Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

eXeem Lite Public Beta Released

Posted by timothy on Sun Jan 23, 2005 09:02 AM
from the one-down-manship dept.
Software Media The Internet
TheKarateMaster writes "Just days after the release of eXeem Open Beta comes eXeem lite 0.19 Public Beta. Much like with KaZaA, the official version of eXeem comes chock full of spy/adware -- specifically, cydoor. eXeem lite is spyware free and free of bloat -- and free. Version .20, which should fix a few minor bugs, is expected 'in next coming days.' (read: soon)"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

eXeem Lite Public Beta Released 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • Good news for the computer savvy (Score:4, Insightful)

    by sjrstory (839289) * on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:04AM (#11447388) Homepage
    Whilst this is excellent news indeed, I fear only the so called "computer savvy" will reap the benefits of this (ie no spyware). There are a lot of people out there who seemingly click at random through the World Wide Wreckage, completely and utterly naive of the dangers they face. And there are others who just can't be bothered to protect themself from spyware, data loss, scams, identity theft, etc.

    Does this sound familiar:

    Clueless user: Hrm, that looks like a good idea. Click. Install. Now why is my computer slow and always crashing? Better call my tech boy genius neighbor!

    Tech boy genius neighbor: OMFG what did you do!?

    I commend the software venders that do their best to protect those who need protecting the most. Even Microsoft is looking into integrating Spyware search and destroy tools into Windows. It pays to get with the times!

    • Re:Good news for the computer savvy (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Uber Banker (655221) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:21AM (#11447450)
      Mentioning mindless clicking and downloading - the story takes you to a website where the eXeemLite software just downloads.

      WTF? Computer savvy?

      Download a cracked version of some shadowy software - and trust that its 100% legit??? Why not publish MD5 sum of the package which can be verified by expert users willing to take the plunge?

      Plus, has anyone tried this on WINE?

      • Re:Good news for the computer savvy (Score:5, Funny)

        by batemanm (534197) <batemanm.gmail@com> on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:30AM (#11447485)
        ...has anyone tried this on WINE?

        It was terrible. I saw two of them and they were both out of focus, then I was physically sick and in the morning I had a terrible headache. :-)

      • Plus, has anyone tried this on WINE?

        It installs fine, but when I try to run it, it complains about missing activex and wine dies with a windows about "exception raised" or somesuch.
      • Plus, has anyone tried this on WINE?

        Full instructions here [solaris.name].
      • Often shady versions can be more reliable than legit stuff. How the thing is, for most people, this is in the same category as OSS. It's realeased by a group of people on the net, who knows their motivations? People love to scream about the safety of OSS but 99.0% of the people doing the screaming are doing it with their head in a bag since they either lack the ability to check the source, or just don't take the time. They are taking it on faith that the source is clean of bad shit, and that the binary on t
    • Replace "Better call my tech boy genius neighbor!" with "Better call my ISP! They can fix anything! They will fix anything!"

      Seriously. People call their ISP tech support whenever their PC gets slow, regardless if it's slow when they're actually using the Internet or not.

      Anyways, back on topic. I downloaded the last beta lite version of eXeem, and I couldn't find a damn thing I wanted.
      • Ironically, I'm reading this from my ISP tech support job, and you'd be stunned how bad the calls get. And probably how far we go to fix them sometimes.

        I'd say about 0.1% of calls, if that, could show any hint of being our problem. People don't just call us about the net being slow, they ask us about MSN, printers, screen resolutions, everything. I think my favourite calls have been as follows:

        1. "Close that window, please" "How do I do that?" "Just click the X at the top right corner" "What is an X?"

        2.

  • Guess Exeem Lite is the end of Exeem (Score:3, Interesting)

    by barcodez (580516) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:04AM (#11447390)
    Which is only good news as the poliferation of spyware is just a waste of everyones time and and invasion of privacy.
    • Pity really - they had a chance, and screwed it. I couldn't care less if the software I use (assuming it's free) has a banner ad somewhere in it.

      I get extremely pissed off if it includes spyware and then the developers lie about it.

      Long live Exeem Lite! May the creator of Exceem make no profit on it at all.

  • Azureus Plugin for Exeem (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:09AM (#11447409)
    Somebody please write an Azureus plugin for Exeem!

    • Indeed, if that became the case THEN exeem would really be worth using.

      For the few of you you havnt heard of azureus, its an excelent and cross platform java bittorrent client. Very feature full.

      So come on people! write an exeem plugin for azures, pretty please?

  • Good News! (Score:5, Funny)

    by codesurfer (786910) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:10AM (#11447418)
    From the FAQ There are currently no versions of eXeem(TM) for Linux or Mac. No way to install spyware on my Linux box? Awwww, what a shame!
    • I tryed it on my freebsd box under wine emulator. Now way. It's just throwing me messages like:
      "where is your IE? I need ActiveX!!!"
      no thanks.
      (and why should /. "advertize" things like eXeem?)
    • FYI and anyone else for that matter...
      eXeem lite appears to work well under the latest Crossover Wine... Of course that doesnt negate the requirement for a less encumbered open source incarnation.

  • New name for Exeem Lite (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:10AM (#11447420)
    eXLax - Exeem without the crap.

  • So... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by slavemowgli (585321) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:12AM (#11447428) Homepage
    How long until the eXeem makers either sue or try to ban lite users from the network?

    • Re:So... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Jugalator (259273) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:27AM (#11447473) Journal
      They've already said they'll try to do that.

      But since it's not an option to me to use a Cydoor-infested eXeem, I'll just use other software in replacement of this one, and maybe eXeem Lite for however long I can. For replacements, BT trackers are still around, alive and highly functional, and solve the whole deal with the Kazaaification eXeem might experience too. For more rare stuff than might be found on BT networks, there's always uncentralized networks like Kademlia. Slower downloads, but an amazing selection.

    • Ban users from the network ? Implications... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Animaether (411575) on Sunday January 23 2005, @10:53AM (#11447860) Journal
      Wait... if they have the ability to 'ban (lite) users from the network', then they have the ability to 'ban individuals engaging in the act of distributing copyrighted works without prior permission to do so'.

      Which means that they would become a prime target for whichever media copyright maintenance agency applies to them.

      Unless I'm missing something.

  • A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL (Score:5, Insightful)

    by xDCDx (635101) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:18AM (#11447444)
    If only Bram Cohen would had licensed the original bittorrent under the GPL (rather than the MITL), people would not be able to profit so easily from his work.

    Granted, the trackerless protocol surely took some work, but the base BT protocol (and its implementation) was the revolutionary thing.

    I hate companies providing adware software like Kazaa or Exeem, that promise you heaven on earth, and actually offer subpar programs, that would have much more quality as an opensource project (see eDonkey vs eMule).

    • Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL (Score:5, Informative)

      by costas (38724) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:32AM (#11447489) Homepage
      Even if he had done so, there are tons of BT-compatible codebases out there (Azureus is in Java, BitComet in C++, libtorrent in C AFAIK); the license of the original Python client is not the issue. Unless of course you mean that Mr. Cohen should have either patented or claimed copyright on the BT protocol itself which is (to say the least) very much against the spirit of the GPL.
    • "If only Bram Cohen would had licensed the original bittorrent under the GPL (rather than the MITL), people would not be able to profit so easily from his work."

      Presumably it's not the profit which is the problem, so much as the creation of non-Free software which is competing in an an unfair* way with the original.

      *unfair as in, one project can take freely from the other, but not vice-versa.

      But we all already knew this right? It's not like RMS warned us in 1985 about the problems with non-GPL licenses.
    • If only Bram Cohen would had licensed the original bittorrent under the GPL (rather than the MITL), people would not be able to profit so easily from his work.

      And we wouldn't have exeem. Unless, of course, you can point out an open source solution that provides the same (and better, according to you) features compared to exeem?

      Don't you hate it when people complain about the GPL restricting their free use of software? You are complaining about another person's use of a license.

      When you release your software, you get to choose the license. Don't complain about another author's choice of license. I want other people to use my software, even to make money off it. Therefore I use the BSD license. We have philisophical and political differences, but that doesn't make my choice bad and your choice good. In my case, I don't want to force others to give back to the 'community' - I let them choose how they contribute (or if) to society. The GPL preference is to tell people, "Use my software and you have to release all your efforts - if not, I'm taking my toys and going home."

      Sarcasm aside, each has its advantages and disadvantages. I suspect many choose the GPL not because they have an altruistic desire to further society. Many release it for the reasons you imply when you say, "people would not be able to profit so easily from his work." They don't want other people profiting off their work. "If I can't or didn't make money off it, neither can you." Which, I feel, is a very different goal than the claimed altruism of the GPL.

      I don't mean to imply that most people have this in mind when choosing a license, but I've seen this side of the license debate more than I care to.

      -Adam
      • Yes, but the GPL allows you to go dual-license. Qt does that; you can use Qt as GPL'ed software and be obligated to release all your efforts, or you can buy a commercial license and keep your code improvements to yourself.

        "You can (1) repay me with money or (2) repay releasing your improvements to the community. Your choice."

        Sometimes people like to eat.
  • the official version of eXeem comes chock full of spy/adware -- specifically, cydoor

    Can this above comment be explained? I downloaded and installed eXeem, it did not appear to include any spyware whatsoever. It certainly did not come packaged with Cydoor. What's the deal here?
    • True. Congratulations, you've just installed Cydoor. Lets hope you didn't opt for the Explorer toolbar option as well...
      • not true.
        i installed it being aware of the cydor possiblility. After installing, there were no registry entries by cydor, no cydor dlls present nor were any processes running.
        So it wasnt installed.
    • They're not exactly hiding the fact... Check the privacy statement [exeem.com]:

      Third Party Advertising
      The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users. If you would like more information about Cydoor, please visit: http://www.cydoor.com/Cydoor

    • I downloaded and installed eXeem, it did not appear to include any spyware whatsoever. It certainly did not come packaged with Cydoor.

      Oh yes it did [exeem.com]:

      The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users.

      Don't think that just becau

  • Easy fix (Score:5, Informative)

    by Barny (103770) <bakadamage-slashdot@yahoo.com> on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:30AM (#11447483) Journal
    Easy fix, easyer than DLing and maintaining a differant client...

    Delete files in c:\windows\system32\AdCache

    Set all user permissions on folder c:\windows\system32\AdCache to deny (no access)

    block/deny:
    *cydoor.com/*
    *cms.com/*

    It doesn't complain if the ads are not comming in, it just throws them up :)
    • You sure about the cms.com? Visiting the site, doesn't show anything ad or spyware related.

    • Re:Easy fix (Score:5, Insightful)

      by illumin8 (148082) on Sunday January 23 2005, @10:36AM (#11447750) Journal
      Easy fix, easyer than DLing and maintaining a differant client...

      Delete files in c:\windows\system32\AdCache

      Set all user permissions on folder c:\windows\system32\AdCache to deny (no access)

      block/deny:
      *cydoor.com/*
      *cms.com/*

      It doesn't complain if the ads are not comming in, it just throws them up :)

      Although I appreciate the information, I'd just as soon not have the spyware installed on my computer in the first place. Unless you've sat there with a debugger and stepped through Cydoor one instruction at a time, how do you know it doesn't stick copies of itself somewhere else, or trojan another binary along the way? These spyware programs are notorious for nasty tricks like that.

      Also, I remember reading in the previous article that uninstalling Cydoor causes Exeem to stop working, so you're still better off using the Lite client.

      Please don't support spyware or authors that include spyware in their products. There are better ways to make money, and decent programmers can simply use Paypal or some other method of donationware to make a buck, while still delivering value (and most importantly goodwill) to their users.

      My guess is the real reason why they're funding this using Adware is that the original Suprnova was mostly funded by banner ads, and they still need a revenue stream. Of course, now the editors are no longer screening content, so what they bring to the table (besides the application) is not as much.
  • If it's because you want to take advantage of the # of users, have you considered that they are primarily the type of users that install spyware-ridden software on their PCs? Is that the type of user community you want to get files from, and share with?

    What good reason is there to use eXeem? If you want to use a popular program that a lot of people use, what problem does eXeem solve that Kazaa doesn't?

    Is eXeem supposed to be considered the second coming strictly because Suprnova shut down? Anybody who rel
  • the official version of eXeem comes chock full of spy/adware -- specifically, cydoor.

    Check your sources.
    eXeem does not come with a bunch of spy/adware. It comes with exactly one: Cydoor. Which is adware, only displaying ads.

  • Not FOSS (Score:3, Insightful)

    by offerk (764276) on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:59AM (#11447581) Journal

    eXeem lite is spyware free and free of bloat -- and free

    This isn't Free (libre) software, so while it is nice that it doesn't cost anything, neither does the official eXeem, so it is not better in that respect.

    As for the claim that the official version comes with spyware and that this "lite" version doesn't - several posters have already said they couldn't find any spyware after installing eXeem.
    As for eXeem-lite, if I can't see the source, why should I believe the site that claims it is spyware-free? Because the say so?

  • Uhm... Why do they bother with eXeem at all? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by vitalyb (752663) on Sunday January 23 2005, @10:11AM (#11447626) Homepage
    Sure, it is much HYPED app. But I've yet to hear about how great it actually is. Who even said it will catch and deliver? Why eXeem lite and not X lite, when X can be any ad-sponsored program on ZeroPaid [zeropaid.com]?

    And while we on it. Why so many Slashdot articles on this? Promote it when eXeem is worth it.

  • eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jagasian (129329) on Sunday January 23 2005, @11:30AM (#11448063)
    eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way. It does not use the Bittorrent protocol nor an extension of it. It is yet another P2P application/network that is trying to captilize on an already popular application/network/protocol. Considering that it is closed source, Windows only, spyware stricken, and leeching off of Bittorrent's popularity, it would be wise to boycott eXeem.

    If you want to use a P2P application that combines the swarming of Bittorrent with distributed indexing, searching, and tracking, try one of the eDonkey apps such as aMule [amule.org], eMule, eDonkey2000, etc. Many of them are open source, spyware free, and run on multiple platforms. Since the eDonkey network has been around for a long time, it is filled with a variety of content. However, Bittorrent is still the fastest P2P protocol for raw data transfer, so don't drop it, just find a few good torrent sites.

  • How is it different from Kazaa/eDonkey/etc..? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by stickyc (38756) on Sunday January 23 2005, @12:32PM (#11448421) Homepage
    Due to the spyware, I'm not likely to install eXeem anytime soon, some questions to those who have:

    One of BitTorrent's strengths was that it was very difficult to spoof content. IE - If you trusted the tracker, you knew exactly what you were downloading. Given eXeem's new "everyone's a tracker" marketing, is it now vulnerable to spoofing? If a user posts a malicious file under an alternate name, what's to prevent everyone from downloading it? Are there safeguards to protect the network from being flooded with invalid files?

    Functionally, how is eXeem different from other P2P clients? My idea of what goes on is; You do a search across all files shared on the eXeem network, pick a file you like, and start downloading from peers. That's roughly the same thing with Kazaa, etc. What's the advantage of using eXeem?

  • It's NOT free.. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by sudog (101964) on Sunday January 23 2005, @01:21PM (#11448696) Homepage
    ..until I can recompile it myself.

    • Re:I thought.... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 23 2005, @09:10AM (#11447415)
      To be fair, they kind of screw themselves over asking for donations, given that their users are exactly the people too cheap to pay for music/tv/games/whatever.
      • Surpnova asked for donations yes, but eXeem is unrelated to suprnova for all but publicity purposes - it was an existing development project which latched on to the recent publicity surrounding SUprnova (with its apparent approval).
      • Have you not seen what lowkee did at LokiTorrent?
        He raised 30k last month and 10k this month.
    • It is now known that slashdot editors don't read slashdot.

      That was the official eXeem release, the one with spyware.
      This is eXeem Lite, which is supposed to be spyware free.
    • I'm confused. I have the official Exeem 0.20 installed and Cydoor is NOT on my machine. Does it only install if you select the install ie toolbar option? Do we really need a hacked installer just for that?
      • the same with me.
        i noticed a little white area in the program windows, and it seems thats were ads are supposed to be shown, but cydor isnt present.

        maybe thats one of the bugs that need fixing...
    • To Lepaca:
      I don't understand your point, Lepaca. I just used the lite version to dl a nice PDF version of the Kama Sutra. How is eXeem or eXeemLite useless? Why is taking a decent program riddled with spyware (eXeem, KaZaA) and hacking out the spyware (lite versions), therefore improving the base program, not a valid endeavor?

      To the anti-p2p crowd:
      You people make me sick. You know in your heart-of-hearts that there's plenty of legitimate uses for this technology, and yet you still try to paint p2p users wi

      • To the anti-p2p crowd:

        You people make me sick. You know in your heart-of-hearts that there's plenty of legitimate uses for this technology, and yet you still try to paint p2p users with the broad brush of illegality. Go bust the kids trading Brittney tracks! Leave us the tools to easily distribute legitimate large files (Linux distros, Project Gutenberg archives, etc), you dark-minded fucks.

        I'm sympathetic to your point, but this seems to be the wrong discussion to be making it in. Check out clause 7.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.