Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

Vegas: Monorails v. Gridlock 478

TimeTrip writes "Vegas seems to be taking a little cue from Disney. 'Las Vegas, which never stops thinking big, has just embarked on its most ambitious, costly attempt to solve a problem that once seemed impossible to have in this sprawling desert valley: gridlock. It is building the nation's largest monorail system.'" Or maybe they'll be taking their cue from Lyle Lanly. Frankly this sounds more like a Shelbyville idea.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Vegas: Monorails v. Gridlock

Comments Filter:
  • by Cheetah86 ( 136854 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:38PM (#3399050) Homepage
    Glass protected stations that protect people from walking on the track are not new. In London I remember going to an underground stop which had glass doors so you couldn't go on the track. It is a good idea to implement it in Las Vegas though.
  • Links (Score:5, Informative)

    by axlrosen ( 88070 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:48PM (#3399104) Homepage
    A few cool mockups, and some more detailed maps.

    http://www.monorails.org/tMspages/LasVegas.html [monorails.org]
    http://www.lvnvmonorail.com/ [lvnvmonorail.com]
  • by jerryasher ( 151512 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:53PM (#3399121)
    Here's a page (framed, mozilla unfriendly, slow jsp) [bombardier.com]
    from the principal contractor, Bombardier.

    This is the largest of three monorails they are building (although they say 4 miles, not 8). What's cool is that two of the three are for systems to get around downtown, not just for a system to get you to the airport parking lot.

    Unfortunately, the careers page doesn't reveal any openings. Sigh, this is the sort of socially responsible project that so many aerospace companies were to turn to after the cold war ended.
  • by km790816 ( 78280 ) <wqhq3gx02&sneakemail,com> on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @11:07PM (#3399174)
    The Seattle Monorail Project [elevated.org] aims to put a monorail in downtown Seattle. It's set to be put to a vote in November, I think.

    Seattle suffers from the same problem: too many damn cars. With the 2nd worst rush hour traffic in the US (behind LA) I hope they can pull it off. There have been fights with light rail folks, but I think monorail is a much better option. Keep it above grade so there is little disruption of traffic. Many claim that monorail is Mickey Mouse transit. (no thanks to certain Simpson's parodies). Keep in mind that millions use monorail daily for transportation in Japan. When the people from Seattle went over to look at Japan's system they were blown away by its efficiency and capacity. After spending time abroad, I've become very disappointed with the mass transit systems in the US (or lack there of).

    We love our cars way too much.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @11:11PM (#3399188)
    .this is one of my favorite features of paris or london. You don't have to mess around getting a taxi or bus into town. You grab your bag, catch the tube and away you go.

    I'll agree. Having only experienced the Boston T, I was quite doubtful about mass transit options.

    Then I visited Switzerland (Zurich in particular). For about $35 you get a full month on *all* the public transit in the near Zurich area. And it's convenient. Along the main tram lines, there are stops every 2-3 blocks or so, and the trains come so often that if your going anymore than 1-2 stops down the road, it's quicker to wait and grab the tram for the next 2 stops than to walk it.

    One thing I particualrly liked was the ease of transfers. Zurich has Bus, Trolley Bus and Trams - not subways. The upshot of this is that all public transport stops are on-grade. There is no hastle of walking underground as with a subway. This makes transfering to a different line as easy as walking across the street. Compare this to Boston, where a Blue line - Orange line transfer has you walking the equivalent of 5-10 blocks. Not to mention the fact that the stops, being above ground, are more scenic than the concrete tubes of Boston :)

    I think one of the things that makes it work is that tickets are on the honor system. There's an automatic dispenser at the tram stop, buy a ticket (or just buy a monthly pass at the railway station) and get on the tram. No gates, no turnstiles, no queue as you wait for the conductor to check your ticket. They take care of abuse by having the public-transport police conduct random ticket checks. If you don't have a valid ticket, you pay about $50 on the spot. Your're likely to run into them about once a week. (Since monthly passes are only about $35, traveling without a valid ticket isn't worth the risk or the hastle.)

  • Too bad (Score:4, Informative)

    by j09824 ( 572485 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @11:32PM (#3399244)
    Too bad they are thinking "big 1960's style public transportation". A monorail system like Personal Rapid Transit [cprt.org] would have been so much nicer. See also here [washington.edu].
  • Re:Monorail (Score:3, Informative)

    by Paradise Pete ( 33184 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @11:53PM (#3399306) Journal
    Just in case not everyone in the world knows, it's a takeoff of The Music Man, in which a fast-talking con-man comes to town and sells them on the idea of creating a marching band to combat the problem of idle youth. In the original song he's singing about the evils of pool playing. It goes something like this:
    Ya got trouble, folks, right here in River City

    with a capital 'T' and that rhymes with 'P' and that stands for 'pool'
    Just in case this post isn't yet sufficiently trivial, in the movie a very young Ronnie Howard plays the little boy who helps soften the con man. Here's the whole thing [themusicmanonline.com].
  • by mattr ( 78516 ) <mattr@teleboREDHATdy.com minus distro> on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @11:55PM (#3399311) Homepage Journal
    Perhaps the people building this could get something out of trying two trains in Japan.

    - The monorail from Shimbashi (in Tokyo near the Ginza) to Ariake (manmade peninsula with convention and amusement facilities).
    This is an unmanned, beautiful monorail which loops out over the sea. Has some good handholds and soft parts you can lean on because it seems on a narrow train with lots of windows you get pushed strongly to the side when you don't expect it. Beautiful glass car in front is a great panorama.

    - The newest subway built in Tokyo, opened last year: Namboku Line which runs from northern Tokyo down to fashionable Azabu. (Like the above monorail I believe) the platform is enclosed on either side by glass walls interrupted by sliding glass doors which only open when the train stops right in front of it. There are metal posts with electric eyes on them just inside where the doors retract, so that they won't try to close while someone is entering. No room also because of those posts for someone to slide outside the glass wall.
  • by Peyna ( 14792 ) on Wednesday April 24, 2002 @12:11AM (#3399356) Homepage
    I don't have any linkage for you, but I guess I could walk outside and take some pictures. A local hospital is footing the bill for an approximately 3 mile monorail line in downtown Indianapolis to connect Methodist Hospital with the IUPUI Campus and all the hospitals around it.

    Clarian Health, who owns most of these hospitals is foot the 34 million dollar bill for this, and the city will get monthly payments from them for taking land away I guess. I just have to find out if I can catch a ride to class on the thing, or if it will be limited to medical personel only.
  • From the article:
    Denver is extending some of its new commuter rails and a proposed monorail downtown is a subject of fervent debate.
    Well, sort of. Denver [rtd-denver.com] is indeed expanding its Light Rail [rtd-denver.com] system. However, the section of track that just opened has little to do with commuters-- it passes by Mile High (our new stadium), the Pepsi Center (our new-ish arena-- go Avs!), and Elitch Gardens (the local Six Flags franchise). Basically, it's for people looking for entertainment, not working schmucks.

    However, the next expansion (which will be completed in a few years, IIRC) is a link between Denver and a large suburb to the south. A benefit to commuters, but also greatly welcomed by shoppers.

    Also the proposed monorail [highspeedmonorail.com] is meant to connect Denver with the ski resorts-- it isn't meant to be a "downtown monorail" as the article implies.
  • by interstellar_donkey ( 200782 ) <pathighgate&hotmail,com> on Wednesday April 24, 2002 @01:48AM (#3399596) Homepage Journal
    My first response was Yes! As somebody who goes to Las Vegas several times a year, and cringes while sitting in cabs as the meter keeps running at stoplights, I was happy to see finally a nice transit system that stays out of the way of traffic.

    Then I saw the route map.

    1/2 the strip is not accessed by it. It starts at the MGM grand. And, most problematic, it does'nt go to the airport.

    If I was designing this, it would run up the strip to the Sahara, turn right to the convention center, then head north to downtown.

    I can't help to think that those cab drivers I hate so much had something to do with this assinine design.
  • by SgtChaireBourne ( 457691 ) on Wednesday April 24, 2002 @01:54AM (#3399614) Homepage
    Schipol (Amsterdam) and Kastrup (Copenhagen) seem to have done this best that I've seen. Arlanda (Stockholm), Ventemoen/Gardemoen (Olso) have seen the importance and made special lines just to the airport. Often way faster than than taking a car, unless it's a cab or you're getting a lift. Get on the train from just about anywhere and you're set. This type of connectivity with the airport could really have helped out places like Detroit and L.A.

    The airport, casinos, and some of the major hotels would be obvious nodes for the rail network. For those fixated on increasing economic growth through 'security' measures, some of the airlines could offer check-in at some of the more prestigious hotels or conference centers. This would be an obvious attraction for tourists and would allow the airlines extra time to scan the bags and back up their 'profiling' with hard data.

    In Chicago, many rails came years before many of the buildings. I think there the rail companies did it the other way around and sold air rights to put buildings over the tracks. Monorail's a good option when you don't have the budget to bore tunnels or buy up surface real estate.

    What's the geology like there? Maybe they could hire Norwegians to bore tunnels. ;)
    (Subway / tube / underground sure, but how about "Casino Moria"?)

  • by Gorimek ( 61128 ) on Wednesday April 24, 2002 @02:53AM (#3399742) Homepage
    A lot of Americans go abroad on vacation and get blown away by how well mass transit works. Let me tell you why that is not a good way to evaluate it.

    A typical European major city is built around a more or less ancient center, where all roads and transit system originate, with important extensions to the airport and rail stations. As I hope you can see, the mass transit system is working at it's very best for the typical travel patterns of a tourist, going between the main transit centers and all the tourist attractions in the center.

    Now, if you were to live in a regular home and commute to a regular job in that same city, things would be very different. You'd be going from one suburb to another, probably having to change train or bus at the center. It would take at least twice as long as going by car, quite likely more. You could and would probably make arrangements so you lived where mass transit was favorable for your commute, but whenever you were going to some friend or some other random place, you'd have quite a logistical task on your hands.

    And that's in a city that's always had it's transportation system built for mass transit. In an american city, built from the ground up for cars, it would work quite a bit worse.

    I think I know since I moved to San Francisco from Stockholm 7 years ago. And while Stockholm has a quite decent mass transit system, and SF traffic is painfully congested, going by car here just can't compare to going by mass transit there. It's one of my bigger reasons for not moving back.
  • by Driph ( 7107 ) on Wednesday April 24, 2002 @08:52AM (#3400616) Homepage
    I think the route ain't bad except for the glaring mistake they made not running all the way to the airport. I can't figure out why hotels south of the MGM Grand (including Excalibur, Luxor and Mandalay Bay - 3 of the biggest hotels in town) aren't covered.
    They've already been covered for a while now by a tram that runs between Mandalay Bay, Luxor and the Excalibur. More info here [lvstriphistory.com].
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 24, 2002 @10:15AM (#3401058)
    The old trains running between MGM and Bally's were Ex-Disney Mk. IV's. The new trains are brand new Bombardier M-VI's and are the latest revision of the Disney design, including fully automated operation (no driver).

    for more info check out: www.monorails.org [monorails.org]

    Austin
  • by cybercuzco ( 100904 ) on Wednesday April 24, 2002 @02:21PM (#3402767) Homepage Journal
    Thats funny, I live in Washington DC, which, last time i checked was within the United States. The metro in DC rocks. I can get wherever i want to go without a car. In fact I spent probably 30 bucks on gas in the last year.

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...