Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Stealth Paint From German Inventor Werner Nickel

Posted by timothy on Sun May 04, 2008 02:51 PM
from the peek-a-boo-you-can't-see-me dept.
Gerhardius writes "Werner Nickel sounds like a Disney-style wacky inventor. He moved to the UAE to develop his previous invention: he had bred a worm whose excrement made it possible to grow radishes in the dry desert sand. That project failed so he moved on to the next item on his agenda, naturally a radar absorbing paint. While it certainly is not unique, there is some interesting history behind the development, and a proposed civilian use."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by KDR_11k (778916) on Sunday May 04 2008, @02:54PM (#23293982)

    he had bred a worm whose excrement made it possible to grow radishes in the dry desert sand.

    But can that excrement allow humans to see the future and travel faster than light?
    • But can that excrement allow humans to see the future and travel faster than light?

      If you don't get it, the OP is a reference to Frank Herbert's novel Dune [amazon.com] where the chemical produced by the sandwords of the desert planet Arrakis proved the key to faster-than-light travel by giving starship steersmen superhuman powers.

      While I admire Herbert's creation of a science fiction novel based on modern studies of desert ecology, I felt the whole spice deal weakened the hard sci-fi goodness of what otherwise would have been a less fantastical book.

      • The spice expands consciousness! :D
        • The spice expands consciousness! :D
          The geriatric spice extends life, and in large doses, expands consciousness. It is needed for space travel. The spice is the most precious substance in the universe, and it is only found on one planet.

          What I never understood, is how they ever got to Arrakis in the first place, if you can't get there without the use of a substance only found there :-S
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            You can also go there with the use of really smart computers to do the navigating, but those are banned in the Dune universe due to a war with sentient machines ~10000 years before the time of the Dune books.
      • I felt the whole spice deal weakened the hard sci-fi goodness of what otherwise would have been a less fantastical book.
        You need unobtanium to go faster than light.
        And you need to go faster than light to reach another planet while you're still young.
      • the chemical produced by the sandwords of the desert planet Arrakis proved the key to faster-than-light travel by giving starship steersmen superhuman powers.

        To be utterly pedantic, the spice provided the key to faster-than-light navigation rather than travel/speed. The only way to navigate safely at super-light speed involves information that travels faster than light. It's an interesting point that all other Sci-Fi seems to have ignored; assuming we could travel faster than light, navigation would be

    • he had bred a worm whose excrement made it possible to grow radishes in the dry desert sand.

      But can that excrement allow humans to see the future and travel faster than light?
      First, the sleeper must awaken.
    • walk without rhythm and it won't attract the radish?

      • by porkmusket (954006) on Sunday May 04 2008, @03:02PM (#23294036) Homepage
        LSD in the dessert? Far out man, I'll take another brownie please
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          When light hits a surface, it can be reflected, or transmitted. If' it's transmitted then it's going to go through the paint and strike the metal and be reflected.

          What are you talking about? Matt Black paint, applied to a mirror, does not result in a surface that reflects visible light.

          Paint can certainly absorb photons, and translate the energy to a wavelength no longer recognizable as related to the source.

          How did the parent post get rated so highly? Has the Slashdot community fallen so far that it's blin
          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            When light hits a surface, it can be reflected, or transmitted. If' it's transmitted then it's going to go through the paint and strike the metal and be reflected. What are you talking about? Matt Black paint, applied to a mirror, does not result in a surface that reflects visible light.

            precisely my point. the black matte is many wavelengths thick in the visible. Radar has enormous wavelengths compared to the paint thickness. If black mat were 100th of a wavelenght thick then either 1) it would impedance match badly and therefore reflect 2) it would not be thick enough to absorb light.

            Paint can certainly absorb photons, and translate the energy to a wavelength no longer recognizable as related to the source.

            duh. this is known in physics as "absorption".

            How did the parent post get rated so highly? Has the Slashdot community fallen so far that it's blinded by the mere mention of "scientific" concepts like index of refraction?

            Maybe because I actually know what the hell I'm talking about?

  • by ccozan (754085) on Sunday May 04 2008, @02:55PM (#23293984) Homepage

    worm whose excrement made it possible to grow radishes in the dry desert sand..
    .. the radishes are quite ... spicy?
  • Hmmm, I could see that being problematic. So a marginally informed Cessna owner wants to give his new plane a paint job. Then it's "Cessa to tower. Requesting clearance to land" - "Tower to Cessna, you are not showing up on radar and do not exist."
    • Re:Civilian use? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Brandybuck (704397) on Sunday May 04 2008, @02:59PM (#23294008) Homepage Journal
      Except that commercial airports use transponders, not radar, to locate planes.
      • by JustOK (667959) on Sunday May 04 2008, @03:04PM (#23294056) Journal
        So, paint the transponder.
      • Re:Civilian use? (Score:5, Informative)

        by Deadstick (535032) on Sunday May 04 2008, @03:22PM (#23294148)
        Oh, jeez...

        The transponders are in the airplanes, not on the airports. They help the airport's radar to see airplanes.

        A transponder is a combination of a receiver and a transmitter that receives the pulses from a radar; generates a train of pulses that encode the identification and altitude of the airplane; and transmits them back to the radar. That way the guy sitting at the radar not only sees the airplane more easily, but knows which airplane it is and how high.

        rj
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          He said they were *used* by them, not *on* them. Time to level your reading skills.
        • The transponders are in the airplanes, not on the airports.
          I'm pretty sure they both have one.
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          That's really not how transponders work. They do not receive the radar pulses and send them back to the radar with ID information encoded into the pulses.

          They are totally seperate and unrelated systems operating on radically different frequencies. The only things they have in common is that the base station antenna is typically mounted somewhere on the rotating radar antenna so that they are ensured to both be pointing in the same direction, and they generally share a single display, with the information
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            You're describing the distinction between primary and secondary radar. Yes, they're separate systems, but they're both radars. One operates on reflected pulses ("skin painting"), the other on transponded pulses, but they both get their bearing information from the pointing direction of the antenna and their range information from the out-and-return travel time of the pulses. The only difference is that the secondary radar gets information that is furnished by the airborne installation: identification ("squa
      • Static Speed cameras are optical (they take two photos at a fixed interval and measure the distance you've travelled.. it's really simple and undefeatable), and there are mobile optical versions too.. they just switch technology.

        btw. those 'jammers' are useless. By the time they detect the radar it's way too late.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        If you had RTFA, then you would have stumbled upon the following lines:

        In one respect, however, Essen's message is disappointing. Drivers can't expect to become invisible to police radar traps anytime soon. "When an object is moving at such close range," he admits, "even the best shield paint doesn't do any good."
  • so many possibilities, had this been discovered earlier.
  • Drivers can't expect to become invisible to police radar traps anytime soon. "When an object is moving at such close range," he admits, "even the best shield paint doesn't do any good."
    Damn.
  • Uses (Score:5, Insightful)

    by camperslo (704715) on Sunday May 04 2008, @03:08PM (#23294076)
    All that stressful military/terrorist stuff aside, that paint might just be good for silencing cell phones in movie theatres. It's generally illegal to jam any sort of licensed transmission, but creating an environment that weakens the signal is a good workaround.

    Perhaps adding a layer of the paint to some consumer products, like PCs, might be a viable way of reducing the R.F. noise (and security issues that go with it?) leaking out.
    • You don't need this paint to silence cell-phones in a theatre.. conventional construction techniques already exist to block wireless communication.

      Here at the University of Toronto, there are several large lecture halls in the Bahen Institute of Technology building that are shielded, preventing students from using cell-phones, PDAs, wireless internet, etc.

      I suspect in the case of movie theatres they have done some studies and decided that for whatever reason it is a better idea not to shield the movie h

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        if by conventional construction techniques you mean buying rolls of aluminum foil backed wallpaper, then yes, it's quite easy to make a cellphone proof building.

        also there are simple devices that can make cellphones useless by interfering with their broadcast frequency (cellphone jammers) but i would think that aluminum foil backed wallpaper would be cheaper long term than a jammer, the advantage of a jammer is that it can be disabled from when the credits roll until the film starts...

        i think the main reaso
        • I work in a hospital. When I am on call, I go to Blockbusters, not the movies.

        • Re:Uses (Score:5, Insightful)

          by v1 (525388) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:43PM (#23294732) Homepage Journal
          Regardless of who you are, it is not my responsibility to make sure you are available in case of an emergency. If you need to be available, it is your responsibility to adjust your behavior to increase the odds that you are available, given the provided situations you find yourself in. I don't care if you're a doctor with a patient in the ICU, a parent with a sitter at home, or anyone else for that matter.

          A doctor will also be without cell phone service when taking a tour of the Great Mounds Cave. That doesn't mean we should put up cell towers in there. What it means he should not be there while on call. Same goes for a theatre or any other venue where cell reception is naturally or artificially unavailable. Although any venue where a reasonable person would expect cell service but cannot get it, should have reasonable notice. In this case a note on the ticket or at the door to the theatre.

          I'm so tired of people trying to make me responsible for their bad decisions. That's what your parents are for. While you're under 18. After that, take ownership of yourself.
          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            Regardless of who you are, it is not my responsibility to make sure you are available in case of an emergency. If you need to be available, it is your responsibility to adjust your behavior to increase the odds that you are available, given the provided situations you find yourself in.

            But it is your responsibility to disable the phones of rude and obnoxious people?

            If you want to take that on yourself, why not take a more direct route -- next time someone starts gabbing on the phone go take it away from them and toss it in the parking lot.

            I always leave my cellphone on in the movie theater, so my kids can call if they need me. It's on vibrate, in an inside pocket where the light won't bother anyone, and I don't answer it. If it rings, I leave the theater (I always sit near the ais

      • It's gonna work out real well for a university that blocks out phone calls like that when someone shoots up the school and nobody knows anything about it.

        You'd think safety would be more important than some freshman getting a text with the quiz answers.

  • by zappepcs (820751) on Sunday May 04 2008, @03:13PM (#23294102) Journal
    Think of a more efficient microwave oven. If it can scatter radar signals, it might just be a better coating for the inside of microwave ovens.

    Then there is beamed power applications???

    Perhaps this might lead to a method of shielding astronauts on their way to Mars? If it can deflect/scatter radar, can it be made to protect the Hubble?

    There are literally thousands of applications where some shielding would be preferred to the current methods, especially in Military applications. I think that if he keeps it up, he might well help us discover how to shield from all manner of things. Shielding in Nuclear power plants is an issue that needs to be tackled better.

    Imagine that if it can deal with radar, perhaps there is a way that this can lead to better coatings for fiber optic cables? 30Gbps not good enough for you? How would 100 Gbps with FTTH sound? It's all in how you deal with shielding.

    Anything that is as thin as paint and does the job can lead to major improvements in many other things. I hope something really good comes of this and not just some Patriot Missle avoidance tactic.
    • I'm sorry, but I thought that radiation in a nuclear power plant was completely different from radio waves. Which is why the whole cellphone use causes cancer thing is silly. And why do microwaves need to scatter waves? I thought the whole point was to create a standing wave inside the microwave? I think your confusing EM radiation with ionizing radiation (which is what the problem in space is).
    • Think of a more efficient microwave oven. If it can scatter radar signals, it might just be a better coating for the inside of microwave ovens.

      Antiradar paint does not scatter RF radiation. It absorbs it. If you coated the inside of a microwave oven with that stuff, it would (a) reduce the energy arriving at the food, and (b) heat up the walls of the oven, making your enchilada taste like burned paint.

      You want the walls of the oven to reflect, not absorb.

      rj

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Shielding in Nuclear power plants is an issue that needs to be tackled better.
      Actually, no, it isn't. I don't even think it's been an issue that needed to be tackled better within my lifetime. Nor would this help. 20 cm of rolled steel and 1.5 meters of reinforced concrete provides all the radiation protection you need until the pressure vessel ruptures.
    • Think of a more efficient microwave oven. If it can scatter radar signals

      Chances are that if it works for stealth applications it is absorbing signals instead of scattering them. In the presence of very strong signals it would heat up if that is the case.
      That could still have uses in a microwave oven though, more shielding for the door/cabinet, and perhaps coatings for containers where one would rather generate heat at the container level instead of in the food.
      Perhaps this could make it easier to cook egg
    • That's all good and stuff, but as mentioned, a lot of the radiation you're referring to has a very different wavelength/frequency than what it is currently known to block. And, in high-risk applications, toughness of the coating becomes an issue. What do you do when your nuclear power plant, or space ship, gets a scratch and begins leaking radiation?
  • Will coat a flatscreen with it and mount it on an Escalade.
  • he had bred a worm whose excrement made it possible to grow radishes in the dry desert sand.

    And here I thought you always had to do a worm breeding apprenticeship before learning the radar absorbing paint trade. That's the way my college career councilor outlined it for me.

  • From TFA (Score:5, Funny)

    by CopaceticOpus (965603) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:32PM (#23294636)

    Nickel, who is literally bubbling over with ideas...
    Oh, is he? Does he literally carry a pan around to catch them? Do they literally need to mop up behind him when he walks across the room?
  • by Ancient_Hacker (751168) on Monday May 05 2008, @07:17AM (#23299090)
    Radar absorbing paint isn't as exotic as it sounds. Basically it's paint that is "black" at radar frequencies. Nothing more than iron or ferrite filings in a Rustoleum base. Or better yet, go to an airshow for a free sample. The F-16's usually have some good RAP flaking off by the nosegear cover hinges.

    The japanese have been painting RAP on their skyscrapers for decades now to lessen FM and TV ghosting.

    • Right, but even current (and comparatively primitive, I'm assuming) generation stealth aircraft are pretty resistant to IR sensors (which often lack range detecting ability). The coating doesn't have to necessarily absorb all the energy, it just has to throw it somewhere where the original sender won't pick it up.
    • Re:Energy = heat (Score:5, Insightful)

      by TransEurope (889206) <eniac&uni-koblenz,de> on Sunday May 04 2008, @03:50PM (#23294302)
      Actally the energy of radar is very low, except you stand directly in front of the emitter. Or when was the last time you got cooked by the radar from the airport next to you? You must have really good sensors to detect such low heat. I assume the heat of computers and electronics on board of a plane or the exhausts of the turbines are the much bigger problem for the one doesn't want to be 'seen'.
    • One of the proposed explanations for how it works -- and exactly how it does work is not presently known -- is that it could be "a type of Jaumann absorber, which reflects incoming radar waves in such a way that they cancel each other out". The other way is some type of absorption. Also, do you have an idea of how much energy is put out by the typical radar? I'm guessing even if it fully absorbed 100% of the energy from the radar and converted it to heat, it would be so minuscule as to not matter.