Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Google Campus to Become Solar-powered

Posted by CowboyNeal on Tue Oct 17, 2006 12:19 AM
from the off-the-grid dept.
prostoalex writes "Reuters is reporting that Google is equipping its headquarters with a solar panel 'capable of generating 1.6 megawatts of electricity, or enough to power 1,000 California homes.' This will make Google's Mountain View campus the largest solar-powered office complex in the United States."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Hardware: Solar Tree Bears Fruit 106 comments
Hugh Pickens writes "A prototype solar tree that recently went on display on a busy street in Vienna, Austria has passed a key test by providing light during the night-time even when the sun had been blocked by clouds for four days in a row. The branches of the solar tree were decorated with 10 solar lamps, each one powered by 36 solar cells. The tree included rechargeable batteries and electronic systems to measure the amount of light in the atmosphere and trigger the solar lamps to go on. 'Not just trees but other objects could be decorated with solar cells and so keep streets well lit at night time,' said Christina Werner from Cultural Project Management. Google uses a similar concept to light their parking lots with 3,000 solar panels that provide up to 10 percent of the Googleplex's power demand. We discussed Google's solar initiative last year."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:24AM (#16464037)
    I can only google stuff when the sun is shining in Mountain View?
  • by rm999 (775449) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:24AM (#16464039)
    "A Google executive said the company will rely on solar power to supply nearly a third of the electricity consumed by office workers at its roughly one-million-square-foot headquarters. This does not include power consumed by data centers that power many of Google's Web services worldwide, he said."

    That's great, I am really proud of them for using an alternative energy source (especially in such a sunny area) but most of their energy usage is those data centers and servers, not their employees. They purposefully did not give a % of total energy saved because it probably would have been on the order of 0.1-5%, which would have revealed the ridiculous amount of energy they actually use.
  • I wonder how easy the transition will be for them to leave Linux behind in favor of a sun [sun.com] powered setup.

    Oh yes. I went there.

  • How big is it? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jorghis (1000092) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:30AM (#16464099)
    The article didnt say anything about its physical size. I wonder how much space they would have to consume to supply that much power.

    The google campus doesnt have that many buildings, I have this weird image in my mind of all their buildings completely covered by solar panels.
  • Yawn! (Score:3, Informative)

    by J. T. MacLeod (111094) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:31AM (#16464109)
    Call me when they hit 1.21 gigawatts!

    OK, to be serious, this is a wonderful leap. Granted, it took a company as flush with cash and as well organized as Google to make the switch, but even if they're much better suited to do so, they can at least be an example to strive for.
  • Hours (Score:5, Funny)

    by DoofusOfDeath (636671) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:40AM (#16464179)
    Well, I guess that's one way to keep people from working late...
    • Well, I guess that's one way to keep people from working late...

            Nawww, at night they just turn the lights on to power the solar ...oh, wait!
  • Now (Score:3, Funny)

    by Revenge_of_Solver_Ta (862178) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:42AM (#16464193) Homepage
    "This Search Powered By The Sun" -Now with 1/3 Less Evil?
  • by Salvance (1014001) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:42AM (#16464195) Homepage Journal
    Think there's any chance Google would start installing solar panels on their data centers? This would be a HUGE gesture of enviro-friendly computing, even if it did cost them a bundle. It would certainly get other data centers and large power consumers (like yahoo and microsoft) to consider following suit. Based on estimates posted at Wikipedia, they consume 20MW of power for their 450,000+ servers (which actually seems really low - only 50W per server?).

    Assuming it's more like 80MW of power they consume (equivalent to ~60K homes), I wonder if there'd even be enough high quality solar panels to offset a majority of this power consumption? I guess it makes more sense for them to start building wind farms near their out-of-the-way GooglePlexes. Some 5MW wind turbines are being tested today - hmmm ... let's see, 16 wind turbines vs. 150,000 solar panels ...

    BTW: here's a link to a more detailed article on the subject: SF Gate - Google sets sight on solar [sfgate.com]
  • Payback? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Nick9000 (960604) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:55AM (#16464281)
    I wonder what the energy payback period is expected to be? I've heard up to thirty years for solar panels, which has always put me off because I would guess in 5-10 years there will be improvements in the amount of energy a panel can produce.
  • by nephridium (928664) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @01:05AM (#16464349)
    Use of solar panels goes way back [radford.edu]. I still can't believe Ronald Reagan took down those panels that Carter installed on the White House as well as axing the solar research program - weakass politics.. :(
  • Did we cross the threshold of solar panel arrays giving off more power before the MTBF than it takes to create them? If not then this is just showing off, or maybe more simply some exeutive being missguided. Its just google being wastfull.
    It happens when your rich, I suppose.
    • by Kris_J (10111) * on Tuesday October 17 2006, @02:40AM (#16464797) Journal
      Did we cross the threshold of solar panel arrays giving off more power before the MTBF than it takes to create them?
      Yes. [seia.org] Quite a while ago IIRC.

      Solar power is simply a small way from being price competitive with established power generation. It is a viable energy source. It is not a net energy loss.

  • What this takes. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Animats (122034) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @01:55AM (#16464589) Homepage

    OK. One square meter of solar panel is typically good for 130 watts at peak, but only about 655 watt hours per day, or 27 watts averaged over 24 hours. In other words, the average power is about 20% of the peak. So, to get 1.6 megawatts average power, you need about 60,000 square meters of panel, or an area 245 meters square. This is about two football fields of area, or three Wal-Mart Supercenter roofs.

    A typical price for a good solar panel today is about $1000 for 160 watts peak. So to get 1.6 * 5 = 8 megawatts peak power, you need 50,000 of those panels, or about $50 million worth of panels. Batteries, inverters, and installation extra. (I suspect that Google is talking about 1.6MW of peak capacity, but that's a phony number to compare to other energy sources that can run 24 hours a day.)

    There are already data centers that draw 30 megawatts continuous. That would take about a billion dollars worth of solar panels to power.

    And by power plant standards, 30MW is dinky. Commercial power plants today run around a gigawatt.

    • by x2A (858210) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:26AM (#16464059)
      Yeah but wait til Google becomes too powerful, the only option we'll have to shut the computers down will be to black out the sky :-/

      I think I heard a story about it once...

    • by Karloskar (980435) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:49AM (#16464253)
      pretty powerful nuclear furnace.

      I think the boys from They Might Be Giants summed it up best.

      The sun is a mass of incandescent gas
      A gigantic nuclear furnace
      Where hydrogen is built into helium
      At a temperature of millions of degrees

      Yo ho, it's hot, the sun is not
      A place where we could live
      But here on Earth there'd be no life
      Without the light it gives

      We need its light
      We need its heat
      We need its energy
      Without the sun, without a doubt
      There'd be no you and me

      The sun is a mass of incandescent gas
      A gigantic nuclear furnace
      Where hydrogen is built into helium
      At a temperature of millions of degrees

      The sun is hot

      It is so hot that everything on it is a
      gas: iron, copper, aluminum, and many others.

      The sun is large

      If the sun were hollow, a million
      Earths could fit inside. And yet, the
      sun is only a middle-sized star.

      The sun is far away

      About 93 million miles away, and that's why it
      looks so small.

      And even when it's out of sight
      The sun shines night and day

      The sun gives heat
      The sun gives light
      The sunlight that we see
      The sunlight comes from our own sun's
      Atomic energy

      Scientists have found that the sun is a huge
      atom-smashing machine. The heat and light of
      the sun come from the nuclear reactions of
      hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, and helium.

      The sun is a mass of incandescent gas
      A gigantic nuclear furnace
      Where hydrogen is built into helium
      At a temperature of millions of degrees
    • by tlambert (566799) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @03:13AM (#16464935)
      Payback depends on how you measure it.

      If you measure it as "payback of the purchase price", it could be as little as 2.5 years, depending on the specific technology.

      If you measure it as ERoEI, it's generally acknowledged by everyone except die-hard solar power advocates that the ratio of Energy Returned over Energy Input for solar is less than 1, unless you use very very recent strained Silicon-based technology, which barely hit break-even earlier this year.

      If you use thin film technology the purchase price payback grows to 4 years, and the Payback ERoEI drops to about 0.8.

      There's also the little problem of there being a shortage of polycrystaline Silicon, from which solar cells are made. This shortage is expected to last through at least 2008, since it takes about 3 years to build a manufacturing plant for it, and that's what would have to happen to reduce the cost overhead.

      So for right now, any decision to switch to solar by Google is going to be an economic one, rather than an environmental one.

      This makes sense, since Larry Page and Sergey Brin are invested in a Solar power startup, Nanosolar http://www.techreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=170 25&ch=biztech [techreview.com]; they provided the initial seed funding, according to a release on Nanosolar's web site: http://www.nanosolar.com/pr5-6.htm [nanosolar.com] (see second release at this page).

      Since Nanosolar is a thin-film photovoltaic shop, we are looking at a longer economic payback time; their output capacity after their plant is built will be 430MW of cells per year, so this will eaither be the first run cells, or it will be about a day and a half of cell output at their full production capacity.

      FWIW, the 1.6MW capacity is going to put them at ~1/500th of the total US Solar capacity, which as of this year is at 927MW, for just this one installation. Comparatively, total US solar capacity is only 85% of the output of one of the two reactors at Diablo Canyon (1087MW each), while total US wind power capacity is 10,000MW and growing by 3,000MW in 2006 alone, according th AWEA (the American Wind Energy Association).

      -- Terry
    • by SirSlud (67381) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:27AM (#16464083) Homepage
      They'll all show up at your door one day and go, "Wern't you the guy who dropped incredible internet science at slashdot? Our one single panel broke, and we're out a vast amount of money. Apparently, you're the man who will lead us into the next generation of solar powered offices."
    • by gbobeck (926553) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:29AM (#16464089) Homepage Journal
      What if it breaks?

      Two words: Duct Tape.
      • by sethstorm (512897) * on Tuesday October 17 2006, @01:09AM (#16464375) Homepage
        Two words: Duct Tape.

        Would that be to fix it or to shut up the person who revealed the problem?
      • by sniepre (517796) <sniepre@gmail.com> on Tuesday October 17 2006, @01:30AM (#16464479) Homepage
        Remember: There are only two tools in life. WD-40, for when something doesn't move, and should, and Duct Tape, for when something is moving and it shouldn't.
        • by flyingsquid (813711) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @01:41AM (#16464551)
          Remember: There are only two tools in life. WD-40, for when something doesn't move, and should, and Duct Tape, for when something is moving and it shouldn't.

          So does the universe explode if you spray duct tape with WD-40?

          • by gbobeck (926553) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @02:01AM (#16464615) Homepage Journal
            Lets conduct an experiment and investigate what will happen if duct tape is sprayed with WD-40.

            But, before we use any power tools, let's take a moment to talk about shop safety. Be sure to read, understand, and follow all the safety rules that come with your power tools. Knowing how to use your power tools properly will greatly reduce the risk of personal injury. And remember this: there is no more important safety rule than to wear these -- safety glasses and a funny hat.

            I have with me a brand new roll of duct tape, and a fresh can of WD-40. Next to me is my trusty lab assistant, Timmy, who will be assiting in this experiment.

            I am now going to rip a piece of duct tape approximately six inches long off of the roll and have Timmy hold it.

            (I rip tape and hand it to Timmy)

            Ok, Timmy, hold the tape tight, I am going to commence spraying the tape.

            (I spray the tape)

            Ok, Timmy... continue to hold it as we observe what happens.

            (wait 5 seconds)

            Timmy has told me it is starting to shake and do funny things...

            OMG! A black hole has opened where the tape was. Timmy, hold on to it... this is the crucial moment...

            Uh, oh! I think we are going to need another Timmy! It looks like Timmy was consumed by the black hole.

            Luckily, I was prepaired for this. I will now throw into the black hole a few New Kids on the Block tapes and a copy of the movie Hobgobblins. This should cause the blackhole to enter "terminal suckage phase" and end its existance.

            (I throw in the NKotB tapes and the copy of Hobgobblins. The black hole immediately ceases to be)

            Well, it looks like yet another experiment has occured.

            Tune in next week when I will show everyone how to build a perpetual energy generator using a cat and a slice of buttered toast.

    • Re:Commendable (Score:5, Insightful)

      by JymmyZ (655273) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @12:32AM (#16464119)
      I don't think there's enough space in all of California that could be covered in the solar panels needed to power their data centers. Maybe if they bought New Mexico and turned it into one big panel array though.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      What about:

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/14/132323 0 [slashdot.org]

      and

      http://news.com.com/2300-1030_3-6089390-5.html [com.com]

      Seems like there is a lot of hydroelectric power in Oregon.
    • Re:Commendable (Score:4, Informative)

      by hazem (472289) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @02:28AM (#16464737) Journal
      Well, there's the datacenter they are building in The Dalles, OR. It's next to a defunct aluminum plant and will be powered by the nearby hydroelectric dam. It's awefully hard on the salmon but it's mostly renewable and fairly clean. The many cooling towers are already easily visible from the freeway.

      My guess is the picked the location for the nearby/cheap power, low labor costs, cheap land, and relatively low corporate taxes in Oregon. Plus there's great windsurfing just 20 miles down the river.. and it's a pretty place.
    • I had JUST read this on Google's blog, and when I clicked back to Slashdot, boom: deja vu on the top of the front page (and not from a dupe! :P).

      This is obviously a sign that you should submit it, and it'll make the front page tomorrow! :)
    • by l3v1 (787564) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @02:01AM (#16464613)
      Cost Savings

      Cost savings, cost savings, cost saving... This is why humanity's lifespan as we know it will be much shorter than it could've been. It should not be just about the money and cost saving, but about nature saving, resource saving, human saving.

      Any company who deploys renewable energy sources as a partial or total replacement, gets my support.

      And, this news is proof for one more thing: geeks should have more money, they can do the coolest things.
       
    • by hazem (472289) on Tuesday October 17 2006, @02:38AM (#16464787) Journal
      Nike doesn't often get good press, but they recently build a windfarm in Lakdaal, Belgium, where they have their main European distribution center. The windfarm provides 100% of the power needs of the facility, in addition to the power needs of some 8000 households.

      I'm sure google will share/sell what they don't use.