Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Researcher Says Social Networks Link Terrorists

Posted by samzenpus on Thu Jan 08, 2009 07:57 AM
from the you-have-a-terrorist-request dept.
An anonymous reader writes "At the International Conference on Cyber Security 2009 in New York, Evan Kohlmann, a senior investigator and private consultant for Global Terror Alert, claimed that a new breed of terrorists are using online forums to recruit people who align themselves with the mission of Al Qaeda, creating global networks of would-be terrorists."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • FUD (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Spazztastic (814296) <spazztastic@gmai ... minus herbivore> on Thursday January 08 2009, @07:59AM (#26370531) Homepage
    Just another article stating FUD. Nothing to see here, move along. Might as well also get rid of online forums, USENET, and telephones.
    • Re:FUD (Score:4, Insightful)

      by noundi (1044080) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:15AM (#26370673)
      And paper, morse code, whistles, Microsoft Sam...
      • You know, all these terrorist organizations would have a lot more trouble communicating if we just stopped teaching children how to communicate.

        Of course, this might make them behave in a more feral-like fashion, but it's a small price to pay to help fight terrorism.

    • Re:FUD (Score:5, Insightful)

      by phagstrom (451510) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:15AM (#26370681)

      Also ink - people always forget about the ink. Used by terrorists for recruitment and plotting attacks. When will the madness end and ink be banned.

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      oh, you can count on the USENET getting the FUD cannon.
      Where do you think the terrorists get their kiddie porn.

    • You could even get rid of photobucket or craigs list.

      If I was a real deal terrorist I'd start putting messages in images. "For sale: " each with a different message, all embedded with text or encrypted text.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I can't think of any technology that can't be twisted and turned towards aiding evil.

      OMG stop making penicillin as it could be given to a terrorist to make him healthy enough to be able to bomb his next target, where before he may have died from his illness.

    • Money! (Score:4, Insightful)

      by ShatteredMind (1109153) on Thursday January 08 2009, @09:59AM (#26371857)
      Obviously the number one method for recruiting, arming, and gathering terrorists is good old green backs! Money the number one tool for terrorism; guess we need to ban that shit too.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I've done a lot of sales in my life. But I can't even begin to understand how difficult it must be to convince some idiot to blow himself up with the notion of virgins in paradise etc..
                On the other hand I can't think of a better thing to do with a radical Moslem than strapping bombs to them and blowing them up.

    • This Just In (Score:4, Informative)

      by maz2331 (1104901) on Thursday January 08 2009, @12:36PM (#26374133)

      Technology is show to be poltically-neutral. The same websites that link peaceful people can also link criminals, terrorists, military personnel, and the CIA to each other.

      The same gun can be used to terrorize or defend.

      The same hammer can drive nails or bash in skulls.o

      We now return you to your regularly-scheduled /.-ing.

  • by Thanshin (1188877) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:00AM (#26370543)

    I've heard that terrorists also speak to people to recruit new members!

    We should stop right now the use of language.

  • Technically, I've created a network if I plug a crossover cable between two machines.

    Technically, there is "a global network of would-be terrorists" if a jihadist from Pakistan uses a social site to contact anyone else in the world.

    Technically, paranoid people are really stretching the definitions of the word "network".

  • Oh come on... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by tygerstripes (832644) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:02AM (#26370557)

    How many stories like this do we have to read? When will the internets finally be recognised as a medium rather than an entity?

    As soon as government agencies begin to properly recognise this fact, they will be able to operate within the medium, making use of its strengths and weaknesses, instead of fearing it the whole damned time. Did it never occur that social networking sites offer an excellent means of infiltrating "would-be terrorist" networks? Anonymity works both ways.

    Just my 0.02.

    • When will the internets finally be recognised as a series of medium-sized tubes ?

      Fixed that for ya.

      • Infiltrating these recruiter networks to sow confusion and discord, as suggested in TFA, would be highly effective to curtail recruitment in an anonymous environment where little trust exists to begin with.

        Wouldn't you take the opposite approach and encourage trust in your fake user ... and then use the logs to track the IP addresses of the other participants ... and then tap (legally) their phones ... and find the people who have real connections with real terrorist organizations and crack THEM?

        This is the

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        When the public is scared, it's easy to justify spending on security, etc. Where does a lot of that money end up going? To consultants. And guess who wrote the TFA?

        This is the single most insightful comment on this post. I really need to get in on consulting work.

  • The Zarkman [typepad.com] was not impressed with the quality of recruits and supporters garnered through the interwebs. . .

  • ANY means of meeting people can be "used by terrorists", if you think about it too hard. If we listen to these guys, we'll first take down Facebook and MySpace. Then the chat rooms, and the public forums. Once the internet is expunged, cell phones would be banned, because "terrorists use them to meet and plan." Eventually, land lines would follow too. Should we also extend this fear to shortwave radios, pencil and paper? How about coffee shops? People can meet there too. And plan "terrorist activities." Now
  • It was also announced at the International Conference of Asshats (Those with heads in ass) that today's terrorists may also link using 2 tin cans and a piece of string!
  • Other links (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Joce640k (829181) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:09AM (#26370623) Homepage

    The networks also link the exact same people to well adjusted, middle aged Caucasians.

    Weirdly enough, this positive influence doesn't seem to be mentioned in the study.

  • There was a FUD about terrorist using PGP, there was FUD about terrorist using cell phones, there was even FUD about terrorist using Skype to communicate.

    Anyways, what's the fuss? Terrorist on Facebook? Police should cheer, it'll be a lot easier for them to infiltrate these groups and identify their members.
  • How convenient (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cruachan (113813) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:17AM (#26370699)

    So the jist of this article is several semi-permanent chatrooms have been identified where proto-terrorists gather to recruit and discuss strategy, and they want to take these down??!!!

    That's perverse. Why on earth would you want to take out honeypots that your foes are kind enough to set up for you?

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        I would think a law protecting websites from civil liability with such sites and encouraging them to permit them would do more for intelligence gathering than a dozen agents in the field could ever dream of doing.

        The West apparently stopped doing intelligence work some time between 1991 and 2001. Your suggestion is therefore completely unworkable. Repost your idea in Mandarin, perhaps someone will actually pick it up :-)

  • by TheP4st (1164315) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:18AM (#26370707)
    This made me visualize not X number of terrorists planning attacks and recruiting in these chatrooms, but X number of spooks gathering info on another in the belief that the other spooks are the real thing.
  • Same song, different lyric. Will they never learn?

  • Facebook (Score:5, Funny)

    by pzs (857406) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:23AM (#26370747)

    Osama Bin Laden has sent you some anthrax using the super poke application. Would you like to reply?

  • by Shawn888 (1392647) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:26AM (#26370763)
    This is just the government looking for a new way to view the people's email in any way they can. They will keep making new stories and attach the work "terrorist" to it, so that they can get a free pass to peek inside the area. First it was phones (obviously), and now they do warrantless wiretaps (and get away with it). Then it was laptops, now they can confiscate your laptop at the border for about as long as they want to. Now it's social sites... Anyone see a trend here? Now before I finish I will say that the government does need some of these options under certain circumstances, but not a free pass to view whatever they want, whenever they want.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I will say that the government does need some of these options under certain circumstances, but not a free pass to view whatever they want, whenever they want.

      Which is the entire point of warrants. Can someone explain to my why the government would ever possibly need to act without a warrant? If there's an imminent threat, they can even go ahead with a wiretap and get the warrant later, they just have to let a judge know why they did it. Is the government afraid our judges are terrorists now?

  • Panic! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Clovis42 (1229086) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:26AM (#26370767)
    Yeah, thanks to websites like Myspace, terrorist groups like "Fans of Panic at the Disco" have been able to organize and terrorize the rest of the web.
  • by fruey (563914) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:40AM (#26370879) Homepage Journal

    Anyone stupid enough to read this article and decide avoid the Internet because it is a hive of scum & villany is just one less stupid person on the net in the first place. So much the better.

  • minority report .. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by rs232 (849320) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:43AM (#26370899)
    What good is freedom of expression if there is no freedom of response. So-called democratic states attempt to suppress descent on social networks by painting them as havens for terrorists. It's curious as both the capitalists and the communists are dead scared of people talking to each other, without the moderating influence of some state-run or private-enterprise owned media.

    Yoani Sanchez and her blogging comrades are now the targets of the Castro regime's [motherjones.com] censors--and police.
  • by mgiuca (1040724) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:44AM (#26370903)

    Terror: "One that instills intense fear".

    How is this continual stream of "they could be EVERYWHERE" news not spreading the terror? Seriously ... every once in awhile they fly a plane into a building or blow up a bus, which is horrible!! But having our media and our politicians say, "forall x. x can be used by the terrorists (watch out|let's get rid of it)" is doing way more damage to our lives.

    Preaching to the converted, I know, but that's why we comment on Slashdot after all :)

    • by LiquidCoooled (634315) on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:07AM (#26370607) Homepage Journal

      You are giving people too much credit.

      we hear about it time and time again in all different aspects of life.

      Sure, there might be some smart ones who try to slip under the radar, but most just don't have the technical ability to manage a secure network let alone use technical security methods.

      do terrorist organisations have their own helpdesk?

      "Hello Dell support, how can I help?"
      "I can't get my warhead armed."
      "Have you tried turning it off and back on again?"

    • Once SOMEONE in that "network" performs any terrorist act, the logs would be collected and EVERYONE in that "network" would be discovered.

      It wouldn't even take that. Just one of them being investigated for doing something stupid.

      If anything, the government should be encouraging this.

    • Re:Prison System... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by dargaud (518470) <slashdot AT gdargaud DOT net> on Thursday January 08 2009, @08:39AM (#26370865) Homepage
      3 quotes for you:

      Convicts register their religious affiliation when they're processed into prison. And about 99.5% of the huge U.S.A. prison population consists of inmates who identified themselves as members of religious denominations." -- Gene M. Kasmar.

      "In general, higher rates of belief in and worship of a creator correlate with higher rates of homicide, juvenile and early adult mortality, STD infection rates, teen pregnancy and abortion in the prosperous democracies." -- From 'Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies' a study published in the (peer-reviewed) Journal of Society and Religion, 2008.

      "When I was young I used to pray for a bike. Then I realized that God doesn't work that way, so I stole a bike and prayed for forgiveness." -- Dan Gadino.

      So how about we instead teach those criminals _not_ to use god as an excuse or as a way to get forgiveness ? Maybe if they figured out they have only their current life they'll decide to make better use of it. One can dream.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Additionally, an inmate declaring membership in a religious group sets the stage for affiliating with a "group" that might afford protection in prison. Also, I'm told that the halal food is better at Rikers. IIRC there are some benefits for prayer times. Just one example.

          You are in prison - what are the advantages to going it alone? By declaring affiliation with a group, what have you lost?