Radar For Safer Driving 484
Posted
by
michael
from the johnny-cab dept.
from the johnny-cab dept.
KarmaOverDogma writes "The New York Times reports that in the next few years, auto manufacturers may look to use low powered phased-array radar in the back of cars, in combination with enhanced mirror displays, to help reduce accidents related to so-called 'blind-spots.' The system currently under devlopment is a result of a partnership between Valeo, an auto parts supplier, and Raytheon, a military contractor. They note that according to data from the NHTSA, In the last 10 years such (blind-spot) accidents led to 1.5 million injuries and caused more than $360 billion in damage in the United States alone. With an expected cost of around $500.00 (depending on the configuration), will this low-power radar system from the 1970's really help make driving safer?"
It's official... (Score:5, Funny)
It would really come in handy during rush hour though.
Will it? (Score:5, Funny)
Only if it jams cell phones in the process...
360 degrees (Score:3, Funny)
Prolly Won't Help Seattle Drivers... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Article Text/Psuedo-Mirror (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Convex Mirror (Score:5, Funny)
Uh, you know where you are, right?
Re:Just look over your shoulder! (Score:5, Funny)
No (Score:5, Funny)
What would make driving safer would be to require better qualifications and a different license class for 5'1" women to drive trucks with 400 horsepower engines which are utilized primarily to travel the two blocks from the bank to the grocery store at 75MPH, tailgating everyone else on the road all the way.
That would be a start. Yeah, the radar might help too, but then again, perhaps there wouldn't be a ten-yard wide blind spot if a) the windows weren't five feet off the ground and b) if a more sensible vehicle size could be offered, like say, five tons instead of six.
Just a thought.
Re:Article Text/Psuedo-Mirror (Score:3, Funny)
HARM missile option on cars? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:This would be entirely unnecessary... (Score:4, Funny)
But it seems to give most people a warm fuzzy feeling to be able to see the back of their own vehicle in the side mirror. Dunno why, maybe they're afraid it'll just disappear one day and they might not notice without the mirror.
You're right that it's not a very helpful thing to watch when you're in traffic though.
A more useful application (Score:5, Funny)
This contraption would be mandatory for all trucks, SUVs, souped-up Japanese compacts, and Volvos.
That would cause accidents to drop by about 90% in my estimation.
Re:This would be entirely unnecessary... (Score:5, Funny)
Lately though, the auto industry has adopted an alternate tactic - instead of making the blind spots too small to hide a vehicle in, make the vehicles too big to hide in the blind spots.
So, what if (Score:4, Funny)
1970's? (Score:2, Funny)
Well, what is wrong with being from the 70's? A lot of good technologies are from the 70's!
Heck, I'm from the 70's :))
Re:Just look over your shoulder! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Article Text/Psuedo-Mirror (Score:1, Funny)
Next up: Lose versus loose! Stay tuned for the next episode of Captain Grammar!
Re:No (Score:3, Funny)
You can only drive something you can push at least 10 feet on a smooth level surface, unless you take the type of course required to obtain a class C drivers license (or whatever it is that professional truck drivers have).