Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Google Sky Now Available Through Your Browser

Posted by Soulskill on Sun Mar 16, 2008 08:21 AM
from the ooooh-shiny dept.
Ars Technica brings word that Google Sky, formerly only available as an extension of the Google Earth software, is now accessible through your web browser. The interface of Google Sky is quite similar to that of Google Maps, complete with search and alternate views by spectrum. The story also mentions (and more importantly, links) ten of the more interesting sights. We discussed Google Sky's initial release last year. Quoting: "Visible light only shows us a small picture of the entire universe; non-visible spectra such as ultraviolet (UV), infrared and X-ray hold a whole other world of information. Here is where Google Sky becomes very cool. There are three more sections that highlight fantastic images from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory, the GALEX Evolution Explorer (UV), and the Spitzer Space Telescope (IR). What makes these very cool is that under each selected body there is a slider that will change the displayed image back and forth between the visible and invisible spectrum."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Google Earth Gets Star-Gazing Add On 142 comments
Tom F writes to mention BBC News is reporting that Google has released a new add on for Google Earth that will allow users to search a 3D rendition of over 1 million stars and 200 million galaxies called Google Sky. "Optional layers allow users to explore images from the Hubble Space Telescope as well as animations of lunar cycles. [...] Users can overlay the night sky with other information such as galaxies, constellations and detailed images from the Hubble Space Telescope. Imagery for the system came from six research institutions including the Digital Sky Survey Consortium, the Palomar Observatory in California and the United Kingdom Astronomy Technology Centre. "
[+] Science: Microsoft Launches WorldWide Telescope 167 comments
esocid writes "WorldWide Telescope, developed by Microsoft's research arm, knits together images from the Hubble Space Telescope, the Chandra X-Ray Observatory Center, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and others. Windows users (only) can browse through the galaxy on their own or take guided tours of different outer-space destinations developed by astronomers and academics. The application allows viewing from different wavelengths such as X-ray, visible light, and hydrogen-alpha radiation. Business Week has a review and some background on the project, which has been in development for years. Google Sky beat them to the punch but Business Week opines that WWT's interface is superior."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • What would be the repercussions if, for example viewing certain systems in the x-ray wavelength was forbidden by some wild alien race? Would they go after the entire earth, the individual people who looked, or what? Ideas?
    • What would be the repercussions if, for example viewing certain systems in the x-ray wavelength was forbidden by some wild alien race? Would they go after the entire earth, the individual people who looked, or what? Ideas?

      The Intergalactic RIAA has the copyright of all the visible and invisible wavelengths outside the milky way.
      Viewing that without any license is piracy.
    • By analogy to google earth and restricted areas on earth, I would assume the intergalactic aliens would sue Google.
    • They would, no doubt, be aware that Earth knew nothing about intergalactic law. Either they'd recognise that Earth is not a part of intergalactic society, and would therefore be excluded from both benefits and punishments, they'd destroy us, or they'd include us in whatever society they have. I'm leaning towards the first, because it would explain why the other two haven't happened yet.
      • Everyone knows that ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law. Just you wait, I guarantee the first signal SETI discovers will be a summons.
    • Would they go after the entire earth, the individual people who looked, or what? Ideas?
      This really hasn't been a problem since the Romulans signed the Khitomer Accord.
  • Cool. By the way, will they be blacking out (or "modifying") parts of the sky that contain things we're not supposed to see?

    And what about Google OrbitView for virtual flights in and out of the satellites (and debris) around the earth... or Google CanalView for Mars? This could be a big funding source for NASA...

  • by DutchMasterKiller (1003736) on Sunday March 16 2008, @08:39AM (#22764938)
    We probably won't be able to zoom in on Tranquility Base, where the Eagle hasn't landed *bleep*
  • Come on, now! Somebody come up with a pithy post vis a vis Eliot, the telescope, and his lady friends. It's another 36+ hours until Jon Stewart is on the air.
  • Anyone know why my Google Maps pages suddenly turned blank sometime last fall, when I apt-get upgraded a whole bunch of apps in Ubuntu (sometime after the release of 7.10)? I don't know which upgraded app caused it, because there was a week or two with a lot of upgrades on different days, after which maps.google.com stopped working, and I can't roll each back just to get back the Google maps - there's too many, and I'm too busy. I've searched the Web several times over the past 3-4 months, but no sign of an
    • by IamTheRealMike (537420) on Sunday March 16 2008, @09:43AM (#22765184) Homepage

      Hey Doc. I work on Maps and sometimes debug weird customer-reported problems like this.

      Here's The Real Mikes three step guide to diagnosing and fixing Google Maps problems:

      1. Create a new browser profile, using "firefox -ProfileManager". This effectively clears your cache, cookies, extensions and other settings that can interfere with maps. Does it work? If so, go back to your main profile and (in this order): clear your cache, delete your google.com cookies, revert any changed settings (especially network settings) in about:config, and finally start disabling extensions and then plugins (in particular, RealPlayer if you have it). If you have any web accelerator type mods to your Firefox, revert them too.
      2. If that doesn't work, the next step is to look at your home router. Disable any firewall it may have, in particular, watch out for the "max pending connections" or "synflood protection" settings. Make sure they're either off or set really high. You may need to reset your router after doing these things.
      3. Finally, try loading a satellite tile URL directly in your browser: http://kh0.google.com/kh?n=404&v=25&hl=en&t=trtqttrrttqts [google.com] - do you see a tile? If you get a connection timeout, but regular google.com works, see step 2 above. If you see an error page talking about viruses, make sure you're only using Google Maps/Earth to view imagery and not any other app.

      To be honest, from your description it sounds like the first step will yield the most fruit - I include the other two for completeness (if people see Maps load just fine but you don't see the roadmap or satellite images themselves, those two steps can help). Probably your cache has corrupted somehow, either that or some of the files Maps needs aren't loading. If you can't figure it out and know how, I'd suggest watching what happens with the Live HTTP Headers extension.

      • by johannesg (664142) on Sunday March 16 2008, @11:56AM (#22765944)
        You would think Google might have some sort of site where you could find these solutions. Some sort of searching system would be ideal.
      • Thanks for helping :).

        I got the tile [google.com]. Before I blow away all my useful history/state with (firefox -ProfileManager), is there another, less intrusive way I can test that technique? Like creating a new user with no profile, or creating them and running (firefox -ProfileManager) to blow away their profile? Maybe I have created a root user profile and should blow that away?

        As for my router, it doesn't have a problem with max connections, which is rather high. And I don't want to turn off synflood protection. I
      • Sorry, but I've looked into this extensively from the user side, on multiple different systems and browser setups, and you're wrong. This is what happens in userland:

        If your connection speed TO GOOGLE drops below about 20k (as can easily happen on slow dialup), Google maps WILL cease sending satellite-view tiles. It doesn't matter how many times you clear your cache, profiles, whatever (been there, done all that) ... it simply will not work after your connection speed drops below a certain point. It stops s
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Thanks, I figured it out, and fixed it :).

        It was a config:

        general.useragent.extra.firefox.InternetExplorerSignature
        user set
        string
        Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0)

        I deleted the value and (right-clicked to) reset it, restarted Firefox, and all was well :).

        Deleting cache and cookies didn't change anything. I used (firefox -ProfileManager) to create a test profile, which worked OK with maps.google.com . So I progressively copied directories files from my failing profile to replace their counter

        • and deleted it using the about:prefs page GUI in my failing profile


          Actually, that's a mistake. It's in the about:configs page.
      • by Jugalator (259273) on Sunday March 16 2008, @09:22AM (#22765116) Journal
        So what component in Ubuntu is at fault then, so he can roll it back?

        Somehow I think you're better at giving a hand waving reply here than knowing what you're talking about in this case.
            • Not true, you get whatever people feel like posting. That's the nature of the site. You, sir, are welcome to take your inanities right here. Just don't expect them to be heeded.
      • Except that I haven't seen anyone else with Ubuntu mention this problem, even though Ubuntu is the most popular desktop distro.

        So despite your personal dislike of Ubuntu, there's no evidence that Ubuntu itself is to blame.
      • I don't have any extra ad blocking installed or enabled, other than the default Firefox popup block.
  • by RobinH (124750) on Sunday March 16 2008, @09:03AM (#22765026) Homepage
    Wouldn't Google Sky be more useful if you could enter a lat/long, and it could give you a picture of the sky from that location at a given time, related to NSEW, etc.? Then you could actually see that the bright object in the SE sky in the morning really is Venus, etc.

    The problem with it currently is that there's no frame of reference. On Google Earth, you generally look at everything from some frame of reference, like you start with your house or the Eiffel Tower or Hoover Dam and start looking around from there.
  • by isorox (205688) on Sunday March 16 2008, @09:19AM (#22765104) Homepage Journal
    It seems a little buggy. Having found Mars, and found Venus, I decided to do what I do on google maps, just for a laugh. I guess I hoped for a "3 degrees up, 7 minutes right" or whatever, but instead I got some interesting results.


    - 33 Results for venus to mars -
    Head north on Blue Shore Dr toward Lakeside Dr
    Blue Shore Dr turns left and becomes Lakeside Dr
    Lakeside Dr turns right and becomes Shaded Trail
    Turn right at Highway 109
    Turn left at Highway 207 ....
  • infrared (Score:4, Interesting)

    by TheSHAD0W (258774) on Sunday March 16 2008, @10:13AM (#22765342) Homepage
    The wide angle infrared view [google.com] is especially striking. I'm assuming the black slashes indicate missing imagery and not alien activity.
  • Sensors located a Borg cube at 16h 15m 45.00s and -42 degrees 46' 16.4". Resistance is futile.
  • Once again Google Creates something that is Hypercool. Well, it will be once they work out the bugs in the display.
  • So like... does this mean that Google CAN take the sky from me?

    And is this like giving it back?

    I'm confused now...
  • Google Sky seems to weigh in on whether Pluto still counts as a planet. If you search for "Planets", you're directed to the planets layer, which I couldn't find (and isn't found if you search Google Maps help either). But click on "The Solar System" and there's Pluto, still included, no matter how many other small round bodies may be lurking about the solar system. Way to stand up for the little guy, Google!

      • A dwarf planet is not a planet. Yeah, try wrapping your head around that one. They used some scientific formula that takes its mass compared to the mass of all the objects around it and how far away those objects are, and all the other planets have results thousands of times bigger than the dwarf planets'. For instance, about everything in the vicinity of Jupiter has either crashed into it, become a satellite, or was ejected far away from it. As for Google Earth, I hear it's worse than the programs already
  • Have a look at www.sky-map.org - its really nice, and has a convenient overlaid sidebar where you can browse interesting phenomena like the Bubble Nebula without knowing its Calder Number.
  • by operon (688118) on Sunday March 16 2008, @11:17AM (#22765728) Homepage
    Search: "Extraterrestrial life" OR E.T. OR Borg OR "Death Star" "No results"
  • Unluckily, that interface works only because nobody lives in the polar region (well... yes, nearly nobody). For the sky, polar area is a frequently watched part of it, which is hopelessly distorted. Perhaps they should make an alternative view for those?
  • I guess Google finally got the hint after seeing such a large number of image searches for "Your anus".
  • Am I the only one seeing the text in the historical map mirrored left-to right?
    Maybe this was on purpose? (it was necessary to reverse it so that the superimposed maps would match and it was considered more important to preserve the original image than to make it more useful by being able to read it normally)?
    Got it! the real reason is that the brain of the original developer has a codec that automatically filters the map and mirrors it in a readable way, it must be the ffdshow in my brain that needs an upd