Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

The Coming Air Age 319

Lovejoy writes "Sixty years ago in The Atlantic Monthly, Igor Sikorsky wrote The Coming Air Age. "Any of us who are alive ten years after this Second World War is won will see and use hundreds of short-run helicopter bus services." He goes on to write about personal helicopters which fit in large garages and that helicopters that are easier to drive than cars, etc.. So, will personal flight ever be viable? Do wildly wrong predictions like this give futurists pause? I think they should."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Coming Air Age

Comments Filter:
  • ... when we can have rocket belts [slashdot.org]?

    Jouster
  • Not yet ... (Score:3, Funny)

    by nbvb ( 32836 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @08:03PM (#4434856) Journal
    Personal flight won't be a reality until we figure out how to put skip-lines and double-yellows in mid-air to keep people in line :-)

    --NBVB
  • by brandido ( 612020 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @08:27PM (#4434970) Homepage Journal
    How could someone even want to consider having a personal flying device when we know that Rocket Belts make people homicidal [slashdot.org]. Build a rocket belt, get killed by your business partner, simple as that.
  • by djupedal ( 584558 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @08:33PM (#4434996)
    I like that line in 'That 70's Show', where Red keeps complaining how Americans were promised a 'personal helicopter in every garage', and he's still waiting...

    C'mon, already, when's it gonna happen??!! They told us we'd have our own personal helicopter, and I haven't gotten mine yet, damn it."

    Hang in there, Red. We're still waiting for NASA to figure this out for us.
  • by woogieoogieboogie ( 598162 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @08:54PM (#4435091)
    from your driveway and blowing the neighbors garbage cans over, creating huge dustclouds and taking out a few powerlines on the way to work. that will make you popular with the neighbors!!!!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 11, 2002 @09:17PM (#4435171)
    See, the problem isn't with the projects, it's Popular Science.

    Everyone knows that as soon as a project is published in Popular Science, it's doomed.

    Popular Science continues to write articles on the most fabulous of technology, and most of them die a quiet death.

    So, the problem wasn't Sikorsky or Helicopters or anything else. The problem was Popular Science. Keep your invention out of Popular Science, and you have a better chance of succes.
  • by shadowj ( 534439 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @10:21PM (#4435391)
    Not to mention if the rotor "departs the aircraft." A prop you can live without, but not a rotor.

    True enough. A helicopter mechanic (who may have been pulling my chain) once told me about a critical connector that he called a "Jesus bolt". Why? Because if that bolt lets loose, you're going to see Jesus.

    Playing devil's advocate, though... if you're going to talk about gross structural failures, you have to admit that there will be similar problems with other aircraft. If a wing falls off of your Cessna, you're going to be just as pissed, aren't you? What's the likelihood of a rotor going away compared to a wing going kaput?

    With that said, I think I'd prefer to be in a dead-stick Cessna, just as you would... but that's with today's helicopters. A liberal application of technology could go a long way toward fixing those shortcomings.

  • by sielwolf ( 246764 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @10:21PM (#4435395) Homepage Journal
    Hmmm. My personal suggestion is to replace your step three with this:

    3. Beat her like she stole a package.
  • by AJWM ( 19027 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @10:42PM (#4435469) Homepage
    ... and see how well she does ...

    Just think of it as evolution in action.

    In actuality, most FAA regs are to protect (a) people (and property) on the ground and (b) passengers. They don't really care much if a pilot kills himself (or herself -- although most of the female pilots I've known were a little less reckless than the males) as long as he doesn't hurt anyone else. (Unless, of course, it was a commercially built (vs homebuilt) aircraft at fault. And then they're still more concerned with the other folks who might get hurt by similar.)
  • by nbvb ( 32836 ) on Saturday October 12, 2002 @01:01AM (#4435866) Journal
    General Protection Fault at address x:FE2C y:42FA z:FFFF in module lane.dll.

    Please turn your yoke up up, down, down, left, right, left, right, gas, brake, start to reboot.

    Or, if they're built like anything from Detroit, a big 'ol light would come on that says "SERVICE AIRFRAME SOON" and it'd drop out of the sky.

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...