Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

Landshark 337

An anonymous reader writes "This has got to be, or will be when they actually make one, the coolest amphibious vehicle around. It's a cross between a motorcycle and a jet ski, and it seats three. It can travel at 200 mph on land and 50 mph on water. Just what you need to get you from point A to point B."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Landshark

Comments Filter:
  • by Beatbyte ( 163694 ) on Friday November 08, 2002 @10:15AM (#4624786) Homepage
    I'd imagine the suspension is adjustable in the front. Air bags or coil over or something where it would actually bring the front end down and the back end up at least to the same height if not higher than the front.

    Either way, when my car hits 130mph and I'm feeling kinda scared, I don't think I could handle going much faster than that. Besides, RWD at 200mph? a little lite in the back end would be DAMN scary/dangerous!
  • Re:Next SUV (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Smidge204 ( 605297 ) on Friday November 08, 2002 @10:17AM (#4624798) Journal
    Also note that practically nobody uses an SUV for the kinds of things an SUV is capable of. I know Landrover owners you *freak* if they get mud on it... wtf did they buy a Landrover for, then?

    As for betting from A to B... who would use this for a daily vehicle? Recreation, definately, but recreational vehicles aren't genarally used for 'A to B' travel.

    +4 Neat, +0 Useful
    =Smidge=
  • by p3d0 ( 42270 ) on Friday November 08, 2002 @10:27AM (#4624872)
    Actually, I thought the Redundant mod was pretty funny. I wish I could metamod it as Funny.
  • Re:Next SUV (Score:3, Insightful)

    by susano_otter ( 123650 ) on Friday November 08, 2002 @05:58PM (#4628978) Homepage
    Yay. Hundreds of SUV owners use their SUVs in some close approximation of how the television tells them it should be used.

    Compare that to the thousands who use them almost exclusively to commute, pick up groceries, or take the kids to soccer practice.

    Not to mention the whole debate you hinted at--that these vehicles aren't actually even appropriate for the kind of use that the television proposes. Or the debate about whether or not the drivers are properly qualified for these fantastical depictions of "extreme driving".

    Your Landrover website aside, the trend seems to be as follows: Your television tells you to buy the SUV for its extreme driving capability. You do what you television tells you to do, and then use the SUV almost exclusively for mundane driving tasks.

    Meanwhile, companies like Subaru and Volvo are making AWD cars that not only have superior extreme driving capabilities, but have smaller footprints, better mileage, better price points, and significantly less emissions.

    I have no patience for your Landrover enthusiasts. The amount of money they're spending to bounce over muddy tussocks is laughable. The visual obstruction they pose on the highway, and the level of pollution they contribute in pursuit of their own amusement, promptly drains all the humor out of the situation. Go offroad all you want. I'm not against having fun. But keep your over-sized, gas-guzzling, luxury follies the fuck away from my commute.

"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight

Working...