Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Dell To Offer Win XP On Consumer PCs Again

Posted by Zonk on Thu Apr 19, 2007 03:21 PM
from the that's-a-ringing-endorsement-right-there dept.
phalse phace writes "With so many consumers still asking for Windows XP to be loaded on Dell's consumer level PCs, the PC maker has finally decided to offer that as an option. 'Like most computer makers, Dell switched nearly entirely to Vista-based systems following Microsoft's mainstream launch of the operating system in January. However, the company said its customers have been asking for XP as part of its IdeaStorm project, which asks customers to help the company come up with product ideas. Starting immediately, Dell said, it is adding XP Home and Professional as options on four Inspiron laptop models and two Dimension desktops.' The Dell models with the Windows XP option are: Dell Inspiron 1405, 1705, 1505, and 1501; and Dell Dimension E520 and E521."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Well Duh (Score:4, Insightful)

    by zoomshorts (137587) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:22PM (#18803565)
    Who wants Vista?
    • Re:Well Duh (Score:4, Funny)

      by Rosco P. Coltrane (209368) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:25PM (#18803611)
      Microsoft?
    • Re:Well Duh (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jcgf (688310) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:28PM (#18803665)
      I certainly don't. I'm testing it at work here on a 1.7 celeron with 1.5gb ram and a radeon 9550. Can't do anything without the cpu meter hitting 100 for a couple of seconds. Videos that played fine in XP stutter now and I had to turn off UAC cause it was driving me mad.
      • Re:Well Duh (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Sylver Dragon (445237) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:01PM (#18804155) Journal
        Same experience here. Pentium 4 2.26Ghz, 1GB RAM, NVidia 6600GT, and it chugs with just the Vista basic interface. The worst part is that it occasioanlly just goes off and starts thrashing the hard drive, and pretty much locks the system up. I think it's the indexing service doing that, but I've not confirmed that. I also run it on a Pentium M 2.0Ghz, 1GB RAM, Radeon X700 laptop system, and it feels like I'm working on an XT.
        The only positive feature for Vista, so far, is the built in chess game. For the price, you can get a better one on XP.
        • Re:Well Duh (Score:5, Interesting)

          by RootWind (993172) on Thursday April 19 2007, @05:11PM (#18805175)
          Seeing as how we are sharing anecdotal stories. I have a Pentium M 1.3ghz, 1GB RAM, Geforce Go420 32MB, and it actually works fine (Aero basic of course). It's certainly not faster, but it's not much slower either. My only slow-down problem was a misbehaving 3rd-party driver, which still needs an update.
          • Re:Well Duh (Score:5, Interesting)

            by adolf (21054) <adolf@phreaker.net> on Thursday April 19 2007, @09:55PM (#18807911)
            Anecdotes, anecdotes.

            What I've found about the thrashing: It happens only at first boot, and when closing programs or otherwise freeing large amounts of RAM. Also: If you, Joe Fucking User, stop trying to fix the fucking computer and just use the thing, it will eventually stop thrashing.

            After that, programs tend load fast. It's called SuperFetch, and it's supposed help[1]. Quit being paranoid.

            [1]: Of course it seems like it's not helping, but that's not been Vista's fault in my experience. Rather, it seems to be a competition at boot time between SuperFetch intelligently trying to load data for applications that I'm actually likely to use, and those applications themselves doing their own foolhardy preload[2]. Since the hard drive head can only be in one place at a time, this presents a problem. It should be noted that Vista rather uniquely supports several priority levels for disk IO, and that SuperFetch appears to operate at low priority. It doesn't seem to get in the way at all, once you kill the third-party preloads and try to ignore the disk activity.[3]

            [2]: OpenOffice is a horrible example of this, trying to push its bloated self into RAM at boot time by default. Other common offenders are, of course, Microsoft Office and Adobe Acrobat Reader.

            [3]: Also: Almost all of this activity (including indexing) stops cold when running on battery, where runtime is generally preferred over performance. The whole thing is really pretty well behaved. Try it sometime. (incidentally, I get about an extra hour of real run-time from my Inspiron 6000 when running Vista instead of XP.)

    • Dell vs. Microsoft (Score:5, Insightful)

      by TheMeuge (645043) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:38PM (#18803821) Homepage
      This raises an important question - who's more important to whom?

      1. Is Windows essential to Dell's business model of building and selling PCs?
      2. Is Dell essential to Microsoft's business model of establishing a monopoly and locking in customers?

      In an ideal world, it's obvious that #2 would be more true than #1, given the huge percentage of the PC market that Dell occupies. However, customers still demand Windows, and while Microsoft has the power to raise the wholesale prices for Dell, and render the latter unable to compete in the low-margin world of hardware sales, Dell is still quite dependent on directives from Redmond.

      This latest trend just serves to underline the inherent instability in this partnership. In this context, it is not surprising that Dell is looking into Linux, since proliferation of the latter will benefit Dell in that it will limit the extent to which Dell depends on Microsoft in the long run; in the short run it'll give Dell more bargaining power with regards to wholesale Windows price negotiations.
      • I'm inclined to say that Dell is more important to Microsoft than Microsoft is to Dell.

        Remember that PC hardware stands on its own and free operating systems exist to drive it. However, Windows does not stand on its own and requires hardware to run.

        Add to that the fact that many, many people do not distinguish between the OS and the PC (or even the "computer" and the "hard drive" for that matter, but I digress) and they'll blame problems with --anything-- to do with their PC squarely on Dell, and you have a culture that strongly associates the OEM with everything computer-related.

        When you have the company with the greater amount of mindshare also creating the components that are more flexible (versus the OS which, as previously mentioned, requires hardware) you have a situation in favor of the OEM telling the software company what for.

        Simply put, it only takes a few commercials from Dell about "the power of open source" to get people doubting Microsoft.

        YMMV, of course, and this is just my experience dealing with the public for 7 years working in a library. Thank Cthulhu that's over.
        • by Corporate Troll (537873) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:50PM (#18803997) Homepage Journal

          Simply put, it only takes a few commercials from Dell about "the power of open source" to get people doubting Microsoft.

          Wow, I never saw it that way. Of course Dell would need to grow a spine before ever doing that. That means saying. "Screw you Microsoft, I don't care paying a premium for your licenses.... Brand recognition will save us!" Not very likely to happen... Interesting none the less.

          • Brand recognition will save us!

            Actually, I think it could, they just have to get their timing right, have a decent distro or 2, and a little cash in the bank to weather the storm. If done right, it would put them in a great position before the inevitable meltdown happens.

            Think about it from dell's point of view: Would you rather lose some money and market share while helping stake a solid and tenable future position, or watch your supplier (MS) drive everybody to the competition (Apple)? Dell might not make as much profit with a PC loaded with Ubuntu rather than Windows (at least int he short term), but they make no money if the customer buys a Mac.
              • by chris_mahan (256577) <chris.mahan@gmail.com> on Thursday April 19 2007, @05:21PM (#18805277) Homepage
                People have this amazing realization when they see their computer running 1 month straight with Linux and Mac: Windows was a piece of crap, and it is not normal to have to reboot more than a 1-2 times a year. By that point, they are ready to blame everything on Windows, not the PC manufacturer.

                As far as games: They follow the money.

                The problem with games and Linux is that if a game runs in linux, it can be trivially copied to another machine (blame the geeks) so copy protection and all that does not work at all. Running as a service also is not so hot. See valve's latest troubles.

                Ultimately, the Personal Computer (PC) is not a gaming machine to most people. It's a tool to Get Shit Done (term paper, email, research, or work-for-hire), and those people are Dell's bread and butter.

                I suggest that Dell is going to put together a Ubuntu-ready line of desktops and laptops, price them aggressively, and cause the Microsoft meltdown. Remember: The best way to predict the future is to invent it. (Alan Kay)

                I am not saying they will be successful, but I can guarantee Michael is thinking real hard on how to make it work. By August 1st 2007 is my guess, but maybe sooner (no later than that for sure).

        • You're forgetting... (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Jeff Molby (906283) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:35PM (#18804621)

          However, Windows does not stand on its own and requires hardware to run.
          ...Microsoft has the cash to enter the hardware business by the end of the month if they wanted to. They'd have some serious catching up to do, but Dell's business model is pretty simple to duplicate for anyone with enough resources.
      • by puppetluva (46903) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:37PM (#18804661)
        There is no contest here: Microsoft runs the show because they are virtually an OS monopoly for the vast majority of customers that Dell has.

        Role play it out. If MS refused to let Dell sell Windows, then Dell would die (or shrink significantly). If Dell refused to sell Windows, then Dell would die (or shrink significantly). Microsoft has plenty of other vendors to sell their OS, Dell doesn't have plenty of in-demand OS's to sell (trust me- I wish linux counted, but that is nowhere near the volume business of selling XP/Vista).

        For future scenarios, this is the basic rule of supply chain economics. Think of this chart.
        Producer -> MiddleMan -> Distributor

        As you go towards the right, your power increases in all cases EXCEPT where someone to the left has a monopoloy (or somewhat close to it). Wallmart is all the way to the right and all they sell are commodities, that's why Wall mart can gouge their suppliers. Dell wishes they were in the same boat, but they have a monopoly to the left.

    • I've worked with Vista a bit on VMware for work and I think I would eventually want to upgrade to it. I just don't want to have to pay an arm and a leg for hardware to really use its full feature set, so I'm waiting at least until SP1 comes out because then the hardware I really want will be less expensive. If you're curious what I was using to run it in VMWare, I was using VMWare Workstation 5.5.3 on a computer with an Intel Core 2 CPU 6600 @ 2.4 Ghz and 2 GB of RAM. I gave 512 MB of RAM to the VM, and
    • Isn't it not true that you do not want to not install Vista on your Dell computer? Cancel or Allow?
  • by benzapp (464105) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:22PM (#18803573)
    Long live Windows XP
  • Wow (Score:5, Insightful)

    by geekoid (135745) <dadinportland.yahoo@com> on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:24PM (#18803601) Homepage Journal
    this means the hating of Vista is stronger then the hating of previos OSs.

    Good, Maybe MS will take a hint....
    • Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)

      by walterbyrd (182728) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:29PM (#18803685)
      This also means the hating of Vista is stronger then msft's influence over dell. You know that msft must hate this.
    • Re:Wow (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Rosco P. Coltrane (209368) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:31PM (#18803707)
      I think you're wrong here: as hateful as XP was, it was a relief compared to such gems as Windows 98 or ME. Frankly, if Microsoft was smart, given the relative acceptance of the latest iterations of XP as a stable and useful OS (in Microsoft metrics of course), they would have kept pluging holes and making it better one patch at a time until it was finally good. But of course this doesn't make them big bucks, so instead they embarqued on this stupid Longhorn fantasy and this is the result: people are happy enough with XP (and justly wary of any new Microsoft product) that they don't want Vista.
      • Re:Wow (Score:4, Insightful)

        by gad_zuki! (70830) on Thursday April 19 2007, @05:02PM (#18805015)
        MS could take your advice and keep building on XP, but they would charge, just like APple charges for the next "version" of their OS. Essentially, SP2 should have cost 150 dollars, but it was free. I seriously doubt windows users want MS to act like Apple.

            A clean-ish break from XP is actually a good idea, but the implementation didnt go off so great. I wouldnt be surprised if by the time Vista hits SP1 it will have some love come its way, the same way XP did, which from what I remember on these boards was "just a new 2000 skin, dont buy it" "ripoff" "conspiracy to blah blah" "raw ports will destroy the net" "home version wont join a domain, run!!" "system restore didnt work in ME so it wont work in XP" "WMP and DRM!" etc.
      • Re:Wow (Score:4, Informative)

        by paganizer (566360) <<thegrove1> <at> <hotmail.com>> on Thursday April 19 2007, @08:39PM (#18807339) Homepage Journal
        Do NOT tell me that you are implying that Win98 is anything like WinME.
        When it comes to usability/ stability in major versions of windows, it goes something like this:
        Win2k (any version)
        Win2k3
        WinXP Pro (only recently was I convinced to not lump XP Pro in with home)
        WinNT 4
        Win98SE
        WinXP Home
        WinNT 3.51
        Win98
        Win95
        Vista
        Win3.x
        WinME
        Win2.x
        I never tried Windows 1.0
    • Re:Wow (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jomas1 (696853) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:37PM (#18803801) Homepage
      I think you are partly right. Vista is receiving much more hate than Microsoft and most PC manufacturers thought it would but I doubt Vista deserves or is hated as much as Windows ME was. The fact that Dell feels the need to sell XP again may indicate that Dell has lost faith in Microsoft's "Reality Distortion Field" more than anything else. Everyone talks about Steve Jobs' RDF while neglecting to mention that Redmond has convinced people that they always need to upgrade and have no choice but Microsoft for the last 12 or so years. People far from the fringes now know that both Apple, Linux and XP are viable options for many folks and that means Microsoft's free ride is ending.
    • Re:Wow (Score:5, Funny)

      by suitepotato (863945) on Thursday April 19 2007, @05:19PM (#18805261)
      this means the hating of Vista is stronger then the hating of previos OSs.

      I can feel your hatred... It makes you strong... Gives you focus... A powerful Sith Lord you will become!
  • by Orig_Club_Soda (983823) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:25PM (#18803621) Journal
    ...whether we buy VIsta or XP?
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      MS has a massive dev cost to recoup for Vista. If nobody buys Vista then that's a failure to make back the money they spent.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        While true at face value, the purchases today are probably mostly from people who would buy the PC with Vista or XP. Either way they're buying a Windows license, so assuming the OEM price is the same, it financially makes no difference to Microsoft.

        If anything people were not buying a PC because it would only come with Vista. Which means no sale at all for Microsoft. So Microsoft overall makes more money by at least selling another copy of XP.

        Of course there are secondary costs, like lower sales figures
        • True, as a company, giving them $100 is giving them $100 (or $20, or whatever, I don't know exactly how much they get per copy from Dell).

          However, if they spend a billion dollars developing Windows Vista, and then they only sell $800M worth of Vista-related crap, because everyone else is still buying XP (because Vista sucks that badly), then they've effectively 'lost' $200M on Vista, because it didn't generate as much in profit as it took to develop. It's not lost in the same sense of the money you blew on blackjack in Vegas is 'lost,' but it shows that Vista was a very, very bad investment, and it'll probably make them not meet their projections to their investors.

          It doesn't really hurt them as much as make them look like a bunch of idiots.
    • by SuperKendall (25149) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:30PM (#18803697)
      Traditionally each new Microsoft OS has had a certain percentane of gauranteed sales due to computer makers switching. Having fewer copies of Vista sell means Investors could get skittish about the long term and not value the company as highly.
    • That's a very good question, and in spite of all the theories people will throw around, I'm not sure Microsoft even knows the answer.

      On the one hand, they're still getting paid. On the other hand, I assume they're getting paid less for the copy of XP (but who knows?).

      They could, theoretically, end up getting paid more if they can convince people to upgrade a year from now (XP OEM license + Vista retail license > Vista OEM license). However, most users do not upgrade their OS, and the lack of Vista adoption shows that people might be looking elsewhere for their "next generation" OS. Most likely this is good news for Apple, but also it might mean an increased market share for Linux. People are always looking for new things, and if IT departments don't like where Microsoft is going, it could mean they'll start looking at Linux as a way to upgrade existing computers (without the hefty system requirements).

      Plus, Microsoft has been trying to wrap products together in various ways. For example, Windows Update gives me errors in Vista if I try to use Office 2003, but not Office 2007. Call me paranoid, but at this point I would believe that this isn't entirely coincidental. Also, Office 2007 wants me to install Microsoft's desktop search, which also pushes me towards their "Live" services. They spent a lot of time on Vista making its DRM better so they could collect more licenses on Windows Media formats. Microsoft has been so successful in the past due to this sort of approach-- buying one thing means trouble unless you buy in to their other products. So even if they aren't missing much money in Vista, they might be losing money on things they hoped to push on customers using Vista as the vehicle.

      Either way, I'm sure it's embarrassing for Microsoft. They spent years working on an upgrade to their flagshit* product, and no one seems to want it. That's not a financial hurt, but I'm sure it hurts.

      * it's a typo, but I'm leaving it.

  • by Mockylock (1087585) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:27PM (#18803647) Homepage
    With the last Linux input to Dell and now XP being begged for.. Why doesn't dell have an option on their PC customization site that states,

    "Choose an OPERATING SYSTEM:
    1. Vista 32 or 64 Home
    2. Vista Ultimate
    3. Anything But Vista."
        • by codepunk (167897) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:15PM (#18804377) Homepage
          Why stop there:

          "Choose an OPERATING SYSTEM:
          1. Vista 32 or 64 Home
          2. Vista Ultimate
          3. Windows XP
          4. Windows 2000
          5. Windows NT
          6. Fedora
          7. Ubuntu
          8. FreeDOS
          9. FreeBSD
          10. BeOS"
          11. Mac OS X
          12. I am feeling lucky!
  • Whee! (Score:3, Funny)

    by Junior J. Junior III (192702) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:29PM (#18803683) Homepage
    Now I can order Crap with oldCrap installed on it! Not that crappy NewCrap! I hate NewCrap!
  • by Bobfrankly1 (1043848) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:33PM (#18803747)

    vista NOUN: A distant view or prospect, especially one seen through an opening, as between rows of buildings or trees.
    Well finally, Microsoft creates an OS that lives up to it's name. People like to see Vista as far away from themselves as possible.
    -
    You are moderating this comment -1 "Retarded", Allow or Deny?
  • "Vista Ready" (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Apocalypse111 (597674) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:37PM (#18803805) Journal
    With new computers and top-end hardware running Vista at a crawl, I can't help but think that the 'Vista Ready!' sticker on many new machines just means it would make a really bitchin' XP box!

    Bravo Dell, bravo. Now if you could make just one more leap and offer Linux, we'd be all set.
  • I recall something similar happened with Windows Me where many vendors actually offered machines with Win98SE instead. Is Vista shaping up to be the next Windows Me?
  • by phulegart (997083) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:40PM (#18803855)
    Indeed, as was posted already, it would be nice if Dell just offered the option of several Operating Systems for every computer purchased. Sure, it would drive Microsoft crazy as they want everyone to switch over to their new OS, and thus dump their old computers for ones that will run Vista, but if a company like Dell has the ability to provide what it's customers demand, why shouldn't they?

    From what I've seen from Vista (specifically an install of Vista on a Sony Viao that refused to run the DVD authoring software because the Sony's video wasn't up to snuff), I am not impressed by it. Furthermore, when has Microsoft released an OS that did not need a major overhaul (other than Win2k) soon after it's release?

    There is far too much media hype over Vista, this early in it's release. I can't wait until the equivalent of an SP2 to come out for Vista, so I can chuckle like a maniac. I just wish Dell would expand their offer to all their products.
  • by michaelmalak (91262) <malak@acm.org> on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:51PM (#18804015) Homepage
    It's become clear that IdeaStorm isn't about soliciting ideas from users -- it's about using the web to publicly humiliate Microsoft into letting Dell sell to its customers what Dell already knows they want. It should be called PassiveAggressiveStorm.
    • by IthnkImParanoid (410494) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:09PM (#18804279)
      They'd be in a lot of legal trouble if they called it PassiveAggressiveStorm, since my girlfriend has already patented the idea, trademarked the name, and holds the copyright on a number of creative implementations.

      I kid, I kid.
  • by Jck_Strw (35674) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:09PM (#18804277)
    I bought a new machine about 3-4 weeks ago. Vista was the only option. I asked Sales before I bought it if I could get XP. No dice.

    So when the machine finally arrived, I declined the licensing terms of Vista (I have my own licensed copy of XP) and I emailed Dell for a refund. Two emails later I got $27. This is about half of what the guy in Germany got from Dell Germany (plus he got $8 USD for Works, which Dell US didn't bother to comment on when I asked for that refund).

    Just my $27 worth.

    http://www.headsallempty.org/wordpress [headsallempty.org]

  • by TristanGrimaux (841255) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:33PM (#18804593) Homepage
    Many computers that hardware vendors offers today are under the recommendations to run Vista and yet, they come with Vista.

    So, you buy a new computer with Vista, and your old computer with XP is faster. You call your vendor and you ask him to explain. The help-desks can testify: the user satisfaction is low and they tend to blame the vendor. So the assistant tells you that you should add more memory to your computer... you have 512Mb? You should have 1Gb, or maybe 2! And then, only then, your Vista may run at the same speed in a brand new computer!

    This is hurting everybody's business, and Microsoft asks vendors for patience: "when the modest computer raise to an Intel Core 2 Duo with 2Gb nobody will remember these days... but until then you have to stand by me!"
  • by hxnwix (652290) on Thursday April 19 2007, @05:02PM (#18805025) Journal
    We all know that Microsoft is going to play games with DirectX. And not the fun kind - the buy vista or go fuck yourself kind, wherein the next Halo and the next everything-not-based-on-an-ID-engine will only run on Vista.

    You know how I know this? First, I imagine that I were a huge fucking prick. Then, I ponder how I could screw the world with my massive pricktitude. The logical answer is, make the next DirectX Vista-only. But, in the grand scheme of things, I'm glad that Microsoft will make this move. Windows users obviously need a dick to come out of the screen and smack them in the face daily, or they feel unloved. They are the Mister Garrison of users, I say.
    • Re:Dumb People (Score:5, Insightful)

      by roman_mir (125474) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:46PM (#18803929) Homepage
      Now, unlike this post [slashdot.org], the post of the parent is actually a troll. Haven't you heard an expression: customer is always right?

      It does not matter whether XP is older than Vista. There are plenty of products on the market that are newer and at the same time much worse than the products that preceeded them and the customer is correct to try and get an older better product than to buy into the 'newer must be better' crap.

      XP works for many people, and apparently it works for so many people that Dell had to change its way, this does not imply that people are dumb for choosing an older OS, it implies that XP is a superiour product.
        • Re:Dumb People (Score:5, Insightful)

          by jhfry (829244) on Thursday April 19 2007, @04:08PM (#18804257)
          Obsolete and dated to whom... software is ONLY obsolete when it can no longer support the mission... and it's only dated when the user craves something new.

          I haven't met anyone who has even remotely suggested that Vista was something to crave... especially in the business realm.

          Sure if your a gamer, and can foresee that all the new games will be DX10... Vista is a better bet. If your a business and have a hundred XP machines, putting your new secretary on a Vista box is just a pain to manage . And updating the entire network is out cuz the hardware won't support it.

          Right now... Vista is a LOSING proposition for businesses... and not really that appealing for general purpose users. The only market I can say would be stupid for not going with Vista is the gamer market, and only for the reasons you hinted at... eventually it may be needed.

    • Re:Dumb People (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jhfry (829244) on Thursday April 19 2007, @03:49PM (#18803979)
      Your the dumb one.

      Dell sells to a metric assload of businesses. Most businesses are not migrating to Vista any time soon.

      Additionally, many users REQUIRE software that does not operate properly in Vista... thus they REQUIRE windows XP instead of Vista to have a computer of any value.

      Sure they could choose not to buy new computers... but for a company on a strict 3-4 year lease rotation on their dell machines, or a business that is adding employees, or any number of other situations where waiting is not an option, Windows XP is a must in order to maintain uniformity.

      For example, I have managed networks with several hundred machines broken in 3 groups... each group was on a 36 month lease, so over the course of 3 years, every machine would be replaced with a new machine. A software upgrade would never be done until 100% of our hardware was capable of running the new software... even if that meant waiting to rotate the oldest hardware out. With the new hardware demands of Vista, I have a feeling it will be at least 2 years before organizations that operate the way ours did has the hardware in place to perform a complete migration.