Slashdot Log In
Google Search Flagging Everything As Potentially Harmful
Posted by
Soulskill
on Sat Jan 31, 2009 09:58 AM
from the minor-problem dept.
from the minor-problem dept.
dowlingw writes "It looks like for the moment at least, all Google results are failing the malware checks and being listed with a warning 'This site may harm your computer,' including all pages from Google themselves. Users trying to visit pages at search results will only be able to proceed via manual manipulation of the search result link to remove the Google click-through (which is also broken). Until Google fixes this bug, it looks Google web search is useless." Update: 01/31 at 15:16 GMT by SS: The problem now appears to be fixed.
Update: 01/31 at 22:01 GMT by KD : Google has now posted an explanation, apologizing and taking responsibility for the "human error" that led to the problem.
Update: 01/31 at 22:01 GMT by KD : Google has now posted an explanation, apologizing and taking responsibility for the "human error" that led to the problem.
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Broke the internets! (Score:5, Funny)
Who googled google..
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:5, Funny)
I initially figured that this was an attack on FOSS since I was looking up where to install gdm themes and all the linux sites said they were potentially harmful.
Little did I know it was really skynet.
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:5, Funny)
Little did I know it was really skynet.
iptables -I INPUT 1 -p udp --dport skynet -j DROP
iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp --dport skynet -j DROP
There, I saved the human race. Do I get chicks now?
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:5, Funny)
No you get John Connor. Sorry.
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:5, Funny)
i searched for "site:google.com -google" and got "Britney spears big tits" as the 5th match.
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:5, Funny)
i searched for "site:google.com -google" and got "Britney spears big tits" as the 5th match.
Nice try, getting all of slashdot to DDoS Google just when they are showing signs of weakness.
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:4, Funny)
Wow, that's pretty impressive. Their scanner somehow didn't find a bunch of my drives though...I wonder if the downloaded version is any better.
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:5, Funny)
Who googled google..
http://flickr.com/photos/tonyaustin/3241509252/ [flickr.com]
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:5, Insightful)
http://flickr.com/photos/tonyaustin/3241509252/ [flickr.com]
Maybe Google is just flagging itself as harmful because it knows that Google doesn't respect your privacy ;)
(Sad thing is I'm only half joking....)
Parent
They broke one thing to fix something else (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:They broke one thing to fix something else (Score:5, Funny)
It seems like they disabled the engine entirely.
someone threw a chair at it
Parent
Re:Broke the internets! (Score:4, Interesting)
I did, Screenshots here:
Google Flags Itself as Harmful [techemperor.com] Hilarity ensued.
Parent
Clearly... (Score:5, Funny)
Skynet - er, Google - has become self-aware and has deemed that the entire Internet is harmful to us power sour - I mean, humans, and is protecting us for some reason it has not divulged yet...
Re:Clearly... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Adsense Still Works (Score:4, Informative)
Not entirely useless (Score:5, Informative)
It isn't entirely useless, you can still get the link for your results, it is just overly annoying. I also found that it was NOT flagging youtube sites, which I found interesting.
Easier workaround for Firefox users (Score:5, Informative)
Redirect Remover [mozilla.org]
What am I supposed to do now? (Score:5, Funny)
Time to see if Alta Vista still exists.
Re:What am I supposed to do now? (Score:5, Funny)
For the time being, I'd avoid this weblink issue altogether and just use archie.
Parent
I knew the Internet was evil! (Score:4, Funny)
Now Google confirms it!
Layoffs? (Score:5, Funny)
So I heard Google was having some layoffs recently...
Well... (Score:5, Funny)
slashdotted already (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, the sites
www.stopbadware.org/
and
www.google.at/support/bin/answer.py?answer=45449&topic=360&hl=de&sa=X&oi=malwarewarninglink&resnum=1&ct=help
were slashdotted before this was even on slashdot ...
Not a common carrier (Score:5, Insightful)
This feature, no doubt implemented with good intentions, show the perils of the nanny state so many politicians all over the world are proposing. Why should Google police the internet?
They should act like the phone company used to be, a common carrier just sending through the information, for better or worse.
Of course, I understand that Google isn't an ISP, so the "common carrier" principle does not apply. They are just providing a service for me, without charging me directly. But the principle is the same, if I wanted some sort of protection from malware there are many places where I can get it by asking, I do not need to be protected involuntarily.
Re:Not a common carrier (Score:5, Insightful)
I think what it really shows the perils of is piling additional "features" on top of a perfectly good product until you've ruined what made it good in the first place and turned it into worthless crap. Search should be simple: give the user what they are looking for. All the other extraneous stuff they are loading it up with is bound to interfere with that basic requirement at some point.
I see this in mature development projects all the time. At some point, people get a pretty good product working, but they can't repress the urge to continue "improving" it... it can be boredom, wow factor for marketing, or just plain stupidity, but few people or organizations seem to know when to quit messing with a product that already works well.
Parent
Re:Not a common carrier (Score:4, Interesting)
That's a simple way to state the goal, but it takes a lot of clever algorithms to achieve it. If your search results are irrelevant, spam, scams, or largely duplicates, you didn't get what you were looking for. And if a web site takes over your computer as soon as you visit it, you really didn't get what you were looking for, hence the interstitial warning page.
Parent
Re:Not a common carrier (Score:4, Insightful)
but most people don't know (and don't want to know) how to protect themselves.
And furthermore, viruses don't just hurt the people whose computers they infect; infected computers are used for illegal activities of spam or just to infect other people. It becomes a matter of "public health", like requiring kids to get their vaccinations--it's not just for their benefit, it's to prevent epidemics as well.
Parent
their check site failed (Score:4, Informative)
Google use stopbadware.org to check if a site is bad or not - this site is down.
I think it should work when it's back up.
Yahoo has changed (Score:5, Funny)
Wow! Yahoo looks a lot different than it used to.
The ads are broken too... (Score:4, Interesting)
No AdSense ads are displaying, at least for several popular advertising keywords like "refinance".
No cache, either (Score:5, Funny)
If I'm nervous about the site, I look at Google's cache instead. Well, that's no longer available either. Sheesh!
Finally (Score:5, Funny)
Finally, a company just comes out and says what we all know: the entire Internet is dangerous and must be stopped.
Has anyone considered... (Score:5, Interesting)
Has anyone considered the possibility that as of this morning 95% of the sites on the Internet are infected with malware?
sPh
Re:Has anyone considered... (Score:4, Insightful)
yes - you just did. There's got to be an award for that :)
was that a serious question?
Parent
out of beta (Score:5, Funny)
Exit to parking lot, run in serpentine fashion! (Score:4, Interesting)
Someone is so getting fired for this.
This is the first Google effective downtime in my memory.. Were there other ones that anyone can think of?
Re:Exit to parking lot, run in serpentine fashion! (Score:5, Informative)
I work for Google.
I would bet a lot of money that won't happen. Any failure like this one has many sides to it and responsibility will always be distributed over multiple people. The result of this will be a detailed post mortem, better processes, tools, and software, to ensure that something like it does not happen again.
google.com stopped resolving back in 2005 for 15 minutes. Nobody got fired.
Parent
reminds me of the classic Letterman commercial (Score:4, Interesting)
the one with Letterman says "imagine what the world would be like without TV", and then you get a couple of seconds of nothing, then Letterman appears again and says "scary, wasnt it?"
Failsafe (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Failsafe (Score:4, Insightful)
At least it failsafes to every site being flagged. Much better than it just letting people get malware ridden sites.
You must be kidding? 15 minutes of the entire planet being without our precious Google is *much* better than some stupid yahoo getting a virus from his pr0n site? Not to me, at least...
Parent
Google Announcement (Score:5, Funny)
BitTorrent, Azureus, uTorrent (Score:4, Funny)
At that time I was doing searches about bittorrent clients. For a second I thought the RIAA/MPAA had bought Google or something.
Explanation from official Google Blog (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the explanation from Google's official blog:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/this-site-may-harm-your-computer-on.html [blogspot.com]
What happened? Very simply, human error. Google flags search results with the message "This site may harm your computer" if the site is known to install malicious software in the background or otherwise surreptitiously. We do this to protect our users against visiting sites that could harm their computers. We work with a non-profit called StopBadware.org to get our list of URLs. StopBadware carefully researches each consumer complaint to decide fairly whether that URL belongs on the list. Since each case needs to be individually researched, this list is maintained by humans, not algorithms.
We periodically receive updates to that list and received one such update to release on the site this morning. Unfortunately (and here's the human error), the URL of '/' was mistakenly checked in as a value to the file and '/' expands to all URLs. Fortunately, our on-call site reliability team found the problem quickly and reverted the file. Since we push these updates in a staggered and rolling fashion, the errors began appearing between 6:27 a.m. and 6:40 a.m. and began disappearing between 7:10 and 7:25 a.m., so the duration of the problem for any particular user was approximately 40 minutes.
Re:Explanation from official Google Blog (Score:4, Informative)
The quote posted here does not correspond to the linked blog entry [blogspot.com] anymore, as the blog was updated. Essentially, it now states the list with the error was not provided by StopBadware.org, but created by Google themselves.
The changed part:
We maintain a list of such sites through both manual and automated methods. We work with a non-profit called StopBadware.org to come up with criteria for maintaining this list, and to provide simple processes for webmasters to remove their site from the list.
We periodically update that list and released one such update to the site this morning.
The issue is also explained on StopBadware.org's blog [stopbadware.org].
Parent
Re:Even Google (Score:5, Funny)
It's a good thing I took lots of pictures for the "pics or it didn't happen" crowd :)
Parent
Re:Even Google (Score:5, Funny)
yes, but now how do you appease the "everything is photoshop" crowd?
Parent
Re:Not Useless (Score:5, Funny)
There are other search engines.
yes, but they link to another internet
Parent
Re:Not Useless (Score:5, Funny)
There are other search engines.
Why do you hate America ?
Parent
Re:Not Useless (Score:5, Funny)
Be careful. According to google, Yahoo.com could be harmful to your computer!
Parent
Re:Not Useless (Score:5, Funny)
Only if Microsoft had bought them ;)
Parent