Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Apple and Google to Blog the World

Posted by Zonk on Sat Jan 06, 2007 06:28 PM
from the look-where-i-am-ma dept.
Zrop writes "AppleInsider is reporting that Apple has been working on OS-level integration of an geographical mapping technology as an integral part of Leopard, its next-generation OS. The technology is rumoured to employ GPS functionality. Will GPS chips make Apple iPod phones and MacBooks location aware? Users would be able to post information at a location, hanging in the air, ready to be browsed by people passing by. Imagine getting highly relevant messages, without even pressing a button, simply because you are in the vicinity and your preferences match the content of the post."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • You mean... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by blike (716795) on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:31PM (#17492326) Homepage
    Imagine getting highly relevant messages, without even pressing a button, simply because you are in the vicinity and your preferences match the content of the post."
    You mean "Imagine getting highly relevant advertisements..."
    • by mrchaotica (681592) * on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:43PM (#17492462)

      ...if this is anything like the "sudden motion sensor," it's really exciting because of all the cool stuff third parties will do with it. For example, off the top of my head I can think of a few things that I'd like to see implemented: automatically switching the "location" (which is used for determining network settings) according to the actual GPS location, linking iCal events to locations so that I can get reminders when I'm in the right place, etc.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Another lack of the difference between Apple and Microsoft.

        If true (and I stress "if true", since it's 1. from appleinsider and 2. a breathless rumors appearing days before MacWorld), this shows some real imagination. A product from Microsoft with the same features would be Microsoft from end-to-end, locking out potential partners or subsuming them well before the product became useful.

        I hope that this feature will be implemented in the typically benign-if-a-little-restrictive style of most of Apple's consu
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Well, that all depends on your definition of "place." For example, is the meeting room a "place," or is the whole office building a "place?" If it's on the former scale, maybe you have the situation where you want to be reminded of the meeting if you're in your office, but not if you're in the meeting room. But if it's the latter, maybe you want to be reminded to go, say, get something from a particular coworker before you leave. Also, it can even depend on the transitions between places. For example, if yo

  • by mrmeval (662166) <mrmeval@gmai l . com> on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:32PM (#17492338)
    Muh ha ha ha

  • AppleInsider is reporting that Apple has been working on OS-level integration of an geographical mapping technology as an integral part of Leopard, its next-generation OS.

    Why is it that when apple does this kind of thing it's somehow "cool", but when Microsoft does it, it's somehow "evil"?
    • by brass1 (30288) <SlrwKQpLrq1FM @ w h a t . net> on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:51PM (#17492536) Homepage
      Why is it that when apple does this kind of thing it's somehow "cool", but when Microsoft does it, it's somehow "evil"?

      Because when Apple does it, it becomes a well documented [apple.com], open [webkit.org] API. Microsoft? Not so much [microsoft.com].
        • by DECS (891519) on Sunday January 07 2007, @02:06AM (#17495412) Homepage Journal
          ADC was only DVI, power, and USB together in one plug. Anyone wanting to use a standard DVI monitor only needed an adapter. Mini-DVI is just a another example of the same pins in a different connector to save space. Of all the real examples of standards, those two are the best you could come up with?
    • Why is it that when apple does this kind of thing it's somehow "cool", but when Microsoft does it, it's somehow "evil"?

      It is? Who said that?

    • by Overly Critical Guy (663429) on Saturday January 06 2007, @07:59PM (#17493076)
      Because Apple doesn't have an OS monopoly.

      Since when did Apple sign illegal OEM deals that forced OEMs to not ship competing products to prevent them from entering the market?

      Next.
    • 1. When Apple does it, they're not leveraging a monopoly, because they don't have one.

      2. The last time anyone cared about Microsoft bundling anything, Windows 95 was new and the Earth was a rapidly-cooling ball of magma.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      There is a long, boring answer to this which involves Microsoft's past and present sales and PR tactics. This is the answer most slashdotters would give.

      A more interesting answer is, 'because their software sucks'. If Microsoft's software was better, they would have some fans, and on social websites like this one there wouldn't be such a strong prevailing dislike of them.

      Obviously apple also engages in evil business ethics. But because they have fans, they can get away with it a bit more. Microsoft has, as
      • what part of "AppleInsider is reporting that Apple has been working on OS-level integration of an geographical mapping technology as an integral part of Leopard, its next-generation OS" didn't already make your point?

        oh I see, you're just trying to repeat the FUD about Apple forcing its users (at gunpoint) to buy teh new OSs every month for $1299.9999!!!11 each time omg wtf!
        • oh I see, you're just trying to repeat the FUD about Apple forcing its users (at gunpoint) to buy teh new OSs every month for $1299.9999!!!11 each time omg wtf!
          Pretty much.
      • Apple: Where the customers eat shit and like it.

        Linux: Where the customers eat shit, and get told "Submit a patch or run back to Micro$uck$ Windoze, n00b!"

        (Disclaimer: I'm a Mac user. And a Windows user. And a Linux user, and an OpenBSD user, and ...)

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        I never thought the browser or media player were the bad thing, might as well argue the included TCP/IP stack. Life moves on and essential grows. It was the inability to remove those items and having to pay for Windows even if I wasn't going to use it that got me.
      • Unlike Microsoft, you can uninstall the web browser and media player in OS X.

        Any other trolls I can quickly shoot down while I'm here? Or are you busy struggling with Vista's security flaws over at your employer, Microsoft?
  • by Spazntwich (208070) on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:34PM (#17492362)
    "You're not standing in a puddle of water."
  • I heard ideas like this a long time ago, only then it was using cellphones.

    I think if Apple releases a cell phone (iPhone), it, and the next gen iPods are much more likely to be of use for geographically targetted advertisements (airtisements?) than a macbook. Anyone walking around with an open macbook will have thier own issues to worry about.
  • I remember when the Pentium III came out, and everybody freaked out because it had built-in serial number identification that were supposed to destroy your privacy. Now "They" will know where you are, but since it's Apple, slashdot puts a nice happy spin on it. Do they make tinfoil iPod cases?
    • Do they make tinfoil iPod cases?

      They did, but people complained that they scratched too easily.
    • by dangitman (862676) on Saturday January 06 2007, @07:01PM (#17492646)

      I remember when the Pentium III came out, and everybody freaked out because it had built-in serial number identification that were supposed to destroy your privacy.

      I don't remember everybody freaking out. That would surely make the world news, and lead to civil chaos, if the entire population of the planet started "freaking out." I don't remember anybody freaking out, actually. A few people raised some privacy concerns, yes. Not the same thing as everybody freaking out.

      Now "They" will know where you are, but since it's Apple, slashdot puts a nice happy spin on it.

      Actually, the majority of the posts so far are talking about ways this could be abused, and a sprinkling of "Apple is teh suck" posts. I haven't yet seen anyone on slashdot say it is "cool" or put a happy spin on it.

    • by mr_matticus (928346) on Saturday January 06 2007, @07:23PM (#17492802)
      Cars with OnStar and every cell phone made in the past 5 years (if not longer) already have the ability to be tracked. If someone especially desired it, your computer could also be located (to a lesser degree of accuracy).

      If "the man" wanted to know where you were at any given time, it's not like it was hard before. The serial number 'scare' (if you can really call it that) was different because it reported information unrelated to any communication purpose. With wireless devices of any kind, you're already broadcasting your location by using it (even just having it turned on), so it's really a non-issue. Why not provide the option of doing something with it?

      The difference between Microsoft and just about anyone else (including Apple) is that Microsoft would turn it on by default without any real security concerns, and it would "integrate" with a soldering iron. Take Media Center for instance--if you choose "satellite" in the setup, you CAN'T continue if it doesn't detect an MCE-compatible IR receiver (even if you don't want to use it). You also can't cheat by calling your connection "cable" and then choosing a satellite lineup. Microsoft is too smart for that. With this, it's like texting to a bulletin board (the cork-and-pin variety). You can put something up there that might be helpful to someone else--but you aren't obligated to post anything, nor are you obligated to read any of it.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Reading the article (btw, why was it linked to twice in the summary?), it seems to me to just be an opinion piece based on rumors and a single patent application. The patent application itself sounds more like it describes the rumored 'iPhone,' which would make GPS functionality not that out of place seeing as many cellphones on the market now employ GPS technology. As far as the OS-level integration, it seems more like adding GPS and/or map support to the OS is what Apple is interested in. More like iMa
  • by theurge14 (820596) * on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:36PM (#17492380)
    "Here I sit all broken hearted
    I tried to..."

    You know the rest.
  • Finally. (Score:5, Funny)

    by CosmeticLobotamy (155360) on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:39PM (#17492418)
    Neat, a way for me to tell passers-by, "Bob Johnson sucks ****," without the hassle of finding a bathroom stall and a marker. Heck, now I can let people know right as they're passing Bob's house. He'll be so happy.
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Hey man, fuck you!

      Bob

  • by drewzhrodague (606182) <drew@@@zhrodague...net> on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:42PM (#17492456) Homepage Journal
    You can do geolocation with WiFi, if you have a large enough database. We have one [wifimaps.com], and there are others. Here [placelab.org] is a good example of this kind of action. There aren't many applications that deal with location, but as you can imagine, there is a point to location-based blogging, and apparently a need for it. I wasn't successful in building a killer location-based app, but I like to see the other valiant attempts by others.

    Hay, I'm looking for a gig too, Apple and Google.
  • The site stephansmap.org is geared towards this. It actually goes beyond: it has time integration.

    I developed it. So far needs some more users. So I'm redesigning it.

    Stephan
  • GPS Navigation With Your Laptop! http://www.bytefusion.com/products/op/usb-gps/usb- gps.htm [bytefusion.com]


    Does anyone know this device works under Linux?
    I Love to buy one.

  • Ummm... (Score:5, Funny)

    by dangitman (862676) on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:49PM (#17492524)
    How do I type if I'm hanging in the air? And isn't this Mac-user-levitation technology a bigger story than boring old GPS?
  • At least in mobile phones. Some phones (in the UK at least) will automatically display the dialling code for the area you're in. It's a more simplified version but it's a handy feature to have. Of course, this is a more complex version and should hopefully have more beneficial uses.
  • by dpbsmith (263124) on Saturday January 06 2007, @06:56PM (#17492578) Homepage
    There are ads on the back and on the front inside of the shopping cart. There are ads on the floor that I walk on, while trying to manuever my cart around instrusive stands of featured products placed so as to block the aisle. Hanging off shelves in the aisle are little machines with bright blinking LEDs ready to dispense coupons for products. Flat-panel TV sets with sound hang near the meat section, running a continuous informercial. Another TV set with sound hangs above the cash register in the checkout line, running a different infomercial.

    As I check out, the process is interrupted by the cashier asking whether I want to buy their X-Treme Value of the Week, which is stacked near the cash register with an ad on it, and hands me two long slips of paper: a receipt, and a bunch of ads and coupons. These latter are "highly targeted," alright: they are always for competing brands of products I just bought.

    Can I "imagine getting highly relevant messages, without even pressing a button, simply because you are in the vicinity and your preferences match the content of the post?"

    Yes, I can.

    And I know exactly kind of messages they'll be.

    And I betcha a nickel those preferences will be opt-out.

  • While this might be a nice geek toy, it wouldn't be practical for everyday use. Picture the scenario: You're in some unknown city, now you have to pull out your MacBook (better hope the battery's charged). After that you can either whip out your phone as well to switch on Bluetooth and get your laptop online via GSM or UMTS, or you've got to find a WLAN hotspot which would only let you look up stuff around that very hotspot. Not a killer app. Not Apple-like at all.

    I could see something like this being usefu
  • I am going to give my girlfriend one of these so I can stalk her.
  • GPS + Ipod (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nurb432 (527695) on Saturday January 06 2007, @07:04PM (#17492666) Homepage Journal
    "Sorry, your content is not authorized for consumption in the country which you currently are in"
  • If it's as unobtrusive as Gmail's topical advertising, I think topical+geographic advertising would be OK.
  • Right... (Score:5, Informative)

    by gordgekko (574109) on Saturday January 06 2007, @07:12PM (#17492710) Homepage
    >> Users would be able to post information at a location, hanging in the air, ready to be browsed by people passing by. Imagine getting highly relevant messages, without even pressing a button, simply because you are in the vicinity and your preferences match the content of the post."

    Right. This didn't even work when users were able to post information at a web site using invisible notes back in the 1990s. Remember that "revolution"? Users of a web site could discuss its contents with each other using software that interfaced with their web browser. End result? No one posted anything except the occasional juvenile comment.

    Now I'm expected to believe that people are going to be walking around with a cellphone and eagerly texting messages and posts that others will be able to read when they enter the area.

    Good luck with that.
  • And if Apple releases a MacThin touch tablet, then the ability to scrawl on the virtual bathroom wall will be that much more realistic.
    "For a good time, IM..."

  • by Aminion (896851) on Saturday January 06 2007, @07:54PM (#17493032)
    ... you will hover by a school and be attacked by "LOL U teh gay!!1" messages.

    ... you wife borrows your nano nuclear powered PDA only to receive the following message as she passes one of the store downtown "Hello again, Mr Smith! We hope you enjoyed Chixx with Dixx 69. May we also suggest: Brazilian Tranny Wars 43?"

    ... your n00b neighbor has got his box pwned again and it is constantly broadcasting ads for Viagra alcopops and penis pumps with festive Christmas motifs.
  • Every street corner will pop up a notification saying, "CowboyNeal WAS HERE," and the obligatory "in SOVIET RUSSIA THE INTERNET MESSAGES YOU."


    I, for one, welcome our new GPS-messaging overlords.

  • by AlXtreme (223728) on Saturday January 06 2007, @08:53PM (#17493472) Homepage Journal
    A location-based wiki (wikipedia, wikitravel) would be pretty neat. Travel to a city, walk around while having access to short descriptions of monuments. Figure out which restaurants are good by walking up to them and reading a few reviews.

    Of course, abuse would be just as easy as messing up a wiki page, but that hasn't stopped their popularity either.

    I don't see why this would have to be tied into an OS though, and it would make more sense for phones than laptops. Once we have cheap unlimited GPRS/UMTS connections, that is.

  • But GPS: (Score:3, Interesting)

    by RalphSleigh (899929) on Saturday January 06 2007, @09:20PM (#17493684) Homepage
    But GPS:

    a) Does not work indoors, and there are very few times I would consider using a laptop outside in this climate.

    b)Eats battery like nothing else, this might be good for the odd fix now and again when you boot up, but running continously would probably put a bit of a crimp on your battery.
  • by Dak RIT (556128) on Sunday January 07 2007, @02:55AM (#17495698) Homepage
    Every assumption here on Slashdot for the most part seems to assume that ANYBODY can "write" information in a location and when you walk into that location it is wirelessly transferred to your iPod, iPhone whatever, so that you have no control of what content you are receiving.

    Wouldn't it be far more likely for the information to be downloaded to your iPod FIRST, and then the information already on your iPod is then simply triggered to come up when you're in a specific location? Stores could potentially use this data for advertisements, but you'd have to agree to download them first... not likely. I think a more likely use of this technology could be by museums or various attractions to provide a kind of "virtual guide" to people with iPods/iPhones, or by individuals themselves to possibly import information from iCal for example to help them remember appointments, or to use as a personal shopping list reminder that sits right there in one device with your music, phone, etc, quite convenient. Dak

    • Strangely, most comments i read were quite critical if not negative of this initiative...

      Must be a different slashdot "crowd" you're talking about...