Finally: Broadband for the Commodore 64 442
GP writes "Now even die-hard Commodore 64 users are able to enjoy the benefits of broadband Internet connectivity. A newly announced Ethernet card together with the Contiki operating system lets you surf the web, send e-mail, host web sites with the built-in web server, and soon even play LAN games on your good old Commodore 64! All this with a computer that is old enough to drink."
Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps (Score:5, Insightful)
Really? In my day we used to have 386/33 machines with 4 10Mbit ethernet cards running Novell Netware, and several large hard disks. You're not running Windows, by any chance are you?
Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. (Score:3, Insightful)
Shouldn't you be out feeding them instead of:
1) reading slashdot
2) reading a story on slashdot you don't think is worthy
3) reading, and then commenting on a story on slashdot that you don't think is worthy
By your line of reasoning, nearly everything is offtopic and not relevant except for the bare necessities of life. What a very painful existance you must lead.
C-64 (Score:5, Insightful)
This also brings up the sheer amount of unneccessary bloat in alot of software today.
Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. (Score:2, Insightful)
Some of us make a living from this geek stuff. Can't feed people if I have no money. Your logic is faulty.
Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. (Score:3, Insightful)
Wrong. 18% of people in DEVELOPING COUNTRIES don't have enough to eat, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization [feedingminds.org]. 12% of the global population is malnourished. The numbers are huge enough as it is without getting them wrong.
"Don't mod this down just because you disagree."
No, mod it down because it's wrong.
Re:New kind of bottle neck (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:New kind of bottle neck (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm gonna be ill. (Score:3, Insightful)
I had one of these machines when I was a kid. I outgrew BASIC fairly rapidly and started coding in assembly. My blue 6502 Assembly book was so dog eared that it made neighborhood beagles jealous. While I was taking calculus in college, I wrote a crude ray tracer that output 16 colored blocks and attempted to use screen refresh rates to eek more than 16 colors out of each text cell. I'm as big a fan of the machine as anyone, but it's time has passed.
Now, however, both the CELL PHONE AND PDA IN MY POCKET have more beef than a C=64.
I mean, if you're going to mod something from that era, at least use a C-128D. There's so much more room in the case.
Re:New kind of bottle neck (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps (Score:3, Insightful)
The first box I had after the C64 was a 80286 cruising along at a blazing 16mhz, and that was a quantum leap upgrade. The C64 [old-computers.com] plodded along at a piddly 1mhz, with a whopping 64kilobytes of ram. I'd be real surprised if the C64 could utilize a fast connection, especially since all the data is running over serial cables for god's sake.
Not to be a bastard, but I've got an obsolete TI-83 calculator sitting on my desk which can do anything a C64 can do, and I don't have to lug around a 30 pound floppy drive to use it.
Just my opinion. Flame away.
Re:two clocks? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:New kind of bottle neck (Score:1, Insightful)