China Proposes Rival Video Format 424
Richard Finney writes "Yahoo News is reporting that
the Chinese government is supporting an effort to develop a homegrown standard, called 'AVS,' for compressing digital audio and video in order to avoid paying royalties
on proprietary compression schemes.
The AVS groups website is online but in Chinese."
1.2 billion (Score:1, Informative)
fish translation (Score:3, Informative)
Not Invented Here syndrome (Score:5, Informative)
Re:1.2 billion (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Go China! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Go China! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Piracy? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not Invented Here syndrome (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Yet another proprietary codec... (Score:5, Informative)
Xiph.org is also developing the experimental wavelet-based "Tarkin" codec. As I understand it, it's more written from "scratch", much like Ogg Vorbis, but is even further ahead in the future than Ogg Theora, which they are focusing on right now.
Re:1.2 billion (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Go China! (Score:1, Informative)
The bullets were not rubber, 4 defenseless students died, 1 was permanently paralized. Many many more were injured.
At least with a tank coming at you, you have a chance to run, verses being in a field surrounded by a fence, and having over 60 bullets fired into the crowd in a matter of seconds.
As opposed to (Score:5, Informative)
And now of course we have American publishers who want to extend copyright in perpetuity to stop people having fair use of characters in the likes of Rudyard Kipling's books.
Re:Go China! (Score:3, Informative)
OK they are not a friendly goverment. But I have met a couple of people who work there and they like it.
Seing as so much IT work is starting to go to India and China I am seriously considering a move in the next couple of years.
The Chinease goverment is slowly getting better and the western goverments are getting more authorotarian. So I don't think it will make much differance in a few years
With so many people it makes sense for China to research and make home grown products, they have their dragon chip, own linux distro and this is just part of that. They have their own space program too. Basicaly china seems to be going through a pahse of massive tecnolgical growth right now.
Re:Yet another proprietary codec... (Score:1, Informative)
Xiph.org is focusing its efforts on Theora right now, which amongst others requires a new libogg that can do non-degenerate Ogg streams (Vorbis I only uses degenerate Ogg streams, which can only hold one data stream. For Theora you need both VP3 video and Vorbis audio, and hence full-featured Ogg streams). VP3 is proven technology so the chances of that working in the near future are much better than those of Tarkin, even if Tarkin may be more interesting from a technical point of view.
Lourens Veen
Re:Piracy? (Score:4, Informative)
Yes, all bootleg DVDs are region-free to allow the most number of people to use them. That is not to say many legitimate DVDs aren't region-free, in China, Hong Kong, and elsewhere (while most DVDs from the US are region 1, you will find many that have no region restrictions built-in).
DVD players that can be modified to be region-free (usually through a remote hack) work excellently. The Nerd-out forums [nerd-out.com] and dvdrhelp's player hack list [dvdrhelp.com] are both very helpful in finding a region-free player or finding out if your current player is region-free. But basically, once you have a region-free player, you can watch DVDs from anywhere. Especially if you have one that does proper PAL -> NTSC conversion, allowing you to play anamorphic widescreen DVDs from Europe and any other PAL countries (CyberHome and Malata are two brands to look at with this feature).
They want to OWN patents (Score:4, Informative)
It is true that paying royalties to domestic companies is much better than paying foreigners (we all remember the DVD player fiasco), and it doesn't matter much whether ship-making (etc.) technologies are open or closed, but I don't think the current policies are suitable for software and related technologies. Mandating domestic proprietary (and sometimes incompatible) standards over existing free (as in freedom) ones may create more GDP in royalties, and possibly give domestic companies some advantage in competition (unlikely), but ordinary people actually loses.
Being a Chinese citizen, I think the situation here is similar to that in the US in 1970s as described by RMS. Basically most people are not aware of IP, and those who are getting to know it rush to "protect" it, few have yet to get the notion of free software(information, knowledge, etc.).
SVCD was created for the same reasons (Score:2, Informative)
The linked article doesn't mention it, but the SVCD (Super Video CD) format was created in 1998 for the same reasons. Here is a good overview of why and how SVCD was created [uwasa.fi] (some excerpts follow...)
Super Video CD (aka SVCD, Super VCD or Chaoji VCD) is an enhancement to Video CD that was developed by a Chinese government-backed committee of manufacturers and researchers, partly to sidestep DVD technology royalties and partly to create pressure for lower DVD player and disc prices in China. The final SVCD spec, set by the China National Committee of Recording Standards, was announced in September 1998, winning out over C-Cube's China Video Disc (CVD) and HQ-VCD (from the developers of the original Video CD).
As always, the background story is a bit more complicated than how it appears in brief summaries like the above. First of all, why was there such a big interest in creating a new CD-based video disc format for China, at the time when the rest of the world was already preparing to accept DVD as the "next generation" digital video delivery format?
It all comes down to the following three reasons:
Re:Probably Nationalism (Score:3, Informative)
They've failed as a communist party
India. [cia.gov] Government type: federal republic. Population: 1,045,845,226. GDP per capita: $2,540. Literacy: 52%. Life expectancy: 62.2 years.
China. [cia.gov] Government type: Communist state. Population: 1,284,303,705. GDP per capita: $4,600. Literacy: 81.5%. Life expectancy: 71.86 years.
Don't get me wrong, China sucks wang, but I'd hardly call it a failure.
Re:Ermmm... (Score:3, Informative)
Untrue
The US is fourth in absolute terms of overseas aid given (behind Japan Germany and France). In terms of percentage national income, the US at 0.12 per cent, ranks below Uganda.
Re:6 billion people (Score:5, Informative)
Total population figure is irrelevant though. Even if people in rural Fujian aren't making enough money to buy a lot of DVDs, there are 16 million people in Beijing and several million more in the Yantze river delta. And when the population of just a few Chinese cities starts to rival countries like Germany... it makes a huge difference for international standards competition.