Mozilla Jumps on 'Lean Browser' Bandwagon 675
fader writes "Following in the footsteps of fast (and often fantastic) wrappers around Gecko (the Mozilla rendering engine), Mozilla has just released their own lightweight browser, Phoenix. Only Phoenix will still use XUL, the cross-platform markup language used for the current Mozilla interface. Will it still be fast enough to overcome the final gripe about Mozilla, namely that it's just too slow?"
slow? (Score:5, Informative)
I timed it (Score:4, Informative)
If you allow Mozilla to load itself into memory for faster startup times (only fair considering IE does it without asking) you'll find that you can get a page loaded faster with mozilla.
I tried it using both browsers on the same site with my machine at work. The difference was on the order of seconds...
IE is junk compared to mozilla. Also, the Orbit theme rocks! Take a look here [mozdev.org].
Re:Mac? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Gripe (Score:4, Informative)
Of course won't solve the shortcut problems and if it's not customizable by editing some file (anyone know?), then I hope the Mozilla team will have that in 1.3 or so.
Just installed and tried it... (Score:3, Informative)
Currently Mozilla (1.1) is using 32,852 kb of RAM, while Phoenix (phoenix.exe) is using 25,188 kb. This without any additional tabs/windows open.
There's only the fact that many, many preferences are not accessible yet (although many are enabled by default), but that is to be expected from an 0.1 release.
I'll definitely be keeping my eyes on this project
Re:mozilla slow? (Score:4, Informative)
IE launchs pretty much instantaneously because it's always running... 0.5-1 second.
Phoenix launches in about 1.5 seconds
I don't know about you, but I'm willing to wait an extra second for phoenix. It seems to have everything I need for standard browsing.
Mozilla jumped on this bandwagon long ago. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I timed it (Score:2, Informative)
I can leisurely launch IE and visit a webpage before Mozilla launches. I mean, I can hit start, run, type in "iexplore", load the default page, click on the location bar, type in my page and load it -- all before Mozilla launches.
Mozilla is the only application I have ever known under Windows to regularly produce the "This application has stopped responding.." window just because it is taking so long to shut a window.
Once it is up and running it is fine. Windows will swap it out, and it takes a good half-minute to pull out of swap, but otherwise it is fine.
Despite this pitiful performance on every Windows 2000 (or NT) platform I have tried(it doesn't do this to me on Linux, and doesn't do it nearly as badly on Win98.), I still use it as my primary browser.
Trust me, it is not my machine, nor is it the dozens of other machines I have tried it on. My Win2k system is the fastest machine I have.
Posting this with Phoenix (Score:1, Informative)
I just downloaded the app for Win and took it for a spin. Very stable. Very fast. Reminds me of early versions of Opera.
Go lizzard! Go! Kill the round blue 'e'!
Re:mozilla slow? (Score:1, Informative)
You should install the Moz Quicklaunch to put it on the same footing before you claim it doesn't load fast enough.
Screenshot (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I timed it (Score:2, Informative)
IE "cheats". Don't use startup time as a benchmark (Score:3, Informative)
Now, have both browsers try to render a hideously large, long, tabled page like and popular article here set to -1, Nested, and see how THAT test goes. Even my favorite browser, Opera 6, craps out a lot on that.
Re:I timed it (Score:2, Informative)
How is Mozilla keeping you from viewing ASP pages?
Tried it. (Score:5, Informative)
Gone:
Still there:
Since my computer is fast enough and has enough memory to run Mozilla, I don't notice that Phoenix loads faster. An older computer with less memory would probably be a better test. Since my favorite privacy features are missing, I have no intention of switching, but if it runs faster on older computers I would recommend it for that. (Please try it on something slow and report.) It might also be appropriate for somebody who wants "just a browser" because of the lack of other applications. The lack of these applications seems to only save a couple megs of download, again I'll take the full featured Mozilla.
Proxy settings (Score:2, Informative)
Think I'll stick with Opera still.
Re:Good timing (Score:2, Informative)
If you want a fast browser (Score:1, Informative)
Dillo [cipsga.org.br]
It's not perfect, but it is extremely fast, and very useful. It even got a mention on Linux Today:
Linux today article on Dillo [linuxtoday.com].
Re:Proxy settings (Score:2, Informative)
Go to Sourceforge (or it might be Freshmeat; one of the two, but I'm in a hurry) and search for NTLM. NTLM is the authentication scheme used by this proxy. There should be a listing for some sort of NTLM proxy server there.
Download this proxy, set it up appropriately (it's simple; read the directions) and point your browser to go through your local proxy. The proxy will do the authentication for you.
It's written in Python, so you'll haveta have that installed. Other than that it is no-hassle and can be useful for other programs (Winamp mebbe?) that you might want to grant access through a passworded firewall.
Hope this helps.
Re:Proxy settings (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Tried it. (Score:5, Informative)
Just for grins, I copied my Mozilla prefs.js over the phoenix version. Theming doesn't work, but the proxy and tab preferences do and it appears to ignore onLoad for popups as well. Apparently, the Edit preferences ability is not done, but using the prefs.js does.
Re:Mozilla jumped on this bandwagon long ago. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I timed it (Score:3, Informative)
The only time I have to wait for anything on my Win2K box (Mozilla included) is when it's spun the hard drives down due to 3 hours on inactivity. With quick launch, the limiting factor in getting Mozilla on the screen is my video card, and I have a Geforce 4 Ti 4200. If I had to guess I'd say it taks 3-4 frames to come up at 1600x1200x85Hz. Granted, my machine is a little faster than most,(Dual XP1800+ w/1GB RAM) but even on older hardware, quick launch should bring up mozilla before you can get your mouse from the start menu to the address bar. It sounds to me like your probelm is that you've got like 128Mb of RAM, and a slowass hard drive, and all your system memory is being used by the OS. (Win2K uses ~100MB of memory on my system without anything loaded right after boot.)
If you include page loads in the timing between IE and Mozilla, it's no contest. Slashdot is loaded practically instantly in Mozilla, and takes seconds to render in IE.
You've only tried really low end Win2K boxes, haven't you?
Re:Gripe (Score:4, Informative)
This is version 0.1, *not* 1.0 (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I recently "made the switch" (Score:3, Informative)
Eh, I'm not sure if your Windows shortcuts will be the same as my Linux ones, but here goes...
so anyway, I hope this helps, even if just a litttle...
-l
Re:Gripe (Score:3, Informative)
Opera beta (Score:2, Informative)
In somewhat related news, Opera released [google.com] a new beta version of their browser last night, Norwegian time. It has many new features, including improved anti-alias and Java handling. The "hidden" distribution place is here [opera.com]. Incidentally, native FreeBSD builds are provided for the first time.
Re:Tried it. (Score:2, Informative)
Many of the preferences are listed on customization page [mozilla.org]. To edit preferences, quit the browser, edit your prefs.js file, save it, and restart the browser. Using these preferences, I can set pop up, cookie, window permissions, and other options.
I will agree with critics that say the average user, and even the average programmer, is not capable of reading through the examples and manually setting preferences. But those who can are freed from slow and viral browsers.
Re:Adding proxy in prefs.js doesn't work? (Score:3, Informative)
user_pref("network.proxy.type", 2);
or
user_pref("network.proxy.type", 1);
depending on if you want auto (2) or manual (1).
Re:Standalone or component in new "Mozilla Suite"? (Score:2, Informative)
together in an easy fashion.
Nothing really prevents you from using pipes in a GUI application. Maybe shared memory is a better fit.
But in the case of Mozilla, The browser does not need to communicate with the mail reader or anything else.
The obvious solution is to have the independent applications be independent executables.
Netcape and Mozilla was blind to the obvious, causing such things as galeon to form.
This has been my main complaint from Netscape 0.9 to mozilla/Netscape 7.
There is a patch to allow one to specifiy another mail reader. And another patch to only compile the mailnews application. But this is a real pain to do such a thing.
There should be at least 4 code trees ( and 4 separate releases). Mozilla GUI libs, Mozilla core libs, Mozilla browser, and mozilla mail/news. Splitting the released libraries up even more would better, as it promotes better separation, sharing and competition (open source).
The "new" Unix way is to have many shared libraries used by many executables. You install the Mozilla core libraries, then Galeon on top of that. Then install the Mozilla GUI libs, then install the separate Browser and Mail executables on top of the GUI and core libs.
Re:Mozilla's Biggest Problem -- Poor Branding. (Score:5, Informative)
Ever heard of company called "Netscape"? Mozilla isn't meant for end users. Quote [mozilla.org]:
(emphasis mine)Re:This is version 0.1, *not* 1.0 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:My complaint about Mozilla... (Score:2, Informative)
And Mozilla mascot is cool. You should see OpenBSD, *that* is a stupid mascot.
Ever heard of "security"? (Score:3, Informative)
I still use it, and have now added entries in my local DNS server to block out links to gator etc as I got sick of uninstalling their redirect garbage.
Besides which, MS is the beast, as we all know and using their browser just encourages them...
Re:Gripe (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ever heard of "security"? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Gripe (Score:2, Informative)
Duh.
Re:Proxy settings (Score:1, Informative)
Re:XUL is holding back Mozilla project (Score:3, Informative)
O'reilly [oreillynet.com] is taking this seriously [oreilly.com]. Maybe they know something you don't
Re:Gripe (Score:2, Informative)
So much for consistency.