Trojans and Popups and Slimeball Business 287
Selanit writes "Salon.com is reporting
on a company which exploited a vulnerability in an old but common version of Internet Explorer's Java engine to install spyware on the visitor's machine. " It's a pretty in depth story showing the lack of respect that
some companies have. My favorite part is that the guy who denies any knowledge
of the trojan popup is named 'Frank Bigott'.
I wonder if this is true... (Score:2, Insightful)
The line gets thinner (Score:5, Insightful)
It seems that all the Klez and Chernobyl kiddies have gone and got themselves some venture capital, and are turning their malware into a business.
Um.. (Score:4, Insightful)
I didnt see any mention in the article of somebody lodging a criminal or even civil complaint.
I think a big reason these companies get away with this crap is that nobody takes them to task for what they are doing...
Re:Microsoft, security and Java... (Score:1, Insightful)
Look who Sun chose to sue. Hmm...
That would explain... (Score:3, Insightful)
i thought flowgo.com was a known spamhouse... (Score:1, Insightful)
Yep - definitely (Score:4, Insightful)
Many times: it's why I now use Mozilla (well, that and the tabbed browsing and...and...and...) and Ad Aware.
Mostly it seems to be dialler programs for offshore ISPs. Porn, basically.
Use IE unprotected for a while, then run AdAware - it's quite scary.
Another reason why choice is good. (Score:2, Insightful)
With that in mind, if the slimeballs knew that they can target one platform / browser (which is the case now as most normal people use IE anyway), they can devise things like this. Personally I use Mozilla, and tonight I'm converting to Linux, so this won't be much of an issue. I just wish more people knew there were other choices out there besides M$, and then they wouldn't fall victim to this.
That comment is not insightful (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Um.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:'scuse my language, but (Score:3, Insightful)
A lot of the large media companies would be happier if no other competition existed for people's attention. A lot of the recent legislation is aimed not only at controlling the means of media consumption, but also the means of media production.
In ten years, it could be illegal to put up a web site or run an ISP without arranging content licensing and censoring (like, say, Iran or China).
Don't like it? Get active about it.
You can dream, but the reality gets more and more like a nightmare each day.
Re:r-e-s-p-e-c-t (Score:3, Insightful)
Scary Stuff! (Score:2, Insightful)
I hope this company is held accoutable.
There's another company that's nearly as bad: Real Networks. Ever see how much crap they try to install if you're not paying attention?
Our company now has RealPlayer on its banned list, because we consider it a virus.
Re:'scuse my language, but (Score:1, Insightful)
Maybe that's why the internet was so much better before the Homer Simpsons of the world decided to get on the internet.
Re:Speaking of slimeball tactics.... (Score:2, Insightful)
No, respectable people would never do that, would they? Respectable people like, hmmm, THE FBI???
Re:It was only a matter of time... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:That comment is not insightful (Score:2, Insightful)
If you had written applets between 1996 and 1998 using Netscape's VM, the Sun JVM and the Microsoft JVM at the time, and tried to get the same code working on all three, you wouldn't have needed any corroboration.
One of the worst was that Netscape's VM used completely different Z-Order to everyone else's. Their security manager was different.
I'd come up with more examples, but I've blocked out that awful part of my memory.
Simon