A User's First Look at GNOME 2.0 550
Gentu writes: "OSNews has just published a review of the Gnome 2.0 desktop environment and its verdict is not so positive. The author feels that the new version is limited in many ways and with a UI not well designed."
Bad quality (Score:1, Funny)
Re:So basically.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Err... yeah, ok... (Score:5, Funny)
Hmm, sweet irony.
Re:Gnome and KDE are more or less the same these d (Score:5, Funny)
Sade?? (Score:3, Funny)
He didn't even know enough to hide the Sade before taking the screenshot.
Re:Sade?? (Score:3, Funny)
Smooth Operator (an obvious reference to overloaded operators in OO programming languages); and Diamond Life (obviously a reference to hardened carbon based nano machines).
Re:Err, Well, mostly on topic (Score:3, Funny)
(it'll be back as soon as I apt-get it back, but I'm lazy
Actually, Nautilus is a *pain* when used w/ transparent terminals, as each redraw of the icons will cause each terminal to redraw. Besides I don't like desktop icons anyway. What I miss in nautilus is:
1. middle-click to open new windows
2. split-screen for easy DnD
3. Konqueror, that's what I miss, actually.
But with nautilus gone, everything is quite snappy on my PIII450. Of course "everything" is a lot damn smaller now