Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

3G Cel Service Starts in Japan 225

Graymalkn writes "According to this story on the BBC, DoCoMo has finally launched the world's first 3G cellular service in Japan. Phones start at $560 and can go as high as $800 for one which can double as a video camera." Eventually they'll be able to watch movies on the new phones, but for now service for the phones is limited to a 20 mile radius around the center of Tokyo. I haven't found an exact number of bandwidth, but I believe it's like 384k downlink. To your phone. Once again, my jealousy runs rampant.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

3G Cel Service Starts in Japan

Comments Filter:
  • long term thinking (Score:3, Insightful)

    by [amorphis] ( 45762 ) on Monday October 01, 2001 @02:28PM (#2374627)
    NTT DoCoMo is also cautious, expecting only one in every 10 subscribers to have a 3G phone in three years' time.

    Wow, that statement really illustrates how Japanese think in the long term.

    I hope, for their sake, that they can run legacy networks over the new backbone.
  • by DickPhallus ( 472621 ) on Monday October 01, 2001 @02:35PM (#2374693)
    "In the United States, we have been working to make the service available. But we have not set any date for the US launch."
    That's unfortunate, but at least we have a decent landline system here... I know Europe definately a lot more expensive that here for landline phone/internet. I think that will be one of the factors that will keep sweet things like this from catching on really quickly.
  • by sterno ( 16320 ) on Monday October 01, 2001 @02:38PM (#2374712) Homepage
    Why on god's earth do I want to watch a movie on my cellphone? Convergence, as with all things, is best in moderation. The irony of this is that we'll have people watching movies on cellphones and talking on cellphones in movies. Then after the movie is over they'll get in their car and watch TV and talk on their phone WHILE they are driving.

    Theory: it was recently demonstrated that multi-tasking causes the human brain to be less efficicent. An increasing tendancy to do more than one thing at a time will lead to an overall reduction in the productivity of humanity. Because the time we spend will be less productive we will have to spend more time partially working in order for us to achieve the same output. This will lead to more multi-tasking. Wash, Rinse, Repeat...
  • Meanwhile... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by HongPong ( 226840 ) <hongpong@ho[ ]ong.com ['ngp' in gap]> on Monday October 01, 2001 @02:38PM (#2374715) Homepage
    ...I believe it's like 384k downlink. To your phone. Once again, my jealousy runs rampant.

    Meanwhile much of the rest of the world struggles to get clean water and electricity. Just a reminder that you need to keep your geek-goodies envy in perspective.

  • by FatRatBastard ( 7583 ) on Monday October 01, 2001 @03:00PM (#2374849) Homepage
    Here's my prediction ("All the authority and accuracy of Gartner (i.e. None) without the cost" (TM)):

    3G is going to be dead in the water, at least for the next few years (5-10) here in the states. Why?

    Because what it delivers can be done for MUCH less money. High speed wireless *is* a very cool thing, and very desirable. The problem is the cellular phone isn't the application for it. In reality, who wants to watch a movie on a small screen if you have to pay for it? Who wants to pipe music down the phone if you have to pay for it? These services are not going to be cheap (someone's got to pay for all of those licenses). What reason does a cellular *need* 300+kbps?

    The only reason you would want that speed to your phone is if you have it hooked up to a PDA or a laptop. That's the only "killer app" I see for high speed internet. And if that's the case, there are better and cheaper ways of doing it. Think the "Freenets" that have been talked about on /. as of late. The infrastructure cost for some 801.xx network is *much* less than 3G service. Its a fairly open protocol, so you won't get locked into Sprint / AT&T / WorldCom / et al's service.

    I see cellular service sticking with 2.5 G here in the states. That allows you to do all the things that are a cellphone actually does well (voice, some limited data: e-mail, texting, *simple* WAP). For high speed data that you'd need for your laptop/PDA, look for the commercialization of 801.xx (or something similar).

    So says the Bastard
  • by RangerSpeedBumpp ( 250645 ) on Monday October 01, 2001 @03:37PM (#2375114) Homepage
    I won't care one bit about 3G until I can actually get a call through in a real-world setting. It's very common that I have to redial the number 5-10 times in downtown San Francisco during peak hours just to get through the network congestion. For providers who have oversold their service, everyone competes for a channel in their overloaded cell. And now they want to increase the bandwidth? How about taking the 256Kbps or 2Mbps or whatever the hell the limit is and use it to support more channels?

    ObProvider: Cingular Wireless

After a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn.

Working...