Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

How 10 Iconic Tech Products Got Their Names

Posted by timothy on Tue Nov 11, 2008 01:33 PM
from the slash-dev-slash-random dept.
lgmac writes "Think Windows Azure is a stupid name? Ever wonder how iPod, BlackBerry and Twitter got their names? Author Tom Wailgum goes inside the process of creating tech product names that are cool but not exclusionary, marketable, and most of all, free of copyright and trademark gotchas. Here's the scoop on ten iconic tech products and how they got their monikers, plus a chat with the man responsible for naming Azure, BlackBerry, and more. (What's the one he wishes he'd named but didn't? Google.)"
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • I bet... (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:35PM (#25723847)

    ...it involved a lot of pot.

    • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by JCSoRocks (1142053) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:40PM (#25723923)
      Not really. Naming is actually a really big business and is usually a pretty painful process. I know someone that was a professional namer that worked for a big branding house for a while. The time they spent coming up with names was pretty incredible.

      I never would have believed it if I hadn't seen him working on projects with my own eyes. I always figured a bunch of marketing hacks just got together in a room and tossed around names until one stuck. Maybe I was just biased because that's the way it worked where I was at.
      • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:44PM (#25723989)

        and then there is Apple

        it's a phone, what should we call it? iPhone

        it's a new Mac, what should we call it? iMac

        it handles all your tunes, what should we call it? iTunes

        great, boys, we're done here

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          And since they're apple, the fact that another company (some networking equipment firm no one's ever heard of) had already thought up and marketed an iPhone is no problem whatsoever.

            • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Informative)

              by b96miata (620163) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @05:47PM (#25727077)
              it was InfoGear [streettech.com], who were later acquired by cisco, who later used the same trademark to launch another, unrelated product under the linksys brand. There's a whole blurb about it on the iPhone's wikipedia article. While I never bought any of the products in question, they all seem to have been available from the usual channels at their time of launch.
        • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Funny)

          by No-Cool-Nickname (1287972) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @03:59PM (#25725773)

          it's a toilet, what should we call it? iShit

          it's an intravenous drug, what should we call it? iNject.

          it's an Apple fan boy, what should we call it? iDiot.

          (just a little joke, Macaniacs..)

          • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Funny)

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 11 2008, @04:12PM (#25725937)

            "it's a toilet, what should we call it? iShit"

            In the Health care industy, a shit is callws a 'BM' (stands for bowel movement)

            So an Apple toilet would be called... oh wait, you think big blues lawyers would have an iSue with that?

      • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by paeanblack (191171) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:28PM (#25724561)

        Naming is actually a really big business and is usually a pretty painful process. I know someone that was a professional namer that worked for a big branding house for a while. The time they spent coming up with names was pretty incredible.

        F/OSS, in general, fails miserably here. "Linpus Lite" on the EEE PCs? WTF?

        The name should not matter, but in reality, it does. Unfortunately, OSS projects seem to only accept a rebranding under threats of legal action.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        same goes for logos. I remember a friend of mine saying that he got to see the Nike sketchbook, he said the original brainstorm of "possible" logos was as thick as a bible (if the bible was printed on regular paper, not the thin paper).

        in the end, all the work for a swoosh :)

      • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Funny)

        by Logic Bomb (122875) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @05:24PM (#25726813)

        Mitch Hedberg had a bit on one of his comedy CDs about product naming. Paraphrasing: take whatever the product does and add "er."

        "What's this thing do?"

        "It keeps things fresh."

        "Then that's a fresher. I'm goin' on break."

        • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Informative)

          by JCSoRocks (1142053) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:25PM (#25724525)
          A team of namers is given the parameters of the project -
          product / company type
          target audience
          what sort of feeling the name should convey
          the regions that the name will be used in

          Namers then go off on their own and compose massive lists of names. I've seen the names run the gamut from simple mashups of common words to mashups of greek / latin roots to words based on etymological research of the original target "feeling" words. Then the namers get together and reduce the list down to a set of finalists before presenting them for client review.

          Sometimes it takes a few iterations... Particularly if the objective is to get a globally trademarkable word that won't be misinterpreted as meaning anything offensive in another country.
          • Hey maygn! Why you buy a car that no go?

          • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Funny)

            by sorak (246725) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:54PM (#25724849)

            So, what kind of names do their children have? Did they spend months obsessively trying to determine a name that conveys "don't beat me up, now, please hire me later"?

          • Re:I bet... (Score:5, Insightful)

            by dubl-u (51156) * <2523987012@DALIpota.to minus painter> on Tuesday November 11 2008, @03:02PM (#25724933)

            And I'd add that some places actively test the names, as well. E.g., asking what people think in focus groups of different names. Or, more subtly, showing a new product to different people with different names on it, and getting stats about their reactions.

            Depending too much on what executives personally think of names is dangerous, because executives are very rarely representative of the target market. That lesson applies to lots of other things, too, like features and pricing.

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      iPot?

      How about the "iForOneWelcomeOur...".

      On second thought - nah...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:40PM (#25723919)

    He says before Google, all the search engines were engineering names like WebCrawler, Webfinder, Websearcher, etc.

    Apparently he never heard of search engines like AltaVista, Yahoo!, Lycos, etc. Seriously? Names are his business and he doesn't remember any of those?

  • by Fallingcow (213461) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:40PM (#25723927) Homepage

    ... to the GIMP devs.

    • Gimp (Score:5, Interesting)

      by mfh (56) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:48PM (#25724795) Journal

      Quick, someone mail this article... (Score:4, Funny)

      Yes, what you said is funny, but seriously now I had to pitch using a free image suite to a customer who was kinda penny-pinching, and when I suggested that we "bring out the GIMP" the customer started laughing at me, and they became somewhat violent. I ducked the coffee she threw at me, but only after I explained (while dodging numerous other desk utensils) that GIMP stood for "GNU Image Manipulation Program" did the abuse dwindle.

      And then she said, "What the hell does a GNU have to do with anything? You people are all fucking crazy!! ARRRRRGHHHHH!!!!" And she had a coronary and passed out from too much bacon and eggs... cholesterol rich, fatty foods, apparently add up over the years.

      Why couldn't they call it something like "Expensive Looking Free Graphics Suite" so like people could present it and be cheered for mentioning the product? The customer might have invited me to join her for a cup of coffee instead of hurl the damn thing at me. Although that tends to be reduced to "ELFGS" which sounds equally as annoying.

      Let's have a name-fork of the project! I vote for the name "Rez". That way, I could say, "MRS. Customer, we have just what you need in the Rez project, a free graphics utility. I'm not sure what this GIMP project is you keep balking at, but the last guy who brought up that project is a fool. Go with our project instead and we'll use Rez. It sounds cooler."

      Of course I'm joking around a little but apart from my exaggeration, this was the level of irritation expressed by said customer in regards to the GIMP moniker.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      In general giving Open Source Apps horrible names, and odd Icons to go with it hurts the adoption of open source more then most anything else. First there is no real point except to feed RMS's ego to put G for GNU in its name. If you care what license it is then you read the license (at least the title), otherwise you will download and use it anyways. Next the name and/or the icon should help the person know what the app does. Next the name shouldn't sound like a 3rd party ripoff of a well known brand. N

  • by OffTheLip (636691) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:45PM (#25724007)
    If the developers hail from a UNIX background there is no mystery. biff, awk, grep, sed. google and twitter seem tame by comparison.
    • If the developers hail from a UNIX background there is no mystery. biff, awk, grep, sed. google and twitter seem tame by comparison.

      At least if you say twitter and google to a girl and they won't take it the wrong way.

      awk, biff, grep, sed, emacs, du, chmod:
      I definitely see a drink thrown in my face and a slap in the future. Even from imaginary ones.

  • by John Hasler (414242) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:46PM (#25724017)

    > ...free of copyright ... gotchas.

    A name cannot have any "copyright gotchas" . Names cannot be protected by copyright.

  • Azure? (Score:3, Funny)

    by jejones (115979) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:52PM (#25724105) Journal

    I figured that they were tired of hearing about the BSOD, and "Azure screen of death" would at least sound nicer.

  • Second? Try third. (Score:4, Informative)

    by jspenguin1 (883588) <jspenguin@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:53PM (#25724123) Homepage
    Firefox was actually the third name. Its original name was Phoenix (it rose from the ashes of Netscape), but Phoenix Technologies raised a fuss. Then it became Firebird, and the Firebird database team raised a fuss. Then it became Firefox, and Debian didn't like that and called it IceWeasel. Anyone remember the FireSomething plugin that would randomly change the name.
    • by John Hasler (414242) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:09PM (#25724313)

      > Then it became Firefox, and Debian didn't like that and called it IceWeasel.

      Debian had no objection whatever to calling it Firefox. Mozilla objected to Debian doing so.

    • by barzok (26681) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:10PM (#25724335)

      Then it became Firefox, and Debian didn't like that and called it IceWeasel.

      No, Debian was forced to rename it due to their stance on trademarks.

      The Firefox logo is trademarked, so Debian doesn't consider it to be Free and will not include it as part of its distribution. Mozilla claims that using the Firefox name without the official branding is a trademark violation.

      Furthermore, Mozilla claims that if Debian runs any patches to the version of Firefox included with Debian distros, it has to run them by Mozilla first for approval.

      http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3634591 [internetnews.com]

    • by SanityInAnarchy (655584) <ninja@slaphack.com> on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:16PM (#25724397) Journal

      The second iteration was actually probably the better, branding-wise.

      They were all set -- Firebird for web, Thunderbird for email, Sunbird for calendar -- even things like Songbird for music. I think there were even logos.

  • by zappepcs (820751) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:16PM (#25724395) Journal

    A couple decades back there was a German man with his own branding/naming company. A Japanese company, not satisfied with their experience for English speaking markets, called him up and asked him to help out with a new car. Naturally, he inquired as to the project timeline, due dates etc.

    Nervously, the Japanese marketer replied that they needed something for the following Monday.

    After a few moments pause, the German replied "Dat Soon? eh?"

    Later that same year he took a trip to London on business. While eating at a local steakhouse, he asked "what's dis here sauce?"

  • TEN pages?! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by NorQue (1000887) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @02:22PM (#25724481)
    WTF? No way I'm clicking through that. Not even a fig leaf "print this article"-link there. And for what? A huge picture and three lines of text? Abominable.
  • by SageinaRage (966293) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @03:12PM (#25725091)
    even considering the subject matter. It covers that wikipedia is wiki + encyclopedia, but offers nothing on how wikis got their name (a hawaiian bus system), it just says that android was made by a company named Android, and says that OSX is the 10th mac os, without even bothering to look into the cat names at all. The only one with an actual interesting answer was Red Hat.
  • by The Cisco Kid (31490) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @03:23PM (#25725253)

    get online news websites to understand how the scrollbars work in a web browser, instead of breaking one 'page' into a dozen small ones that, instead of the whole article loading at once, and then being able to scroll smoothly, instead of having to click next, next, next, and have frustrating pauses while trying to read.

    After I read the first 'bit' and realized Id have to click, wait, click, wait to read the rest, I just closed the tab instead of bothering.

    Occasionally on sites like that there is a 'printable version' that gives the whole article as one, but lately it seems to just give a 'printable version' of that one bit of the story. /. editors - lets not encourage these sites by linking to them and giving them the ad traffic.

  • Third time's a charm (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Lord Byron II (671689) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @03:46PM (#25725581)
    The article says that Firefox was the browser's second name, but during development Firebird was known as Phoenix. I forget what the reason for the first change was, but they're definitely on their third name.
    • Re:MSFT (Score:5, Funny)

      by Mateo_LeFou (859634) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:41PM (#25723945) Homepage

      "If you want to keep us secure, take a page from Linux and open up your OS to public scrutiny so that people can perfect it. What are you afraid of?"

      You must be new here

      >mfh (56)

      or not

    • Re:MSFT (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Moridineas (213502) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:55PM (#25724151) Journal

      Name it what you want, but the RESULT is what gives products their reputations, not the names of said products. The only saving grace of XP is how terrible Vista was received by the public, so in comparison, XP looked much better. And how interesting this is to me because I remember how terrible XP was in the beginning.

      I think that's BS. Other than a small subset of people who were upset about activation, XP was pretty good from the get go. SP1 made it good without reservations. (and I don't mean this is a big linux vs Windows vs Mac flamefest) Most people switching to XP had been using 95/98/ME. XP--without reservation--is better than all of them. If you were coming from 2K, it was less of a jump, but still an improvement for most users (imho, I know some people debate this last point).

    • Re:MSFT (Score:5, Insightful)

      by JaredOfEuropa (526365) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @03:01PM (#25724923) Journal

      Name it what you want, but the RESULT is what gives products their reputations, not the names of said products.

      Amen. And think about it... Micro-soft itself is a pretty ho-hum name, in fact it's downright lame. Today, if the company name would be still available, no one in their right mind would give their software firm a name like that, even freelancing consultants wouldn't be so silly as to pick that as their firm's name. But they rose to greatness (in influence and dollars if not reputation for quality), and thus the name lost its lameness and became associated with an extremely succesful tech company.

    • Who cares if we find out that you people at Microsoft haven't done any real work since 1990... we ALREADY KNOW THAT.

      Nah, their consumer OSes have seen the addition of memory protection. Beore then, Microsoft did some real doesn't-work.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      The security dialog problem is overrated. They only pop up when you'd expect them to pop up. When you're installing things or modifying system wide-settings. Mac OS and Gnome/KDE will do the same thing. The only difference is that Vista doesn't make you reenter your password, it just alerts you that something's up.
          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            Ballmer's net worth is 15 billion dollars on paper for the moment.

            Remind me how it's divested entirely from the Microsoft shares he holds?

            • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

              Ballmer's net worth is 15 billion dollars on paper for the moment.

              Remind me how it's divested entirely from the Microsoft shares he holds?

              Even if Microsoft stock collapsed to a relatively unthinkable low, Ballmer probably would end up with stock worth north of $100M.

              Remember that Microsoft has billions of cash in the bank, a large amount of real property, and no debt. So, unlike many other companies, their stock has a absolute bottom value (it could go lower, but then it would be pushed right back up as people bought it).

    • Re:Windows 7 (Score:4, Informative)

      by Tadrith (557354) on Tuesday November 11 2008, @01:56PM (#25724171) Homepage

      I believe it's based on the official major releases of Windows NT, since the 9x kernel was abandoned.

      1. Windows NT 3.1
      2. Windows NT 3.5
      3. Windows NT 4.0
      4. Windows 2000
      5. Windows XP
      6. Windows Vista
      7. Windows 7

    • I'm still trying to find funding for my Tamper Indicative Toggle Switch. I even offered to change the name to Authenticated Smart Switch. For some reason, my boss objected to both names.

      • by dubl-u (51156) * <2523987012@DALIpota.to minus painter> on Tuesday November 11 2008, @03:22PM (#25725237)

        Yes, by all means someone should start selling a Skami Computer, hopefully via infomercial! I'd recommend filling out the product line with a "Do!Be!Us!" smartphone, a "Krapee" monitor line, the "De-Funk(t)" music player, the "Borkt" series of printers, and the "InnerFierce" wireless networking gear.

        But please, if you do this, make sure you set up your "world headquarters" in a semi-abandoned strip mall, and move it every time the landlord kicks you out for non-payment. (And no, you can't ever pay rent when running a scam. A penny stolen is a penny earned.)

        The good news is you'll be able to sell Vista on this stuff without increasing your complaint load. Heck, given the target audience, you could probably charge them for two copies and call it Double Vista.