Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Software

Opera Browser Creators Planning IPO 368

Iphtashu Fitz writes "Norwegian web browser developer Opera Software is reportedly planning an Initial Public Offering on the Oslo Stock Exchange next month. According to a press release issued today, Opera's revenue for the last quarter grew 108.7% and CEO Jon S. von Tetzchner stated that 'After developing and refining the technology and commercial side for nine years, Opera Software is now ready for public listing.' Opera has, according to CNET News, gained popularity in the past few months thanks, in part, to having ported their well-known browser to smartphones."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Opera Browser Creators Planning IPO

Comments Filter:
  • Opera (Score:5, Insightful)

    by MysteriousMystery ( 708469 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @05:52PM (#8230675)
    Opera is a nice browser, but honestly how many people do you know that actually regged it? Most people are using the ad supported version. With the company going public it makes me wonder about how many ads and to what level the ads will be showing up in future releases. Instead of just a banner at the top maybe pop ups FROM Opera? Perhaps I'm just seeing things negatively but this certainly makes me wonder about the product. I will say it is nice to use on a Zaurus though.
  • worthy? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by segment ( 695309 ) <sil@po l i t r i x .org> on Monday February 09, 2004 @05:57PM (#8230756) Homepage Journal
    For the quarter ended Dec. 31, Opera earned 1.3 million kroner ($190,000), compared with a loss of 21.4 million kroner ($3.1 million) in the same period a year ago.

    Not to bang the drum slowly here but if Netscape which was already paired with a money maker (or loser depending on your view) such as AOL, and it's pretty much a dead product nowadays, I wonder what Opera is thinking aside from making a quick dollar. Even if they made a measly $190k they lost $3.1 that will eventually have to be paid back if not done already.

    Now, Opera is alright as a browser, but as it stands the majority of `quickie' users tend to be - dare I say it? - IE (l)users, and with Microsoft making it pretty much the first thing a new computer user sees, I wonder what is making Opera think they can compete with the (s/^/crooked/g) Microsoft 400lb Gorilla.

  • not a good idea (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mabhatter654 ( 561290 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @05:57PM (#8230763)
    This is not good...the only way the net has survived so far is that very key, very identifiable PRIVATE companies have been involved. They might as well sell it to the highest bidder right now and save the trouble of the IPO. Perhaps they could get IBM to pick them up, or maybe Google! ...as a best case...

    Their board will get slammed by the "big kids" trying to get a piece...the directors will get sick of it quickly and quit within a year...Either way the "standards compliance" will be the first thing to go when the corps take over...and that is Opera's only "killer" feature...If the directors want their money, sell it to somebody like google, or OSDN or IBM...somebody that's big enough and "in tune" enough to appreciate it....unlike the whole AOL/Netscape thing.

  • It's about time... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by tipiyano ( 709370 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @05:57PM (#8230765)
    Opera gets some more recognition. I love the mouse gestures, image off browsing, autosave links for when you need to reboot the system but don't want to bookmark all the open pages and lots of other cool features.

    Now only if they could get a search keyword highlight (like the google toolbar), I will stop using mozilla (which has a google toolbar lookalike).

  • by D-Cypell ( 446534 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @05:58PM (#8230794)
    Take your 108.7% increase, give the staff a nice bonus, and keep on developing.

    Why is it that every tech firm thinks that making a profit means sell up as fast as possible? Why put yourselves in the hand of people that have no idea about your technology, company culture or internal standards and just expect you to keep turning profits at all costs?

    Keep the money, keep your company and keep inovating.
  • Re:Opera (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gl4ss ( 559668 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @05:58PM (#8230795) Homepage Journal
    why does 'going public' always equate into 'after this they must try to bring in all the cash they can in and sell their souls to the devil too!'? you know they don't have to have a businessplan like that!

    the more intresting news is that they made profit..

    seriously, they're doing this to get some financial flexibility afaik, you can be more stiffed for maximum profit with private investors..
  • Re:Why Pay? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kannibal_klown ( 531544 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @05:59PM (#8230813)
    I like Mozilla, and usually support free software, especially OSS, but I don't see what's so wrong about liking payware. It's not like I'm dirt poor, and can't afford the registration fee.

    Free Software and Open Source software is great, but not every company is Microsoft; some are benigh or even benevolent. There's nothing wrong with paying for software if you like it more than the free alternatives.
  • Re:worthy? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Kenja ( 541830 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @06:08PM (#8230950)
    Well for one thing, people are actualy working on Opera and have been since the start. Netscape died becuase the devlopers gave up on it long before the soruce was released. This is why Opera is a good product and Netscape started to suck long before they started going out of business.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 09, 2004 @06:10PM (#8230978)
    WHY??

    I mean.. i love opera.. i use it to test all my web pages against.. because if it works in Opera.. it will work in ANYTHING.

    Now they're gonna sell out.. it will become the next NetScrape.. the programmers will get rich and quit and then MS will buy it out so ZDnet can rave about the "BRAND NEW FEATURE! Tabbed Browsing" in IE 7.0

    pftt.. IPO my ass.. what a way to ruin a great company.

  • Re:Amazing ... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by El ( 94934 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @06:15PM (#8231039)
    Hint: ABC, NBC, and CBS also offer a "free to use" product.
  • Re:worthy? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by segment ( 695309 ) <sil@po l i t r i x .org> on Monday February 09, 2004 @06:19PM (#8231095) Homepage Journal
    Netscape crashed and burned following Sun's lead and spending millions chasing dreams in a court of law against Microsoft. Not because they gave up so get your info straight. They lost because they decided to focus their resources on fighting that same 400lb gorilla I just mentioned.

    Personally I use Lynx most of the time or Firebird for my personal use, but as for work I use Windows IE. So here is just another little quip, the majority of corporations (big money spenders) have (or at least should have) policies against software being installed, and I doubt they'd be willing to dish out more money for something already "FREE" (note the quotations before you flame back), "FREE" on the OS they were conned into buying/upgrading. It's called IE.

  • Re:Opera OK (Score:2, Insightful)

    by saberworks ( 267163 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @06:29PM (#8231243)
    Ahem, I use opera for ebay all the time. Maybe you're typing your passwords differently? Maybe you've got it set to identify as IE when it should be identifying itself as opera? Why not contact their support department?
  • Re:I wonder which (Score:2, Insightful)

    by neko9 ( 743554 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @06:53PM (#8231591)
    Opera :-)
  • by Tin Foil Hat ( 705308 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @07:12PM (#8231805)
    They've been in business for nine years. I wouldn't call an IPO now "selling up as fast as possible." An IPO is a business decision, and like all business decisions, the smart company will weigh it carefully before embracing it. Opera has survived too much for too long now, and can certainly not be described as stupid. I don't claim to know the reasoning behind their move, but I'm willing to think it is worthwhile from their point of view.

    Hell, their reasoning could be that it will make the founders very rich. Sucks for the rest of us, but if it were my decision, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
  • Re:Here's Why... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by lrichardson ( 220639 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @07:13PM (#8231819) Homepage
    Puh-leese!

    '...sole OFFICIAL responsibility ...'

    There's a vast difference between what they are supposed to do, and what they actually do. Enron, WorldCom being perfect examples.

    And what time frame are we talking about? The best way to maximize future dividends is to minimize those paid out now, leaving plenty of cash for growth/development. It's a fine line to walk, keeping investors happy and still maintaining future profitability.

    Looting a good company is another consequence of IPOs (thankfully somewhat rarer). Normally done by members of the board through 'options', thus deferring the rape till some time after the IPO, and out of the public's attention.

  • by FrankDrebin ( 238464 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @07:26PM (#8231983) Homepage

    The Norwegians feel about the Swedes much the same way the Americans feel about Canadians.

    Given that Norway is smaller in population but richer in resources (ie. North Sea oil & gas) than Sweden, I'd say it's more like the way Canadians feel about the Americans.

    Although it could be construed as insulting to any one nationality, the fact is that to the rest of the world, there's little distinction between Canadians/USAmericans and Norwegians/Swedes.

  • by danila ( 69889 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @07:26PM (#8231988) Homepage
    Most people around here seem to miss an important point. Opera is a Norwegian company and it is going to be listed on Oslo Stock Exchange, not on NASDAQ. Being a small company is not a problem for them. They don't aim for multi-billion capitalisation, just for a way to raise some relatively small amounts of capital to finance their expansion plans (whatever they are).
  • Re:worthy? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by rolfwind ( 528248 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @07:32PM (#8232055)
    I wonder what Opera is thinking aside from making a quick dollar. Even if they made a measly $190k they lost $3.1 that will eventually have to be paid back if not done already.

    It might be the creditors who gave them the 3.1 million in the first place might be the ones pushing for the IPO to get their money back. AKA venture capitalists. To them, it doesn't matter whether the business floats or sinks afterward, they just need to get their investment out of it anyway possible.

  • by emarkp ( 67813 ) <[moc.qdaor] [ta] [todhsals]> on Monday February 09, 2004 @09:07PM (#8232962) Journal
    Apparently enough to grow their revenue by 108.7%. Well, registrations plus embedded sales.

    I have registered version 6 and 7. See, I'm supporting software I use and love. My only complaint is that they don't have a port to PocketPC.

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz

Working...