Futuremark Replies to Nvidia's Claims 317
Nathan writes "Tero Sarkkinen, Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Futuremark, has commented on the claims by Nvidia that 3DMark2003 intentionally puts the GeforceFX in bad light, after Nvidia had declined becoming a member of Futuremark's beta program. This issue looks like it will get worse before it gets better." ATI also seems to be guilty of tweaking their drivers to recognize 3DMark.
nVidia vs. ATI (Score:4, Funny)
ATI: "Well, this shader program isn't optimally coded - here is a more optimally coded shader that does the exact same thing but more quickly."
nVidia: "Well, you caught us, but we have to cheat because you have it in for us!"
ATI: "Well, you caught us, and although we were doing the exact same thing (only faster), we will remove that code ASAP."
Hey, on the upside (Score:5, Funny)
ATi wasn't so bad (Score:5, Funny)
Re:nVidia vs. ATI (Score:5, Funny)
Preposterous! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:nVidia vs. ATI (Score:2, Funny)
Wouldn't that be:
SCO: Hey, we have a patent on SOMETHING you did, pay us money!
Does anyone think it's coincidence (Score:5, Funny)
to quake3.exe removes those pesky leaves, revealing her suptle nature, and that renaming it to 3dmark2003.exe removes the leaves and her wings? Is the inside joke that they leave "certain things out" of quake3 and 3dmark? Does the government know of the existence of aliens and wormhole portals to other worlds?
Re:NVIDIA DID NOT CHEAT (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Driver strategies (Score:1, Funny)
JC: WHEN WILL YOU FINISH DUKE NUKEM FOREVER? (Score:3, Funny)