button on the bottom right of the browser, which creates a new bookmark folder. Inside that folder, the links to the stories of the day are created automatically for that site.

    Yeah, I know, you've been doing this for ever, what's next, Nice2Cats will discover these things called fax machines. But for slow people like me, this is just awesome. Combine this with the adblock extension, and there is no way in hell IE can compete anymore.

  • by gozu (541069) on Sunday December 12 2004, @12:45AM (#11064551) Journal
    The infamous 100% cpu usage bug. It has been present at least since 0.9 and occurs frequently and seemingly at random though usually it's when it's "loading" a page. It gets stuck and usually, closing the tab is not enough and i have to restart the browser.

    Don't get me wrong, I love my firefox but it's annoying as hell to constantly find out that the reason my computer has been running so slow for the past 5 minutes or the reason this game i launched is giving me 10 fps is because firefox did it again (and again, and again...like the duracell rabbit)

    I'm not the only one complaining about this and I 'm still waiting for a fix. (amd64 3200+, 1 gb ram)
    • Re:Not there yet... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Hamstaus (586402) on Saturday December 11 2004, @09:15PM (#11063684) Homepage
      my non-geek website is still showing 2% of firefox users

      Well, mileage may vary. In contrast, my non-geek website is showing IE's share down to about 85%, with Firefox up to 5.7% and Mozilla up to 3%. We get about 60,000 unique visitors a month, so I feel comfortable in using the log benchmarks (AWStats) as at least a semi-definitive source when I look at the browser stats these days. It's enough traffic to provide a significant data set.

      • Indeed. Looking at the stats for Stuff.co.nz [stuff.co.nz] - one of New Zealand's largest news sites - I see Firefox currently at around 8-9% and the total for all of Mozilla at around 13-14%. That's on traffic of around 7-8 million hits per day.

        Not a geek site this one - Linux usage is around 1%.

    • We need to keep up with this momentum to make firefox the standard browser.

      No you don't. You need to keep up with this momentum to make Firefox a standard browser.

      Make anything the one and only standard, and you're back to a monoculture, with all the potential problems that embodies. (Yes, I know that Firefox would by its nature be a much more benign monoculture, but that wouldn't prevent those problems.)

      Firefox is a great app, and I'm very pleased for its success, but it's not The One True Browser. Instead, it's the browser that's good enough to show that there's a whole family of True Browsers, and that once people start coding to standards we all benefit, whether we user Firefox, Camino, Safari, Opera, Konqueror, OmniWeb, Lynx, or whatever.

      Please don't get all arrogant and monopolistic now!

        • Not the same issue as the person's who I am responding to. This bug is basically all about firefox getting paged out to disk, which will cause slow waking time.

          However, the person was experiencing major slowdown to the point of hangs with firefox killed. If he really killed firefox, then how is it a problem with firefox, unless he runs a crappy OS, such as win9x.

          Besides, as for your bug, this is what is really driving me to find a smaller browser on my laptop:

          220 MB and and high seek time, low transfer r