Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

$298 Wal-Mart PC Has OO.org, No Crapware

Posted by kdawson on Thu Jul 19, 2007 08:37 AM
from the tell-me-again-why-dell-can't-do-this dept.
cristarol writes "Wal-Mart has begun selling a $298 PC (Everex IMPACT GC3502). It comes with Windows Vista Home Basic and OpenOffice.org 2.2, as well as a complete lack of crapware: 'Users accustomed to being bombarded with trialware offers and seeing their would-be pristine Windows desktops littered with shortcuts to AOL and other applications will likely be pleased at their absence from the GC3502.' The machine is targeted at the back-to-school market. The hardware is nothing to write home about: a 1.5GHz Via C7 with 1GB of RAM and integrated graphics, but as Ars points out, it should be more than capable of performing basic tasks." Dell sells a low-end PC through Wal-Mart for $200 more, and one assumes it is loaded with crapware. Anybody know for sure?
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Funny (Score:5, Funny)

    by abigsmurf (919188) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:39AM (#19913341)
    Strange how the headline doesn't mention it comes with Windows Vista installed...
  • by iknownuttin (1099999) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:40AM (#19913355)
    "Ooooo, I wonder what Linux distro to put on it?!"
  • One Question (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Eightyford (893696) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:42AM (#19913379) Homepage
    Why not buy used? Wouldn't a used computer be a better deal?
    • Yeah, and why doesn't everyone cook their own food, since it's cheaper? And why doesn't everyone build their own house, since it's cheaper? And why doesn't everyone buy a used car, since it's cheaper? And why doesn't everyone use fluorescent lighting, since it's cheaper?

      And why does anyone bother trying to whack computer geeks with a clue stick, since it's cheaper not to?
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        ``Yeah, and why doesn't everyone cook their own food, since it's cheaper? And why doesn't everyone build their own house, since it's cheaper?''

        These may actually not be cheaper. It depends on how much your own time is worth. Buying a used computer doesn't have to cost you extra time, whereas preparing your own food or building your own house certainly does cost time.

        Also, I do cook my own food, because it's cheaper. And because it's better.

        ``And why doesn't everyone buy a used car, since it's cheaper?''

        Agai
  • by InvisblePinkUnicorn (1126837) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:42AM (#19913381)
    I noticed that the manufacturer's product manager threw in the word "eco-friendly" to describe the computer. Did they really have efficiency in mind when they developed the computer, or is this just part of the recent trend (a la "no carbs/trans fats") to label anything and everything as being good for the environment?

    I guess a computer that has little or nothing to it also doesn't use much power either. But then, my Game Boy is more eco-friendly.
    • by InvisblePinkUnicorn (1126837) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:57AM (#19913603)
      I found this on the processor they're using:

      "With a maximum power consumption of just 20 watts (2 watts average), the VIA C7®-D processor sets new standards..."

      How much do 1.5GHz processors normally consume?
      • by Applekid (993327) on Thursday July 19 2007, @10:04AM (#19914503)
        According to this [amd.com], the Sempron 2500+ runs at 1.4 GHz and had a thermal design profile of 59 W. I assume actual power consumption is greater than the thermal design.
        • by samwichse (1056268) on Thursday July 19 2007, @11:28AM (#19915677)
          Actually, that is incorrect. AMD calculates their TDP as a worst-case [silentpcreview.com] thermal output. From the linked article:

          Thermal Design Power (TDP) is measured under the conditions of TCASE Max, IDD Max, and VDD=VID_VDD, and include all power dissipated on-die from VDD, VDDIO, VLDT, VTT, and VDDA.


          Sam
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Didn't you get the memo? In modern terminology, "eco-friendly" means being wasteful in the most efficient way possible.

      Driving a Hummer once per year --> terrorist.
      Driving a Prius 100 miles each weekend to bounce between parties --> eco-friendly.

      Lighting up a tiny studio apartment with incandescent bulbs --> terrorist.
      Lighting up a mansion full of empty rooms with CFLs --> eco-friendly.

      Running non-eco-friendly computer 8 hrs per day --> terrorist.
      Running eco-friendly computer non-stop -->
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          You may be surprised to know that many common TFTs still use significant amounts of power, even when in standby (some even when off!).

          Compared to a PC that runs at over 100 W, it probably doesn't matter too much, but if your PC uses about 20 W, it matters if your monitor uses 1 W or 20 W.
  • Has VIA improved? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by athloi (1075845) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:43AM (#19913407) Homepage Journal
    Last time I checked, their CPUs were erratic, their chipsets flaky and their reputation mainly derived from making cash register and micro-PC machines that were for one-app use and no manic power user antics. Has VIA improved?
  • Comparison (Score:5, Informative)

    by eldavojohn (898314) * <my/.username@@@gmail.com> on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:44AM (#19913421) Homepage Journal

    Dell sells a low-end PC through Wal-Mart for $200 more, and one assumes it is loaded with crapware. Anybody know for sure?
    Well, from the product page of the $500 "Dell Dimension E521 Desktop PC w/ AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor" [walmart.com]:

    • # Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Edition
    • # NVIDIA GeForce 6150 integrated graphics
    • # Dell USB keyboard and USB 2-button mouse
    • # Integrated 10/100 Ethernet
    • # Integrated 7.1-channel audio
    • # 56k PCI data/fax modem
    • # Microsoft Works 8.5
    • # Adobe Acrobat Reader 7.0
    • # Roxio Creator Basic
    • # McAfee Security 30-day trial
    • # Earthlink application software
    • # Windows Vista PC-Restore
    • # 1-year limited warranty and at-home service
    Having experienced all the above software (with the exception of Earthlink application software whatever that is), I'm going to say that yes, it is loaded with crapware. Scariest one on that list would probably be the earthlink application software because that's the most generic name for a product I can ever think of.

    The other differences between these two machines is they have comparable memory, DVD burner & GPU, the Dell's hard drive & CPU are a lot better. The ArsTechnica article mentions upgrades at a price, you could probably get the IMPACT up to the Dell range and get it close which is probably pretty important for the average consumer who doesn't want to deal with the ordeal of reinstalling Windows just to get a clean slate.
  • Minimal crapware.. (Score:5, Informative)

    by tji (74570) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:45AM (#19913451)
    It's not totally crapware free. From the Specs: Norton Internet Security(TM) 2007 (90-day subscription included)

    They could have chosen a free AV package, like they chose a free office suite (or even a free operating system). But, they went with the try-now buy-later package.
    • by l3v1 (787564) on Thursday July 19 2007, @10:15AM (#19914649)
      It's not totally crapware free. From the Specs: Norton Internet Security(TM) 2007 (90-day subscription included)

      They could have chosen a free AV package, like they chose a free office suite


      Even more, with the Norton stuff installed that 1.5ghz via cpu will feel like a 800mhz one and with constant hdd scratching it will feel like it swaps all the time. There are dozens of - even free - av sw that are at least as good and need much less resources - which is point to consider given there's only 1gb of memory and vista on it. I just made a 750mhz duron machine usable again last week by replacing that norton 2k7 stuff, they just wondered how could that be...
       
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      They could have chosen a free AV package,

      Are you sure about that? While I obviously don't know any details of the discussions between "freeware" AV companies and PC makers, I doubt that AVG would let the company bulk-install even the freeware AVG version. They would probably treat installing it on 100k computers as a corporate install, and AVG charges for those.

      Norton is only willing to pay to put their version on since it's crippled and they expect people to pay up when the trial ends. It's a lot d

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Also: anyone know how a 1.5GHz VIA C7 performs? Comparable to a 1 GHz PIII at least?

        Yeah, the Epia and JetWay microATX/miniITX boards use that line, and I have one with that exact chip.

        I'd say it compares favorably with the PIII, clock-for-clock. It works pretty well for a general purpose PC. You can use all your normal "productivity" apps no problem, it can handle audio just fine, some video (they usually have hardware MPEG2 and now even MPEG4 decoders, though I don't know what the exact setup mentio
  • by tji (74570) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:50AM (#19913505)
    At $300, it's hard to beat.

    The VIA C7 is a nice low-power CPU, with enough kick for most server tasks. At only 20 Watts power, it's well below any of the Intel/AMD options.

    Too bad there isn't a version without the Windows tax.. this box at $250 would be even better.
  • by edwardpickman (965122) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:53AM (#19913555)
    Does it come with a hamster to run the power supply or are those extra?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:54AM (#19913557)
    What's up with the inflation of specs you need to have to write reports and do other school stuff ? When I was in high school ("Gymnasium" as we call it over here in Europe), I wrote all papers and reports the first year using Amstrad CPC 6128, Arnor Protext on ROM and a 9-pin printer. Later I used a 486 and WP 5.1 (Now with Graphics..). Today I have a 900 MhZ AMD K6, 512 Mb memory, and still I can use InDesign, Word 2003 and Excel to do 100s of pages of technical manuals, without any slowdown at all. Yes, I do not play games, but do you have to ? I would be happy to have a 1,5 GHz with 1G or RAM. So stop saying that it's "Nothing to write home about". My guess is, the people that don't play games never use even a fraction of it's powers.
    • Yeah, I really believe you have a 900MHz K6. (I know, you meant an athlon or duron as even K6-2s maxed out around 500MHz or so)

      Other than that, I agree -- most non-gamers would be fine with it.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Isn't the answer obvious?

      How would stores shift the mid- and high-end PCs, given that most people don't play modern 3D games, if they didn't inflate the specs required to perform more common tasks?

      I've even seen stores recommending at least a mid-end PC if you want to surf the web. Presumably the low-end ones aren't powerful enough to run a web browser...
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      When I was in high school ("Gymnasium" as we call it over here in Europe)
      In Austria or Germany. In Scotland, England and Wales it's "Secondary or High School". In France, "Lycée". etc etc.

       
  • ....but will it run Linux?

    Even with the MS tax, can you realistically buy or assemble a full PC with those specs for that kind of price? Sounds like a good entry-level Linux box to me!
  • Four years ago, when I was just starting university, I bought a $200 bargain basement GNU/Linux PC from Wal-Mart (unfortunately they don't sell these anymore). I used it as a personal server in my dorm room. Yeah, it was severely underpowered compared to my desktop, but it was just fine for using to tinker around with GNU/Linux. I used it for a good three years until I had enough money to buy something better. But what an incredible value that was, three years of experience for only $200. This latest machine looks to be good for exactly the same thing. Buy it, strip off Windows, put on GNU/Linux, and it makes a good first server.
  • by hal2814 (725639) on Thursday July 19 2007, @09:15AM (#19913839)
    A few months ago I bought a Dell with an Athlon X2 3600, 1GB RAM, 80GB HDD, and XP Home off the Dell Outlet site for $260 shipped. It was "Previously Ordered New" which generally means the original owner never even opened the package. I'll take the crapware and an X2 over no crapware and the C7.
  • Windows Tax Refund? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Doc Ruby (173196) on Thursday July 19 2007, @09:33AM (#19914075) Homepage Journal
    Is there any way to calculate how much of that $298 pays for its Windows OS?

    Does MS just give them away "free" to companies like Everex/Wal-Mart, just to protect their platform marketshare for selling Windows apps (or reporting marketshare)? Isn't all of that anticompetitive, probably explicitly so under the various (though largely unenforced) monopoly verdict decrees?

    Or can you get your MS tax refund if you delete it and send it back? Has anyone pulled that off lately? Or maybe, possibly, convince Wal-Mart to save the expense, and sell a cheaper PC with Linux installed - or nothing installed, but with a Linux LiveCD/netinstaller?
  • It's all good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PhotoGuy (189467) on Thursday July 19 2007, @09:43AM (#19914217) Homepage
    I know a lot of people hate Wal-Mart. I personally don't, I guess I haven't watched the right documentaries yet, to tell me what to think, or something.

    And yeah, Wal-Mart probably isn't doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, nor to boost open source, nor to satisfy the few Linux people. Their motivation is undoubtedly to make money, and they usually do that by giving consumers what they want (a cheap item, that does the job).

    Well, we should be proud that OpenOffice is seen as a viable enough too in their delivery of such a product, especially one aimed at students. It really is a big step in the right direction, and validates Open Source to a very large degree.

    -dale
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)


      On the other hand, many colleges either provide Microsoft Office for a very low media fee, or for a very low student discount price.

      So perhaps Wal Mart is figuring that students will just buy the cheap PC and then get the $12 version of MS Office from school. They probably include OOo as the default just to have something to provide. "Use this until you get MS Office from school..."

      Just guessing.
  • by addbo (165128) on Thursday July 19 2007, @10:26AM (#19914795)
    OK... so Dell.ca has a very decently spec'ed computer for about $100 more... (I'm sure there are similar deals in USD... it's $399 CDN... just did a quick conversion on XE.com

    http://www.redflagdeals.com/deals/main.php/alldeal s/pop7days/#e26983 [redflagdeals.com]

            * AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 4000+
            * Windows XP Professional
            * 1GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 533MHz - 2 DIMMs
            * 160GB SATA Hard Drive (7200RPM)
            * 16x DVD+/-RW Drive
            * Microsoft Works 8
            * Integrated 7.1 Audio, Video
            * Dell USB Keyboard, Optical USB Mouse
            * 1 Year Next Business Day Onsite/In Home Service and Tech Support

    I think it's worth it for $100 more... even with possible crapware... XP Pro itself is worth like $150 OEM. (I'd still rather of XP than Vista at the moment)
    • The computer needs to do web browsing, email, and word processing. The occasional song or pic shared with friends is to be expected too. However, as long as the hardware is shitty enough to prevent the owner from becoming hooked on WOW, Eve, or any other time-vacuum, then it will probably be the best $500 the parents DIDNT spend to get their kid a better computer. And with all that free time, they just might do their homework! For the education market, this product gets an A+ from me.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        When I was in university residence (1999-200), my roommate convinced his parents to get him a $4000 on the assumption that he couldn't play games on it (he was quite a game nut) when all along he had intentions of running games on it. Anyway, we ended up playing a lot of Quake 2 and NFS2, not because we couldn't get Quake 3, or NFS 4, but because there was a lot of people in residence who couldn't run those games. It was more fun to have an 8 player game of Quake 2, then to spend the time to find 2 other
      • I concur 100%. If I'm going to buy my kid a new PC (big "if"), it will have ZERO bells and whistles. If he/she wants to play games on it, the upgrade costs are coming out of their pocket. As a parent who will likely be paying for their college, I don't feel obliged to provide for their entertainment.

        In fact, while I'm thinking of it, this PC might be a good buy for my parents who badlu need to upgrade their old workhorse. Those specs will run XP just fine!
      • The hardware is nothing to write home about: a 1.5GHz Via C7 with 1GB of RAM and integrated graphics, but as Ars points out, it should be more than capable of performing basic tasks.

        I'd just like to point out the absurdity of describing such a powerful computer with terms normally used to describe a 4-function calculator.

        When I entered college, I paid for my own 8086 turbo, running DOS 3.something, and a 1200 baud modem. It had a 32MB RLL hard drive. It was also "more than capable of performing basic tasks

        • Where to start. (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Joce640k (829181) on Thursday July 19 2007, @09:09AM (#19913757) Homepage
          "email takes substantial amounts of ram and cpu power..."

          The machine has 1Gb RAM. My laptop has a quarter of that and seems to browse the web and run Office perfectly well.

          As for CPU... I'm pretty sure it will cope with the heaviest of messenger sessions.

          I've actually convinced myself that this computer is worse for students than I thought in the first place.

          You need to climb down back to the real world. Very few people need garanteed sub-millisecond response times (or even knows what they are).

          • Re:Where to start. (Score:5, Interesting)

            by Andy Dodd (701) <atd7@nOsPam.cornell.edu> on Thursday July 19 2007, @09:52AM (#19914329) Homepage
            I got through a good portion of my senior year of college (2002) using an ancient 233 MHz Pentium-MMX laptop. with an UPGRADE to 128M of RAM (from 64).

            This included:
            Word processing
            Web browsing
            IM
            Matlab simulations
            Circuit design with Eagle

            I did have a 1 GHz Athlon Thunderbird available, but with the exception of the Matlab stuff, I took no productivity hit. In fact, if anything my productivity was higher because I could work while laying on my apartment's nice comfy couch instead of sitting at my desk. (This is why I used the laptop when I had another machine available.) In some ways the slowness of the Matlab stuff actuall increased productivity because it forced me/allowed me to multitask while my simulations ran.

            Admittedly, the laptop ran Linux. Running Vista on this machine is likely crippling it so that 1GB RAM might indeed be insufficient.
              • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

                Ok, I'll bite...

                My college computer was an Exidy Sorcerer with a 2.5 MHz Zilog Z80 processor, 32KB RAM and a Radio Shack portable tape recorder. I used it to do my compiler and assembler class assignments. In Microsoft 8K BASIC. My instructors loved it because they had never seen one before.

                The CS lab had an Imsai 8080, but was used by the card reader and was unavailable to students.

        • I think you're being slightly pessimistic here.

          All this stuff runs just fine even on 512M of RAM. I use one such machine for work, which includes most of the stuff you listed (word processing, web browsing, matlab, lots of compiling, lots of PDF, image editing, etc.), and it runs just fine even with dual monitors.

          Let's not even go into the "uphill both ways" stories of what computing power we used in college to do these exact same things.

          I think the GP is right, the kids will whine because they can't play games. Been there, done that :)
        • 1 Gig ought to be enough for anyone. Heh.

          Seriously, though, if the choice is between a student having this $300 computer, and a student having no computer, which do you think is better?

          Not every parent can afford to spend $1000 or even $500.

          I'm sure accountants, geologists and every other field have their specific apps. These aren't tweaked to run on low-end hardware.
          Yes they are. Any app designed for business is tweaked to run on a variety of systems, programs are designed to run on systems that were state-of-the-art more than five years prior. The business upgrade cycle used to be around three years, but now it's getting larger every day -- and businesses tend not to buy top-of-the-line systems anyway.

          Back to educational use -- very few disciplines of study require apps that really use a lot of cycles. And when they do, typically those apps are run on university computers, not students' PCs. Those apps are also typically used for high-level research, not basic undergrad stuff.
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            Clear your download manager list. Processing the names of all those pr0n clips slows the download initiation down.

            P.S. I may be kidding about the pr0n, but not about the root cause of the slowdown.
    • I know that Walmart are a bunch of pricks, but seriously a 1G PC with 80G HD is more than enough for a students LEARNING needs.
      Sure, if you include MP3's, porn, FPS games and bittorrents it may not run so well, but still $289 isnt a bad price for that.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I wish they sold stuff like this elsewhere. I'd have no problem paying £300 for one, it'd make a great router/whatever with the Via chip in it.
    • by TheWoozle (984500) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:45AM (#19913449)
      "Just any junk hardware"? I'll spare you the long list of systems I've worked on, but please allow me to ask you to get off my lawn.

      I've done statistical analysis on a Zenith Data Systems 8088 system and written games for a Commodore 64, so please don't refer to anything with an 80 GB hard drive and 1 GB of RAM as "junk hardware". I know junk hardware, and that, sir, is no TRS-80.

      The fact that the OS needs 1 GB of memory to function is what's wrong with the world! Seesh, kids these days...
      • by mwvdlee (775178) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:53AM (#19913543) Homepage
        I wholeheartedly agree!

        Apart from the fact that, if you're going with Windows on this kind of hardware, a version prior to Vista would've been smarter, everything should suffice for it's intended purpose.

        Problem is that Microsoft probably offers OEM's Vista for near free but charges a premium for XP, the system would have probably been more expensive if it included an older version of Windows.
    • by Silver Sloth (770927) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:46AM (#19913461)

      More likely than anything, I'll just keep building my own.
      Ok, you can build your own. So can I. However there are many, may people out there who either can't and/or don't want to so supplying an entry level PC at an entry level price is good marketing. There's plenty there to run a browser and OO which will cover most homework assignments. Maybe, when the users find that it won't run the latest games software they'll be forced to upgrade and start the IT learning experience.
        • I believe part of their point was that if they built their own, they wouldn't have to repartition/reformat the hard drive in order to remove Vista...
    • by LWATCDR (28044) on Thursday July 19 2007, @09:37AM (#19914119) Homepage Journal
      Okay let's take a look at the "real world"
      1. It has Vista Home Basic so no Aero. It probably will not be stressing the harware.
      2. It has a gig of Ram. I have NO problem running XP media Center and OpenSuse on a system with a Gig of ram as a duel boot. Open Office runs just fine.
      3. It is under $300.
      4. I has a DVD drive so yes you can watch DVDs on it.
      5. It has IE on it. The sad truth is some sites require IE to work correctly. This is changing but having IE to fall back on does make life easy.
      6. It has Open Office. Which gives you a lot of good tools.
      7. Did I mention it is under $300. Less than a PS/3 or 360?
      8. It only has an 80 gig drive. So it has 6 USB ports. Think Geek was selling 80 Gig external drives for under $50! Those are much better to put your music and videos on anyway. When the RIAA and Montag come knocking at your door they my not find your external drive with your MP3s or your collection of books.
      9. It uses SATA for the HD. I bet you could put in another or a Larger drive if you really wanted it.
      10. So it only has one gig of ram. It has an open memory slot. Go buy an extra gig.

      For a High school kid or even a college student this would be a good machine. Frankly a lot of businesses could work just fine off one of these. It also doesn't use a lot of power thanks to the C7 CPU.

      As to just building your own. Not everyone wants to build their own PC or even knows how. This machine with an LCD monitor would be a handy little system for many people.
      I don't know if it has any open slots but even without them you could add WiFi with USB. You could also add a TV tuner so it could be you kids TV as well.
      In other words it seems like a good deal for some people. The fact that it will not play the latest and greatest games I can only see as a plus.
    • by CaffeineAddict2001 (518485) on Thursday July 19 2007, @08:50AM (#19913497)
      Uhm. Not one person on slashdot has said anything positive about wal-mart.

      You are just the kind of dog that likes to pee inside the house I guess.
    • by kebes (861706) on Thursday July 19 2007, @09:05AM (#19913723) Journal
      I just love the people who treat Slashdot as a single entity with a single opinion... and then proceed to point out hypocrisy in Slashdot because it holds two seemingly incompatible notions.

      Interestingly, they usually describe this as "Groupthink" ... which is basically the notion that everyone starts supports the popular opinion. That is, that everyone agrees with each other to be part of the crowd, and suppress dissenting views. The irony, however, is that the very hypocrisy that is being referred to is telling evidence that groupthink is not as prevalent as it is assumed to be.

      The fact is that Slashdot users have a variety of backgrounds and opinions. On every issue, there is a distribution of opinions. On some subjects we all seem to agree (e.g. "technology is good"), on others we mostly agree (e.g. "Linux is cool") and on others still there is so much disagreement that you will see completely contradictory and opposing opinions both modded up to +5 (e.g. "global warming is a myth").

      Your example, of disliking MS but supporting Wal-Mart, is a total strawman. The general impression I get is that there is a consistent but not universal dislike of Microsoft's business tactics, and that there is solid division of opinion on the Wal-Mart issue. I've seen insightful comments both supporting the good that Wal-Mart does as part of a thriving free market, and insightful comments about the harm that Wal-Mart does as a megacorp that only cares about money. Both sides make good points and the most reasonable stance is probably a nuanced view that takes into account all of these factors. To suggest that Slashdot has a single opinion on these subjects betrays a serious lack of perspective on your part.

      Your closing sentence, "I wish I lived in the fantasy world of most Slashdotters", again is deeply rooted in the fantasy that Slashdot is a single entity with a single mind, and that any self-contradictory statements it makes represent its own insanity, rather than diversity of opinion among its constituents.