Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

LimeWire Brings Darknets To All

Posted by samzenpus on Thu Mar 05, 2009 07:57 AM
from the yes-have-some dept.
An anonymous reader writes "LimeWire's new version lets people create private darknets with contacts on any Jabber server (like GMail or LiveJournal). It's different than the recent p2p darknet announcement because it doesn't use onion routing. Sharing with a friend connects directly to that friend. If you're worried about exposing personal information, LW5 doesn't share documents with the p2p network by default."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Your Rights Online: Combining BitTorrent With Darknets For P2P Privacy 325 comments
CSEMike writes "Currently popular peer-to-peer networks suffer from a lack of privacy. For applications like BitTorrent or Gnutella, sharing a file means exposing your behavior to anyone interested in monitoring it. OneSwarm is a new file sharing application developed by researchers at the University of Washington that improves privacy in peer-to-peer networks. Instead of communicating directly, sharing in OneSwarm is friend-to-friend; senders and receivers exchange data using multiple intermediaries in an overlay mesh. OneSwarm is built on (and backwards compatible with) BitTorrent, but includes numerous extensions to improve privacy while providing good performance: point-to-point encryption using SSL, source-address rewriting, and multi-path and multi-source downloading. Clients and source are available for Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows."
[+] Obama Helicopter Security Breached By File Sharing 408 comments
Hugh Pickens writes "A company that monitors peer-to-peer file-sharing networks has discovered a potentially serious security breach involving President Barack Obama's helicopter. 'We found a file containing entire blueprints and avionics package for Marine One, which is the president's helicopter,' says Bob Boback, CEO of Tiversa, a security company that specializes in peer-to-peer technology. Tiversa was able to track the file, discovered at an IP address in Tehran, Iran, back to its original source. 'What appears to be a defense contractor in Bethesda, Md., had a file-sharing program on one of their systems that also contained highly sensitive blueprints for Marine One,' says Boback, adding that someone from the company most likely downloaded a file-sharing program, typically used to exchange music, without realizing the potential problems. 'I'm sure that person is embarrassed and may even lose their job, but we know where it came from and we know where it went.' Iran is not the only country that appears to be accessing this type of information through file-sharing programs. 'We've noticed it out of Pakistan, Yemen, Qatar and China. They are actively searching for information that is disclosed in this fashion because it is a great source of intelligence.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Chabil Ha' (875116) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:02AM (#27076139)

    Until you start letting 'friends' join your peer network with usernames like Riaa250k into your 'private network'.

    • Re:Great idea... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by briggsl (1475399) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:08AM (#27076167)
      Unfortunately, the social networking society we're in now, where the norm is to accept anyone who 'sends a friend request' will make darknets unworkable for the majority
        • Re:Great idea... (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:24AM (#27076253)

          Yes, people still fileshare. I like streaming (youtube) but I still want high quality copies on my local machine which I can have access to even when the network/stream service goes down. And filesharing is useful for rare stuff.

        • Re:Great idea... (Score:5, Insightful)

          by meist3r (1061628) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:41AM (#27076355)

          Everything I want to listen to and watch can be streamed now. Thanks to Hulu and Netflix and iTunes I can get the latest movies and just about everything else! The costs for these activities are no longer prohibitive.

          Lucky for you, Windows using American. I as a Linux using European can use none of the aforementioned services. Arrrhhh. Off to the bay where they don't geo-judge.

          Segmenting the internet back into region specific chunks is probably the worst thing that happened since MySpace.

          • Re:Great idea... (Score:5, Insightful)

            by Ninnle Labs, LLC (1486095) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:42AM (#27076367)

            Segmenting the internet back into region specific chunks is probably the worst thing that happened since MySpace.

            So you'd rather Hulu and Netflix be sued into bankruptcy for streaming content to places in the world they have no right to do so? Yeah, that'd be a much greater idea...

            • Re:Great idea... (Score:4, Insightful)

              by Dorkmaster Flek (1013045) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:59AM (#27076531)
              No, we'd rather they be able to stream content into other places in the world. I don't give a rats ass about the legal crap. It's their mess, and they need to work it out. Until then, don't expect us to stop going to places like The Pirate Bay to get content we can't stream otherwise.
              • Re:Great idea... (Score:5, Interesting)

                by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 05 2009, @10:02AM (#27077137)

                As a similarly affected European, I empathize, but I think it's important not to bite the hand that feeds you here; Hulu is one of the good guys. If they can succeed at showing the cartels at the local level that digital distribution is a good idea, then it will eventually expand to the global level. I wish them none but the best success.

                Until that actually happens I will join you in pirating, however.

            • Re:Great idea... (Score:5, Insightful)

              by MightyYar (622222) on Thursday March 05 2009, @09:02AM (#27076557)

              So you'd rather Hulu and Netflix be sued into bankruptcy for streaming content

              You missed his point... he doesn't care what happens to Hulu or Netflix. They don't exist as far as he's concerned.

            • Of course, they would not be sued if they bothered to negotiate world wide distribution instead of only negotiating "domestic" distribution Limiting who they can accept money from to a tiny fraction of their possible customers, and instead paying loads of money for technology to make that possible.

              • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

                I'm certain that Hulu at least has tried to get international distribution... most likely it is because the organization which holds the rights to that is not interested.... often each country will have a company which has previously negotiated distribution rights for various content. The details of these contracts are likely very convoluted due to some special circumstance.

                I can imagine a scenario where a media company gives some other media company distribution rights to general content so that they can g

            • Segmenting the internet back into region specific chunks is probably the worst thing that happened since MySpace.

              So you'd rather Hulu and Netflix be sued into bankruptcy for streaming content to places in the world they have no right to do so? Yeah, that'd be a much greater idea...

              Yes!

              Well, no, I wish them a violent, painful death. But bankruptcy is an acceptable compromise.

          • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

            Where are my mod points when I need them?
        • Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)

          Hulu, iTunes, and Netflix are great if you want to watch the content on your computer, or buy a few different boxes to watch content on your TV. For me, it is way faster to just download the content from usenet and pop it on a USB stick for watching on my DiVX DVD player. Perhaps when that dies I'll look into building a Hulu/Netflix/iTunes streamer - since you sure can't buy one.

          Even then, you are at the mercy of the content providers and their whims. Usenet seems to be much more resistant to a point failur

        • People still fileshare? Everything I want to listen to and watch can be streamed now. Thanks to Hulu and Netflix and iTunes I can get the latest movies and just about everything else! The costs for these activities are no longer prohibitive.

          Yes, everyone is living in the United States.

        • People still fileshare? Everything I want to listen to and watch can be streamed now.

          Yeah, nothing like low-quality, [BUFFERING] media that can suddenly "become unavailable" with no warning! That's the best!

        • Re:Great idea... (Score:5, Insightful)

          by poetmatt (793785) on Thursday March 05 2009, @09:50AM (#27077021)

          So how's last year's season of movies and independent music artists who are not crap, working out for you? Can't find them on the streaming websites? Enjoying your guns n roses, aerosmith, metallica etc? I'm not saying those are great artists but just easy examples.

          The only way to get the stuff at the real cost of distribution is to instead get it at completely scam-worthy prices online (10$ for a digital CD? 4$ for a movie?) simply because you didn't record it yourself and/or get it off filesharing networks for free, which is what it's truly worth: 0$. Honestly why should you pay later for something that you could have recorded yourself for free?

          whoops.

          Guess you can't do that, because they're all taken down or removed due to licensing issues, or label you a pirate for daring to fileshare.

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            ...you are guessing that iTunes is Windows-only? Just to be clear, we're talking about the iTunes from Apple, not some other iTunes? ;)

            Netflix is not Windows-only either, btw. I don't know about Hulu.

            Being US-only is a concern though.

            • Hulu works on Linux ... sort of ... if your standards of "works" are pretty lenient. Perhaps if I tweaked enough stuff, it would be watchable. ... But even on Windows, its overall quality might generously be described as "really awful".

              It's apparently going to be a few years before the Internet + telco can deliver me a picture that is as watchable as a noisy and degraded NTSC broadcast signal. My esteemed spouse and I did watch a couple of glitchy episodes of "WKRP in Cincinnati", and enjoyed them. But i

            • ...you are guessing that iTunes is Windows-only? Just to be clear, we're talking about the iTunes from Apple, not some other iTunes? ;)

              Netflix is not Windows-only either, btw. I don't know about Hulu.

              Being US-only is a concern though.

              Hulu is definitely not Windows-only. It's more available than Netflix's "Watch Now" as far as tech goes (I think it's just a Flash player), but I believe they restrict access to only some countries (like the US).

              It's a decent site, and I was shocked when they pimped it during the SuperBowl. Free and legal streaming of a lot of TV and a some movies.

          • Hulu and Netflix, AFAIK, are US-only, and I believe there are still countries where iTunes is unavailable. I would also guess (not using any of them) that they are all Windows-only.

            iTunes is clearly not Windows only. Hulu just streams things via flash so it's accessible via any OS with a flash player (which is basically all of them). The Netflix service can be accessed on OS X and Windows via Silverlight and on Linux with Moonlight. So no, none of them are Windows only.

            • But still US-only and DRM infected!
            • by horza (87255) on Thursday March 05 2009, @09:19AM (#27076727) Homepage

              iTunes doesn't work with Linux, as jopsen says Hulu is US only (and the BBC iPlayer is UK only), and Moonlight is never going to gain any traction under Linux. Even Flash has only just arrived for 64-bit computers recently. The only reliable cross-platform and international way to watch movies is to download them via file-sharing.

              Phillip.

                • Moonlight is never going to gain any traction under Linux.

                  And let me guess, somehow this will not be the fault of Linux, and the blame will be squarely leveled at Microsoft.

                  It'll be the fault of Microsoft if Microsoft continues to make questionably necessary additions to the Silverlight spec to make the Moonlight developers fall behind, and then continues to push Silverlight app developers to "take advantage" of those additions.

          • Most of Hulu's content runs under Mac OS X 10.5, but there are a few videos that do not work.

            • All of Hulus content runs in flash... but they link to content on other sites that uses WMV - which should work on Mac at least if you download the QT plugin (used to be called Flip4Mac)

    • reading the neauseatingly gushing article, I couldn't quite figure out how this works - does it require limewire servers or exspose you to lime wire ? what is this jabber client ?
      my impression is that the software basically lets you share a folder, or the equivalent of a folder between a set of computers; the problem, for making this useful, is that only downloaded files appear - what if I just want to share some word docs ?
      surely someone on /. can offer a clean, simple explanation

  • Funny (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:06AM (#27076155)

    I thought we had gotten past this whole INVITE PLZ PLZ PLZ PLZ business years ago.

    • Let me guess, you don't have a facebook account?

      • Neither do I. I think he is referring to the days of IRC. Those were the days...

        I don't really care about any of the social networking sites. The furthest I've gone is Jabber (with my own Jabber server) and it works great. Don't know why I need anything else. I've had my finger wetted with MSN Messenger but didn't really like it (ads and spam) and closed it after a good year.

  • Darknet != Freedom (Score:4, Insightful)

    by onion2k (203094) * on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:07AM (#27076165) Homepage

    Being anonymous is not the same as being free.

    To that end, using a darknet is actually reducing how free you are because you're not standing up to the authority or laws you're circumventing. Freedom is being able to do what you want to do without having to hide it.

    • by impaledsunset (1337701) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:36AM (#27076327)

      And how is the ability to exercise a freedom which you weren't given, but should have been, is bad for you? Of couse that if an essential freedom is missing, anonymity won't give it back to you, but it will still give you the ability to exercise it.

      Of course, after reading the first half of TFA, I don't see what anonymity you're talking about. It's about sharing files only with people you want. It's a cool feature, which I would find usefull, but it seems useless if you want anonymity.

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      Freedom is being able to do what you want to do without having to hide it.

      Hiding is what precedes [wikipedia.org] freedom [wikipedia.org].

      Otherwise premature [wikipedia.org] openness can get you shot down [wikipedia.org].

    • Like ripping off the movie industry of their product. Yeah that's our freedom right there.
      This is more of a way to bypass the laws that would normally include file sharing of regular files,
      in the generalization of p2p torrent laws enforced by the ISPs, but fall into the category, you are using torrents so this file must be a bad pirated one.

  • I like the 65 yearold grandmother example. And given that, this app looks interesting. The security features could make it an interesting app for businesses; keeping legal, personal, and medical records safe.
  • huh? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Cornwallis (1188489) * on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:35AM (#27076325)
    "LimeWire's new version lets people create private darknets with contacts on any Jabber server (like GMail or LiveJournal). It's different than the recent p2p darknet announcement because it doesn't use onion routing." For some reason reading that statement brings to mind Clarke's Third Law: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
  • by wjh31 (1372867) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:38AM (#27076343) Homepage
    If it's what i actually think it is. Which is private sharing within your own group without others being able to see what's going on. It would only take a modest half dozen or so friends to share thier video collections, and you could have a pretty extensive collection, with some reasonable speeds and redundancy. And by videos i of course mean all those silly videos from when you were drunk that night, definately not those feature length things shown in cinemas.
  • When I worked in a computer shop I'd get a lot of computers coming in infected with so much spyware/adware that they were struggling just to remain "idle". In just about every case I could trace the infection back to something downloaded off of limewire.

    I wonder if this is just going to make that spread faster, since these darknets will compose of your friends and you'll think "Well this file must be clean, it's on my friends computer, I trust him!" Meanwhile the friend downloaded the file ("Britney spears

  • by meist3r (1061628) on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:44AM (#27076387)
    So right now we have open, public sharing infrastructure that can be arguably used for both purposes. Legal and illegal sharing. The people trying to sue users can't automatically assume that just because you're using the technology you must be a criminal. Darknets are satan's work and for terrorists only amirite? So you get caught using one of those and you're auto-screwed (interval 5sec).

    This is of course adapted thinking from the way our authorities work atm.
  • Has a third party tested limewire to make sure it is safe?
  • by stevied (169) * on Thursday March 05 2009, @08:45AM (#27076405)

    So basically it allows encrypted file transfers between people who are communicating on a chat / IM network? Is it me or is that not exactly a huge innovation [wikipedia.org]?

    • Yeah, that's my thought every time someone brings up a 'secure' network that relies on only talking to your friends on it. There are already -tons- of ways to get that file from someone you know. The problem that P2P solves is getting a particular file from a stranger.

    • Is it me or is that not exactly a huge innovation?

      Haven't you read other news in IT lately?

      MSN msgr, Yahoo chat, ICQ, Google talk et al. all reinvented IRC each in their own mutually incompatible way. Then they added file transfer that wasn't FTP.

      Web 2.0 is a reinvention of the mainframe with thin clients on dumb terminals. JavaScript is becoming a reinvention of python, except with curlies. JSON is a reinvention of XML, which is a reinvention of s-expressions.

      Next up, someone's going to reinvent the business process of reinventing the wheel in slightly different and incompatible ways ("for added value", of course) and patent the method. Hey, that'd be a good use of business method patents.

      Can you tell I'm bitter? ;)