Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

The 10 Coolest Open Source Products of 2008

Posted by timothy on Wed Dec 31, 2008 03:11 PM
from the not-the-transom-of-the-novel-white-jazz dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Open Source Software is about more than just the Linux operating system, and 2008 brought advances in the form of OpenOffice.org, IBM Lotus Symphony, Firefox and Android. But Linux is still the heart of the FOSS movement, and this year brought key developments in the operating system as well. Here's a look at the coolest open source products to come across the transom in 2008." Along roughly similar lines, davidmwilliams points out the year in review of the iTWire's "Linux Distillery" column.
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • CCExtractor [sourceforge.net]

    *Sorry, couldn't resist.
  • Zzzzzz (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sunderland56 (621843) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:15PM (#26284303)
    Of the 10, 9 are merely updates of existing products - nothing new here.

    Android *is* new - but is hardly newsworthy by now.

    • >merely updates of existing products - nothing new here.

      Put this into up-to-the-minute context. With ZUNEs going to comas around the world [msn.com], OSPs of any ilk shine, baby, shine - now, isn't that newsworthy!!!
    • Re:Zzzzzz (Score:5, Informative)

      by larry bagina (561269) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:23PM (#26284427) Journal

      1 is Open Office, 1 is an open office derivative. 1 is a website. 1 is firefox 3. 1 is Android. The rest are linux distros.

    • Yeah, I could write an article right now about what would be coolest in 2009
      1. Ubuntu 9.10
      2. Ubuntu 9.4
      3. Fedora 10
      4. Firefox 4
      5. JeOS 2
      6. Open Suse 11
      ...

      And I wonder, why did they forget the service packs, IIRC Open Suse 10 SP2 was released this year.

      TFA is a non-story.

    • Re:Zzzzzz (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mcgrew (92797) * on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:27PM (#26284495) Journal

      Thanks for that. I tried to RTFA and found it was one of those "one paragraph and ten thoudsand ads per screen" sites so I didn't go any farther.

      How can you trust any tech site with a gawdoffal layout like that? Pathetic!

      • Re:Zzzzzz (Score:5, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:39PM (#26284631)

        Plus Ubuntu's on the list twice. So here's the article reproduced verbatim, sans ads, just as a giant middle finger extended in the direction of CRN and all the other assbags using this format these days.

        OpenOffice.org 3.0

        The popular -- and free -- open source productivity suite hit its milestone 3.0 version in 2008, making it more clear than ever that its functionality and compatibility with Microsoft Office (including OpenOffice Impress, which is PowerPoint compatible) make it a force to be reckoned with. With an acquisition cost of between $150 and $200 less than Microsoft Office 2007, it could have a big year in a down economy in 2009.

        IBM Lotus Symphony

        IBM has taken great pains to position itself as more of a middleware company than a desktop productivity software company, but diverged from that path a bit in 2008. By launching and upgrading its IBM Lotus Symphony suite of productivity apps based on OpenOffice.org, IBM is once again using the Lotus brand to take aim against Microsoft on the desktop.

        Firefox 3.0

        Die-hard Firefox users showed thanks for the Mozilla community's efforts to eliminate memory leaks and other annoyances in the most recent iterations of the open-source browser. Features like its "awesome bar" are also helping it continue to gain market share against Microsoft Internet Explorer, even as it's fending off new challenges from Google's new Chrome browser.

        Laconica

        If microblogging site Twitter became the social networking smash of 2008, 2009 could be a great year for the open-source microblogging platform called Laconica. The best-known site using that code, Identi.ca, allows communication through browsers, e-mail and SMS messaging -- giving a powerful, free alternative to those seeking to build their own social networking or microblogging platforms.

        Fedora 9

        Test Center highlighted three intriguing aspects for Fedora 9: the new desktop schemes, the new package management system and back-end improvements to memory usage and performance. On the desktop front, Fedora 9 Beta offers GNOME 2.22 and KDE 4.0.2 as the defaults. GNOME 2.22 in Fedora 9 has better file system performance, security improvements and the ability to manage power right at the login screen (quite handy on a laptop). There's also better Bluetooth integration, especially for Palm devices.

        Ubuntu 8.10

        Ubuntu 8.10 Desktop Edition, nicknamed "Intrepid Ibex," provides so much functionality and ease of use, at zero cost of acquisition, that it is really impossible to ignore. For anyone or any business not tied to Microsoft legacy desktop applications, Ubuntu 8.10 may realistically be considered a smarter choice in many scenarios.

        OpenSuSE 11

        Novell didn't launch a new version of its SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop in 2008, but it did shepherd the OpenSuSE community that delivered OpenSuSE 11. OpenSUSE is powerful, and improvements in usability, performance and stability should attract and win back users from other Linux distributions. There is some business advantage to consider OpenSUSE instead of Ubuntu or Fedora because of Novell's relationship with Microsoft, such as the tweaks to OpenOffice.org that make document conversion and migration easier, as well as the hypervisor adapter support. OpenSUSE is probably best for power users, those who can take advantage of the virtualization support and those with more experience using Linux.

        Novell JeOS

        SUSE Linux Enterprise JeOS (pronounced "juice"), the beta "Just enough" operating system from Novell is a lightweight and barebones version of the company's SUSE Linux Enterprise Server. The code base is SLES 10 Service Pack 2. The stripped-down operating system is intended specifically for virtual appliances. Applications certified to run on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server will carry that certification onto the JeOS

        • Re:Zzzzzz (Score:5, Interesting)

          by mcgrew (92797) * on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:54PM (#26284807) Journal

          Thanks for that. I see that half of their coolest ten are all Linux. Not run on Linux, but ARE Linux!

          I wish slashdot would quit posting interesting summaries of mediocre websites and stories.

          • Re:Zzzzzz (Score:5, Interesting)

            by ToasterMonkey (467067) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @08:51PM (#26287647) Homepage

            Thanks for that. I see that half of their coolest ten are all Linux. Not run on Linux, but ARE Linux!

            ...and two of them are just different versions of Ubuntu. WTF?

            How about OpenSolaris for Christ's sake? The first Sun supported Solaris LIVE CD for desktops, had it's initial 2008.05 release and a new 2008.11 release this year. That's just not as cool as Ubuntu, and... newer Ubuntu I guess. What in 2008 did these Linux distros do that rates being in a top 10 OSS list anyway? OpenSolaris had it's _FIRST_ release at least, I would expect that at a minimum. Two f'ing Ubuntu's...

            I wish slashdot would quit posting interesting summaries of mediocre websites and stories.

            It NEVER ends.

        • Lotus Symphony (Score:5, Informative)

          by Enderandrew (866215) <enderandrew@@@gmail...com> on Wednesday December 31 2008, @04:29PM (#26285187) Homepage Journal

          The list fails. Lotus Symphony isn't OSS, though it is based off OpenOffice 1. They based it off OpenOffice 1 as opposed to the trunk for 3 at the time, because IBM didn't want to have Symphony a GPL product.

          • Re:Lotus Symphony (Score:5, Informative)

            by Petrushka (815171) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @05:02PM (#26285533)

            The list fails. Lotus Symphony isn't OSS, though it is based off OpenOffice 1.

            Indeed. Seeing Lotus Symphony on the second slide was enough to make me realise that these folks haven't done more than a minute of research, and that it's time to stop reading /., go outside, and make the most of the sunshine ...

          • by KlaymenDK (713149) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @08:49PM (#26287635) Journal

            I wonder, who here has actually tried Lotus Symphony?

            I have; it's part of Notes 8 which I use at work. After about two minutes of acquaintance with it, I reinstalled OOo3: They actually managed to break some things that OOo gets right (CSV import/export in Calc) and completely omit (WTF?!) other parts (Draw).

            I have no idea why they would do that. But it certainly makes the whole experience more, um, Lotussy. (If only that were a good thing!)

      • Thanks for pointing that out. Took way longer to get through that list than it needed to. Especially with the lag between page loads.
      • Re:Zzzzzz (Score:5, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:57PM (#26284833)

        Article has wrong title, should be: "1 Cheesy Way To Drive Up Your Ad Revenue"

    • Even if they were new, five are Linux distributions. And that's not counting Android.

      Yeah, Linux is cool, distributions are cool, but you'd think they would show some variety. Coolest one I've seen all year -- that is new -- is Archaeopteryx [blogspot.com]. Perhaps not a big deal, but weren't they doing the 10 coolest projects, not the 10 most important projects?

    • by joggle (594025) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:37PM (#26284605) Homepage Journal

      Android is cool but does anyone know why they took out some of the beta functionality (like being able to get driving directions which are now expressly forbidden by the terms of service for the Android google maps API key)?

      It seems like it would be fairly trivial to write a turn-by-turn voice app for Android if they still had the API to request driving directions. By knowing the location of the phone the program could easily find what segment of a route it's on (if any at all), see how far it is until the next instruction and then read the instruction using the text2speech library someone has already made.

      As it stands, the only way I see of implementing such an app would be to have a webserver somewhere that would forward direction requests from the phone to google using the standard google maps javascript API and then return the directions back to the app. Very much a PITA if you ask me and might violate the terms of use of developing software on Android for all I know.

    • These are all projects with mainstream corporate backing.

      In my opinion the list should include projects done by people who don't have vast sums of cash to back them.

  • by uncledrax (112438) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:15PM (#26284305) Homepage

    2 Ubuntus, 2 SuSes, a new Fedora.. and a host of applications that just version incremented this year, and a twitter clone.

    Meh.

    Not dissing the applications.. I think OO3 is a vast improvement, and newer versions of an OS is probably a good thing.. I was just hoping for stuff that wasn't just 'Newest release of MyFlavourHere linux based OS'

    • More in depth? Heck they couldn't even bother themselves to add a link to the products. If they're that lazy a link to Distrowatch would've covered over half the entries.

      I was going to say this is the first site I've seen that has more ad and navigation space than article space, but no, I've seen that before.

  • Spoiler (Score:5, Informative)

    by ojintoad (1310811) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:19PM (#26284353)
    The coolest are:
    1. OpenOffice
    2. IBM Lotus Symphony
    3. Firefox 3.0
    4. Laconica
    5. Fedora 9
    6. Ubuntu 8.10
    7. Open SuSe11
    8. Novell JeOS
    9. Ubuntu 8.04
    10. Android
    • Damn that FOSS, I tried to find a FOSS app named "ice" but google failed it. Ruined a perfectly good joke.

      Programmers, get on that ICE project, ok?

  • open office, IBM Lotus Symphony

    I didn't even read the the rest, dos not seem worth it. Why can't these list articles have sofware like this. [yorku.ca]

  • by DRAGONWEEZEL (125809) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:22PM (#26284403) Homepage

    WinDirStat is my #1 favorite OSS by far and above anything else. This year I have used it a ton, and I even have a contribution budgeted for Feb. It's small, fast, useful and beautiful. Thank you WINDIRSTAT!

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      isn't that just a windows clone of the KDE program that does the same thing? Kdirstat (i think)
  • WTH? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by MBGMorden (803437) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:25PM (#26284467)

    5 of the 10 are just Linux distro's. Ubuntu 8.10 AND 8.04 were both on the list as seperate entries!?!? And Lotus Symphony, a version of OOo, was listed along with OOo as seperate products. For the most part this could have been condensed down to:

    Linux, Firefox, OpenOffice, Android

    Which is so boring a list that it's of no use to anyone actually using open source already.

  • why is open source crawling through the transom?

    still cant get a key eh?

  • hidden in 500 adds. That site just made my blacklist.

  • Completely worthless (Score:5, Informative)

    by IICV (652597) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:30PM (#26284523)

    This list is entirely without any redeeming value. More than half of the "coolest" products are new versions of operating systems and applications (OMG they released Fedora 9! I may wet myself with glee!), and the rest of it includes useless things like what appears to be a Twitter clone and something IBM's branded as Lotus. Hell, they put Android on there, and that's a hardware platform that doesn't even have a killer app yet.

    Ubuntu's on it twice for goodness' sakes! And the second time is the long-term service distribution, which is about as exciting as growing grass!

    Normally I don't complain about the stuff that makes it to the front page, but this list is just a complete waste of absolutely everyone's time.

    • And the second time is the long-term service distribution, which is about as exciting as growing grass!

      I think you mean about exciting as watching grass grow .

      Growing grass on the other hand, is quite exciting to a lot of people; eg. drug dealers, pot heads, the DEA.

    • ...they put Android on there, and that's a hardware platform that doesn't even have a killer app yet

      Android is an OS, not a hardware platform.

  • by xrayspx (13127) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:31PM (#26284535) Homepage
    How about some individual projects? Amarok [kde.org] 2 came out in 2008. Other things that existed before but which improved mightily in '08 were:

    Flock [flock.com] (released v2)
    KDE Released 4x series, abysmal at first, but it's great now.
    BasKet [kde.org] Probably doesn't belong on a Best Apps Ever list, but it is pretty useful. This existed before, but I just found it this year and it's great, and it has become a lot more stable for me through the year. Someone help get them to qt4!
    There are lots of great apps out there that deserve some love this year.
  • Not quite mainstream and obvious as the pointless list presented in TFA, but I gotta add: Clojure [clojure.org]

    Clojure seems at first as Yet Another Lisp or Yet Another JVM Language or the general Yet Another New Programming Language, but once you scratch the surface you will discover it's an amazing engineering feat with groundbreaking design.
  • Arduino (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Speare (84249) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @04:52PM (#26285449) Homepage
    I'd have to say that the most interesting "product" that I've seen this year is an electronics microcontroller platform called Arduino [arduino.cc]. It started pre-2008, but it has shot up in popularity and had a writeup in Wired this year. The board is open source (blueprints and source code are Creative Commons), and people are making a wide range of alternative form factors with special features.
  • by TinuvaZA (1295961) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @05:07PM (#26285583)
    I actually think the article "Great Linux Innovations Of 2008" on http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=great_linux_innovations_2008&num=1 [phoronix.com] was much better.
  • Asterisk (Score:4, Informative)

    by z_gringo (452163) <z_gringo@@@hotmail...com> on Thursday January 01 2009, @06:14AM (#26289937)
    I am kind of surprised that Asterisk didn't make the list. There is a complete open source revolution happening in the field of Telephony. Asterisk 1.6 has been released, and Asterisk 1.4 is very solid and not only can do everything that the conventional higher end PBXs do, but can do a lot more.


    Asterisk has also inspired some other open source PBX projects. Asterisk doesn't necesarrily need to be only a IP pbx either, but in the VOIP field there are loads of exciting products that are revolutionizing telephony.


    Surely one of those products is at least worth a mention instead of putting linux in the list 4 times and open office in there twice.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      They're saying that MS Office costs $150-200, and OOo, being free is therefore $150-200 less than that.

      I think.
      • by owlnation (858981) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:33PM (#26284563)
        Actually as far as a medium to large organization is concerned, OpenOffice wouldn't be free in accounting terms. There would be training and admin costs on top of that -- which would initially be high. Training is expensive, and there would be a re-productivity curve for employees too, and thus a resultant increased cost again. It's probably a show stopper for many companies. While they do have to pay licences etc for MS Office, they don't really need to provide training in most corporations as Office knowledge is an expected skill to have, and most IT depts are familiar with it too.

        Which brings me to the fact that the real key to having the oft-heralded Year Of Linux, is to have a Year of the Office Replacement first. (I'm not sure that Open Office is currently anywhere near that happening). MS Office / Exchange are the whole key to Microsoft's dominance, not the OS. Find a viable solution for that, and Linux will follow.
        • Re:I don't get it... (Score:5, Interesting)

          by Kt.foss.zealot (1442361) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @03:48PM (#26284737)
          I don't think it's just me,.. but I was pretty much crippled when forced to use Microsoft Office Suite 2007 at work for the first week or so. The whole ribbon bullshit interface just seems completely counter-intuitive to me. Not to mention the unexpected way Microsoft Word 2007 handles simple things, It seems like I spend 20 minutes writing a document, and hours trying to make an unwanted line-gap go away, or trying to figure out some stupid header or footer issue. Somehow even LaTeX seems easier to use. Anyway, OpenOffice seems pretty intuitive to me for most uses, such as simple text editing, which is what most people sans-OCD do pretty easily anyway on pretty much any text editor. While the total cost of migrating to OpenOffice in most offices is most definately not 0, it's probably not higher than Microsoft Licenseing fees, and even if they were I think in the long run it could still save the company money, as most users have to re-learn MS Office every few years anyway.
          • by paganizer (566360) <thegrove1NO@SPAMhotmail.com> on Thursday January 01 2009, @03:58AM (#26289593) Homepage Journal

            Try IBM's version.
            I don't really have any problem using OpenOffice, but it's kludgey. and pretty slow.
            Lotus Symphony, on the other hand, seemed very polished to me, and significantly quicker.
            It's still not Office 2000/2003, but it is worlds better than the pile of excrement that is Office 2007. Which, by the way, I have not heard more than 5 people say they like, including the previous side-post.
            I would even say that, personally, I like the spreadsheet application in symphony better than excel in most instances; They have quite a bit of experience with those, so it makes sense.

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          I really don't accept your statement that "OpenOffice wouldn't be free in accounting terms as there would be training and admin costs on top of that." Just about every office suite is basically the same, and it doesn't matter what software package that you give your people because there will "always" be training involved. The only difference here is that OpenOffice is free. I can't begin to tell you the amount of time that I had to spend training people on Microsoft Office on just the basic functions, so it
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          Training is expensive, and there would be a re-productivity curve for employees too, and thus a resultant increased cost again.

          Actually, our organization recently upgraded MS Office and had to go through the retraining costs because of those stupid "ribbon" interfaces. The newer release is rather radically different from older releases, so the issue of retraining costs is moot.

          In addition to that, Open Office actually maintains a better user interface compatability with older releases of MS Office than Office itself does.

        • by David Gerard (12369) <slashdot.davidgerard@co@uk> on Wednesday December 31 2008, @05:34PM (#26285895) Homepage
          Training? You must work in some different office to everyone else. No-one gets training in the latest weird shit MS Office pulls. I'd like evidence that such training is widespread, or even happens.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          It's more than that, it's the entire ecosystem of third party stuff that's based on the assumption that Office is available. Off the top of my head, we have:
          1)Export from JDE (yes this can do CSV, not nearly as useful)
          2)Export from GL reporting package (no real alternative provided)
          3)Addon for Excel that's basically a macro package into the JDE financial, again no ready replacement
          4)Edit functionality in our Enterprise Content Management system
          5)Export functionality from our fixed asset software, no al
    • I think that says that 200 - 0 = 200 (so the OO.org costs less than Microsoft Office... with about $200)

    • Total cost rather than just the cost of the software. This may include training, support, etc.