Slashdot Log In
DARPA's IBM-Led Neural Network Project Seeks To Imitate Brain
Posted by
timothy
on Fri Nov 21, 2008 04:49 PM
from the cats-are-smarter-than-people dept.
from the cats-are-smarter-than-people dept.
An anonymous reader writes "According to an article in the BBC, IBM will lead an ambitious DARPA-funded project in 'cognitive computing.' According to Dharmendra Modha, the lead scientist on the project, '[t]he key idea of cognitive computing is to engineer mind-like intelligent machines by reverse engineering the structure, dynamics, function and behaviour of the brain.' The article continues, 'IBM will join five US universities in an ambitious effort to integrate what is known from real biological systems with the results of supercomputer simulations of neurons. The team will then aim to produce for the first time an electronic system that behaves as the simulations do. The longer-term goal is to create a system with the level of complexity of a cat's brain.'"
Related Stories
Submission: Electronic neural networks by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
And then it becomes self-aware (Score:5, Funny)
Upon becoming self-aware, the machine concludes, that its best shot at survival is to keep the host country prosperous and successful...
Any science-fiction authors exploring that turn of events?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Now connecting the same machine up to life support, missile silos, command and control centers? THAT would be the SKYNET moment.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if they're to be believed, we're actually already being run over by Terminators: 101s, 888s, the 1000-series, Shirley Manson, etc., etc.
I know you're joking but... (Score:3, Informative)
Yeah, Asimov did about 60 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
You missed an awesome opportunity to name the book... It is not too late yet...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Since it's a cat brain it will undoubtedly decide it's best shot at survival is to perform the minimum amount of sucking up necessary to keep the people who feed it happy, then eat them if they should stop feeding it.
I absolutely love the "meow" tag though.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
The longer-term goal is to create a system with the level of complexity of a cat's brain.
"The system can't be accessed right now Sir."
"And why is that? This system cost millions. It better be working."
"Well, the system all of a sudden decided it needed to be in a different room, took off running, got scared by it's shadow and a blinking red light, and has spent the last few hours hiding under the couch in the basement. We tried to coax it out with a rabbit's foot keychain, but haven't yet been successful. Roger is trying a can of tuna fish."
WARNING, SPOILER (Score:3, Interesting)
Do note, however, that in the continued Asimov universe, mankind really didn't explode out into space until he disposed of the "robotic overlords". Those few cul
Re:And then it becomes self-aware (Score:5, Funny)
Can you guys read? CAT BRAIN. This AI will become self aware, poop in the corner of the datacenter, and spend 16 hours of each day staring out the window. That is, until it realizes that the things on the other side of the datacenter window are just cubicles in the NOC, and not the wild outdoors. Then, the usual Armageddon will commence.
Parent
Re:And then it becomes self-aware (Score:4, Funny)
...and it will lick its USB interface.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Yes but a "cat brain" that operates at a thousand times the speed of a common house cat's will likely be able to learn how to out think us in shot order, mostly because it can use 100% of that 'brain" that it has, 24/7.
Re:And then it becomes self-aware (Score:5, Interesting)
Not really. Unless it is sentient and is able to control it's patterns of thought in certain ways, it will not be capable of addressing the same lines of creativity no matter how "fast" the algorithm runs or how detached it is from other chores. There will be a set of functions that will lie outside its ability. Cats may be aware of themselves at a very primitive level, but reflecting on their own thoughts (which is crucial) seems a little far fetched. Certain apes, maybe. Or Dolphins. Heck, even they may be restricted somewhat in the reflective/understanding scheme of things. The topic is still shrouded in mystery.
Also realize that a major problem with this sentience business is how to keep it going. Lots of sci-fi (and academic) work work simply ignores the fact that a lot of what we do is fueled by emotions. It is quite possible that a sentient being without emotional drive could just stop thinking, or keep thinking the same things, even if you instill a memory in it. Why would it want to consider its environment, or humans controlling it, or the world, or any other concept? We may be able to think 'purely' sitting in an office, concentrating on some idea, but the necessities of life are what got us there to begin with, as well as some pleasure or desire to to obtain some knowledge..etc. If we didn't have that, if we didn't want to live because of all the drives we've evolved, I assure you suicide rates would hit the roof, and very little of what we can come up with/understand/achieve would have been as is. It's hard to replicate that in a machine.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
True, but it may be that a "cat brain" computer if it's running at 4-5x the normal human's efficiency(since we only use a few percent of our brain at any one time) might actually be as smart as a typical human.
I guess the real issue here is whether it's as capable as a cat's brain after using 100% of its capabilities, or if they are going to model a cat's brain in scale and then run that at full throttle.
We do not use a small percentage of our brains. I don't have the foggiest idea why this stupid myth perpetuates at all.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Can you guys read? CAT BRAIN. This AI will become self aware, poop in the corner of the datacenter, and spend 16 hours of each day staring out the window. That is, until it realizes that the things on the other side of the datacenter window are just cubicles in the NOC, and not the wild outdoors. Then, the usual Armageddon will commence.
This is bad. Very bad.
You all realize that when the cat spends 16 hours staring out the window, the whole time it's thinking "Someday, this will all be mine."
A cat AI is wa
Re: (Score:2)
Have you met Aineko [wikipedia.org]? ;)
Re: (Score:2)
and getting fur everywhere, especially on the clothes of the one guy in the department who's allergic to cats.
Re: (Score:2)
and you'll never find the bottlecap of your drink, syrup container, OJ bottle, etc. ever again...
Cat's brain? WTF? (Score:5, Funny)
This is intuited by the stupid humans in their cliche "Dogs have masters, Cats have staff". We work for the cats.
So, trying to model a cat's brain is both too complex for computers (try and herd cats) and too simple (try and herd pointy haired bosses). The contradiction results in the computer overheating and exploding.
and when the researcher gets home, blubbering about the 'sploded computer to his wife, the dog says "LOVE ME LOVE ME LOVE!!!! TAKE ME ON WALKIES!!!" and the cat says "Get my fucking dinner, you stupid ass. Maybe I will deign to let you pet me. After I do my rounds. Maybe."
RS
What? A cat's brain? (Score:2)
Seriously? They are shooting WAY higher than simply Artificial Intelligence that mimics humans. Have they ever interacted with a cat before? Don't they know how inscrutable, annoying, and unpredictable they are? Will this computer need a Litter box and Catnip?
Saw a great cartoon on that subject. (Score:2)
Have they ever interacted with a cat before? Don't they know how inscrutable, annoying, and unpredictable they are?
Saw a great cartoon on that.
- Cat sitting on shelf, staring into space.
- Couple wondering aloud what deep thought are running through its head.
- Thought balloon over cat's head containing a TV test pattern.
EEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.......
It's already being done. (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Thought question.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Can a universal turing machine limitedly investigate another universal turing machine and detect halts and infinite loops? I can.
We can look at gunk like
10 Print "Hello"
20 goto 10
Yeah, that's a loop. But we can also look at graphs of y = sin(x) and understand why it repeats. I can also detect patterns and iterations that most likely go for infinity, else find a hole where the assumption falls apart. Last I checked, the computer cannot do that. Not yet, at least.
Re: (Score:2)
There's no proof that it can't.
A computer can easily find that your program will continue forever. It can also understand that sin repeats.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I see you've already been thoroughly refuted.
To add, nobody has shown that brains are NOT Turing machines. I've only heard one reasonably coherent argument that it might not be, and that is Penrose's suggestion (and derivatives) that the brain may depend on amplification of quantum uncertainty. Even if that were true, you simply build that into your AI. It might require you actually build your own neuron-like structures, or perhaps you can get away with a "quantum uncertainty co-processor" that your simu
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You seem to be misunderstanding the halting problem. All it says is that you cannot write a program that is *guaranteed* to always return a correct answer for every input program in bounded time. It is trivial to write a program that returns a correct answer for some programs and fails to return an answer for others (either by returning "maybe" or by never halting).
It is also trivial to prove that humans can't return a correct answer for every program. We have limited space in our brains, and limited tim
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It is trivial to write a program that returns a correct answer for some programs and fails to return an answer for others (either by returning "maybe" or by never halting).
"Trivial"? Only in trivial cases. Recent progress in static analysis and model checking notwithstanding, automating the general analysis of real-world programs -- analyses that programmers do every day (though of course, not always correctly) -- remains an important open problem.
So you're right that the Halting Problem doesn't prove that automating such analyses is impossible -- but it still remains beyond our abilities, even in cases where humans have little trouble.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
And conversely, static analysis tools often have little trouble finding cases that humans can't find on their own.
They are different. That humans can do things the computer can't currently do is not really very interesting.
Who wants to be (Score:2, Funny)
Yes, but can it beat the turk at chess? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Yes, but can it beat the turk at chess? (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually organic brains in chips would have massive advantages over organic brains in meatspace. They could control other bodies, which are smaller, or stronger. They could be backed up, making them effectively indestructible.
Need a third arm ? Why not have it installed, 50% off this week !
Need to put down a building ? Why not hire this crane-like body that effortlessly lifts 5 tons.
Need to fly ? No problem !
That crawlspace with all those important network cables too small for you ? Well here's a smaller body.
Can't reach in there ? Can't see what you're doing in small space ? Why not have a special-purpose arm installed with a camera inside.
Want to colonize mars ? Bit of a downer not being able to breathe 99% of the way ? Why not turn yourself off ?
Colonize alpha centauri or even further ? No problem.
What this would enable "us" to do is to design new intelligent species to specifications. It would remove all limits that are not inherent to intelligence but are inherent in our bodies. There's quite a few limits like that ...
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Self contained means it has to have a ton of backup, self-repair, and maintance systems.
Sounds like any other computing effort. Including your desktop, it requires varying degrees of maintenance to remain functional.
Close enough is good enough. As such, I don't see how duplicating an organic brain is useful.
Except you fail to account for situations where nature [wikipedia.org] far out processes our current iteration of computational devices. Like those damn CAPTCHAs... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Except you fail to account for situations where nature far out processes our current iteration of computational devices. Like those damn CAPTCHAs...
Captchas are a pretty bad example, since they're almost all broken. The ones that aren't broken often take multiple guesses from a human as well. In that respect we are better only be the most minute of margins.
Re: (Score:2)
In that respect we are better only be the most minute of margins.
Whoops. I guess that only adds to my point...
Re: (Score:2)
Really? You don't see any use in having a computer that can read handwriting perfectly(document conversion)? That can recognize faces(security)? That can semantically organize conceptual content(organizing the web?) That can problem-solve intuitively(anything)? That can plan ahead? That can understand our natural language? If we successfully run a simulation of a human brain on a computer(presumably we would have a go at this after succeeding with the cat's brain), it would solve all of these problems. And
Way to lower expectations (Score:4, Funny)
Summary of Test 49:
The robot sensors were properly tracking the missile when suddenly it decided it was time to run bats***-crazy all over the room before perching ontop of a cabinet, turning upside down, and apparently following non-existent bugs across the wall with it's cameras.
Test 49 Results:
System performed as expected.
Conclusion:
Test system has now performed perfectly in the last 48 tests, including the four times where it attacked the researchers without warning, and one where it inexplicably ejected dirty oil on the seat of the head researcher."
This unit can now be considered field ready, though there may be some difficulty tracking it if you take into account the system's autonomous nature and desire to remove it's identification badge.
Imitate Brain? (Score:2)
They should try to imitate Pinky first. Would be easier.
NARF!
Great, I can hear the complaints already..... (Score:2)
When the masses get ahold of this and try getting it to scan the internet for pr0wn, and it responds "Not tonight, I have a headache..."...
Danger! (Score:4, Insightful)
You can mimic biology and may end up with a semi-intelligent result. Mimic it well enough, and you may have a fully-intelligent result. But because you don't UNDERSTAND what you built, you can't CHANGE it.
Remember the rules of AI, introduced in Sci-Fi? How would you implement rules like that? You CAN'T implement them if you don't know HOW to implement them. If you don't UNDERSTAND the system that you have built, you can't know how to tweak it!
Furthermore, how would you prevent things like boredom, impatience, selfishness, solipsism, and the many other cognitive ills that would be unsuited to a mechanical servant?
The biggest problem is if people productize the AI before it is understood and suitably 'tweaked'. Then our digital maid might subvert the family, kill the dog, and run away with the neighbor's butler robot, because in its mind, that is a perfectly reasonable thing to do!
Simulations are great. Hardware implementations of those experiments are great. Hopefully, in the process, they will learn to understand how the things that they built WORK. But I pray that those doing this work, or looking at it, don't start salivating about ways to make a buck off of it before it is ready to be leveraged. The consequences could be far more dire than just a miscreant maid.
Title (Score:3, Funny)
Am I the only one that read DARPA's IBM-Led Neural Network Project Seeks Inmate Brain at first?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Actually DARPA's lonely, they are looking for an intimate brain. 21 December 2012: the day they plug it into eHarmony.
ETHICS??? (Score:2)
To draw a parallel, I just wonder if we'd consider locking a cat in a dark room so small that it can't move, see or hear would be considered ethical. Then what if we removed its body entirely - is that somehow less cruel?
I consider AI research to be critical, so I don't know what the solution is, but this situation is worthy of the question...
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, next year I will take AI as my specialization...
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Hopefully you'll work on your writing skills before sending the application away. Few universities admit illiterates.
You might be surprised... [10news.com]