Slashdot Log In
No Russian Operating System, At Least For Now
Posted by
timothy
on Sat May 02, 2009 01:30 PM
from the nichyego-for-now dept.
from the nichyego-for-now dept.
Elektroschock writes "The project by 27 Russian parties to develop a National Operating System for Russia has not taken off, yet (Russian). Ilya Ponomarev, the responsible technology committee chair in the Duma, received a negative response from the government. The government argues that the project and Open Standards would not impact the society and economy. Parliament members regret the setback for Russia's digital independence. Ponomarev wants to find other interested partners in the Government now." The Google translation makes it tough to tell whether this project is actually dead, or just shelved for the moment. Any Russian speakers out there who can parse it with greater clarity?
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Not I (Score:5, Funny)
I would, but then I would have to kill you, comrade. Our national secrets are safe from your translations of the Google.
Innovation comes from the Individual, not Gov't (Score:5, Insightful)
The Kremlin is wrong to think that the government can pick a winning operating system (OS) and then guide its develop.
The best thing that the Kremlin can do is the following.
In short, create a liberal Western society and a truly free market. Within this environment, Russian engineers will, for reasons of greed or personal achievement, create the best OS that meets the needs of Russian society. If the Japanese can achieve such technological success, I am certain that the Russians can do the same.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
You reminded me of a quote I've read recently:
-Peter Bauer, London School of Economics.
Re: (Score:2)
Make your mind up, which one of these do you want?
How would they benefit by cutting off the influx of talent and ideas? And why would an Eastern country want to protect Western culture?
Economic crisis (Score:2)
"In short, create a liberal Western society and a truly free market."
Because that worked soooooo well for us now didn't it? Tired stale Libertarian rhetoric, is tired, stale and so 2006. A xenophobic Libertarian wonderful good thing your user id is 666... that ought to be a tip off right there. SIGH!
Re: (Score:2)
nonsense, the state capitalism of the U.S. isn't free market. There are other places in the world where one can buy and sell anything and the market actually sets the price. nothing like not needing a doctor to get any medication you want....
Re: (Score:2)
You remind me of the King Crimson song:
"I repeat myself when under stress
I repeat myself when under stress
I repeat myself when under stress
I repeat myself when under stress
I repeat myself when under stress
I repeat..."
You Libertarians need a new riff before you become more unpopular than even George Bush himself. Hint a Libertarian is only slightly less repulsive than a neo-con. Yeah Libertarians get it right on opposing empire abroad, and police state at home, and your economic theory? Not so much...
Re: (Score:2)
what makes you think I'm Libertarian? the places of which I speak have kings.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
In Soviet Russia (Score:5, Funny)
The system operates you!
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Is it written in CCCP?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:In China (Score:2)
They feel they owe you no respect for your comment, and so I will copy it for you to eleven other sites.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have any idea how offensive that blanket association-without-consent is to some people in the countries you refer to? Many residents of "the Baltic States" are quite furious about still being associated with the country which took them over by force majeur in the 19th and 20th centuries. Equally, many residents of the Baltic States who have b
Re: (Score:2)
"Russian Windows will not be" (Score:3, Informative)
Riiight.... (Score:4, Insightful)
The government argues that the project and Open Standards would not impact the society and economy.
No NSA backdoors, a patriotic/nationalistic project, no licence fees (or less piracy, at least), software that wasn't originally created in America...
Yep, absolutely no impact on society or the economy.
Re: (Score:2)
NSA backdoors? If there were going to be any backdoors in Russian software, they would be put there by other Russians... either the Czar (Putin) or the gangsters (Russian Business Network) or maybe even both.
On a somewhat offtopic note: I continually find it amusing that people on Slashdot simultaneously believe the NSA has a magic backdoor into every Windows box on earth that nobody has ever actually been able to proves exists (because there isn't one), but at the same time they have no pro
Re:Riiight.... (Score:5, Interesting)
I think it is hilarious because you are in more danger from the poor guy trying to keep all that cruft from falling down than you ever were by the NSA. I was one of those that downloaded the source code for my beloved Win2K back in the day when it hit the net. While it was surprisingly well written and clean code every so often you would come along this -#HACK-We aren't really sure WHAT this does, but when you remove all versions of Office from 3.0-97 scream and have a nasty habit of screwing up data-Don"t Touch#
And just from the source code that hit the net there were quite a few spots just like that. Some piece of cruft that nobody had a clue what did anymore, but which seriously screwed things up when removed. Which sadly makes sense if you think about it. WinNT [wikipedia.org] was released in 1993. Think about that for a second. Think about how different the specs were on machines back then and then realize how many coders have been through the revolving door of OS development at MSFT. Each one adding their own code and trying to figure out just what in the hell the guy that came before them was thinking. The fact that the WMF bug [esecurityplanet.com] affected everything from Win3.1-XP(Vista wasn't released at the time IIRC) means that there was code still sitting in the bowels of the OS that damned old.
So worrying about the NSA having a backdoor is like worrying about a pinhole leak when you got a gash the size of an iceberg in your hull. The simple fact is the NSA don't NEED a backdoor, because they can go to a Exploits R' Us and simply buy one for whichever version of Windows they wanted to target. Because with that much code that has been going for THAT long there simply isn't anybody in the company that can tell you with certainty exactly WHAT all those millions of lines of code are doing and where they have come from. I mean it must be a nightmare to get bug fixing duty on that code. Considering the WinNT codebase began as NT OS/2 [wikipedia.org] in 1988 you are talking 21 years of cruft buildup. With that much cruft the NSA simply wouldn't have to bother.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
And I'm sure the US-goverment already has access to the source code of any recent version anyway.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Prove the NSA backdoors before adding more to the FUD-pile that is slashdot commenting on commercial software. Ill help you start: a mention of the letters NSA via a hex dump isnt proof of anything but your own credulity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you use Linux you are entrusting your security to the NSA since code that the NSA wrote is already in the Linux kernel (see SELinux). As mentioned above, plenty of people can see the Windows source code to check for malware.
Of course, be it Linux or Windows, even having security audits doesn't mean there are no security holes... why bother writing your own backdoor that will likely be easier to trace when you could just use the same exploits that the malware writers use?
Re: (Score:2)
Sure. And the Russians can just replace that and recompile it with their own version, eg from the FSB. That's the whole point of Open Source.
With Windows, even if you have the code and the rights (MS will let big enough customers have it), if you did roll your own, quite likely a whole lot of things would stop working. It's funny that Microsoft application are the most sensitive to t
Re: (Score:2)
Prove the NSA backdoors
Hard proof is hard to do when deniability is part of the design.
But here is something extremely suspicious, "a weakness that can only be described as a backdoor."
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2007/11/securitymatters_1115 [wired.com]
This article basically says (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I'll have to think about that a little bit.
Linux becoming the official OS of a nation. Hmmm.
I'm going to have to think about it a little more.
Russian speaker here (Score:5, Informative)
Ponomoarev is not giving up, though, and is seeking direct dialogue between his parliamentary committee and representatives of the Ministry, and also considering discussing his proposal with other government agencies.
Good news (Score:5, Interesting)
They basically suggested ditching the ambitious from-scratch "national software platform", or the infamous vapourware "Russian OS", and instead focusing on contributions to existing Free Software projects.
The key sentence from TFA:
"The communications ministry has instead suggested to use the possibilities offered by the Free Software development model. The limited national resources should be put to further the development of "the best internationally-created solutions, in cooperation with the leading specialists from around the globe".
Yay, there are sane people in our government.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Authors of the reply [...] agree that "supporting a national developer is a strategy" and that "the stimulation of creation and use of free software is a priority in the government policy, as it relates to information and communication technologies [ICT]." Yet they decided against creation of a national software platform and said that it would not solve any problems in the national IT sector.
The ministry of communication suggested to explore the options which are available through the [existing] free software development model. They said, the government's resources are limited and should be directed towards development and improvement of "the best solutions available in the world, in cooperation with leading specialists abroad".
From Ponomarev's reply:
The parliament member is sure that the ministry of communication does not want to invest in ICT sector, but instead wants to stimulate the development according to the liberal theory [of market economy?]. "Government was indirectly involved in all major successful hi-tech projects. Internet, UNIX: they all are collateral results of government programs. Market stimulation methods will not work. This can only happen in an established market, which we do not have at the moment."
Translation is mine.
Hey, I kind of agree with the government. Why fork it again if they can simply adapt one of the mature distributions out there and give some people research grants to work with free software developers around the world? It sounds like the representative is simply trying to create a government-funded software company they do not really need. I mean, Russian works in Ubuntu out of the freaking box.
Re: (Score:2)
Why doesn't the Russian government just give official sanction to the Russian-language version of Ubuntu Linux 9.04 and end it at that? It'll save the Russian government a "mountain of kopeks" in development costs and avoid the IT industry ghettoizing issue, too.
It is dead (Score:4, Informative)
Original Russian text says that Government supported the idea of using open source software, but declined to support National OS.
So the project is dead.
Translation of the first half of the article (Score:5, Informative)
There will be no "Russian Windows"
Deputy Ilya Ponomarev's letter to President Medvedev about the creation of a "national software platform" was redirected to the Ministry of Communications. According to CNews sources, the Ministry's reply letter to the deputy supports the orientation towards domestic and open-source software, but criticizes the deputy's main point - Ponomarev's "national software platform" proposal.
The authors of the reply (CNews has obtained a copy) agree that "supporting domestic developers is of strategic importance" and "stimulating the creation and use of open-source software is one of the government's priorities in the area of IT policy". However, they argue against the creation of a national software platform, believing that such a measure will not be a solution for the domestic IT sector's problems. The ministry writes that "the creation of such a combination of operating systems, software tools, software applications and open standards will not give a return to the economy and society".
The text directly mentions the high cost and risk of the project from the corruptibility point of view, due to the uncertainty of the criteria for project success. The authors also see a danger in the separation between the domestic and world IT industries that would result from the choice of such a development policy.
The Ministry of Communications proposes an orientation towards the possibilities that are enabled by the open-source model of software development. It proposed to direct the nation's limited resources towards the development and modification of "world leading solutions in cooperation with the world's best specialists".
Second half (Score:4, Informative)
Considering the above, the reply proposes to "harmonize Russian normative regulations with international law, including the Civil Code and a number of federal laws". Among the other proposed measures are the development of a list of prescriptions to ensure the compatibility between government IT systems, pilot projects for switching government agencies to open-source software, the creation of a repository of such software, and legislation to counteract monopolies in government IT purchases.
Ilya Ponomarev, chairman of the Duma technology development subcommittee, has not received the reply so far, but agreed to comment on the text that is in CNews' possession. "All of the Ministry's proposals on the one hand are directly listed in our letter, and on the other hand contradict the argument given in the reply", the deputy says. "I can only welcome the creation of a repository for domestic open-source software, if it will be created. At the moment there does not exist such a repository."
The MP is is sure that the Ministry of Communications does not want to engage in investment activities in the IT sector, but simply wants fo stimulate them within the framework of economic liberalism. "All successful large-scale high-tech projects have been completed with the indirect participation of the state. The Internet, Unix -- these are all indirect results of government programs. We will not succeed purely by market stimulation measures, such a development is possible only given an established market, and we do not have one," Ponomarev told CNews. "I am happy that the Ministry has realized the necessity of legislative initiatives, and I await Ministry representatives to present their proposals to our committee. If the Ministry of Communications does not want to deal with the national software platform, we can partner with other government agencies."
Parent
My understanding of FOSS in Russia (Score:5, Interesting)
I live in Russia, and my understanding of the government's Linux usage is this:
A few projects are being written using FOSS software, and depending on the outcome Linux will be either considered for other uses or will be abandoned completely. Corruption is a big problem because some companies (mostly Microsoft) bribe the people deciding which software will be installed.
Police raids searching for illegal software only accept a receipt or a license with a hologram. These are mostly directed at companies and, recently, individuals who install or troubleshoot software for a living. Even if you use Ubuntu you'll probably be considered a pirate 'cause you won't be able to show valid proof that the software is legally purchased. Some companies sell an Ubuntu DVD plus a license certificate for a nominal fee.
Another problem is the so-called "otkat" bribery: when a manager buys Windows for his company for $200, he may ask the store to sell it for $300 (and print a receipt for $300), and split the $100 difference between himself and the store's manager. Linux costs less or is even free, so less money may be extracted from its purchase.
OTOH, I was recently applying for a new passport and the whole system was running on Linux. It automatically OCRed the forms and extracted stuff like signatures, placing them in a database. The system was very simple to use, the computer booted and the app started automatically, it was written in QT3; the OS was some kind of custom Linux distribution based on AltLinux (which itself was forked from an old Mandrake release).
And, Microsoft started suing organisations using pirated software, the solution is either switching to Linux and spending money on training employees, or spending about the same amount on Windows+Office. If enough companies choose the first option, it may actually become the year of Linux on the desktop. Especially since the recent crisis lowered salaries and increased prices of foreign goods by nearly 30-40%.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Can you get Linux drivers for ICBMs?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Corruption is a big problem because some companies (mostly Microsoft) bribe the people deciding which software will be installed.
Happens worldwide, including the US.
Police raids searching for illegal software only accept a receipt or a license with a hologram. These are mostly directed at companies and, recently, individuals who install or troubleshoot software for a living.
And this is exactly what Microsoft wants to happen everywhere, especially the US.
(If you don't like it, do something about it.)
Russian Linux distribution (Score:5, Funny)
State sponsored software is sooo last century (Score:2)
When Gazprom decides that it's time to monopolize the Russian software market, we'll see what happens.
Funny (Score:2)
Russia made an Apple // Clone [vintage-computer.com] with no troubles. How come they cannot fork a Fedora clone from the open source code? I think even China was able to do that with Red Flag Linux. Maybe they can license Red Flag Linux from China? I am sure it has all of the Communist customizations for spying on their citizens built into it. :)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Red Flag Linux is missing software used to track your bribes, so is completely useless for Russians.
Re: (Score:2)
The bigger question is why should they bother? They can just work on existing projects, put patches out and delay the decision to fork until if and when it becomes necessary.
Otherwise they're just re-inventing the wheel.
Anonymous Coward (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm from Russia and it's obvious that the project wasn't aimed to provide a really good alternative platform but to make a buzzword and PR for initiators. The people who really do something, like Alt Linux or ASP Linux or Mandriva Ru get no support ever. And so is true for most independent russian companies that try to develop free or open source based products.
Sadly disappointed... (Score:5, Funny)
I was so looking forward to trying the 'Stalinux' distro, comrade.
They got an even better name for it! (Score:5, Funny)
I was so looking forward to trying the 'Stalinux' distro, comrade.
I heard they went with 'Lenix'.
Parent
Re:fp (Score:5, Funny)
You must be new here!
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Dear Sir...the united coalition of trolls awards you this video of a turtle having intercourse with a shoe.
I accept this award graciously and with thanks. It made me laugh! Definitely better than Goatse.
Re: (Score:2)
I heard the rights to the image are owned by the Getty Museum.
They outbid Time Warner and ABC/Disney.
Hey, if you really want a new experience, check out the goatsi guy in Cooliris.