More on JSF Laser System 422
An anonymous reader writes "Seems Lockheed Martin has won a contract to equip future versions of the Joint Strike Fighter with a 100-kW laser. Housed in a dome within the aircraft, the laser's turret would emerge for firing [sound familiar?], and the laser itself is spec'ed to achieve airborne and ground kills at a distance of more than six miles. The problem? According to this Aviation Week article, Lockheed Martin has to figure out how to dissipate 900 kilowatts of heat. Maybe the Finnish airforce could value-add to the OEM model." We mentioned this earlier.
Re:Thats a lot of heat! (Score:5, Informative)
Very efficient for a laser. Most lasers get less than 1%.
Re:Very Nice if it works (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Time to buy some really good sunglasses (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Cooling via the fuel tank? (Score:4, Informative)
Along the same lines it is very common for automobiles to have their fuel pumps inside the fuel tank for the same reason. If you live in a hot area there is a pretty good chance that people who run their cars frequently near empty go through more fuel pumps than those who don't.
Re:Cooling via the fuel tank? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Uplift saga (Score:2, Informative)
I know lasers are often used to lower the temperature of small numbers of atoms in order to observe quantum effects, among other things. This is not the same as dissiptating heat, mind you. Heat is a measure of radiation, whereas temperature is a measure of molecular motion. I would imagine that Brin got his vocabulary mixed up.
Focusing the beam (Score:3, Informative)
I'd say we should wait and see how the ABL performs before getting rid of the trusty ol' AMRAAM.
Re:Not the first time fuel has been used to cool (Score:2, Informative)
Playing fast and loose with power and energy (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Time to buy some really good sunglasses (Score:2, Informative)
This link
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2002
actually discusses the weapon to be mounted on the f35.
The article also states 2015 as likely date for entry into service.
Re:Thats a lot of heat! (Score:1, Informative)
fire laser for 1 second, blow something up
mess around for 2 minutes (~100 seconds)
during that time, dissipate 9kW, which is reasonable for the usual systems on a jet fighter
Shouldnt be a big deal.
The trick is having an efficient heat-exchange and storage systems (efficient in terms of not costing you too much MORE energy, which would imply more heat production, and in terms of not weighing too much) thats why they wanted to use the fuel- liquid is good for heat stuff
Re:Lazers! That not right??? (Score:2, Informative)
It is ok to make lasers that kill or destroy objects.
Re:Not the first time fuel has been used to cool (Score:5, Informative)
Very different from kerosene. Most military jet aircraft run on JP-5 or JP-8, which are essentially aviation kerosenes.
The SR-71 runs on JP-7. JP-7 is a more viscous fuel with a low vapor pressure and a very high flashpoint. So high, in fact, that the SR-71 can't start its own engines. To light the fires on a Blackbird takes a chemical ignition system, where the ground crew squirts a measure of tetraethylborane into the engines. TEB is actually hypergolic with JP-7, and the resultant explosion starts the engines.
The airframe heats up to 1000 degrees F in high mach flight, and so it has to be built to fit together nice at the higher temperature. When it's on the ground and cool, it does indeed leak fuel like a sieve. And yes, they do pump fuel from tank to tank in flight to cool hot spots.
Dear lord, what a plane. 5.2 thrust-to-weight ratio. 3200km/h. 85,000 ft ceiling. 1100 C inlet temperatures. 2000 degree combustion exhaust. Has successfully evaded over 4,000 SAMs.
Like, wow.
Re:Very Nice if it works (Score:5, Informative)
At 1/2 watt, it will blind you immediately if your eye passes in front of it.
At 3 watts, it will burn through a piece of paper.
At 6 watts, it's burning through my sleeve.
At 8 watts if I accidentally wave my hand through it, it will cause blisters to form several minutes later.
At 10 watts, our power meter starts smoking and our mirrors begin to get these ugly burn marks on them.
At 15 watts, it'll burn through an aluminum can.
This is for a continuous wave laser (one that doesn't pulse). Now you can imagine what 100,000 watts will do:). The question is, seeing as how this must be firing in pulses, what is the pulse length? Minutes? Seconds? Milliseconds?
I'm also curious what wavelength it is firing at. I didn't notice it in the article (but I definitely could have missed it). Anyway, I hope that helped answer your question. Maybe some other slashdotters out there have worked with more powerful lasers?
JoeRobe
Re:Cooling via the fuel tank? - not a new idea (Score:2, Informative)
Same thing with the XB70 Valkyrie The Great White Bird [labiker.org]
"Heat is the major enemy of speed. Caused by the friction of cutting through the air, heat has limited the top speed of modern aircraft (such as the F-15) far more than power. Beyond Mach 2.5, friction increases at an ever-growing rate (for comparison, an SR-71 operating at Mach 2.2 heats up to about 275 degrees, but at Mach 3.2, skin temperatures rise to almost 900 degrees!). The same aerodynamics that gave the XB-70 so little drag helped minimize heat buildup. The hottest portions of the Valkyrie, her nose and horizontal splitter, reached a temperature of only 625 degrees during Mach 3 flight, with the majority of the XB-70s skin at a temperature of just 450 degrees! Equipment was placed in the fuel tanks, which acted as heat sinks. As the fuel soaked up the heat from the fuselage, it was drawn into the engines and burned away, leaving the cooler fuel behind. At the same time, it had to be replaced with nitrogen gas. The temperatures inside the tanks were high enough that just two percent oxygen would have caused the fuel to burst into flames -- a decidedly undesirable event."
Just 450 degrees?
whatever happened to international law? (Score:1, Informative)
Plese read this:
http://www.unog.ch/frames/disarm/distreat/ccwpr
Does anyone give a F#$@ about this?
intyernational treaty (Score:3, Informative)
The treaty was a bit unclear, and unfourtunatly I don't have the deatials, but as I recall it might be offlimites to use the laser to blind enemy pilots too. As in shining the beam inot he cockpit of the enemy jet! I guess it depends ont he situation, and the combat senarios.... but we are realyl treading new ground here!
Re:Focusing the beam (Score:1, Informative)
I wouldn't call these guys "clowns." Adaptive optics was actually developed as a classified project by the DOD in the 1980s.
They were kind enough to unclassify most of the research so that it could be used by astronomers.
Re:Pass out the idiot awards... (Score:1, Informative)
The energy densities for these laser systems should be sufficiently high if the active optics work as advertised.