Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Mac OS X Tiger Released and Analyzed

Posted by Zonk on Fri Apr 29, 2005 08:35 AM
from the grrrrrrr dept.
bonch writes "Ars Technica has gone under the hood of the Tiger release and offers up detailed impressions on the new OS X update. The review covers everything from interface changes, new kernel updates and programming interfaces, the unification of UNIX system startup services into one service called 'launchd', the return of metadata, to the fact Apple has announced that from 10.4 forward there will be no more API changes. A fascinating read about the technical details behind Tiger and the specific changes that have occurred since Panther's release 18 months ago." Today is the update's official launch day, though some lucky people have had it for a few days already.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Another good review (Score:5, Informative)

    by archdetector (876357) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:38AM (#12382668)
    Another in-depth review, focusing more on features and less on the OS's underbelly is over at MacInTouch... http://www.macintouch.com/tigerreview/index.shtml [macintouch.com]
  • Fantastic! (Score:5, Funny)

    by bigtallmofo (695287) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:39AM (#12382677)
    Now that I've seen Tiger, I can't wait until Longhorn is released. Just think of all those juicy features that Microsoft will see and innovate into their latest product!

      • by Taladar (717494)
        I hope the newest "innovative" destruction of perfectly working user interfaces on Linux will be delayed that long but I guess they will come up with something before then.
      • Re:Fantastic! (Score:5, Informative)

        by IAmTheDave (746256) <basenamedave-sd AT yahoo DOT com> on Friday April 29 2005, @09:19AM (#12383083) Homepage Journal
        DotNet does not work as advertised (EG: have you seen any commercial apps in it?)

        - Dell's Website [dell.com]
        - MIT's iLab and ShuttleTrak services [mit.edu]
        - T-Mobile's customer portal [t-mobile.com]
        - Infragistics website and software solutions [infragistics.com]
        - Any one of the items listed in Microsoft's .NET connected directory [microsoft.com]

        Or perhaps you would like to look at the massive amount of work that has gone into emulating the .NET framework with the Mono project? No, .NET is completely unsuccessful (BTW, I wrote and run an ecommerce application for my company of employ on .NET that does over $20k/day in business. Sounds like production quality to me.)
        • Re:Fantastic! (Score:4, Interesting)

          by ceeam (39911) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:32AM (#12383260)
          Do you see the difference between an application (where you compile it and send multiple copies out for users to (ab)use) and a "service point" like a web-site or in-house app. In other words: PHP domain (which I believe still kicks dotnet's ass for the web, despite its naivety, or maybe because of it) and Delphi/VC++ domains. OTOH - I've seen tons of Java applications, but have yet to see a reasonably "commercial grade" dotnet app. You know why? Because standalone apps are hard to make right and for web apps basically anything goes.
        • by SuperKendall (25149) * on Friday April 29 2005, @10:12AM (#12383705)
          Any old in-house app can be developed in .Net, where you can throw as many servers as you like at it and who cares how often you have to coddle it?

          He was talking about user applications - I've seen some simple examples myself but nothing really beyond shareware.
  • by dduardo (592868) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:40AM (#12382682)
    to tiger direct today to pick up a copy.
  • Yay ars! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BenjyD (316700) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:44AM (#12382732)
    I wish more hardware/software sites were as rigorous in their reviews and articles as Ars Technica. It's so much better than the average OS release or Linux distro review from many other sites.

    To me, "The installer is cool, look at these spiffy screenshots" and nothing else is not a review. 21 pages of detailed technical and UI examination and discussion - now that's a review.
    • Re:Yay ars! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Matthias Wiesmann (221411) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:58AM (#12383553) Homepage Journal
      I agree, if more articles linked by slashdot were of this quality, I would sure be happy. Then again I'm really disappointed by the discussion here on slashdot, we get a really technical article (stuff for that matters), and people keep bitching about the price of the upgrade, making silly wishes for g5 laptops or OS for intel.

      A few months ago, Jordan Hubbard came to CERN to talk about some of the Unix elements of Tiger, and talked about launchd. I think that this is one of the features of Tiger that should be cloned ported to Linux (John Siracusa seems to agree). Having an unified launching mechanism for processes is really something that is needed on Unix, especially for laptops.

      You really want to be able to launch processes depending on different triggers and circumstances, like saying at that time, if the machine has been idle for some time and I'm not running on battery power, then launch that process. Yes, you can do hack similar functionality with scripts, but no, this is not convenient or stable.
      • Re:Yay ars! (Score:4, Informative)

        by adam mcmaster (697132) on Friday April 29 2005, @10:51AM (#12384189) Homepage

        No need to clone it, from TFA:

        Apple has developed launchd as an open source project that it hopes will be adopted by the wider Unix community. To the average Unix hacker, launchd probably looks like a reinvention of the wheel. I think it addresses a problem the Unix community doesn't even know that it has. In this way it's much like Mac OS X itself. There was "Unix on the desktop," and then there was Mac OS X. You'd think that alone would have been a big enough wake-up call.
      • Re:Yay ars! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by As Seen On TV (857673) <asseen@gmail.com> on Friday April 29 2005, @11:57AM (#12385040)
        I think that this is one of the features of Tiger that should be cloned ported to Linux

        Please don't. We're releasing it as part of Darwin for a reason. Please don't waste all that time re-implementing what we created in a similar but not entirely compatible fashion. Just use our code, then invest your time doing something new and wonderful.
          • Re:APSL (Score:5, Informative)

            by JQuick (411434) on Friday April 29 2005, @04:22PM (#12387952)
            Your claim does not make sense to me. In fact, the idea that launchd CANNOT be used in Linux appears rather foolish and short-sighted.

            You provided a reference to an FSF document to support your reasoning. The cited web page says, in part:
            The FSF now considers the APSL to be a free software license with two major practical problems, reminiscent of the NPL:

            It is not a true copyleft, because it allows linking with other files which may be entirely proprietary.

            It is incompatible with the GPL.

            For this reason, we recommend you do not release new software using this license; but it is ok to use and improve software which other people release under this license.


            Granted, the APSL does not prohibit users of the software to link with proprietary libraries, thus is not a "copyleft" license. So, what? This is less restrictive than the GPL, not more. This, in and of itself does not preclude Linux users from using it on their systems.

            The FSF concludes that it is ok to use and improve software which other people release under this license.

            You would be allowed to compile the daemons using gcc and glibc libraries and use them with no problem from the APSL. You would also be allowed to link GPLd programs against the supporting APSL licensed frameworks.

            The only limitation is that if you ship an improved version of this code that you make that code available to others under APSL terms. i.e. you provide source code so that Apple and and other users of the APSLed code benefit from the changes.

            Insisting on re-inventing every wheel just so that everything is covered under GPL is a waste of effort. It steals time of those working on GPLed code from doing other work, and selfishly prevents others from benefit from you good ideas if you improve a fork of the work rather than the original work itself.

            It strikes me as foolish that GNU/Linux people spend so much effort to mimic other people's work, re-implementing large subsystems just to get them under the GPL umbrella, rather than cooperating with others to re-use and improve the best code available.
          • Re:Yay ars! (Score:4, Informative)

            by As Seen On TV (857673) <asseen@gmail.com> on Friday April 29 2005, @05:41PM (#12388583)
            Completely different, as near as I can tell. Daemontools looks more like watchdog, which launchd obsoletes.

            The launchd service is responsible for launching services on demand, be that at boot time, at login time, or upon network connection. It's responsible for automatically detecting dependencies, and for firing off tasks in parallel whenever possible.

            The launchd service replaces (hold your breath) init, rc, /etc/rc.d, /etc/init.d, cron, at, SystemStarter and watchdog.

            And yes, the configuration files are all property lists.
  • by jjv411 (267377) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:45AM (#12382734)
    Does anyone know the list of file types that Spotlight will be able to index out-of-the-box? OpenOffice maybe?
    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 29 2005, @09:01AM (#12382895)
      Tiger ships with these importers

      In System/Library/Spotlight/

      Application.mdimporter
      Audio.mdimporter
      Bookma rks.mdimporter
      Chat.mdimporter
      Font.mdimporter
      iCal.mdimporter
      Image.mdimporter
      iPhoto.mdimport er
      Mail.mdimporter
      PDF.mdimporter
      PS.mdimporter
      QuartzComposer.mdimporter
      QuickTime.mdimporter
      RichText.mdimporter
      SystemPrefs.mdimporter
      vCar d.mdimporter

      In /Library/Spotlight/

      AppleWorks.mdimporter
      Keynote.mdimporter
      Micro soft Office.mdimporter
      Pages.mdimporter
      SourceCode.md importer

      If you install XCode 2.0 (free with OSX 10.4) it contains template project code to create your own metadata importers. The OpenOffice people would need to create an importer and stick it in /Library/Spotlight. It's a fairly trivial task.

      Perhaps they'd like to port OpenOffice first though.
  • Tiger Has Arrived! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ramsesit (754749) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:51AM (#12382800) Homepage
    G'day all,

    My copy arrived from TNT 24hours ago. Along with a friend who's copy arrived at the same time, we upgraded his iBook and my PowerBook overnight.

    I have two words for you:
    1. Spotlight
    2. Dashboard

    If you don't know what I'm talking about (presuming you all do!)... --> http://www.apple.com/ [apple.com] and read all about them! Say no more!

    Well, I can happily report that my experience has been a happy one! After backing up /Users, /Documents and /Applications/apps (where I put any applications *I* install) - yes, I'm a paranoid bugger - I did a boot->nuke->install of Tiger last night onto my PowerBook G4

    All I can say is that Tiger be pretty, Tiger be fast! It was a complete surprise to find that at long last my problems syncing my Sony Ericsson P900 seem to be over, as are my faxing problems. I haven't tried either *fully* yet, first impressions are good, and happiness should prevail.

    A couple of interesting things noted last night:

    * The install *really* doesn't like it if you don't enter in valid .Mac details (you gotta play!)
    * The almost-missed "sending registration details to Apple" message was kind of surprising. My fault for giving my PB a working network connection, but it would have been nice to be asked first before sending off data! Having said that, it's nice not to need loads of installation
    keys, etc. And hey - it's probably in the EULA which of course I read in detail before installing (*NOT*)

    So, for anyone out there holding out to see what the feedback is like - don't! You'll just kick yourself harder the longer you hold off upgrading!
    • by sg3000 (87992) * <sg_public@@@mac...com> on Friday April 29 2005, @09:19AM (#12383082)
      > I have two words for you:
      > 1. Spotlight
      > 2. Dashboard

      I got my copy of Tiger yesterday, so I installed it last night. Dashboard is cool, where I spent way too long adding and removing widgets just so I could watch the ripple effect (I've got a 1.5 GHz PowerBook G4 17" with 1 GB RAM). It's kind of like when everyone spent about 30 minutes doing the Genie effect when they got Mac OS X 10.0 Beta. Random cool things:

      1. When it's sunny outside, the sun from the Weather widget spills out above it, gently illuminating the other things on the desktop. That's cool

      2. The Address Book widget is fast and makes AddressBook far more usable. Just type in a name, and boom! you have their info.

      3. The Calendar widget is next to useless. I thought it would show me my iCal events for the day or something, but no such luck. It just sits there, red and unaware.

      4. I find this hard to believe but QuickTime 7 looks much better than QuickTime 6. I watched the large Star Wars Episode III trailer in it, and it appears to look far more detailed! You can actually see Anakin's complexion turning gray when he's talking to Palpatine!

      5. Spotlight is really cool. It took about 30 minutes to index, but once it was done. I searched on a few terms. It found emails I wrote six years ago that I forgot I received. It's very fast. Type in someone's name, and in one second, you can see all sorts of stuff about them on your hard drive. Basically, your Mac turns into a giant contact manager (if you've ever gotten one of those PIMs to work where it tracked files, emails, and whatever for contacts). I'm getting used to the idea of using SpotLight to look for a file or application before I even go to the Finder, and it works well. SpotLight has earned its place in a hallowed corner place on the screen.

      6. iChat can now display what song you're listening to in iTunes. That's cool, too!

      7. The mouse preferences has a place to adjust the sensitivity of the scroll wheel and which to make the primary mouse button (left or right).

      8. When Safari can't open a page (like this Ars-Technica page right now), it displays an error page, rather than a slide down dialog box. It's less obtrusive this way.
  • by earthbound kid (859282) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:51AM (#12382802) Homepage
    I spent a couple hours earlier today reading it, and I gotta say, the article is right on about the Finder and metadata. How cool would it be if Finder had a "Keywords" utility palette that let you "tag" files in a Gmail-esque manner? Instead we get to deal with the continued inconsistent behavior of Finder. Their video of the "Smart Folder" constantly jumping around after being opened and closed is hilarious, but sadly accurate. Here's hoping the 10.5 will be the release where Apple digs up the Finder and rebuilds it from scratch in Cocoa. It seems like lately Apple's been really lax in the HIG department. (Mail 2.0 buttons, anyone?) Someone in that department needs to find religion and start cracking the whip on their projects.

    Still, Tiger is really, really impressive compared to their competition. While Longhorn continues to look more and more like a cross between Copland and the White Whale, Apple delivered its project on-time and with all the features they promised. It looks like the computing mainstream is finally starting to give Apple some credit for their accomplishments, too. Even the New York Times put out an editorial [nytimes.com] about how cool it is to upgrade to Tiger! It's just interesting to think about how much more it could be.

    A truly spacial Finder with real metadata? Incomparable!
  • by scrod (136965) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:58AM (#12382870) Homepage
    if you tell it to "Use secure virtual memory."
    As evidenced by profiling [onlinehome.us] in Shark [apple.com], page faults can trigger decryption. I was initially worried--as files in /var/vm/ appeared to contain a uniform 128-bit pattern, I had thought at first that Apple was simply preventing user-space processes from reading them, but this is fortunately not the limit of 10.4's virtual memory protection.
  • by allgood2 (226994) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:04AM (#12382923)
    My brain nearly imploded when reading this review. I realized after so many years of being treated to 1-3 page reviews that skimmed over everything except the authors ego, I had almost forgotten what an in-depth review could be (I'm ignoring Amit Singh's http://www.kernelthread.com/ [kernelthread.com] since they're more like white papers).

    It was great to read about a lot of backend stuff like metadata handling or core video rather than just here about Spotlight again and again. No mistake, I'm looking forward to spotlight, but I like knowing how things work and or the problems that had to be overcome to get them to work.
  • Box review (Score:5, Funny)

    by KrunZ (247479) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:07AM (#12382955)
    You know it is Apple related software when the review uses an entire page to comment on the look of the cardboard box.
    • by ianscot (591483) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:21AM (#12383117)
      There are definitely times when I wish Cupertino was as interested in loosening (or just plain changing) doctrinaire API choices as it is in the packaging...

      But you know, every last thing I buy from them does feel like blinkin' Christmas morning to open. Anyone who has an iPod, and obviously they're out there, did a little "that's cool" reexamination of the box once they'd gotten the thing out. God knows why it makes a difference, but it does.

      Maybe Apple just regards it as a way to stake out their market position as (Steve J's analogy) the BMW of the desktop set. Same thing happens in optics: I'm a birder, and if you buy Swarovski or Leica or Zeiss, you get a very cool box around your thousand-dollar binoculars.

  • Great big whiners (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Elwood P Dowd (16933) <judgmentalist@gmail.com> on Friday April 29 2005, @09:13AM (#12383017) Journal
    It's an excellent article, and gets at a number of good points. Very worth reading. I'm just through the first quarter.

    John Siracusa is a great big whiner. Thankfully, in this article, his Spatial Finder crown of thorns is only employed in one sentence. He also predictably complains about the unified title bar look for aqua Windows. And the new look for Mail.app.

    I've been a Mac user from the age of four on. I could move at light speed in System 8's finder, and I'm delighted to be rid of the spatial Finder. I like the unified title bar look, and I like the Mail.app redesign. Does my anecdote cancel his out? The guy at Ranchero Software seems to like the unified title bar look too... now can Siracusa bite it?
    • by be-fan (61476) on Friday April 29 2005, @10:07AM (#12383665)
      No, because Siracusa is basing his analysis on basic human interface ideals that Apple itself pioneered (and still have in the HIG), while you're basing it on your personal reaction. Scientifically, your personal reaction counts for zilch, because it's been shown that users rarely know what's efficient for them until somebody gets in a lab and measures things.
  • by xRelisH (647464) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:16AM (#12383048)
    For those who've already picked up Tiger, how well is application compatibility preserved?

    I'm worried that some apps that I have might be broken and may take a while for fixes to arrive. The one I'm worried about the most is Office for Mac being broken ( yeah yeah I know iWork is better but I got this for free from a friend )
    • by Twid (67847) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:36AM (#12383302) Homepage
      Everything I had loaded ran fine, including some APE stuff with a few haxies. Even GeekTool continued to run, which really surprised me. Office for Mac (2004) ran fine for me after the upgrade, although Word crashed the first time I opened it. (Maybe a coincidence.)

      The biggest annoyance for me right now is that fink and darwinports are partially broken. Ethereal continued to run (which was not expected), but glib appears to be broken so irssi won't run for me right now. That's OK, I needed an IRC break anyway. :)

  • by PenguinBoyDave (806137) <.david. .at. .davidmeyer.org.> on Friday April 29 2005, @09:17AM (#12383062)
    One of the things I really like about MAC OSX is that it offers Windows users an alternative to Windows if they are not interested or if they are afraid for Linux. Readily available software on the shelves and the stability of the BSD kernel. I think it is the best of both worlds. At OSCON in Portland last year I was amazed to see how many people were using Mac's at the show...personal machines. I expected to see many more Linux machines, but I just didn't see that. Maybe someone who is more familiar with it could explain this to me, because while I think it is cool, I just don't know as much about the inner workings of it to be able to say "yes...for an Open Source person the Mac is a good alternative."
  • by frankie (91710) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:20AM (#12383101) Journal
    ...and my PowerBook feels snappier already!
  • Upgrade technique? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Matey-O (518004) <michaeljohnmiller@mSPAMsSPAMnSPAM.com> on Friday April 29 2005, @09:49AM (#12383456) Homepage Journal
    There's a coupon for CD media, but you've got to surrender your DVD media to get it. I _like_ my DVD media...but I've also got an (pre firewire) iMac that can't read DVD's....can I make a dmg on an external usb/firewire drive and install it that way?
      • by As Seen On TV (857673) <asseen@gmail.com> on Friday April 29 2005, @12:14PM (#12385258)
        You should probably be aware that that's a really good way to destroy your iPod.

        The hard drive in the iPod isn't designed for sustained use. Booting off of it and installing Tiger should probably take about a half hour. That might be okay. But it's an oft-repeated and I think true story that one of the engineers somewhere here on campus installed Mac OS X Server onto his iPod for testing and booted it up in a lab.

        The iPod froze up after eighteen hours. The hard drive completely failed.

        Just FYI. Caveat emptor and all that.
  • by rogerbo (74443) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:59AM (#12383575)
    a word of advice, install the dev tools that come with it and take a look at Quartz Composer. It's an entire modular programming interface to all the Core Image / Video / Audio / OpenGL stuff. Similiar to MAX/MSP but complete integrated.

    You can use patches from it your apps with a single function call, make screen savers with it or run the compositions stand alone in Quicktime.

    Hours for fun for graphics geeks.
  • launchd (Score:5, Interesting)

    by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (813746) on Friday April 29 2005, @10:09AM (#12383677)

    The article and summary both mention the consolidation of many launching methods into an new 'launchd' daemon that is responsible for a wide-range of tasks including starting and stopping applications and other daemons on behalf of users and the system. After more than 100 comments, I have not seen even one mention of it. Is this because it is uninteresting, no one has RTFA, or because nobody really knows what it does yet? The Arstechnica reviewer advocates that the other UNIX type systems immediately steal this idea and code and incorporate it. Nobody here has an opinion on that?

    • Re:launchd (Score:5, Informative)

      by Matthias Wiesmann (221411) on Friday April 29 2005, @11:06AM (#12384360) Homepage Journal
      The idea behind launchd is to have one single daemon to replace all daemon that launch other processes, this means initd, crond, inted, etc...

      The advantages of this approach are the following:

      • All those daemon have shared functionality but different code, this means more code to maintain and more security risks (all those daemon have to run at some point as root). Each of the 'old' daemon also has a different file format, which does not make life easier either.
      • Process launch criteria can be a mix of those offered by the 'old' daemons, crond is based on time, inetd on network connections, initd on boot sequence. Launchd 'understands" all those notions.
      The example I was given was of starting a backup task on a laptop. The criteria to launch the task would be something like if last execution was more than X days ago and the computer is not running on battery power and there is a network connection and CPU load has been low for some time then launch... Launchd is supposed to have 'adapters' to understand the old file formats.

      Personally I think this is a good idea, factoring out common functionality and using more reasonable file formats, but of course the old guard will complain that the current set of daemon just works (not on a laptop) and that this was proposed by people who do not understand Unix - who is this Jordan Hubbard anyway? :-)

  • metadata (Score:4, Interesting)

    by welshmnt (787086) on Friday April 29 2005, @10:14AM (#12383727)
    Until there is a way of pulling (good, relevant) metadata out of most (all) file types Spotlight etc will be at best half features.

    I have difficulty getting users (intelegent users, mind) to file things in a single directory consistantly (yes I know this is ment to avoid directories but a location is only one example of metadata) . Fill in meta data as well? I may as well ask them to fly!

    Ok text docs, spreadsheets etc will be fine (ish) as some occasionally appropriate info will be extractable, but what about drawings, scans, films. I know companies and the analy retentive will fill this in but an awful lot of people will not.

    On the plus side I see this as the near end of application (un)installation hell....

    rm *.mozilla !

    ls *.apache !

    or whatever syntax you choose, as the metadata will gladly be added by distro builders/app programmers. I've never heard this mentiond.

    Ah well I'm off for two weeks holiday. Promise to think of you all while walking the dog :)

    Jo
  • by EvilStein (414640) <spam@@@pbp...net> on Friday April 29 2005, @11:24AM (#12384583) Homepage
    I posted this on LiveJournal too..

    Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) comes out this Friday, April 29th. It only ships on *DVD-ROM MEDIA* - if you want it on CD-ROM, you'll have to order the $9.99 CD-ROM set from Apple, and jump through a few other hoops (I don't remember what they are offhand)

    If you don't want to wait, here's how to install it using Target Disk Mode. This will require *two* Macs, both equipped with Firewire.

    * Take the Mac with the DVD-ROM drive (Mac #1) and insert the 10.4 DVD.
    * Power the non-DVD Mac off.
    * Plug the Firewire cable into Mac #2.
    * Plug the other end of the cable into Mac #1.
    * Boot Mac #2 with the letter "T" held down. Hold it down until you see the Firewire logo appear on the screen.
    * Wait a few seconds. Mac #2 will appear as a Firewire volume on the desktop of Mac #1.

    The 10.4 DVD contains the 10.4 Installer - double click it, and it'll ask you to reboot. Go ahead and let it reboot. The installation procedure will be just like you were installing it on your local machine, but when it asks you which volume to install it onto, select the Firewire volume (Mac #2) and go from there. It's safe to have it reformat & install (unless you want to just do an "upgrade" which is rarely recommended.)

    Once the installation is complete, it'll want you to reboot again. Go ahead and reboot. As soon as the machine powered off for the reboot, yank the Firewire cable out of both machines. Mac #2 will still have the Firewire logo, but that's ok. Just force reset it with the reset button.
    Mac #2 will boot up & walk you through the Mac OS X 10.4 setup assistant.

    At this point, you're done. Software Update will run once you get to the desktop. Have fun!

    (Hopefully this will stave off the "Wah, I don't have a DVD-ROM.. how can I pirate teh Tiger??" crowd. :P )
    • by gobbo (567674) <wrewrite@gmail.DEBIANcom minus distro> on Friday April 29 2005, @08:45AM (#12382740) Journal
      It would be nice to have more choice.

      You can have:

      • reliability/stability/security
      • lots of choice
      • bleeding-edge feature set and interface
      But you must pick only two.

    • Part of the reason Apple can produce such elegant software is that they work on a well-defined hardware platform. When you say "Intel" you presumably also mean "random BIOS, motherboards, controllers, graphics cards, NICs, etc." Hardware support is not the only challenge that slowing down Longhorn, but it's a large part of the problem.

      As for the WinXP UI shell on Linux? Why? It's not particularly great. Now, the Mac OS/X UI on Linux... that would be nice.
      • by brainstyle (752879) on Friday April 29 2005, @08:57AM (#12382859)
        I suspect that may be a long time. Apple seems to be pretty clear on that one - they won't get them out till they're ready. And that'll be a while.

        Me, I'm waiting till they upgrade the iMac line. If the new iMacs offer better graphics, I'll be getting one. If not, I'll be getting a PowerMac.

        At the start of the year, I didn't want a new computer. Then the mini came out, and I thought I should get one 'cause they're neat. And then I thought I should get an iMac, because I'd have to get all the peripherals since I currently have a PowerBook, and besides, the mini wouldn't be much faster than what I have now. Now, I'm considering a PowerMac.

        I hate Apple more than Microsoft. Microsoft's a big evil corporation, but I don't want to buy anything they make because it's all crap. Apple's a big evil corporation, but they make really cool stuff and turn me into a consumer whore. That's really evil.

    • by carbona (119666) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:09AM (#12382982)
      I take it you haven't actually used Tiger? Unike what we usually get from the generous ladies and gents over in Redmond, Mac OS X updates actually contain new features, and not simply cosmetic touchups and bug fixes that should have been available as a free update.

      But the nicest thing about OS X updates is that they continue to improve performance on hardware across the board, including older supported hardware. My G4 1.33GHz is noticeably snappier than it was on Panther.

      On the other side, can you even fathom someone uttering the words "Wow, that new version of Windows really makes my P3 fly!"
    • by Seoulstriker (748895) on Friday April 29 2005, @09:47AM (#12383429)
      **** THE PROOF THAT TIGER IS EVIL ****

      T I G E R
      84 73 71 69 82 - as ASCII values
      3 1 8 6 1 - digits added
      \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
      3 1 8 6 1 - digits added

      Thus, "TIGER" is 31861.

      Subtract 97 from the number - this is the year Vesuvius erupted, written backwards. It gives 31764.

      Add 0791 to it - this is the year IBM announced S/370, written backwards - you will get 32555.

      Subtract 38, the symbol of slavery. The result will be 32517.

      Add 1983, the year Microsoft introduced Windows 1.0 - the result is 34500.

      Turn the number backwards, and add 1778 - the year Oliver Pollock invented '$', the symbol of
      exploitation, suffering and injustice. The number is now 2321.

      This, when read backwards, gives 1232. This is 666 in octal, the number of the Beast...

      Evil, QED.


      This can not be good. :-(