Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Google to Include iTunes?

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sat Aug 13, 2005 04:41 PM
from the how-would-that-work-exactly dept.
Baher Al Hakim writes "The Street suggests in a recent article that Apple is about to announce a deal with Google to offer Apple's iTunes Music service through Google's site. The rumored deal would pair the nation's leading online music store with its leading search engine." Update: 08/13 22:00 GMT by T : Truncation untruncated.
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Google Music Store Inches Closer? 282 comments
smallguy78 writes "Forbes is once again reporting on Google plans to launch its own competitor to iTunes, a Google music store. From the article: 'The music industry is broadly unhappy with the fixed pricing and lack of subscription options at the market-leading iTunes Music Store and likely to support alternative services.'" We have touched on this subject previously. This most recent report would seem to indicate the launch will happen sooner rather than later.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Editors? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CyborgWarrior (633205) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:42PM (#13312931) Homepage
    Uhhhhhhhhh. Where's the rest of the story? lol
    • Re:Editors? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:52PM (#13313001)
      Uhhhhhhhhh. Where's the rest of the story? lol
      Paul Harvey has it. ;>)
  • by espenfjo (690929) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:42PM (#13312932)
    Reports from all over the street says that the well known submitt button is on the loose.
  • first (Score:5, Funny)

    by way2trivial (601132) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:43PM (#13312936) Homepage Journal
    po
  • by Space cowboy (13680) * on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:43PM (#13312940) Journal
    I noticed this on Friday, when the stock jumped by 5% :-) A couple of links that *don't* go to the submitters blog...



    For some reason, it *really* annoys me when people link to their own blog instead of the link to the story. At the very least it ought to be obvious that it's a personal link rather than doing it on the sly.

    Simon
    • For some reason, it *really* annoys me when people link to their own blog instead of the link to the story.

      If they're adding information or analysis to the linked article, that's of value and OK in my book.

      At the very least it ought to be obvious that it's a personal link rather than doing it on the sly.

      Quite so.
        • by igbrown (79452) <spam@@@hccp...org> on Saturday August 13 2005, @06:44PM (#13313456) Homepage Journal
          Sorry. I think you are not paying attention to what's going on here.

          1) The submitter of the story included a link to an article on TheStreet.com.

          2) The story was truncated by a malformed HTML.

          3) The only link visible on the truncated story was the attribution link for the submitter.

          4) The submitter's link on his ID, like many of us, points to a homepage or blog.

          5) The grandparent of this post chastised the submitter (mistakenly, IMO) for astroturfing or whatever, based on the attribution link, without seeing the submitted story, which contained a link to thestreet.com.

          6) The submitters blog, displays the most recent post to the blog, which happened to be the same post he was trying to make to Slashdot.

          7) Please pay attention next time.

  • by c0l0 (826165) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:43PM (#13312944) Homepage
    NO CARRIER
  • by reality-bytes (119275) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:44PM (#13312949) Homepage
    In an attempt to make up for the dupes, Slashdot are now providing half and article at a time.

    Baher Al Hakim writes "The Street suggests in a recent article that Apple is about to announce a deal with Google, to a ,


    No doubt it will be edited but it was amusing while it lasted. ;)
  • asdf (Score:5, Funny)

    by stevejsmith (614145) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:44PM (#13312951) Homepage
    Even Madlibs gives you the part of speech.
  • Huh... (Score:5, Funny)

    by creimer (824291) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:44PM (#13312952) Homepage
    Is it me? Or are the aricle summaries is getting
  • Apple! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Luigi30 (656867) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:45PM (#13312959)
    Did Apple file a lawsuit mid-submission or something?
  • CmdrTaco (Score:5, Funny)

    by michelcultivo (524114) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:46PM (#13312964) Homepage Journal
    "What the hell I'm doing here."
  • Complete blurb (Score:5, Informative)

    by JemVai777 (411658) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:46PM (#13312965)
    http://www.technoogle.com/?p=114 [technoogle.com]

    Wall Street suggests in a recent Article that Apple is about to announce a deal with Google, to offer Apple's iTunes Music service through its site.

    That's MAJOR news indeed.

    If it turns out to be right, it would be a great deal for both sides, as Apple will gain a wider audience for its music service iTunes through the enormous base of Google visitors, and Google too will at last have a music service to offer, like Yahoo did a while ago.
    No need for Google to start its own Music Service, they'll have the best Music Service by their side, what could be better than that.

    This is very exciting cooperation between two of the biggest and most influential companies in the Tech World, and it has never crossed my mind, until now.

    Let's wait and see.
    • Actually this is greatly exaggerated. The MOST google will show is a link straight to iTunes at the google frontpage. That's it. Just a link!

      Web Images Groups News Froogle Local

      Ready?.... It'll have probably a Music link. If it has anymore than that, people wouldn't make it a frontpage.

      • Re:Complete blurb (Score:5, Interesting)

        by quanticle (843097) on Saturday August 13 2005, @05:51PM (#13313254) Homepage

        The nice thing will be that you'll be able to search iTunes directly from Google. For example, if I'm looking for Bob Dylan stuff, and I do a Google search, I could get links to Bob Dylan songs on iTunes. Its reasonable for Google search to diversify into multimedia.

  • I think (Score:3, Funny)

    by Geoffreyerffoeg (729040) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:46PM (#13312969)
    Google including iTunes would be a great move, especially considering what they've done with Google Video. They could m
    • Re:I think (Score:4, Funny)

      by inkswamp (233692) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:51PM (#13312997)
      Damn, dude, you beat me to it. I was going to do a joke just like that except I

    • by MDMurphy (208495) on Saturday August 13 2005, @06:08PM (#13313301) Homepage
      When added to the video iPod rumours, it seems to make more sense for Google to tie in with Google Video.

      As part of the spin that Apple might do when explaining the reversal on Steve Jobs' "no video" decree. Google Video is a distribution mechanism well suited to short video snippets, just the thing if you were watching it on a small screen, or carrying someplace to watch on a connected monitor. The iPod also has a DRM mechanism built in. Since the DRM scheme is one linked to a portable device, it might be less annoying than one linked to your desktop PC.

      I can't picture the benefit for Apple or Google when only audio is involved. But video seems to make more sense.
  • Hmmmm (Score:2, Redundant)

    I don't get it. Do the eds not use the preview feature, and if not, do they not at least check the home page once in awhile? I've given them the benefit of doubt for quite some time, but come on... This one seems a little obvious.

    Doesn't it seem like the quality of posts have gotten worse since they added the plum where you can see articles in the Mysterious Future and report bad ones??
  • by Winckle (870180) <mwinckle&gmail,com> on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:49PM (#13312983) Homepage
    That's good, right?
  • I blame this article on the freeloaders. If you subscribed to /., you could have seen this "article" earlier and submitted the error to the mods. I'm sure they would have corrected it. Just like they catch the dupes. Or something.
  • Heh (Score:5, Funny)

    by NanoGator (522640) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:53PM (#13313007) Homepage Journal
    "Baher Al Hakim writes "The Street suggests in a recent article that Apple is about to announce a deal with Google, to a"

    Wow! The submitter of the story stopped at the same place all the commentors would have stopped at.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Don't just leave us hanging!!!!
  • The bottom quote kinda fits; "If at first you don't succeed, redefine success." Or in this case, redefine editor.
  • Wall Street != TheStreet.com AFAICT.
  • by DaphneDiane (72889) <tg6xin001@sneakemail.com> on Saturday August 13 2005, @05:46PM (#13313232)
    One of the things I could see google offer is the ability to search for songs by lyrics and additional meta data. I know a lot of times when I purchase music via itunes and I don't know the actual name of the song the first thing I do is search for "lyrics" followed by the phrase from the song.
  • Impressive (Score:3, Insightful)

    by EvilMonkeySlayer (826044) on Saturday August 13 2005, @06:18PM (#13313334) Journal
    If I were Microsoft or one of the companies who use MS in some form (for example audio format like WMA), then i'd probably be shitting (pardon my french) bricks.

    Pairing up the worlds most popular music service with the worlds most popular search engine is definitely a clever move by both parties, it can only serve to improve their customer bases. A symbiotic relationship if you will.
  • by tyagiUK (625047) on Sunday August 14 2005, @12:36AM (#13314812) Homepage
    Me: "That tune that goes 'tum te tum badda badda tum tum"
    Google (I'm feeling lucky): "Buy 'Pink Floyd: The Wall' from iTunes Music Store Now!"
  • ARTHUR: There! Look!
    LAUNCELOT: What does it say?
    GALAHAD: What language is that?
    ARTHUR: Brother Maynard! You are a scholar.
    MAYNARD: It's Aramaic!
    GALAHAD: Of course! Joseph of Arimathea!
    LAUNCELOT: 'Course!
    ARTHUR: What does it say?
    MAYNARD: It reads, 'Here may be found the last words of Joseph of Arimathea. He who is valiant and pure of spirit may find the Holy Grail in the Castle of aaarrrrggh'.
    ARTHUR: What?
    MAYNARD: '...The Castle of aaarrrrggh'.
    BEDEVERE: What is that?
    MAYNARD: He must have died while carving it.
    LAUNCELOT: Oh, come on!
    MAYNARD: Well, that's what it says.
    ARTHUR: Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't bother to carve 'aarrggh'. He'd just say it!
    MAYNARD: Well, that's what's carved in the rock!
    GALAHAD: Perhaps he was dictating.
    • by ikewillis (586793) on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:44PM (#13312950) Homepage
      http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/tech/hardware/10 237939.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA [thestreet.com]

      Shares of Apple Computer (AAPL:Nasdaq - commentary - research) set an all-time high on Friday following a disappointing report from Dell (DELL:Nasdaq - commentary - research) and amid rumors about a major new partnership.

      According to market chatter, Apple is set to announce a deal with Google (GOOG:Nasdaq - commentary - research) calling for Google to offer Apple's iTunes music store through its own site. The rumored deal would pair the nation's leading online music store with its leading search engine.

      There's "speculation of an iTunes launch," says Paul Foster, an options strategist at Theflyonthewall.com. "Google is going to offer iTunes somehow on their platform," according to the rumor, he says.

      Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said the company doesn't comment on "rumors and speculation." A Google representative did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

      Meanwhile, Apple's shares might well have benefited from Dell's pain. The computer giant missed Wall Street's revenue targets for its just-completed quarter by $300 million and cautioned analysts that they needed to bring down their revenue targets for its current quarter.

      Dell's stumble is in contrast to Apple, which has seen its computer sales and share in the PC market surge in recent quarters.

      "Some investors seem be rotating out of Dell into Apple," says Foster. "Investors kind of have the attitude that Dell's weakness is Apple's strength."

      Shares of Apple closed regular trading up $2.10, or 4.8%, on Friday to $46.10. The company's shares traded up as much as $2.22, or 5%, intraday. Volume totaled nearly 33 million shares, well above its three-month norm of 18.6 million shares.
    • MOD PARENT UP (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 13 2005, @04:59PM (#13313050)
      Yes, once again its another editor fuckup - why is everyone still so surprised that this happens? The 'editors' barely pay lip service to their title and I doubt very much that they read the comments either. At face value there is no real passion from the creators of the site - its just the same old shit day after day.

      To explain further, Slashdot exists for one purpose: to make money for parent company OSDN. There is nothing wrong with that in itself but don't expect a high quality site the way its currently run. The Slashdot business model (if you can call it that) seems to be to provoke reaction from the loyal crowd of slashbots that frequent the site. Inflammatory / trollish stories (e.g here [slashdot.org]) and dupes cause the page hits (and therefore ad revenue) to go through the roof.

      As a result, most of the comments I see on the stories are neither insightful, interesting or informative. There seems to be no real balanced discussion - something I feel is a product of the moderation system which rewards those who conform to the slashbot mindset and censors everything else. This democratic method of editing the comments is terrible - especially where technical issues are concerned, as a lot of nonsense is modded up by people who don't know otherwise.

      You are probably wondering why I read Slashdot. Partly morbid curiosity and partly to laugh at both the flame wars which invevitably break out and the well crafted trolls.

      To conclude, Slashdot is neither really "News for Nerds" nor is it "Stuff that matters". If you want the former, go to somewhere like arstechnica [arstechnica.com] or kuroshin [kuro5hin.org] and if you want actual stuff that matters, the BBC are hard to beat. [bbc.co.uk]
    • Wonderful. Just what Slashdot needs: an article for both the Google and Apple fanboys to rant about...
    • ...to a broken/blocked keyboard maybe ?
    • From the page's source:

      to a
      a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/tech/hardwar e/10237939.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA ">/a>
    • Re:to a...? (Score:5, Funny)

      by The Bubble (827153) on Saturday August 13 2005, @05:05PM (#13313095) Homepage

      Oh, no! I get it! THEY GOT HIM! Somebody stuck him with a stake through the heart! Oh, this is so sad! CmdrTaco... I pine for you.


      Hi, everybody. In memoriam of poor 'Taco, let's go back and revisit a few of my favorite 'Taco memories.


      Baher Al Hakim writes...

      Oh, that was great. And who could forget this one?


      The Street suggests in a recent article that Apple is about to announce a deal with Google, to a...

      Ah, we sure had some great times 'Taco. I'm gonna miss you bro.

    • by joel8x (324102) on Saturday August 13 2005, @06:26PM (#13313371) Homepage
      You are on crack only to the degree that any compressed music will not sound as good as the source. If your source happens to be torrent or usenet for music, than I have noticed that sometimes songs are encoded with preset eq's and/or normalization where the bass is too high, which might explain your tinny argument.
        • I am one such user who has never tried iTunes. I've never had a need to do so, and I don't like the idea of my music being locked via DRM to a single computer (trust me, I move my MP3s around my network a lot).

          And obviously you suffer from some misconceptions. You are not "locked in" to any DRM with iTunes. If you want to rip CDs as MP3s, you can. Even the music you buy off of ITMS is easy to convert to MP3: burn it, then rip it as MP3. And I move files between my home and work computer all the time, no s