Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

British Royal Navy Submarines Now Run Windows

Posted by samzenpus on Thu Dec 18, 2008 03:53 AM
from the deep-blue-screen dept.
meist3r writes "On his Government blog, Microsoft's Ian McKenzie announced today that the Royal Navy was ahead of schedule for switching their nuclear submarines to a customized Microsoft Windows solution dubbed 'Submarine Command System Next Generation (SMCS NG)' which apparently consists of Windows 2000 network servers and XP workstations. In the article, it is claimed that this decision will save UK taxpayers £22m over the next ten years. The installation of the new system apparently took just 18 days on the HMS Vigilant. According to the BAE Systems press release from 2005, the overall cost of the rollout was £24.5m for all eleven nuclear submarines of the Vanguard, Trafalgar and Swiftsure classes. Talk about staying with the sinking ship."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • BSOD (Score:5, Funny)

    by sleeponthemic (1253494) on Thursday December 18 2008, @03:55AM (#26157267) Homepage
    Blue Submarine of Death
    • Re:BSOD (Score:5, Funny)

      by s1lverl0rd (1382241) on Thursday December 18 2008, @03:58AM (#26157293) Homepage
      Having Bliss as a wallpaper below sea level would irritate me a lot.
      • Re:BSOD (Score:5, Funny)

        by TheLink (130905) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:12AM (#26157679) Journal

        How about this instead? http://www.flickr.com/photos/rowandw/2276721446/ [flickr.com]

        Seems more appropriate given the topic.

        • Re:BSOD (Score:5, Interesting)

          by boazarad (1252292) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:15AM (#26157699)

          And these would be backdoors would be accessed... how? ...underwater wifi?

          • Re:BSOD (Score:5, Insightful)

            by leomekenkamp (566309) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:57AM (#26157985)
            1. GP does not sound psychotic at all
            2. I see nothing irrational or excessive at all. The US has deliberately sent the Lucetania into a battle zone in order to enter WWI, disregarded intelligence that could have prevented Pearl Harbor, entered a virtual battle in Tonkin to enter Vietnam, and made up stories on WMD to enter Iraq. In that light an NSA backdoor does not seem more preposterous to me. And there have [heise.de] been [cnn.com] news [bbc.co.uk] items [wordpress.com] on this, even from Bruce Schneier [schneier.com].

            I think you owe GP an apology for your incorrect accusation.
          • Re:BSOD (Score:5, Insightful)

            by digitalchinky (650880) <dtchky@gmail.com> on Thursday December 18 2008, @06:11AM (#26158071) Homepage

            No, but your average submarine does have an array of sigint antennas, elint, and all the other ints. That said, in the course of sucking down internet from that pencil beam footprint along the cost where president whoever lives, do you really think (all) the processing systems are immune to viruses and malware as well? The bored scope goat running his hand crafted packet sniffer used to strip out files (a.k.a porn) from the data stream, gets a little click happy with the mouse on a dull night watch and runs jessica.exe

            Not all viruses get in via the suited moron with the laptop.

    • Re:BSOD (Score:5, Funny)

      by Hanners1979 (959741) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:25AM (#26157747) Homepage
      Considering it's a customised Windows-based solution, I would hope that they've at least made it the Yellow Submarine of Death.
    • Re:BSOD (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 18 2008, @06:06AM (#26158041)

      On my work PC (I don't work in I.T at the moment) the Sysinternal screensaver BSOD was installed as part of the build. Don't ask me why.

      I set it as my default screensaver and thought it was a bit of fun, that is until when I was away on a business trip (trying to RDesktop in) and there was no response from my PC.

      One of the I.T helpdesk muppets had noticed the BSOD on my monitor, not realised it was a screensaver and took my PC away and reimaged it.

      I wasn't happy!

    • Das Reboot (Score:5, Funny)

      by Joce640k (829181) on Thursday December 18 2008, @07:16AM (#26158433) Homepage

      Just came here to say "Das Reboot" in a random place.

  • How deep? (Score:5, Funny)

    by bryan1945 (301828) on Thursday December 18 2008, @03:57AM (#26157285) Journal

    The last time I drove my car into a lake the windows didn't last past 15 feet. Of course my car is American, and those Brits have that funky metric system, so who knows?

    (Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week)

      • by Mark Hood (1630) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:38AM (#26157511) Homepage

        Actually we call it 'Imperial' units.

        Damn colonials are getting uppity again, Ponsenby...

        Mark

          • Re:How deep? (Score:5, Insightful)

            by Hognoxious (631665) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:40AM (#26157847) Homepage Journal

            Americans use the imperial system exclusively

            Not since 1776. Look up the definition of a gallon or a ton.

          • Re:How deep? (Score:5, Interesting)

            by CmdrGravy (645153) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:50AM (#26157933) Homepage

            It's actually a really irritating system we have here in the UK, in school during the 80's we were taught soley in the metric system so I still have no instinctive understanding of what a farenheight, a gallon, a league or a fathom actually are and yet some of these measurements are still pretty much in general use as are pounds, ounces & stones.

            In my car I can view my petrol consumption in miles to the gallon or litres to the kilometer but the fuel which goes into the fuel tank is measured in litres and the odometer shows only miles so there is no way to make a simple comparison without having to work out between the two sets of measurements.

            I wish the UK would make up it's mind one way or another properly and then stick to it !

      • Re:How deep? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Eudial (590661) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:18AM (#26157723)

        They used to use the English system in the UK, and then the rest of the world caught up with them and they converted to metric. Right now, the countries not using the metric system are: Myanmar, The United States, and Liberia.

  • by cjfs (1253208) on Thursday December 18 2008, @03:57AM (#26157291) Homepage Journal

    The navy liked their version of minesweeper best.

  • by JYD (996651) on Thursday December 18 2008, @03:59AM (#26157305)
    Didn't the Brits hear about what happened to the USS Yorktown [wikipedia.org] when they tried Windows as a naval solution. God save the Queen, please.
  • Won't work (Score:5, Funny)

    by this great guy (922511) on Thursday December 18 2008, @03:59AM (#26157307)
    I mean who in a sane mind would want windows on a submarine ? It's not like there is anything interesting to see in the darkness of the depths.
  • Next generation? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rolfc (842110) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:00AM (#26157309)
    This roll-out must be 5 years overdue, windows 2000 server?
  • by sakdoctor (1087155) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:08AM (#26157355)

    Summary fails to mention, and sort of implies the opposite; The cost saving is down to using off the shelf hardware, not switching to windows.

    • 20 posts before the first one that actually provides useful information.

      Is that a typical ratio on slashdot? I haven't been keeping track.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:59AM (#26157611)
      Summary fails to mention, and sort of implies the opposite; The cost saving is down to using off the shelf hardware, not switching to windows.

      Windows made the submarines on-the-shelf hardware, they'll be sitting pretty on some reef shelf in no time.

      Mr. Malda, I'm submitting the news article for 2009-01-19 ahead of time:
      Microsoft's Ian McKenzie announced today that the entire Royal Navy Nuclear Submarine fleet had sunk due to a Windows buffer overflow. HMS Vigilant's captain, Commander Bob Anstey, said: "I heard my 1st officer shouting 'Captain, Be SOD, Overflow!', so I yelled at him: 'Get the caulking guns ready, you SOD!' and he just gave me a blank stare and said: 'We cannot caulk this one, sir! Vigilant's a goner!' Well, bugger me!"

      In other news:
      HMS Vigilant's captain, Commander Bob Anstey allegedly accidentally fired a nuclear missile at Redmond, Washington in an attempt to complete the Windows Activation of the newly installed 'Submarine Command System Next Generation' customized Windows XP system. "It was a bug, yes, that's it. Some kind of unfortunate bug triggered the 19-step launch sequence," said Commander Anstey. Nobody at or near Microsoft could be reached for a comment.
    • by JasterBobaMereel (1102861) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:15AM (#26157701)

      Was custom built hardware running Ada86 custom software

      Then Mixture of SPARC's running Custom Solaris system, and custom hardware, and the same Ada software

      Now some off the shelf hardware (PC's) running custom version of Windows somewhere between Win2k and XP?

      N.B. The Sonar system however run Linux ....

  • HMS Bob (Score:5, Funny)

    by Snufu (1049644) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:09AM (#26157367)
    Tech support: "Can you tell us the problem with your submarine?"
    HMS Bob: "Das Not Boot."
  • other news (Score:5, Funny)

    by Jeek Elemental (976426) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:10AM (#26157373)

    Wolfgang Petersen is reportedly preparing to make "Das Reboot", a (very) short sequel.

  • by Evil_Ether (1200695) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:18AM (#26157419)
    I find the words Windows and nuclear been uttered in the same sentence very disconcerting.
  • by Erikderzweite (1146485) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:38AM (#26157509)

    Now I can sleep safer knowing that if the Brits are about to launch a nuclear missile from a submarine and start WWIII, a UAC window will pop up asking if they are sure about it.

    • by Chrisq (894406) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:08AM (#26157655)
      You seem to be trying to launch a nuclear attack. Would you like to do one of the following:
      • Blast Russia of the face of the earth
      • Blast Iran of the face of the earth
      • Launch a single nuke at China from within Pakistani territorial waters. Let them sort it out!
      • I'm an Al-Quaida Infiltrator. I'll target London, New York and Washington please
  • Clippy (Score:5, Funny)

    by Hognoxious (631665) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:40AM (#26157515) Homepage Journal
    It looks like you're trying to launch a nuke. Would you like me to:
    • Try to talk you out of it
    • Help you start armaggeddon
    • Hide under the table
  • by Peter Cooper (660482) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:42AM (#26157531) Journal

    .. British Navy submarine captains are the only officers worldwide (as of the mid 90s or so) to have the independent right to launch nuclear missiles if they lose contact with the Admiralty.

    • Not quite true (Score:5, Informative)

      by Kupfernigk (1190345) on Thursday December 18 2008, @07:22AM (#26158465)
      If the UK no longer responds to messages and they have reason to believe this is due to war damage, they open their sealed, handwritten letter from the Prime Minister. This contains their instructions. There is of course much speculation as to what it contains, ranging from "Hi, welcome to the US Navy" to "I told them Iraq had WMDs, but would they listen?". Sadly, barring a takeover of the UK by pacifists, we will never find out.
  • by thhamm (764787) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:48AM (#26157571)
    "hello! i am your friendly helpagent clippy! what do you want to do? wage nuclear war? or just launch a conventional cruise missile? learn how to do that here."
  • by Kupfernigk (1190345) on Thursday December 18 2008, @04:53AM (#26157595)
    I was talking to a retired submariner only last week, a former 1st Lt (exec equivalent), and he commented that being in a submarine is like being in prison, only with no visitors. Most submariners hate it. Think about it: you are in a steel box which is actually quite fragile, and your life is entirely dependent on the decisions made by one man. On a surface ship you may have some influence on your fate (shooting down an enemy aircraft with a gun or a missile, deciding exactly when and where to abandon ship) but in a sub you have no control at all.

    Now think about a corporate drone using Windows. Your desktop is locked down, updates are rolled out by IT. If your machine is taken over by an IE exploit, the Exchange server fails, etc. etc., there is nothing you can do about it.

    Conclusion: Windows is the appropriate operating system for submarines.

  • by Xest (935314) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:05AM (#26157639)

    With the Royal Navy's recruitment advert for IT crew where the guy goes on about how complex the equipment is and then finishes the advert with the punch line "but sometimes, I just switch it off and back on again".

    Perhaps this is why it's saved tax payers £22 million too, we no longer need high paid IT staff with a clue what they're doing, we can just get 16 year old school drop outs who IT qualifications are that they built their own PC and set up an internet on uncle Joes computer by sticking the AOL disc in. I mean, hey the nuclear missile launch console has failed to fire off our nuclear deterrent after Russia just obliterated Europe in a nuclear attack, just reinstall Windows and make sure you stick the latest nuclear weapons launch drivers on, if not just pop round to the local PC World store and get the Tech Guys (UK equivalent of Geek Squad) to fix it for £125.

    I can sleep comfortably knowing that our nuclear deterrent is in safe hands.

  • by MadUndergrad (950779) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:25AM (#26157753)

    See, this is actually an elegant solution, as the bloat will act as a redundant buoyancy system in case of the inevitable blue-screen crush.

  • by sepelester (794828) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:47AM (#26157903)
    Sounds like sub standard software to me
  • by ei4anb (625481) on Thursday December 18 2008, @05:47AM (#26157907)
    Slashdot people often said that a Windows computer is only secure when encased in a steel box and sunk beneath the sea. So, why complain now?
  • by freddy_dreddy (1321567) on Thursday December 18 2008, @07:48AM (#26158621)
    before flamebait-tagging me, please read.

    Given the fact that Linux is built mostly by anonymous contributors, kept on servers which are hacked every now and then (Fedora Signing Key Server Hacked in August - Red Hat Infrastructure Servers recently Hacked, Cracked & Compromised) what guarantee is there that Linux - God's gift to nerds - doesn't contain sleeping trojans written by Russians or Chinese ?

    Do the math: what would it cost to accomplish this? I think something like less than 10.000$ (including paycheck, laptop and broadband connection).
    • by lga (172042) on Thursday December 18 2008, @06:14AM (#26158083) Homepage Journal

      It didn't take 18 days to install windows. It took 18 days to re-cable the whole submarine with an ethernet network, replace all the computers, AND install windows. I'd like to see you rewire a submarine in that time...

      I can't believe I just defended the military.