Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

eBay Australia Makes PayPal Mandatory

Posted by samzenpus on Thu Apr 10, 2008 03:04 AM
from the what-about-dubloons dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Australian press are reporting that eBay is using Australia as a guinea pig to trial a new policy where all other modes of payment are barred except for PayPal. If successful, eBay will roll it out to other markets."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Aussie Reserve Bank Eyeing eBay's PayPal Policy 63 comments
Bulldust writes "Regular readers will recollect the recent story that eBay is forcing Australian users over to PayPal or COD as the only forms of payment in June 2008: eBay Australia Makes PayPal Mandatory. It now appears that the Australian Reserve Bank will consider throwing its weight behind users, should the eBay policy be deemed to breach trade practice and competition laws."
[+] Your Rights Online: eBay Australia Delays PayPal Change Indefinitely 56 comments
Daehenoc points out news that eBay Australia has postponed their ban on all forms of payment other than PayPal. The ban had already been delayed once, but eBay Australia has now decided to simply wait for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to determine whether or not the move is acceptable. We discussed the beginnings of this story back in April.
[+] News: EBay Abandons Plans For PayPal Monopoly 277 comments
An anonymous reader writes "eBay's has lost its fight to ban all payment methods except PayPal. When Paypal originally announced the scheme it was to be global, but they began with a dry run in Australia to test the reaction of government and consumer authorities. In the public slanging match that followed between eBay and the regulatory ACCC, eBay spammed users claiming it was fighting for 'safety benefits for consumers.' Fortunately the consumers won. Conceded eBay vice president Simon Smith, 'While we disagree with the ACCC's draft notice, we have decided to withdraw the notification to stop any further confusion and disruption among the eBay community.' Nevertheless eBay insists PayPal is now always offered as a payment option. Have big corporations finally learned that they can go too far? More chillingly, if eBay had launched the scheme in America would they have gotten away with it?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by afaik_ianal (918433) * on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:04AM (#23021740) Journal
    It's not just in the media, either. They emailed us all the following:

    Hi

    Because you are a valued seller we'd like to let you know about some changes to eBay.com.au [ebay.com.au] that are going to make our marketplace an even safer place for you to buy and sell.

    These changes will be introduced in two stages:
    From 21 May you must offer PayPal on all your listings as well as currently permitted payment methods.

    From 17 June you will only be able to offer PayPal on your listings and pay on pick up (i.e.paid for when picking up the item).

    Pay on pick up can only be offered in conjunction with PayPal. No other payment methods will be permitted.
    A small number of exclusions [ebay.com.au] will apply to these changes.

    Get the lowdown on how these changes will affect you.
    "These changes may have some significant implications for how you trade on eBay.com.au, which is why we're organising a series of Q & A events to discuss them with you in person.

    Come along and hear from me about why eBay is making these changes. We'll have a number of eBay and PayPal staff available to answer your questions and explain the changes in more detail.
    We are also conducting a series of online workshops about the changes throughout April and May, so keep your eye on the announcement board for details."

    • by ranulf (182665) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:24AM (#23021840)
      Also, Ebay UK looks like they're not waiting for the results of the Australia experiment. From an e-mail from them this morning:

      Starting in late April, eBay will now ask all sellers to offer PayPal on their listings. This means that even more items on eBay will offer buyer protection.

      This is one of many new initiatives that eBay and PayPal are doing to make it much more difficult for bad sellers to operate on eBay. As a result, you'll notice a dramatic improvement in quality when buying on eBay.
      • by Bert64 (520050) <[moc.eeznerif.todhsals] [ta] [treb]> on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:36AM (#23021908) Homepage
        Except that many of the worst sellers actively use and are supported by paypal...

        See http://www.ev4.org/wordpress/category/fastmemorymanscam/ [ev4.org]

        Basically if you buy an item from a seller, and it's wrong, defective, etc, paypal will give you a refund but only if you ship it to the seller's "registered" address, using a shipping service with online tracking. Because of this, sellers can register an address in a foreign country, sell low value goods, ship you garbage, and then it becomes uneconomical to send it back so the seller keeps your money.

        Aside from the fact that that when selling something, i'd prefer *not* to use paypal, as i have to increase the cost of the item and shipping to cover paypal costs. I much prefer personal collection, i can demonstrate the item to prove it works, and i receive the full amount i sold the item for in cash.
        • by psychicsword (1036852) * <[moc.drowscihcysp] [ta] [ehT]> on Thursday April 10 2008, @05:14AM (#23022310)
          Using paypal doesn't eliminate problems it just reduces the problems and gives you a few tools to resolve them. Also isn't paypal owned by eBay? if so it makes sense that they want it to be required by eBay users.
            • by electrictroy (912290) on Thursday April 10 2008, @10:29AM (#23025092)
              Right now, in the U.S., paypal is not required. You may accept check, money order, credit card, or some other internet pay service.

              If Ebay Did make paypal mandatory, that would be a violation of Antitrust/monopoly laws, because it stifles competition & limits customer choice to zero. I'd start calling my various contacts within the U.S. and Pennsylvania government to see if I can talk them into Prosecuting Ebay in a court of law. Ebay's done a lot of dumb decisions lately, and pardon my French, but they are _______ me off. This would be the final straw to make me stand-up and demand justice & punishment.

              I use Ebay like a garage sale, selling-off used but still "like-new" items.

              But they have steadily made me feel unwelcome, as if they don't want my business, and I'm sick of it. Time to tear-down that arrogance the same way AT&T, Microsoft, and the CD Cartel were brought to task. Remind them of their true position in society (servant to the customer).

        • by MikeFM (12491) on Thursday April 10 2008, @05:36AM (#23022366) Homepage Journal
          PayPal sucks for seller's too. They have the bad habit of doing things like deciding to lock your account and refund all your recent transactions without adequate explanation or any means of recourse. Who knows if they actually give this money back to the buyers or if they just keep it.

          I for one refuse to use PayPal ever again. I think we need something better than credit cards for buying and selling online but PayPal isn't the solution. It's became very evil since eBay bought it. I've considered creating my own alternative but I think to compete with PayPal and credit cards any alternative needs several major backers such as Amazon and iTunes if it is to have any hope. I'm surprised none of them have formed together to form an alternative as it'd seem they could easily boost their profits by cutting the expense of PayPal and credit card processing fees. If they saved a dime per transaction with the volume they do it'd be a fair savings.

          A free, easy to use, well advertised, auction/store + online cash alternative to eBay + PayPal is a killer app waiting to happen. Lots of people hate eBay and PayPal. Lots of alternatives exist but none I've seen are both easy to use and well advertised.
    • by catwh0re (540371) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:52AM (#23021994)
      Hey ebay,
      It was nice hanging with you when we were younger, but since then I can feel we've grown our separate ways. I still remember our first dot com bubble burst like it was yesterday.

      But, sadly it seems that you're hanging out with a new crowd these days and you've changed, I can't put my finger on it, but you're somehow different. It seems like you don't really care about me anymore, and you don't seem to have coped very well with some of the new people in town. [ebay.com]
      I'm sorry to say it, after all of this time, but I'm seeing someone new [google.com] they're so much quicker and dealing with each individual companies policies still feels easier than dealing with your friend paypal.


      I'm sorry it couldn't work out between us.
      Signed,
      The Internet.

    • by eiapoce (1049910) on Thursday April 10 2008, @04:23AM (#23022142)
      Read as:
      "You have been giving already a lot of money to us. Nevertheless starting 17 june we want to get more money from you, just because we can.

      We are so confident that we don't even feel the need to justify it by adding the usual bullshit about security issues with other payments methods.

      Take note that the purpouse of these innovations is ultimately to fuck you, our loyal user, in the ass. So you are welcome to join us to discuss your "position" on our Q&A Forums where our dedicated masters will educate you (in bdsm techniques)

      For those of willing to submit without futile resistance we will grant some recreational activities including the online brainwashing course on how we did successfully turn a user supported community into a pyramidal scheme lookalike wich will benefit your ebay masters for a loong time"
      I guess it's not far away the time when google gets the slight hint of business opportunity.
        • by dangitman (862676) on Thursday April 10 2008, @05:35AM (#23022362)
          Wait, who is "fine" with this bullshit? Not many people outside of eBay/PayPal management, I'd wager.
        • by eiapoce (1049910) on Thursday April 10 2008, @05:36AM (#23022372)
          I tell you what's up with me.

          I honestly sell my used stuff on ebay, and I am constantly discussing matters with buyers. If a problem arises ebay does either nothing or its best to screw me, This happens when I am the buyer and when I am the seller. And when selling even if a problem does not arise I am supposed to pay twice at least for the same item: Listing Fees, Final Value commission, Paypal submission fee.

          By reklessly complying with those rules I managed to make 150 positive feedback and a couple of negs... guess where the negs come from? Paypal costumers. Ebay/Paypal on the other hand managed to make 200+â out of me wich is extraordinary unfair since their costs are just website hosting/band and staff. Also they are dropping the feedback system wich will lead the marginal utility of selling through them 0 (Call it costumer un-fidelization)

          See any reason to be "not satisfied"?
  • Paypal blows (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Clay Pigeon -TPF-VS- (624050) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:05AM (#23021750) Journal
    It looks like it is time to look for alternate online auction houses.
    • by Digestromath (1190577) on Thursday April 10 2008, @04:39AM (#23022194)
      Might I suggest the auction houses in Darnassus or Thunder Bluff, they generally tend to be underpopulated, so you won't lag out when you visit them.

      Oh you meant ones where you can sell real goods? Damn...

  • by DiSKiLLeR (17651) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:09AM (#23021758) Homepage Journal
    Well, I guess its definitely time to look for an alternative, and pull my highly rated account from ebay :(

    I refuse to use paypal due to having bad experiences with it in the past.

    In Australia i'd say paypal for paying for ebay auctions is hardly use AT ALL since in Australia its far easier and quicker and cheaper to pay using direct deposit with netbanking. That is THE standard pay to pay here. Why use a middle man? And now to be FORCED to use one? I don't think so.
    • I no longer use my paypal account. After getting burned bad by paypal i was done. My paypal account was linked to my ebay account. My paypal account was emptied and left with a negative balance. Had i used ebay again paypal would have just took all the money. Remember people they are not a bank. They are just some people holding onto your money. How would you trust someone you dont know to hold your money?

      Maybe you think my story is isolated but read online. Paypal routinely freezes peoples accounts only to never let them have their money.

      Check out paypalsucks.com
      • by johnw (3725) on Thursday April 10 2008, @04:58AM (#23022256)
        The similarities between Paypal (not a bank) and eBay (not an auction house) are quite marked. They both seem to want to desperately defend there "not a ..." position because it means they can have the benefits without the responsibilities. Like so many others I have long refused to use Paypal because of their shifty behaviour. Until Paypal is a proper bank (with all the safeguards that that requires) and eBay admits to being an auction house (ditto) I won't be using either.
      • by phcrack (207416) <adam&stfu,ca> on Thursday April 10 2008, @05:52AM (#23022444) Homepage Journal

        Remember people they are not a bank.
        Actually, in Europe they are a bank. From the German PayPal site:

        PayPal wird EU-weit von der PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. & Cie, S.C.A. (PayPal Luxemburg) als Bank geführt und von der Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) reguliert.
        which translates to something like "PayPal is run EU-wide as a bank, and is regulated by the CSSF."
      • Remember people they are not a bank. They are just some people holding onto your money. How would you trust someone you dont know to hold your money?

        Maybe you think my story is isolated but read online. Paypal routinely freezes peoples accounts only to never let them have their money.


        But why would you let them "hold onto" your money?

        I have a PayPal account and use it fairly often. I don't keep any money in there. What point is there in doing so? If I want to pay for something, I have PayPal take the money off my credit card. (They cannot do so without authorization, by law.) If I'm being paid for something, I wait until I have the payment notice and then I immediately have that money transferred to my bank account.

        Even if you're a bulk seller, I can't see how it's all that difficult to just go in there once a day and transfer the balance to a bank account. It takes less than one minute.

        PayPal should be seen as a conduit between buyers and sellers; that's it. If you use it that way (and it is the proper way to use it), then their service is fine. There's no reason to leave a bunch of money in your PayPal account. You may as well give it to some guy on the street and ask him to hold it for you.
        • by cas2000 (148703) on Thursday April 10 2008, @06:51AM (#23022720)
          since you're talking about GBP, i'd bet that your positive experience with paypal in that situation is entirely due to the fact that you live in a country where paypal is regulated like a bank, a country where paypal can't disclaim responsibility merely by claiming "we're not a bank". paypal fixed the problem because they had to, there were UK laws & regulations on your side that forced them to do the right thing.

          if you lived in the US, you'd be screwed. paypal is effectively unregulated there. hell the yanks can't even properly regulate their banks. regulation is unwanted, and there's been a lot of propaganda to make it a dirty word, because "regulation hinders business"....which is much more important than preventing consumers from being ripped off.

          like you, i live in a country (AU) where paypal is regulated similarly to banks. after many years of wanting nothing to do with paypal, i finally gave in and got a paypal a/c a few years ago (but only after i got a second debit card - no way was i going to give them direct access to my bank account). now, though, i'm seriously considering cancelling both my paypal and ebay accounts in protest.

          not that they'll care one little bit about my protest/boycott - there are way too many stupid sheep in the world who'll just accept ebay/paypal's "rules" without question and without even thinking about it.

  • by Kupfernigk (1190345) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:10AM (#23021766)
    I refuse to use Paypal because I am not convinced it is covered by banking regulations. These may not be perfect (understatement of year to date) but are surely better than nothing. Can anybody explain to me in what way entrusting funds to Paypal offers any real and accessible legal protection against fraud?
    • by edwardpickman (965122) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:24AM (#23021838)
      Don't worry they aren't covered under bank regulations and you are largely at their mercy since there aren't specific regulations covering them. I'm amazed the government has turned their back on them since they are functioning as a bank but are unregulated. They scare me and I've canceled my account several times but certain things require them already. I largely let the account stand inactive. If we loose other options with Ebay I'll probably drop them myself. The whole thing is so dodgy I haven't hardly bought anything on Ebay in years. It used to be pretty cool but I don't trust ebay, the buyers or sellers, I've been screwed by all of the above. Just not worth the hassle and risk.
      • by johnw (3725) on Thursday April 10 2008, @05:00AM (#23022266)
        Vote with your feet. I have several times told retailers that I'd like to buy their product but I won't use Paypal. Usually they offer an alternative means to pay. The few who haven't offered an alternative have at least known *why* they lost my business.
    • by Bashae (1250564) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:31AM (#23021874)
      When Paypal europe moved to Luxembourg last year, due to EU regulations it had to become subject to banking rules. More information here: http://www.finextra.com/fullstory.asp?id=16927 [finextra.com] I don't think it's a bank outside europe though.
  • by Kenja (541830) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:15AM (#23021780)
    From a sellers perspective I can see the desire to take other forms of payment, but as a buyer there is massive appeal for the use of PayPal. With how its integrated into eBay it makes conflict resolution much simpler and gives you a means of tracking and proving receipt of funds.

    The only thing I would want to see added to the service is an escrow option. But the idea of sending a wire transfer, check or money order to some unknown entity on the internet sounds like a bad idea.
        • by freedom_india (780002) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:25AM (#23021846) Homepage Journal
          Nope. If it were a bank, the merchant would pay for the loss or the bank will bear it.
          As banking laws go, once the money is in your account, nobody (except by court order) can debit your account except you.
          Nobody.
          Similarly, they can't suddenly block access to your account without informing you in writing.
          PayPal OTOH can debit your account and drain it fully and then refuse to explain why plus put you in call waiting.
            • by freedom_india (780002) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:36AM (#23021902) Homepage Journal
              Not exactly. When a credit card holder disputes a debit, the bank contacts the merchant first and asks him to verify the debit he made. It also gives the merchant details about who disputed what, etc, plus a specific time.
              Within the time, if the merchant cannot produce proof, the cardholder's complaint is sustained.

              At NO time has the bank the legal authority to debit or even block access to the funds in merchant's account.

              This is different from paypal, which is under no obligation to contact you, can and will block your account, and withdraw funds from it without due process.

              And that is why paypal is different from a bank.
              • by vux984 (928602) on Thursday April 10 2008, @06:08AM (#23022516)
                my god you people miss the mark by a long shot. the merchant is the CC company providing the funds.

                No. Sorry. You are the one way off the mark.

                As someone who has owned a business I can assure you, the merchant is the *business owner*. The other party is typically called a "bank", "merchant bank", "merchant account provider", "acquiring bank", or "acquirer" ... but the *merchant* is ALWAYS you.

                Now, from the "merchant account providers" point of view...

                "In the Visa and Mastercard rules, the merchant's processing bank [merchant account provider] is 100% responsible for all the transactions that the merchant performs. This can leave the provider open to millions of dollars of potential losses if the merchant operates in an illegal or risky manner and generates many chargebacks. The providers pass this cost on to the merchant, but if the merchant is fraudulent or simply does not have the money, the provider must pay all the costs to make the card holder whole."

                Which is probably what you are talking about. So, Yes, its absolutely true that THEY (the merchant account providers) are liable for any fraudulent charges, and THEY must cover it. If you, as a cardholder phone Visa and ask who pays if your card is stolen, they'll just tell you 'not you'. If you persist they'll tell you that (according to PCI DSS [Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard]) the cost is borne by the bank providing the merchant account ["merchant account provider"].

                However, as it says in the above quote, while they are responsible, they *invariably* try to recoup that cost, plus fees, plus fines, from the merchant (that would be YOU). They only get stuck holding the bag and taking a loss, if they CAN'T get the money from you...and that only happens if you're insolvent, or you've fled the country, or something equally drastic. If you are an upstanding reputable business in good standing, they WILL pass that cost on to you, and you WILL pay.

                So as far as your card issuer or VISA is concerned yes, the liability rests with the merchant account provider. But you're daft if you don't think they in turn pass that liability to you via your 'merchant account' agreement/contract, and collect on it vigorously.

                Look it up.
        • by eiapoce (1049910) on Thursday April 10 2008, @04:32AM (#23022168)

          What do you think would have happened if it had been purchased with a stolen credit card, check book, etc? Same thing.
          Bullshit. CC companies have insurances against fraud. Once you get the money it is yours. Only exception is that you participate in the scam, in this case you get a prison term, wich is something that paypal is NOT providing to the scammers.
  • by mcrbids (148650) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:16AM (#23021788) Journal
    Ebay's success comes because it's a moderator - a broker in a sale. It connects two parties together, and nothing more. When it does that, Ebay is golden. It's UI is nice, it's search feature generally works, and that's why it's a multi-billion dollar corp.

    But if they cram paypal down my throat, I'll swallow something else. I'm already at the point where Ebay is my LAST resort, since their ratings have been so thoroughly gamed I have no idea who I'm really dealing with, anymore.

    Forcing paypal? No way. I refuse. What's the next halfway decent auction house? Truthfully, I've already moved much of my online purchasing to froogle.com....
  • double dipping? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by unfunk (804468) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:16AM (#23021794) Journal
    That's fucked up. So now, not only do I have to pay eBay a fee for listing my item, I also have to pay PayPal a fee to get my money? No thanks.
  • PayPal is not a Bank (Score:4, Interesting)

    by freedom_india (780002) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:17AM (#23021798) Homepage Journal
    Firstly, although PayPal may have a banking license in switzerland, it is not a bank per se and the Australian Reserve Bank will not guarantee my money with paypal if any.

    Secondly, As a bank i have recourse to my money when i demand it. Period.
    With paypal i have to jump through many of their fraud hoops which assumes, as a recepient, am guilty of money laundering unless i prove myself to be innocent. That is not how a bank operates. And if a bank will not pay a lawfully presented demand for payment, i can force the bank into liquidation single-handedly. (Long before that the Reserve bank will intervene, but that is beside the point).

    Thirdly, PayPal does not follow banking laws in opening accounts with it. Not even in fact the [in]famous SNOW accounts of Citi in early 1980s in US (Negotiated Order of Withdrawal).

    Fourthly, if PayPal goes under, who will repay my money with them.

    I think the ARb should intervene and either force Paypal to be a "bank" (which is unprofitable for them), or close down.

  • Competition laws (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mikechant (729173) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:22AM (#23021824)
    If successful, eBay will roll it out to other markets.

    If they roll it out in the EU, this could fall foul of competition laws; the credit card companies/banks could presumably complain of being shut out, given Ebay's near total dominance.

    (Obvious the same could apply in other countries, but the EU currently seems keenest on actually enforcing competition laws.)
  • by Chrisq (894406) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:25AM (#23021844)
    If its mandatory, make it free (for use on payment for ebay items, charging for other uses is OK). How can they justify a double charge?
  • by falsemover (190073) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:31AM (#23021872)
    I've already emailed a complaint through their contact system. I've had many happy transactions trough bank transfer from both a buyer and seller perspective. This is the ENTIRE reason for the rating system - so you know who you are dealing with before the transaction. I will cancel my account tomorrow and simply buy new over the internet. With the overshopping that goes on on ebay, I'll probably even save some money and get new stuff rather than second hand. Ebay is going the way of Microsoft, way way down under.
  • Of course.. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nitelord (824762) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:32AM (#23021878)
    "If successful, eBay will roll it out to other markets." Of course they'll be successful, all other modes of payment are barred!
  • Not just Australia (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mattbee (17533) <matthew@bytemark.co.uk> on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:38AM (#23021914) Homepage
    In the UK (3x as many people as Australia) I got an email to say that Paypal *must* be offered as a payment option, not that it must be the only payment option. So I imagine they are testing different policies in different smaller markets. It makes sense to try to streamline it and get a few more % of each sale - eBay is still complicated compared to Amazon's sales process and Amazon seem to get away with taking almost 10%.
  • hmmm. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by apodyopsis (1048476) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:40AM (#23021924)
    blam! the sound of eBay shooting itself in the foot.

    as a buyer paypal has some good points - limited protection, traceability, etc.

    but as a seller it sucks big time as just adds another set of fees to your sale.

    eBay nicks nearly 5-10% of the sale price including paypal.

    if they made paypal free and just part of the eBay service then there might not be so many arguments, but to enforce it and then make additional money is such a blatent money grab that this will backfire big time.

    buyers may like it, but if there are no sellers then there will be no buyers. it will be interested to watch how the number of items for sale changes in ebay.au after this is enforced. anybody know how we can plot a graph of items for sale vs. date to track the impact?

    I'm guessing that there will be such a negative impact in .au that they will not dare make the same change to .com .co.uk etc.

    from eBays point of view they are being pressurized to add more traceability into their system by law enforcement worried about fraud and fencing - so they are really between a rock and a hard place here.

    one thing is certain - behind every internet giant is a number if "would bes" who will seize every opportunity to steal business, so eBay will have to tread carefully here.
  • by ivi (126837) on Thursday April 10 2008, @03:43AM (#23021934)
    Doesn't eBay -own- PayPal...?!?

    Well, forcing your customers to use your subsidiary company (or any supplier, for that matter) sounds pretty anti-competitive to me... and - if the Aussie comtetition watchdog barks loudly enough, eBay may have to play fair again.

    I'm sure credit card vendors will scream "Fowl!" soon...
  • Anti-Trust issues? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 10 2008, @04:00AM (#23022040)
    Ebay is pretty much THE auction site on the net, and they own paypal. this sounds like leveraging a monopoly in one market to effect an advantage in an unrelated market and anti-competitive behaviour to me.

    the EU has given microsoft plenty of shit over the years for anti-competitive behaviour, it will be interesting to see if/what kind of flack ebay attracts over this.
  • by Peregr1n (904456) <ian.a.ferguson@gmail.com> on Thursday April 10 2008, @04:08AM (#23022074) Homepage
    I use eBay occasionally but my email address and bank details are barred from PayPal, so if this happens I won't be able to use eBay at all.

    I'm barred because I (as a seller) was scammed and left £300 out of pocket - when I tried to complain to PayPal, I couldn't even get through to a human being, and they automatically assumed that I was the fraudster, and shut down my account. Ironically, they were slower at shutting down the scammer's account on both eBay and PayPal, despite my attempted warnings, and they went on to scam a few other people before they were finally barred.

    By the way, is there a decent alternative to eBay, or have they got a complete monopoly?
  • by jonwil (467024) on Thursday April 10 2008, @04:18AM (#23022118)
    How is this NOT a violation of the trade practices act?
    Anyone know the right way to get the ACCC to investigate this?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 10 2008, @05:59AM (#23022476)
    As I discovered to my cost recently, if you accept PayPal payment you are effectively also accepting Credit Card payments (via PayPal). Unless your sale qualifies for seller protection (mine arbitrarily didn't, and unless you check it's not easy to realise you're not covered), then you are totally open to something called 'chargeback'.

    Chargeback is basically fraud protection - if someone's credit card is stolen they can recover any lost money. But where do you think this money comes from ? From the credit card issuing company ? From PayPal ? Nope - the fraudulent transactions are reversed, so the person who originally received payment ends up footing the loss. That's maybe all well and good when you are talking about large companies and small levels of fraud, but now with eBay we are talking about literally millions of small time sellers, and probably hundreds of thousands of fraudulent transactions.

    What this means is that if you accept PayPal payment, unless you are very careful about being 'protected' (and even then, who knows how far that protection covers you) you will be totally liable for any credit card fraud that transpires when someone purchases from you. The chargeback can (and does) occur MONTHS after the original transaction.

    I strongly advise everyone NOT to accept PayPal payments at all. If eBay is forcing PayPal onto sellers, then I recommend ditching eBay - the risk of fraud is too big. You might as well leave your items on the street with an honesty box.
        • by Ihlosi (895663) on Thursday April 10 2008, @07:24AM (#23022940)
          But how do you fight against (the large number of) serial fraudsters who claim they never got the goods,



          In my jurisdiction, the buyer carries any risks from the point on when the seller ships the item. The seller only needs to prove he shipped the item, if the buyer never receives it he needs to take it up with the shipping company. If the buyer is concerned about losing the package, he should feel free to take out some sort of insurance (at his own expense).


          The buyer could still claim that the package didn't contain the item in question, but that would mean he's openly accusing the seller of fraud and there are significant punishments for doing so unfounded.

  • by jrumney (197329) on Thursday April 10 2008, @06:29AM (#23022614) Homepage

    It seems that with this, and the Amazon [slashdot.org] news from a few days ago, some of the companies that experienced rapid growth during the first .com bubble by offering what the customer wants vs the old model of trying to control the market are now switching to the old model. They control enough of the market now that it probably seems safe to their board to do this, but they are forgetting how rapidly they themselves were able to grab market share, and seem to be missing the fact that if someone new moves into the space they are vacating, the market share that the new company takes will come almost entirely from their customer base. They should also keep in mind that it won't necessarily be a startup that moves into their space; Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are all contenders that could jump in and cause a massive shift in the market almost immediately.