Google Eyes New Email Service, Expansion 287
GillBates0 writes "According to a CNN/Reuters story, Google is
developing a service to attach its lucrative keyword-based advertising to
email: ''I'm sure Google is getting more and more concerned about locking
in users. It wouldn't surprise me if they did something very sophisticated
with e-mail,' said Danny Sullivan, editor of SearchEngineWatch.com, who
tracks the industry.' Apparently, Google has purchased an e-mail management
software maker and registered the domain name googlemail.com. The article
also speculates that Google is slowly on the way to becoming a
full-fledged portal, with the gradual addition of more and more portal-like
features like Froogle."
Google AdSense and e-mail (Score:3, Informative)
Groups (Score:2, Informative)
Is that really a "discussion groups" section as much as Google's newsgroup browser? It's not really a Google service as much as a Google interface to a web-wide service.
Re:Froogle (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Google needs help (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Interesting things at google. (Score:2, Informative)
it's not expensive either.
Me@google.com (Score:5, Informative)
I have never had anything but praise for Google. The "Less is More" design was an oasis compared to other yahoos. However, I have always had a Yahoo account because it is free. I'll jump to google in a heartbeat ~ as long as it's free.
Google has created more innovative search features than anyone. And they just keep doing it. People have discussed the impending or eventual doom because of new offerings from MS and Yahoo, but the mindshare is with Google and the service just rocks/folks!
I have only 1 suggestiong for Google, and that is to let me up the number results returned to 250 or 500. Other than that, I'm on the bandwagon!
Re:This Does Not Mean Google Is Becoming A Portal (Score:1, Informative)
Googlemail.com (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Interesting things at google. (Score:3, Informative)
> could be used in a software environment and they said not at the current moment
That's odd since the Opera browser has Google ads [opera.com].
Re:Froogle (Score:1, Informative)
Re:I would like a Journal tab in Google. (Score:3, Informative)
Well Actually (Score:3, Informative)
I keep seeing tunnels at the end of all these lights
Brian
Free Shadango Account? (Score:2, Informative)
Cheers,
Alan Steele
Re:Interesting things at google. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Interesting things at google. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Froogle (Score:5, Informative)
froogle is generations behind Yahoo! Shopping, pricewatch, shopper.com etc.'s ability to distinguish actual items for sale from reviews, previews, and other non-merchandising content.
Yet froogle insists on attaching a price to every result returned on a search, often an incorrect one.
Often times a froogle search will turn up pages of "results," but when you go to sort by price, all of the sudden you wind up with only a handful of listings. In effect their software is saying, "well, I wasn't too sure about some of these."
Re:Froogle (Score:2, Informative)
The prices listed for the actual froogle results are as as correct as the vendors say they are, since they come from vendor-supplied feeds (I know, I had to write a script to do this for my company). As for the other results, did you miss the little qualifier that the put above them? "The results below were automatically extracted from web pages. Price and category information are uncertain." None of the other listings that you mentioned do this - in fact, I don't know of any other price-search service that does this.
Of course, the annoying thing about this is that the price filters don't affect these items, either. On the other hand, froogle is still listed as beta, so it can only get better.
Re:If google sucks, what search engine should we u (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Real world example of Google suckage (Score:3, Informative)