Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

A Truly Open Linux Phone

Posted by kdawson on Tue Nov 07, 2006 07:49 PM
from the apt-get-phone-software dept.
skelator2821 writes to tell us about the debut of the OpenMoko, a Linux phone with GPS that is open from top to bottom. The device is set to debut to developers this month for $350, according to the article, but there is no detail on how to get your hands on one, and no link to the manufacturer (FIC). From the article: "This is the first phone in a long time to get us really interested in what it is, what it isn't, and the philosophy behind it. The philosophy is the thing that makes Linux great... it is really open. It runs the latest kernel, 2.6.18 as of a few weeks ago, and you can get software from a repository with apt-get."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] OpenMoko Schedule Announced 165 comments
levell writes "The schedule for the OpenMoko, an open source, Linux-based Neo1973 smart phone was posted to the community mailing list by Sean Moss-Pultz this morning. On Feb 11, free phones will be sent to key community developers and the community websites/wiki/bug tracker will be available. Then on March 11 (the official developer launch) we'll be able to buy an OpenMoko for $350. After allowing some time for innovative, slick software to be created there will be a mass market launch at which point Sean hopes that 'your mom and dad will want one too.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • I own a Sharp Zaurus, and aged as it might be, it pretty much keeps pace - absent the GSM bit.

    Of course, I will buy.
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      You mean apart from the one piece of functionality which defines it as not being a phone?
  • by EmbeddedJanitor (597831) on Tuesday November 07 2006, @08:06PM (#16761403)
    I doubt very much that carriers will be friendly towards open,hack-by-anybody, phones. Most/all carriers require all kinds of certification & testing before they allow vendors to hook up a phone to their network. They also don't like time wasters trying to hook up low volume/low profit phones to their networks. The testing can cost a big bunch of dollars -- ballpark $250k. Now if Joe hacker wnats to spend that, and he can convince the carrier he's going to sell many thousands, he's welcome. Otherwise, at least some part of the phone firmware will be locked down and tamper proof to keep ceritication valid.
    • It's an unlocked GSM phone, so it should work with many carriers in many countries. What carriers exclude handsets by model number?
      • Most of them in the US...
        • by VP (32928) on Tuesday November 07 2006, @08:42PM (#16761849)
          Not the GSM vendors (Cingular and T-Mobil) - any unlocked phone with the appropriate SIM card will work on their networks.
          • Ah... see I have no experience with either since they don't offer service in my area... My choices are locals or Verizon (with a very very small Sprint footprint not worth mentioning).

            It's nice to know other vendors aren't quite so barbaric...
          • by webgeek2point0 (1003266) on Tuesday November 07 2006, @10:03PM (#16762517)
            You're absolutely right. I work for T-Mobile. As long as you have a handset that takes a SIM card, you can use any phone you like. We actually have a tech support department devoted to just helping people with unsupported devices. I help people all the time set up their GSM phones to use on our network (i.e. - internet and picture messaging). I believe Cingular is the same way...as is most of the rest of the world.
          • Do you really think so? My carrier is Virgin Mobile, but that's purely a cost consideration on my part (I don't need more than ~100 minutes a month, which through all my possible carrier chocies where I live doesn't exist). I buy my phones outright (though they must be approved by my carrier as none are sim replacable and they don't sell sim cards).

            Otherwise the 2 local cell phone vendors (Blue wireless & CellOne) as well as Verizon (& Sprint if you feel like tracking down their one store in my area
              • There are no local GSM carriers for me (which was my point). I'd love to have more chocies, but apparently 500,000 people is to small for them...

                Verizon, Cellular One, Blue Wireless, and Sprint have the only networks locally and all require more expensive plans I just don't need... Even prepaid phones are limited to a few providers due to what networks exist here and Virgin Mobile offered the best price vs Service area. Not that they even have service in all Sprint areas either...
              • Not offered since their is no cingular network locally (though I'm going to guess they do have towers on the interstates concneting to Cleveland/Buffalo and Pittsburgh, wouldn't want to interrupt service as they drive through after all). But 2 roads is hardly going to help with an area that's 80x30 miles (rough guess). And I'd have to get one outside my local area, making certain landlands (like the one my parents use) treat it as a long distance number (even with number portability I really doubt I could a
      • So it can't, in all honesty, be called fully open.
    • by btarval (874919) on Tuesday November 07 2006, @11:05PM (#16763055)
      Well, you're just not familiar with what's going on in the Open Source Phone world.

      First of all, the Carriers have little choice here. Fully functional Reference kits are available in the under $1000 range. For GSM, you can get them for about $200-300. These are the kits that companies who build cell-phones use to jumpstart their designs. So what's a Carrier going to do? Outlaw these? And kill development for cell-phones? I don't think so.

      The most they might do is to tighten down on the registration. But that involves overhead and hassle. Unless these kits prove to be an issue, it's not going to happen; at least not with the GSM market. And not worldwide.

      You are also wrong about the "time wasters" who supply low volume and low profit phones. What the Carriers want (at least some of them) is to sell the airtime. Some of these Carriers really don't care where it goes, as long as they get paid for it.

      There's a whole resale market here which underscores the point. You want to to become your own cell-phone company? You can, if you have the money. And if you don't think *those* resellers are hungry, you're kidding yourself.

      I admit that as far as the standard view about "time wasters" goes (for the big companies) you are correct. And it's explicitly been this attitude which has severely hindered innovation in the cell-phone market. There are a plethora of uses for small markets. Some of the hungrier carriers fully realize this, and are supportive of anything which will make them money.

      Finally, the lockdown on GSM transceivers is a bit silly. The interface is extremely simple; it's a variation of the old Hayes Modem interface. I kid you not. "ATDT....". There's even an Open Source Project for this. Here's the link:

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/libgsmc [sourceforge.net]

      Finally, there's even a group dedicated to a fully Open Source phone. Namely, the Silicon Valley Homebrew Mobile Phone Club. They are having a meeting tomorrow night in San Francisco. Here's a link to their mailing list archives:

      http://telefono.revejo.org/pipermail/svhmpc_telefo no.revejo.org/ [revejo.org]

      Check out the list, and the information on various associated websites. There's really a groundswell building in this area. And those Carriers which close things off are going to miss an opportunity that their competitors are actively interested in.

  • Why not make a 100$ one that simply, lets me make phone calls, and not much else? I don't care if the are Wifi. Or Wii. Im 34, and I'm over that.
    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      I assume you are living in the US.

      Buy a tracfone. $29.xx at Walmart, 250 minutes for fifty bucks (or better if you want to spend more). Unless you need something that'll let you talk to your girlfriend for fourteen hours at a time, they are a pretty good deal. I recently carried mine on a trip across NW South Dakota and had a tower for just about the whole trip. No credit check, they pretty much just work, although adding minutes can be a pain sometimes, their tech support has been pretty good in m
  • OpenMoko does not yet return results on Google.

    Yahoo shows 2 results for OpenMoko.

    The $350 price tag is looking a lot better than the $600 tag attached to a similar Linux phone from D-Link.
  • two points (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Hakubi_Washu (594267) <washu@u[ ]de ['ni.' in gap]> on Tuesday November 07 2006, @08:23PM (#16761623)
    1. From TFA: Everything barring a few small drivers is GPL'ed.
      This is a joke, right? The drivers are probably the most important part of any piece of hardware, so calling this thing "open" but keeping drivers proprietary is ridiculous.
    2. From the site: FIC recommends Windows(r) XP
      Yeah, and I am to buy a Linux product from you? Dream on...
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      It's the radio and the GPS which are closed, but that's for Federal reasons; you can't have people broadcasting willy-nilly these days, and I know that there are some GPS restrictions. The interfaces to the drivers are perfectly usable. RTFA, and do some research.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      According to your crazy logic, no one is able to run OpenGL apps on Linux with NVIDIA hardware because the drivers are closed source. If that's not what you mean, then your comment is completely without value. If that is what you mean, then you completely misunderstand. So long as the interface is available and documented (html, text, or simply header files), interfacing to a proprietary driver is not a problem at all. Just like writing OpenGL applications which run on NVIDIA's proprietary graphics driv
      • HP recommends Win XP, DELL recommends Win XP and even IBM recommends Win XP, so, what is your point?
        What makes you think I own any hardware produced by any of them?
        • I think the grandparent's point is that no matter whose hardware you own, the manufacturer will recommend Windows XP, regardless of how well they support Linux.
  • by fortinbras47 (457756) on Tuesday November 07 2006, @08:27PM (#16761667)
    if(!at_home && distance(get_current_location(), get_house_location()) lessthan FIFTYYARDS) ) {
    FILE* mail = openMailStream(girlfriend@house.com, "Hi honey!");
    fprintf(mail, "I'm home!\n");
    closeMailStream(mail);
    at_home = true;
    }
  • More details (Score:5, Informative)

    by IvanCruz (316505) on Tuesday November 07 2006, @08:35PM (#16761763) Homepage
    ... can be found on Linux Devices: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2986976174.html [linuxdevices.com] and also http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS7056478804.html [linuxdevices.com]
  • WTF (Score:2, Interesting)

    When is this ITSATRAP shit going to end?
  • No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.
  • Sure it might be open, but you think there'd be some way to get more than just GPRS on these kind of phones? It's not as if GPRS is the only game in town for data, there's certainly no credible reason why it's omitted on these phones
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Yup. Just like ethernet is becoming the new AT&T.

      Your analogy sucks. You are an idiot.
    • Also, I want to smack all the people using the tag "itsnotatrap" when they know, if they read the tagging FAQ, that it should be "!itsatrap".
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)


      No Camera...no headphone socket, no memory card socket, not enough memory to be a great mp3 or video player.


      OK, no camera, but that's what my DSLR [slashdot.org] is for.

      Headphones: use bluetooth, perhaps?
      Memory slot: What's that MicroSD thingy?

      Sounds good to me...except maybe the touch screen---tactile controls are really hard to beat.
    • > no memory card socket

      what?

      Let's step back and look at what the phone itself is before we get into the software that runs on it. The hardware itself is a Samsung 2410 266MHz ARM9 with a 2.8-inch VGA touch screen. There are only two buttons on the phone, the rest is handled by the touch screen, a microSD slot, Bluetooth 2.0, and USB for connectivity and charging. It also has two 1W stereo speakers so you can repurpose it to an MP3 player or anything else you would like.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 07 2006, @08:38PM (#16761795)
      I don't care about the camera. I never seen much of a point to a camera phone. Makes about as much sense as a mp3 playing bathtub, which I am sure somebody somewere made.
      Sure it's convient, but so what?

      And your absolutely wrong about not having enough memory. It takes miniSD cards and has 128 megs of RAM. Right now I have 2 1gig miniSD cards and a 128 meg SD card. Also you can buy up to 4gig MiniSD cards.

      So frankly with miniSD slot your disk space is practically UNLIMITED.

      For instance many possibilities:

      * Go the 'Slax' route. Slax is a customizable Live Linux cdrom. It has various modules that you can use that you can add-on applications and other things to a already existing live cdrom. You can do this because the modules are compressed read-only file systems and you use UnionFS to mount them over the existing file system transparently. You can mix and match applications in that manner.

      You can do the same thing with this. No problem.

      So other possibilities.
      * Remote X11 applications. Need I say more? (and yes NX compression will make them perfectly usable)
      * Simple games.
      * VoIP.
      * remote access of systems through a veriaty of means such as voice command, terminal, tones.
      * 266mhz CPU is fast enough for video.
      * GPS kicks-ass. Interact with other GPS systems and keep track of things via GPSD and such.
      * secure encrypted file systems for passwords and other sensitive information.
      * stream audio

      What this thing is is a Linux PC that fits in your pocket. Pretty much anything you can do with a PC linux box you can do with this thing.

      This thing literally kicks the shit out of any sort of propriatory hardware phone you can think of. Even with out the camera. The possiblities are endless.
    • Sounds perfect :)
    • glommed from the net...

      Neo1973 Handset Hardware

      The Neo1973 is based on a Samsung S3C2410 SoC (system-on-chip) application processor, powered by an ARM9 core. It will have 128MB of RAM, and 64MB of flash, along with an upgradable 64MB MicroSD card.

      Typical of Chinese phone designs, the Neo1973 sports a touchscreen, rather than a keypad -- in this case, an ultra-high resolution 2.8-inch VGA (640 x 480) touchscreen. "Maps look stunning on this screen," Moss-Pultz said.

      The phone features an A-GPS (assisted GPS)
    • The screen is far too small on a cell phone to play movies. Watching a full-length movie would be really painful. I might occassionally watch "guy gets hit by a pie on youtube" on my cell phone, but hardly more than that. And you don't need massive disk space to do that.

      Proper quality headphones are bigger than the entire size of the cell phone. Having a headphone jack is therefore somewhat irrelevant. If I wanted an iPod, I'd buy that, and throw it in the duffel bag with my regular size headphones. What's
      • I am curious just how bright the screen might be... I used a small lens to project my GP2X screen (3.5") onto the back of a bus seat with an approx 11" diagonal viewing area and it still had better contrast than I (an admitted non-videophile) need. I would love to try the same with this little gadget.
    • Re:No Camera... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by bunions (970377) on Wednesday November 08 2006, @01:52AM (#16764159)
      This is hilarious. The original post contains three facts, one of which is simply wrong (there is a memory card socket) one of which is irrelevant (no headphone jack, but it supports bluetooth headsets, which are better) along with one assertion (not enough memory to be an mp3 or video player) which is either a conclusion based on the wrong fact or a ridiculous assertion that 128MB is too small to fit a player into.

      So basically, the post contains 75% misinformation, and the information it does contain is painfully obvious.

      And it's still +5 insightful.
      • Doing one thing and doing it well is great you're talking about software, and you can have a million things on your computer. It's a bit less good when you need a pocket for each one.
        • Would you pay 350$ to get a phone that can only call and receive calls, just because it runs linux?

          I would rather just get a cheap candy bar nokia.
          • by StarKruzr (74642) on Wednesday November 08 2006, @04:05AM (#16764779) Journal
            It can do ANYTHING, because it runs Linux. It's GSM so it can send and receive text messages like anything else. It can do web browsing, IRC, VOIP, whatever else you want, because it runs Linux.

            What else are you looking for? What can your "cheap candy bar Nokia" do that this can't?

            The reason this will be outlawed by cell phone carriers is precisely because it can do anything... because it runs Linux. Anything that loosens their ironclad control over handsets is verboten.
      • Re:No Camera... (Score:4, Informative)

        by TheRaven64 (641858) on Tuesday November 07 2006, @09:39PM (#16762349) Homepage Journal

        Pretty much any 'phone made in the last five years is a good 'phone. There are some exceptions, but not many. Once you've got the 'good 'phone' part solved, the question is 'what can we do with all the spare CPU power we have on this machine?'

        An address book is obvious; you need to store 'phone numbers anyway, so it's not much of a stretch to store the rest of the contact information. Add in IrDA or Bluetooth so you can trivially send vCards to other people and it's a useful feature. If someone asks for a friend or colleague's contact details you can hand them a virtual business card.

        Since you need to sync the address book with a computer, you may as well sync calendar information as well. I have my 'phone with me more often than my computer and so being able to have calendar alarms on the 'phone instead of the computer is great.

        A camera? I wasn't convinced by this one until I got a camera-phone. I hadn't owned a camera for quite a while and didn't see the point in getting one. But then I found out that having a camera that took reasonable (2 megapixel - not fantastic, but not bad) quality pictures in my pocket all the time meant I actually used it.

        A media player would be useful for the times I don't want to carry my iPod, except that the included headphone have sharp corners which hurt my ears and Nokia insist on a proprietary headphone socket.

        I can't remember what other features my 'phone has, but if they don't take up any UI space (and they don't, since I have a set of shortcuts to the features I actually use) then they don't bother me. Mass production brings the price down.