Tech Titans Prepare to Battle Over Next DVD Format 453
securitas writes "The New York Times Technology has an excellent feature by Ken Belson about the coming battle over the next-generation DVD format that consumer electronics and technology giants are already preparing for. The article covers the (high-definition) HD DVD group, led by Toshiba and NEC, and the Blu-ray Group, led by Sony and Matsushita (Panasonic/JVC). Mass production is expected to begin in 2005, but both sides are expected to show prototypes and aggresively pursue partners at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas next week. Add to the mix a nine-company Chinese faction that says it will develop its own DVD format because - fearing their technology could be used by Chinese rivals - the Japanese manufacturers haven't shared much information, even within the DVD Forum. Finally, Disney, Microsoft, IBM and Intel have yet to weigh in. The worst thing that could happen would be another Betamax/VHS-type war. In that case, 'Everyone is a loser, particularly Hollywood studios, the retailer community and, most importantly, the consumer,' says Warren N. Lieberfarb, developer of the original DVD format."
FWIW (Score:5, Informative)
I would like see the next-gen players be able to play both disks, I have ALOT! I also happen to favor Toshiba they make one of the better players out there for picture/sound.
Re:How are the media companies losers (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Most importantly? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:FWIW (Score:3, Informative)
what ever happened to FMD? (Score:4, Informative)
Not that I really want a new format or anything. I just think FMDs are cool. DVDs are a-ok for me, and I just bought a DVD burner (which supports all the damned various formats), so why are they making something new, again. Can we just have some media technology that lasts for more than 10 years?
DVD Demystified (Score:4, Informative)
Will we see that kind of cooperation again? Probably not. There's too much incentive to play dirty, after the massive success of DVD.
FWIW the book also contains far, far more tech background on the DVD format, MPEG-4, visual theory, etc. than anybody except Slashdotters will ever want to absorb.
Comment removed (Score:2, Informative)
Re:what ever happened to FMD? (Score:4, Informative)
The company (Constellation 3D) working on it finally failed several months ago. The problem didn't seem to be with the basic technology, which actually did work (so I wouldn't really call it vaporware), but with issues such as manufacturing the lens assemblies and the disks themselves for reasonable cost. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the idea reappears after materials and manufacturing technologies have advanced a bit to make real-world products feasible. Or perhaps the manufacturing problems were truly intractable. It's really hard to tell, but I wouldn't write the whole idea off just yet. We may yet see LEP/OLED or iridescence displays too; it's just the nature of bleeding-edge technology that you have to try a couple of times before you know whether the second- and third-order problems are solvable.
Re:Disabled functions (Score:2, Informative)
A pr0n I was bought had one of those ads telling you how small your wiener was everytime you started it up. Nothing like questioning the size of your manhood everytime had it in hand.
Re:Disabled functions (Score:2, Informative)
Re:If I made the DVD specs for movies (Score:3, Informative)
You meant "Fact, not opinion". DTS allows higher bitrates than DD does, so the quality potential for DTS is much higher. Given identical sources and the same quality of encoders, DTS will do better than DD.
Re:exponential or incremental improvement? (Score:3, Informative)
These aren't really GOOD reasons for supporting DVD so late, but they have nothing to do with DIVX.
BTW, Amblin started releasing DVDs in October '98. Dreamworks started in August '98.
Re:Hold on a second. (Score:1, Informative)
There are HD-capable CRT sets available for under $800. I bought a 50" HD-ready Toshiba for about $1800 two years ago.
Studios aren't shooting in 1080p -- they're shooting using film, which has no resolution.
Most are still using film, but Attack Of The Clones was done with 1080p digital. Also, there is a limit to the useful resolution in film - the grain size of the emulsion. Although, a good 35mm film probably has at least 4x the resolution of 1080p. And I'll agree with the original poster that the HD format should store the images at 1080p, and if the customer's set can't display that, the player can convert it. It makes more sense to have the storage format be progressive-scan and as high as resolution as will be needed, and allow the player to interlace/downconvert, rather than try to deinterlace or upconvert lower-resolution video.
Before you start spouting off about what should and shouldn't be, develop an understanding of what you're trying to talk about on Slashdot. That way you won't seem like some nerd whose only movie experience is playing DVDs on his computer in his basement.
Ooh, a lecture on understanding home theater from a guy who hasn't looked at prices on TVs in the past three years.
HD is worth it... (Score:2, Informative)
If the new HD players were backwards compatible with current DVDs, I would be happy to go out and buy a new player. The HD experience really is worth the upgrade. The only concern I'd have is if studios would have to do a standard DVD and also a HD DVD for new releases. Maybe there would be a way to compromise to save money.
Progressive-scan DVDs look good, but I think that once people see what they're missing with the new format, they'd be willing to upgrade.