Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Graphics Software

Kodak Lagging in Digital World 335

mattmcal writes "Wired reports on the Kodak's struggle to survive and Mark Glaser comments on their demise at The Industry Standard saying that Kodak failed to take digital photography seriously, or at least failed to find a way to successfully transform their business. The Photo Marketing Association reported that in 2003, digital cameras outsold analog. Kodak's stock has been hovering near its 20-year low. Finally, today, the Asian Business Times reports that billionaire Carl Icahn sold all his shares saying the current business model there doesn't work."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Kodak Lagging in Digital World

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Film (Score:5, Funny)

    by Zakabog ( 603757 ) <john&jmaug,com> on Saturday February 21, 2004 @06:59AM (#8348390)
    With the ever increasing use of digital photography, I've become wary of the same problem that plagues digital media in general: it's so volatile.

    Properly stored original film negatives last decades, whereas digital media is gone in a blink of an eye when your harddrive/memory card breaks down or you accidentally erase your media.

    It's the same thing as with e-mail. I routinely print out all my e-mail correspondence (sent and received) these days because I've lost my mails too often.


    With the ever increasing use of digital photography, I've become wary of the same problem that plagues film in general: it's so volatile.

    Properly stored compact flash cards last decades, whereas film is gone in the blink of an eye when your negatives are damaged or you accidentaly spill something on them.

    It's the same thing as with snail mail. I routinely type out and store all my snail mail correspondence (sent and received) these days because I've lost my mails too often.

    To quote the daily show "That was a stupid thing to say and you're a stupid person for saying it."
  • by Alomex ( 148003 ) on Saturday February 21, 2004 @09:28AM (#8348711) Homepage

    And that is exactly the type of denial that has Kodak trading at a twenty year low.

    You must be a manager.

  • by CrackedButter ( 646746 ) on Saturday February 21, 2004 @10:50AM (#8348969) Homepage Journal

    Kodak is a superb innovator and without them the market cannot survive, it isn't competition that is killing them or market changes, its PIRACY!
    People all over the net are trading in online photos that should be printed off using Kodak processes, these criminals are killing the market which everybody benefits from. Since people are ignoring kodak and seeing it as a fight against the fat cats and big business, kodak will now be pressured to speak to their concerned congressmen and pass laws prohibiting online photo swapping software. Kazaa is small fry compared to all those iPhoto users and the illegal photo software that is bundled with a competitors digital camera. Its circumventing the whole photo process and thats probably breaking some clause in the DMCA. I implore online users to stop this and make it worse for everyone, use Kodak's stuff otherwise there won't be any new talent or new products from this fine standing company.
    Just remember, every email you send with an attached image is a kill and an illegal act of photo distribution
  • by Natchswing ( 588534 ) on Saturday February 21, 2004 @11:27AM (#8349137)
    With Kodak's business model failing expect to see a round of lawsuits in your future. Did you take a digital picture without paying your royalties to the Film Industry Association of America?

    Remember, photographers need that income generated by you using their artwork. Everytime you take your own picture you're effectively robing from another professional film photographer who could have taken that shot for you and charged you for it.

    P2P networks are notorious for allowing pictures to be traded illegally. When you use your digital camera to take a picture of a tall building you're commiting piracy. Since that angle has surely been photographed by someone else in the past you are killing their lively hood.

    Expect new laws to be passed where taking a digital picture of a building is a $280,000 fine. That one gig flash card you're toting around with pictures of your feet could cost you millions of dollars in fines to the FIAA.

    Taxi drivers will be fined for having pictures of their children on the dashboard - that's an unauthorized broadcast! Twelve year-old girls that take pictures of themselves dressing up like whatever pop idol they like can be sued for every piece of candy they get until they're 34. Grandmothers with pictures of their grandchildren!

    I advise everyone to go pull out their film cameras and take some pictures. If the FIAA feels threatened they'll sue everybody. If they FIAA falls apart then there will be no more pictures in the world.

    Expect Apple to open up an iSee store selling DRM'd pictures (only one view per day).

Work is the crab grass in the lawn of life. -- Schulz

Working...