Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

100Mbps Home Internet Service Next Year in Finland

Posted by timothy on Wed Jul 20, 2005 07:08 PM
from the helluva-commute dept.
Networking Communications The Internet Hardware
Listen Up writes "According to an article on CNN, broadband Internet access via cable modems in Finland will be able to hit 100 Mbps as early as 2006. That would be 50 times faster than the average broadband speeds now offered to cable TV homes in Finland. Do you think this technology has the possibility of reaching U.S. shores? Or do you think the already deeply entrenched U.S. politics are going to keep this technology from ever reaching us? There are already thousands and thousands of miles of 'dark fiber' underground around the U.S."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

100Mbps Home Internet Service Next Year in Finland 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • What is the (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mingot (665080) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:10PM (#13119183)
    What's the upload speed?

      • Re:What is the (Score:4, Interesting)

        by irc.goatse.cx troll (593289) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:17PM (#13119250) Journal
        No, its usually the speed of the line, its just american residential has dicked us around long enough for people to expect it.

        When you run a 100mbit line to your office, if you only get 90mbit upstream you complain about the SLA being broken.
        When you run a 5mbit line to your house, you're lucky if you get .3mbit up.

          • Ok, I really can't believe that I'm defending a cable TV company, but here I go...

            Do you really blame them? They pay for bandwidth too, and if you put up a server that everyone wants to hit then that adds to their bandwidth load. They assume that you're not downloading 24x7, but a popular web server can easily be active all the time. So the upload limit makes sense from a pure business/profitability perspective.

            • Re:What is the (Score:5, Insightful)

              by jellomizer (103300) * on Wednesday July 20 2005, @08:56PM (#13120003)
              You also have to realize that Cable is a shared connection so the more people using it the slower it gets. So with someone with a popular server it would slow down everyone else. Now is it fair if you are getting 52kbs because your neighbor is hosting a popular website, and chewing up all the bandwidth, and your both paying the same amount, that is why the caps are placed. So everyone can get a fair speed. And I find for normal Web Browsing 3-5mbs is fast enough.

              • Um....? (Score:3, Interesting)

                by Atario (673917)
                Aren't all connections shared, at some point? Isn't that more or less the definition of the Internet?

                Those DSL lines all go somewhere, you know, and I'm betting each one doesn't get its own T3...

            • Re:What is the (Score:5, Informative)

              by willpall (632050) <pallwill-slashdotNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Wednesday July 20 2005, @08:14PM (#13119675)
              Bandwidth is not free, people. Home servers that need more than 256 kbps upload speed generally use the bandwidth on a consistent basis. The service you get residentially is extremely cheap compared to business-class circuits, and this is why. You get the speed benefit (down) of a fat pipe but you won't get the volume that a more expensive circuit would offer. This is not because your ISP is evil, simply because, gasp!, they intend to make a profit.

              I know there are better ways to control the aggregate amount of bandwidth being consumed, but this is a simple way of doing it that is acceptable by a huge percentage of the consumers buying cable or DSL service. Those who really would like to have parity between their down and up speeds are exactly the customers ISPs don't want on residential service. They will lose money on you.

              There's nothing evil about that.

              (I know the parent poster didn't say they're being evil, but that's the general impression I get on these threads sometimes.)

      • For me 2MB down, 30KBs up Not so hot in Plano
      • Not for the faster ADSL and cable deals.

        One cable channel can serve up to 40Mbps but a single upstream channel is limited to 8Mbps. So for cable (DOCSIS) systems, this would typically be around 1/5, which is approximately what my ISP is sticking with, at around 1/6. (I know each serving group could include an arbitrary number of upstream and downstream channels but I suspect most cable ISPs, including my own, play cheap.)

        BTW, there are places where 100Mbps and FTTH are already common, the catch is that th
        • Just to clarify to anyone reading this, you are incorrect on terminology (not exactly the right word?). The lowercase 'k' is the SI prefix for kilo. The capital 'K' is for degrees kelvin. I tend to note bits with a little 'b' and bytes with a big 'B', as in:

          300kbps ~= 38kBps

          Usually, I replace the 'p' with a '/' when dealing with bytes, too (i.e., "38kB/s"). By no means a standard notation, but it works for me. Though it isn't widely used, I've also recently taken to using the IEC's units. For exampl
        • Um no :) 300 baud is roughly equivilent to 300 bits per second (300bps).

          Not to further nit-pick, but 300 baud is 300 "symbols" per second. Using constellation diagrams 1 symbol can correspond to a variable number of bits.

          In a dialup modem, 8000 baud is used at 7 databits per symbol to arrive at 56Kbps.

  • Motorola is helping Singapore with the same tech (Score:3, Informative)

    by Stefman (37546) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:10PM (#13119184)
    So I assume that these speeds would be possible if Moto partners with a cable company in the states.

  • Nice! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Sweetdelight (895373) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:11PM (#13119189)
    I wish I lived there..And if the fibre doesn't have Caps, That would sweeten the deal.

  • why is this news? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:12PM (#13119200)
    100Mbps fiber to door was available in Japan since like two years ago; about a year ago in metropolitan areas they even rolled out 1Gbps service. Finland makes the news because...?
  • I already get 4Mbps downstream from Time Warner of San Diego and it is plenty!
    • For those who truly plan Online games... there is no such thing as plenty. Not to mention the server is always slowed down by that 1 guy on a 56k modem anyways.

    • I already get 4Mbps downstream from Time Warner of San Diego and it is plenty!

      Is this something that we can quote you on in 10 years?

      Truth is while 5Mbps may be enough now, it certainly won't be in 5 years. If you look at the increasing size of application downloads, the improving quality of video online, games and IP telephony, and maybe even eventually video telephony, and even applications we haven't heard of yet because of bandwith limitations, then 4Mbps is going to be tight.

  • Possibility of reaching U.S. shores? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:13PM (#13119213)
    I don't think any cat5e can reach that long.

  • Dark Fiber (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BlogPope (886961) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:13PM (#13119214)
    There are already thousands and thousands of miles of 'dark fiber' underground around the U.S."

    Dark Fiber as nothing to do with home broadband. if it were between your house and the ISP, you might have something, but its not. The trick is getting high speed connections where Fiber doesn't exist.

  • I think its unfair to compare these kind of rollouts to the US on a general scale. The US is practically the size of europe, and due to the state demarkations has almost the scaling problems that deploying across europe would incur (although the same core infrastructure providers would help somewhat). This isn't to say some providers aren't trying, there's definitely been a push towards fiber services as the next generation by some US providers. As for me, I'm just hoping that the UK gets its act together a
  • "Based on our research, 30 megabits per second is the absolute minimum in future homes" I wonder what kind of tests they used to determine that figure.
    • Simple... Standard user downloads approximatly one hour of pron per day, encoded in "scrunched" divx = around 400mb then add 600mb of DRM, and you end up with a "user required download" or URD of 1 gig... The average user will complain if a movie that they are paying for takes longer to download than to watch (or at least will do when they're on supposedly "SUPER-FAST-AmazingLine"), so you've got to get it to them in around a hour. 30mbit/sec = approx 300kb/sec actual download = approx 18mb/minute or around

  • Dark fiber... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Faust7 (314817) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:15PM (#13119228) Homepage
    There are already thousands and thousands of miles of 'dark fiber' underground around the U.S.

    So that's where all the dark matter is.

  • Obligatory Monty Python (Score:3, Funny)

    by wootest (694923) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:15PM (#13119231)
    Finland, Finland, Finland
    The country where I want to be

  • Not fully usable, obviously (Score:5, Informative)

    by Peter Cooper (660482) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:18PM (#13119255) Journal
    Having 100Mbps would be great, but it's not as if you're going to be able to pull files off of some Web server at the full speed. Many busy servers only have 100Mbps connectivity in total themselves.

    You might suggest that 100Mbps would be great for BitTorrent and the like, but the flaw is that ISP's backbones and peering arrangements are measured in gigabits, not terabits. Even an OC-48 can only take 24 customers maxing out their bandwidth on this system. A big European ISP like Demon only has 2Gbps going into the LINX.. enough for, wow, 20 customers to max out their bandwidth.

    The ratio of guaranteed bandwidth to advertised bandwidth on this offering is crazy. Backbones just aren't there yet.
    • The whole "technology X has lots of bandwidth!" thing is silly anyway. DOCSIS (Cable Modems) go up to 10Mbps. Who has 10Mbps cable? Nobody. You're lucky to get 3Mbps for less than $100 a month. If you want higher speeds, you will pay through the nose.

      So, customers buying this "100Mbps" service will probably get 10Mbps tops unless they can pay $1000 a month and have a first-born son to sell.

    • Re:Not fully usable, obviously (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      enough for, wow, 20 customers to max out their bandwidth.

      You assume that all of the content they want is not in Finland.

      You assume wrong. There is plenty to see and do, and all you need to make use of it with bittorrent is a number of other people on this service in Finland in the swarm with you. Throw in being able to play your FPS against your local friends while downloading stuff in the background without the latency hit that causes on DSL, and you start seeing where this is going.

      You may be right,
    • A big European ISP like Demon only has 2Gbps going into the LINX.. enough for, wow, 20 customers to max out their bandwidth.

      Yeah, there is a 50 times wider band. This means that those 20 customers will also be finished 50 times faster, freeing up bandwidth for the next batch of 20 customers.

      Point: For the same content, nothing changes. Some customers will just have their content served faster. Just because your network is 50 times faster, you're not going to view 50 times more pages on CNN.com.

      For new c

  • bandwidth cross borders? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Raleel (30913) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:18PM (#13119260)
    Anyone know what Finland has actually has for pipes into the country? 100Mbps is nice, but if you want international content, it might not be such a big deal

  • Meanwhile in japan .... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mxpengin (516866) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:19PM (#13119265) Homepage
    I have this FTH service in japan since last month and is very nice ... my only complain is that is very hard to get high transmition rates with the service... only if you are using things in japan . The cost is about 80 dollars a month and television services can be used on demand ( for a fee of course ). A link in english to my provider [ocn.ne.jp].

  • The problem is the last mile... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:25PM (#13119319)
    There are already thousands and thousands of miles of 'dark fiber' underground around the U.S.

    So what? The problem is not bandwidth in total, it is making the connection to the home to the nearest big fiber point. DSL and cable are popular with ISPs because the cables already go to the customer. Running broadband over a phone line or cable costs next to nothing. The big cost was digging up the street to put in the wire. After that, the operating costs are minimal.

    If you go to a big US colocation facility, you will find that a lot of bandwidth is really cheap, because the fiber is already there. If you want a fiber connection to your home, you will have to pay an arm and a leg to put the fiber in the ground.

    Wireless ISPs have a big potential advantage since they can avoid the last mile problem.

  • That's what I'm getting _today_. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mdn (61636) on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:28PM (#13119351)
    Well, not really. But I could be getting it if I wasn't too cheap.

    100 MBit Internet access (both ways) is offered to apartment owners in a number of Swedish towns. This costs about 76 USD a month.

    As I said before, I'm too cheap to pay for that, so I'm paying for a throttled version (10 MBit/s) of the same service putting me back about 40 USD a month.

    The service has been offered for quite a few years by a company called Bredbandsbolaget [bredband.net]. (The site is in a strange foreign language though. Be warned.)

  • Skeptical (Score:5, Insightful)

    by WhiteWolf666 (145211) <moornblade at gmail.com> on Wednesday July 20 2005, @07:31PM (#13119371) Homepage Journal
    1. Article says 100 Mbps is 50 times faster than what they have now. Thus, they have 2 Mbps cable.

    2. I have 6 Mbps cable. I know people within 20-30 miles of me with 8 or 10 Mbps cable. SBC delivers 3 Mbps dsl, and delivered 6 Mbps to a select few quick enough to jump on the deal.

    Does anyone else find it hard to believe that they will leapfrog technologies like that? Or, that even once those companies start selling the equipment (the article, after all, quotes an equipment manufacturer, *not* an ISP) that deployment will be instant?

    VDSL, VDSL2, and a whole bunch of alphabet soup DSL types exist *right* now, but we don't see them all over the U.S.

    Similarly, many American cable companies have switched much of their equipment to DOCSIS 2.0 stuff, but haven't ramped up the speeds yet (not enough backhaul).

    Avaliability of equipment != deployment. Rather than idolizing some vaporware Finish deployment, we should be looking at places like S. Korea and Japan, where they've managed 2 and 3 digit broadband speeds (in Mbps) *now*, not some-time-in-the-oh-so-near-future.

    I can pull up 100s of articles from SBC's Project Lightspeed, or Verizon's FIOS. Some of them talk about deploying this stuff nationwide in 2003-2004.

    But do I have 100 Mbps internet yet? No.

    This is a non-article. A fluff piece by an equipment manufacturer. I want to hear more about actual deployments (and they do exist), not about some companies wishful thinking.
  • There's no way this going to be widespread in one year, it's at least 3 years out if anyone decides to really adopt it. It would require completly abandoning existing CMTS systems (Cable modem termination system) and adopting and entirely different technology. Docsis 3.0 is the future of cable, this could possibly get some use as a secondary system for businesses where a fiber build isn't possible but not as a replacement to current cable modems. Hell the support contracts alone will likely take several
  • Here in Sweden one of the biggest ISP's (called Bredbandsbolaget or "The Broadband Company" in English) have been offering 100mbits Internet for the better part of a year now.

    Admittedly it's only to their fiber/LAN-customers (which I am a part of) and with a traffic cap at 300GB/month as well as a rather hefty pricetag of approx US$113/month.

    But it's available to the crazies who want it.
    • Have you been here long, or is this your first run-in with the slashdot hippie crowd?

      Don't let it faze you, they're all like this. Best to just ignore them and go on with life. When you confront them they just congregate into a big herd and get even stupider.

      Does make trolling pretty fun though.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.