Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

One Broken Router Takes Out Half the Internet?

Posted by kdawson on Mon Feb 16, 2009 06:32 PM
from the brain-gone-punky dept.
Silent Stephus writes "I work for a smallish hosting provider, and this morning we experienced a networking event with one of our upstreams. What is interesting about this, is it's being caused by a mis-configured router in Europe — and it appears to be affecting a significant portion of the transit providers across the Internet. In other words, a single mis-configured router is apparently able to cause a DOS for a huge chunk of the Net. And people don't believe me when I tell them all this new-fangled technology is held together by duct-tape and baling wire!"
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @06:34PM (#26879387)
    A couple of Nuclear Subs probably cut an underwater cable...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @06:38PM (#26879423)

    A router takes out 'half the internet' and I learn this from Slashdot?

    Seriously, what is/was the impact? I work for a large e-commerce provider and haven't seen a thing that would indicate a problem today.

    • Ditto the A.C. (Score:5, Informative)

      by khasim (1285) <brandioch.conner@gmail.com> on Monday February 16 2009, @06:43PM (#26879527)

      It must have been the "half the Internet" that I don't use. Which would be an interesting half because many of the sites I visit regularly are based in Europe.

      From the thread, it looks like AS 47868 was the route being lost.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_System_Number [wikipedia.org]

      • by roc97007 (608802) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:05PM (#26879841) Journal

        > It must have been the "half the Internet" that I don't use.

        The non-pr0n half.

      • Re:Ditto the A.C. (Score:5, Informative)

        by petecarlson (457202) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:25PM (#26880049) Homepage Journal

        It wasn't just AS47868, it was kicked off by AS47868 sending real long routes like you can get to a by going through b, c, d, e, f ,g, h... and so on and so forth. Older versions of IOS wack out with the crazy long routes and lose their BGP sessions so it is possible that he lost half of the internet while you were on a network segment which was not seeing the issue. If the OP were to post the ASN or IP block he was on we could run BGP play and see just how much of the net he really lost. I'm going to guess about .5%.

    • by Frosty Piss (770223) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:49PM (#26879631)

      A router takes out 'half the internet' and I learn this from Slashdot?

      Non, no, no. You messed up the troll and got modded "Insightful". Let me fix that for you:

      A router takes out 'half the internet' and this is front page news at Slashdot? Slow news day?

      Thank you, I'll be here all week...

    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @07:42PM (#26880259)

      A router takes out 'half the internet' and I learn this from Slashdot?

      Seriously, what is/was the impact? I work for a large e-commerce provider and haven't seen a thing that would indicate a problem today.

      Well I'm not sure about you.

      Personally, I have BIGGER news! A single router in a remote rural US state managed to take down the ENTIRE INTERNETS!!!!

      Yes, indeed when I noticed my cat had unplugged the power adapter, I replaced it. Then the ENTIRE internet came back! It was amazing how I single-handedly brought back the whole internets. Al Gore would be proud.

  • Sorry (Score:5, Funny)

    by Alcoholist (160427) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:38PM (#26879425) Homepage

    My bad. I never should have cut that tape.

  • by Forge (2456) <forge.myrealbox@com> on Monday February 16 2009, @06:41PM (#26879483) Homepage Journal
    Lucky Yankees with all your fancy technology. If I told you what we use, nobody would respond for fear that in attempting to respond I would cause a few fatalities.
  • Yep, Its true (Score:5, Informative)

    by Bryansix (761547) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:41PM (#26879485) Homepage
    Our Hosted VOIP service took a dump today at 8:40 AM PST. Supposedly it was a server in the Czech Republic. From the Carrier

    2009-02-16 0945 PST CP experienced a core network connectivity issue due to a world wide BGP issue that affected all BGP interconnected networks. A rouge machine in the Czech Republic was making bad AS advertisements that caused systems world wide to fail. We have worked with our providers as well as our internal Engineering department to effectively block this node and restore service to our network. This is an ongoing issue that is still being worked to get a 100% correction. There is a workaround currently in place until a complete fix is available.

    • by radish (98371) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:48PM (#26879619) Homepage

      A rouge machine in the Czech Republic was making bad AS advertisements that caused systems world wide to fail.

      Now I really don't know all that much about large-scale networking so maybe someone could explain this to me. What difference does it make if the router is rouge, versus say, green? or black?

      Thanks for any insight :)

      • by ChunderDownunder (709234) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:02PM (#26879795)
        Since folks on Slashdot seem to like car analogies, I'll just mention that Red Cars Go Faster [google.com] and assume that the same law applies for routers.
      • by pyite (140350) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:04PM (#26879821)

        Now I really don't know all that much about large-scale networking so maybe someone could explain this to me. What difference does it make if the router is rouge, versus say, green? or black?

        So they announced a route that was, shall we say, malformed. Part of the problem is that due to a Cisco bug (CSCdr54230), some routers choke on it instead of ignoring it. The bug is fixed. It was fixed some time ago. Nonetheless, it's a pretty bad bug, labeled as "1 - catastrophic" by Cisco (in red letters, even). Routers still running affected code versions are having issues.

        And it's only at this point in writing my reply that I realize you were taking advantage of a pun by way of misspelling. I'll leave my reply anyway ;-)

      • Re:Yep, Its true (Score:5, Insightful)

        by myowntrueself (607117) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:20PM (#26879997)

        That's the problem. You shouldn't use rouge on your routers.

        I think that a rouged router would possibly be overly promiscuous.

        No wonder problems like this can spread like the clap in a port town!

      • by HTH NE1 (675604) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:21PM (#26880003)

        That's the problem. You shouldn't use rouge on your routers.

        They think a rouge router is in vouge, but they're out of their leauge. We should haranuge them! A plauge on them! Rip out their tounges so they cannot aruge! Them and their colleauges. Nothing but demagouges and idealouges I say. There can be no dialouge on this matter. Send them to the moruge!

        Are you intriuged by my ideas and want to subscribe to my travelouge?

  • AS 47868 (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @06:42PM (#26879495)

    There is a post in nanog and on isc.sans.org.

    AS 47868 causing AS paths to become too long...

    http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg15472.html

  • Oops (Score:4, Funny)

    by kbob88 (951258) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:42PM (#26879509)

    Sorry, I *told* Mustafa not to drop the anchor there! But does he listen to me? No...

  • by bugi (8479) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:43PM (#26879539)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baling_wire [wikipedia.org]

    I think you mean baling wire. One uses buckets for bailing.

  • by XanC (644172) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:45PM (#26879563)

    What is Jen doing with The Internet??

  • by fm6 (162816) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:50PM (#26879643) Homepage Journal

    Well, do, you're right to be concerned. The thing is, our technology infrastructure has always been a nasty kludge. In 1965, some coincidental misconfigurations at two minor power plants took out the power grid for an area in the northeast U.S. and eastern Canada where 25 million people lived. It was 14 hours before the grid was fully restored. Our inability to keep our technical house in order is a very old problem.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @06:50PM (#26879649)

    The AS 47868 decided that they wanted to prepend their ASN about 75 or so times to their BGP announcements. When this got re-populated throughout the rest of the world, a bug in older versions of Cisco IOS still in use on many ISP/NSP networks does not like paths this long. As soon as they saw the prefix with that long of a path, the software terminated the BGP session, resulting in the doorway being closed between the two networks -- So on and so forth throughout the rest of the web.

  • by tlambert (566799) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:52PM (#26879665)

    Make sure you are using cat 5 bailing wire.

    -- Terry

  • by need4mospd (1146215) on Monday February 16 2009, @06:53PM (#26879669)

    In other words, a single mis-configured router is apparently able to cause a DOS for a huge chunk of the Net.

    This means the router was able to take out over 9000 internets. Quite impressive.

  • by DeadBeef (15) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:21PM (#26880005) Homepage

    This only broke BGP implementations that are getting pretty long in the tooth now, on a moderately recent version of IOS all we saw is:

    Feb 17 05:25:03.731 nzdt: %BGP-6-ASPATH: Long AS path 10026 3356 29113 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 received from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: More than configured MAXAS-LIMIT

    It was definitely an insane path, our routers were configured to drop anything with an AS path longer than 75, old versions of IOS would often just drop the BGP session ( or even crash with some _really_ old versions ).

    I'm sure there will be some red faced network engineers updating IOS or even doing forklift upgrades of old boxes at their edges in the near future.

  • by lotaris (34307) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:35PM (#26880175)

    This only took down people running fairly old versions of IOS that didn't patch a known bug.

    Did not affect non-cisco.
    Did not affect modern versions of IOS
    Did not affect old versions of IOS that set the knob to limit the max as-path.

  • by Genda (560240) <mariet@got. n e t> on Monday February 16 2009, @08:07PM (#26880517) Journal

    Welcome to Sauronet... One Router to Rule them ALL!!!!

    • BGP (Score:5, Informative)

      by winkydink (650484) * <sv.dude@gmail.com> on Monday February 16 2009, @06:39PM (#26879451) Homepage Journal

      The internet's dirty little secret. It's amazing it works at all.

        • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @09:06PM (#26881101)

          This "article" is incredibly misleading as nothing has really gone awry. It is just another pointless KDAWSON post. These things are getting REALLY old, KDAWSON.
           
          I work for a tier-3 provider, and if "half the Internet" dies, you are going to hear from a half-brained big media outlet (e.g CNN, ABC) VERY fast.

    • by agm (467017) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:15PM (#26879943)

      They need to replace it with a network that is designed to survive a nuclear attack. Oh wait, hang on....

        • Re:Intelligence Op (Score:5, Interesting)

          by Medievalist (16032) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:39PM (#26880873)

          They need to replace it with a network that is designed to survive a nuclear attack. Oh wait, hang on....

          Wish I had mod points today. Parent should already be SCORE:5 Funny. Apparently not enough Slashdotters know the history/evolution of the net.

          If you're referring to the myth that the Internet was "designed to withstand nuclear attack", perhaps Slashdotters know more than you think.

          The Internet was designed to allow distributed control, and to withstand telephone company malice and incompetence. This was a much more useful goal than withstanding nuclear attack.

          • Re:Intelligence Op (Score:5, Informative)

            by hardwarefreak (899370) on Monday February 16 2009, @09:23PM (#26881231)

            They need to replace it with a network that is designed to survive a nuclear attack. Oh wait, hang on....

            Wish I had mod points today. Parent should already be SCORE:5 Funny. Apparently not enough Slashdotters know the history/evolution of the net.

            If you're referring to the myth that the Internet was "designed to withstand nuclear attack", perhaps Slashdotters know more than you think.

            The Internet was designed to allow distributed control, and to withstand telephone company malice and incompetence. This was a much more useful goal than withstanding nuclear attack.

            One of the early arguments made by DARPA folks to politicians, in order to secure continued federal funding for packet switched network development, was the ability of the network to route around failed or destroyed nodes. They made this argument in the context of the cold war, of nuclear war.

            It reality, as you state, this argument had little practical impact on the technical development or evolution of the the network. However, it most certainly did have an impact on the commitment of federal/military funding. This is the origin of the "surviving nuclear attack" lore of the development of DARPANET. It's not a myth. It's real.

            Take Obama's current stimulus package as a parallel example. It's not going to solve the recession, but it's being sold as such. And the congress bought into it. Just as this stimulus bill isn't what it's being sold as, most likely DARPANET wouldn't have really given us what it was sold as at one point. Nonetheless, it was sold as such, thus creating the lore that you call myth.

            • Re:Intelligence Op (Score:5, Interesting)

              by TubeSteak (669689) on Monday February 16 2009, @10:53PM (#26882309) Journal

              One of the early arguments made by DARPA folks to politicians, in order to secure continued federal funding for packet switched network development, was the ability of the network to route around failed or destroyed nodes. They made this argument in the context of the cold war, of nuclear war.

              They made that argument in the context of a widely distributed POTS copper wire network.
              The infrastructure of today's internet is fiber based.
              And most of that fiber is consolidated in a small number of long backhaul runs.

              Remember that grad student whose thesis was classified because he gathered up public documents and mapped out the fiber runs that make up the domestic internet? They classified it (and pulled most of the references he used) because his analysis showed there were a few critical points which, if disrupted, would effectively fracture the domestic internet infrastructure.

              The internet isn't nearly as bulletproof as the DoD would like and there isn't much they can do about it short of laying new fiber that skips over the vulnerable points.

              • Re:Intelligence Op (Score:5, Informative)

                by JWSmythe (446288) * <jwsmythe@@@jwsmythe...com> on Tuesday February 17 2009, @02:19AM (#26883537) Homepage Journal

                    Aw heck, someone in Nebraska is going to trip over one power cord, and shut down the Interweb. :)

                    In addition to using public maps, I did a lot more research. I had my own little project going for a little while. The project was intended to monitor for faults between datacenters we had equipment in. I added the root nameservers. I also had a few other points, such as friends houses and places they had virtual hostings at.

                    Simply enough, it was running traceroutes from everywhere I had control to all points in my "network". I stored what router attached to each hop in a database.

                    I located each hop simply by the city it was located in. Some were easy. Some weren't so easy.

                    It was fun and games with 100 routers. I was manually setting city and state locations.

                    It was a little less fun when it grew to 500 routers. I wrote regular expressions to take known naming conventions and make them into city names. That sounds easy, but it gets pretty hard pretty quick.

                    It was a lot less fun when the list grew to several thousand routers.

                    Basically, ever time there was a routing change, I found new routers.

                    I had a lot of fun using both Google Maps to show the routes (for routers that I could place in a city), and a Graphviz model of the Internet as we observed it. It was a very big map. That was only what we had observed. I doubt we even saw a very small percentage (probably less than 0.01%) of the routes.

                    The map got very very very complicated. I could point out choke points. They existed, but there were also alternative routes.

                    Hell, even on a single good provider, there are no good choke points. On one Tier 1 provider that I used, in a non-core city, they had 6 diverse routes with OC192's. It wasn't a matter of me trusting them when they told me. I saw the routes showing up.

                    There are 4 cities in the US, where if say a big nuke hit each one, ya, the Internet would be hurting. You may not get from Provider A to Provider B, but you'd still have some connectivity within your own provider, and other peerings would start working fairly quickly. More obviously, you'd find that some sites that are hosted in one city would be inaccessible. That's why geographic and topological diversity is very important for anyone who wants to keep their stuff up and running.

                    Google puts stuff out all over the place for a reason. If a route, or a dozen routes, go funky, you'll very likely still be able to reach some datacenter.

                    My office is connected by 3 uplinks. They're all with different providers. The odds of a provider outage killing the office is pretty slim. Other things can happen though. Lightning hit a transformer across the street, which serviced our building. From what people on that side of the building said, it was very pretty. :) Was our Internet connection dead? No. Well, not totally. We still had 2 uplinks working. We didn't have power for the desktops though. The UPS (a big one, not the little desktop ones) provides for the server room and a very few workstations.

                    The biggest effect we saw from that outage was that cell phone service became minimal. The top of our building is also used for cell phone coverage. Without those antennas working, we only had service from the surrounding towers. It probably didn't help that there was now an office building full of people who were evacuated to the ground floor (it tripped the fire alarm), so almost everyone were on their cell phones making calls to customers, friends, family, etc.

                    The most upset people were stuck in the elevator. They were already going downstairs for a smoke break, when it got stuck because those aren't backed up with anything at all.

                   

    • by kenj0418 (230916) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:15PM (#26880617)

      Don't worry, it wasn't a DOS attack. That was just the Internet becoming self-aware.

      OK, on second thought, maybe worrying is in order.

      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @08:24PM (#26880727)

        The last time I experienced a DOS attack it evolved into Windows. Didn't come out of that one unscathed.

    • by CarpetShark (865376) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:23PM (#26880717)

      Yeah, this was my first thought as well. It seems clear that the internet, while designed to route traffic through all sorts of alternate links, is almost certainly being routed through single, centralised listening posts at various intervals.

    • by petecarlson (457202) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:58PM (#26880431) Homepage Journal

      If I'm understanding this 'router' thing correctly, its like a faucet connected to the series of tubes?

      If not, exactly what role does this router thing play in tube interaction?

      Your understanding is rather accurate but what your missing is the manifolds. You see, all the tubes connect to big manifolds with valves to control what gets sent where. At each manifold room there is some poor admin who is in charge of opening and closing valves in order to make sure that the right AOL gets sent down the right tube. In order to keep track of what tube to send your AOL down, the admin keeps a list of all the other manifold rooms and how to get to them. Some of the manifold room operators didn't have a wide enough notebook to write down the new directions so they just closed all of their valves and went home.