Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

GPS-tracked Clothing

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sun May 29, 2005 11:07 AM
from the finally-i-have-to-ask-why dept.
Anil Kandangath writes "A Japanese firm has shown off new technology that enables GPS units to be embedded in clothing that will enable the wearer to be tracked continuously. The device is thin enough to be tacked on unobtrusively and is powered by a thin watch battery. It is also capable of taking biometric measurements and transmitting them PCs and handheld devices. Though marketed as a device to enable people to keep track of spouses, how long before such technology becomes intrusive in our lives?" Like tracking your spouse is ok?. What a world! Update: 05/29 18:00 GMT by Z : Not actually real. A Contagious Media project. Please do not try to monitor your SO's panties.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • April Fools (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    plus 58 days...
  • spoof (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Hank Chinaski (257573) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:11AM (#12670244) Homepage
    this is obviously fake ... slashdot editors do your homework.
    • Re:spoof (Score:5, Informative)

      by NetFusion (86828) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:15AM (#12670273)
      The contagiousmedia.org is the giveaway. Slashdot covered this web page meme advertising contest earlier.
      • Re:spoof (Score:3, Insightful)

        You mean the panties with hidden GPS sensor and wireless transmitter which transmits signals that can be received on "up to four devices" isn't enough of a giveaway already? ;)
    • I tested your comment by trying to order. The buttons are grayed out due to being "Sold out". A real biz would have just put your order on back order - like Amazon. I think you're right.
    • Yeah, I lost a lot of faith when I saw that it wasn't under the "It's funny, laugh" category.
    • the link (Score:5, Informative)

      by westlake (615356) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:39AM (#12670439)
      Contagious Media Showdown [contagiousmedia.org]

      Currently in second place, 175,000 visitors, 115 blog links. Geeks are so gullible when it comes to sex and tech.

    • Re:spoof (Score:4, Interesting)

      by A beautiful mind (821714) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:46AM (#12670465)
      And Taco obviously attempted to do some perl scripting, with a revolutionary new way:

      Like tracking your spouse is ok?. What a world!

      I mean, most, less experienced or cunning perl coders would have done it this way:

      "$comment = $track_spouse ? 'What a world!':'';"

      If you look at the revolutionary concatisanation, the new way to use ? and . next to each other clearly indicate a brilliant new way to use the Conditional Operator and the "." Additive Operator.

      Some less experienced people on slashdot might wonder, that it was just a typo(sic!). They must be new here and do not grasp the subtle indications of the existence of a brilliant mind CmdrTaco must be possessing.
  • It is also capable of taking biometric measurements and transmitting them PCs and handheld devices.

    My biometric information will love to have a PC transmitted to it! Can I get one as well?
  • Oh comeon, that's ridiculous. If you have to track your spouse, then you have a lot more issues than you might think. Good relationships are built on trust, and if you can't trust the person, then all hope is lost.
    • by ShieldW0lf (601553) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:39AM (#12670435) Journal
      Spoken like someone who's never lost their spouse at the mall. I'd much rather track her RFID panties down with my Dick Tracy watch than have her show up at our meeting place an hour late with a thousand dollars worth of clothes that make her look fat in any mirror besides the one in the store...

      "Oh no, her heart rate spiked! I'd better get over there before she gets to the sales counter!"
    • e.g.
      http://tinyurl.com/2yl43 [tinyurl.com]

      Up to nearly 1 in 3 in some areas. Sooo there appears to be fairly good statistical evolutionary reasons for males to be naturally distrustful.

      DNA tests are quick, cheap and easy these days.
  • Though marketed as a device to enable people to keep track of spouses [...]

    What exactly are spouses up to in Japan?

  • by Colin Smith (2679) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:15AM (#12670279)
    To see how many hits you can generate?

    forgetmenotpanties.

    www.contagiousmedia.org

  • This looks like the ultimate high-tech joke to me. Do you know of any biometric sensors that can go through laundry after laundry?

    Have you ever had either a battery or a GPS sensor and antenna embedded in your shorts? There's not a good way to do this and make it "invisible" to the wearer, yet.

    Nice leg pull, though.
  • I call hoax (Score:3, Interesting)

    by iturbide (39881) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:16AM (#12670283) Homepage
    Check the testimonials. PantyMap tracking software? Come on people, I don't buy it. Still, hoaxes are fun. |Anyone remember fufme.com?
  • I can see a great new market for tinfoil hat manufacturers...
  • Tracking... (Score:5, Funny)

    by darkov (261309) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:17AM (#12670292)
    Really, what is the point of stalking them after you've married them?
  • An easy solution to the age old question,
    "Where are my pants?"
    • Heh, but has any company developed some simple "find wallet/dead cellphone" RFID technology? I'd get it in a second. Or is it easy to make it oneself..?
  • Someone stole his wife's sweater, and the tracker on his PC showed she was out of state, as she was walking in the door.

    She was wearing a blouse under it, you Slashdot pervs!
  • the age-old question of where socks go when they disappear from the wash!
  • Who wants a radio transmitter mounted that close to one's (or one's spouse's) genitals? The GPS itself might be a passive receiver (though its electronics make RF radiation), but sending the data to the tracking database requires transmission. Maybe if it also heats up and vibrates, the wearer might like it, but the longerm effects are too costly.
  • by Xargle (165143) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:23AM (#12670331)
    you've made their chain too long.
  • by broothal (186066) <christian@fabel.dk> on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:23AM (#12670332) Homepage Journal
    Ok - at first I didn't realize this was a joke, but just a quick look at the advertized product gives it away.

    But even though this is a joke, the technology to achieve this isn't that far away. I'm going to be a parent in about 6 months, and while my kid is young, I wouldn't mind attaching a GPS to the kid. Of course, once he/she reaches a certain age, I will have to trust him/her. But until then, I'd be using such a device in a jiffy. I think... it's my first, so I don't know what to expect from having kids ;)
  • Wow! I can't wait for the Google map add-on that lets me track these in my area! [/editors should check domains before posting articles]
  • by MisanthropicProgram (763655) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:24AM (#12670339)
    I could see medical uses for a product like this. Especially for people with dementia.
    Grandpa, senile, heart condition, and who's also a diabetic, gets lost while walking and has a heart attack. Now, you can find him and get him treatment. I can see it now, ADT and Brinks will start offering this service. It gives a new meaning to the add, "I've fallen and can't get up!"
  • Although the idea is a combination of abhorrent and hilarious, this is quite probably just a joke. I read it this morning prior to slashdottedness.

    It would be cool if it was possible to embed electronics that seamlessly into clothing, but it isn't possible- at least not according to what I've seen, and I work a lot in designing portable electronic instrumentation.

    It would take some extreme perversion to have parents constantly monitoring the pubic temperature of their daughters. That's far more invasive

  • Absolute Hoax. (Score:5, Informative)

    by Beardo the Bearded (321478) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:29AM (#12670377)
    I'm an EE. I work with GPS. Right now (well okay, during the week) I'm working with the cutting edge Xemics GPS engine. It's about 3cm x 4cm x 0.5 cm. That's the engine plus the em shield.

    Now, let's add the following:

    Batteries. The engine requires a steady 3.0 - 3.6 V supply capable of sustained current of 50mA. You're looking at a 1/2 AA form factor minimum.

    Antenna. GPS antennas require a view of the sky. Beyond that, special antennas designed to fit against the skin are about as thick as a pencil and about 2 cm long.

    CPU and circuitry to decode the GPS signal. (Polling RS232) The size is up to you. The minimum is about the size of a quarter, so I'll grant this part if they use the internal oscillator.

    Let's assume the signal is to be broadcast. Then add:

    Transmitter. This will probably include a crystal.

    Antenna for the transmitter. If we're talking about a VHF transmitter at 150 MHz, the antenna is going to be about 24 INCHES long. (That's already 1/4 wave!)

    Now fit this into panties unobstrustively.

    No way. There is absolutely NO WAY a GPS tracker could be fit into a pair of panties. A jacket, maybe IF it was puffy.
    • Re:Absolute Hoax. (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Dun Malg (230075) on Sunday May 29 2005, @12:13PM (#12670598) Homepage
      I'm an EE. I work with GPS. Right now (well okay, during the week) I'm working with the cutting edge Xemics GPS engine. It's about 3cm x 4cm x 0.5 cm. That's the engine plus the em shield.

      Transmitter. This will probably include a crystal. Antenna for the transmitter. If we're talking about a VHF transmitter at 150 MHz, the antenna is going to be about 24 INCHES long. (That's already 1/4 wave!)

      This is a point which can't be repeated too often: GPS is a totally passive system at the user end. I look forward to a time when regular people understand GPS well enough to know that GPS doesn't track anything ! All a GPS device does is calculate its own location using radio and math. If I had a nickel for every time some jackass script writer has a TV/movie character say "we're tracking him via GPS satellites"...well...I'd have a lot of nickels. I fear eventually we'll get a society full of semi-educated dolts who think that GPS=Tracking Device and will demand that laws be passed mandating GPS devices be at least footstool sized so nobody can "plant one on them"; but they'll all walk around with cell phones, of course, which have no tracking capabilities at all, right?

    • Antenna for the transmitter. If we're talking about a VHF transmitter at 150 MHz, the antenna is going to be about 24 INCHES long. (That's already 1/4 wave!). Now fit this into panties unobstrustively.

      Is that a 24 inch antenna in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?..

  • This is a great reason to keep some degaussing tools around, hell, why nit just rig up a degausser in the dryer, problem solved.

    this is absurd. To throw the trackers off, I just leave peices of clothing at friends houses, in a locker at the bus station and the YMCA, all over the place, hell put a few garments in friends cars so ther are many moving targets..
    How would this work anyway, do you have to register your boxers with "big brother"? is it tied to a unique id embedded into the unit and documented on

  • It has been said several times.

    After looking at the site... I am honestly scared.

    First, this technology(GPS part), could easily be produced very soon. Just a battery with a GPS chip could easily be hidden in pairs of jeans, jackets, etc...

    Now, the panties thing is far-fetched because if I buy my girlfriend 8 pairs of panties one day... she might be a lil suspicious, especially if I keep saying, wear these today.
  • by fohat (168135) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:35AM (#12670408) Homepage
  • This new technology should put any future pants/no pants issues to rest.
  • Wake up Taco (Score:3, Informative)

    by frovingslosh (582462) on Sunday May 29 2005, @11:50AM (#12670479)
    Boy, what a stupid front page article. Not only is it an obvious fake article, but it doesn't make any sense. The device supposedly transmits to other devices, including laptops and cellphones, but how does the untrusting spouse get the data in real time? Are we to believe that the cell phone constantly transmits the data but the user isn't aware of it? Or maybe incoming calls go to the panties before they go to the phone owner? And it just makes no sense anyway. Maybe the biometrics in the panties, but why waste power and deal with a gps receiver and antenna, when the phone it has to be used with could just have the GPS components anyway? How could you believe this???
  • by zippthorne (748122) on Sunday May 29 2005, @01:43PM (#12671098) Journal
    7) No ads, no bots, no scams.
    You are permitted to promote your entry however you see fit, with three exceptions: You may not use paid advertisements, automated processes that fake traffic, or scams that produce traffic without people actually seeing your content. Most other stuff is fair game.

    emphasis mine.

    It seems that by posting to slashdot, they have violated the rules.
    • Just walk outside of your house..

      Go buy something...

      Go for a drive..

      Your privacy rights are already being exploited.
    • You don't need laws for this as:

      - this story smells like a hoax: basic drawings without an explaination and "no one can order due to overwhelming demand"
      - any women could sue the ass of her husband if someone was stupid enough to try it, no need for new laws.
      • any women could sue the ass of her husband if someone was stupid enough to try it, no need for new laws.

        Hmmm... Where I'm at, a wife cannot sue her husband, at least not without a divorce. That's a silly idea - martial assets are shared. If a wife sues her husband she is essentially suing herself.

        If you suspect your spouse is cheating, your relationship has bigger problems.

        But yes, I too suspect this to be a hoax.
    • Remember that most people are sheep and just do as they are told.

      So dont hold your breath on the revolt.. ( or the 2nd revolution here in this country )
    • Uh, if this is real, I expect there to be an 'off' switch somewhere :)
    • When will the public revolt about issues like this and demand either: (A) Real privacy laws with shark's teeth to enforce them. or (B) A completely transparent society where everything is public -- including our corporate master's finance books and the data of the wealthy elites?

      "Issues like this"? You mean jokes? There's no surreptitious way to add GPS tracking to clothing. At present, the smallest GPS tracking device is about the size of a deck of playing cards, requires a clear view of the sky, and