Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology

Your Future Car's Hood Will Be Welded Shut 1196

An Ominous Cow Erred writes "A common argument used by open source advocates (myself included) in favor of open source is the simple question: 'Would you buy a car with the hood welded shut?' According to an article from the BBC, Volvo thinks the way of the future may be exactly that."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Your Future Car's Hood Will Be Welded Shut

Comments Filter:
  • Mechanics? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kravlor ( 597242 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:51AM (#8462176) Homepage
    There's something about trusting the mechanics to tell me when my car's broken that I don't really like...

    Besides, what happens when the radio transmitter breaks?

  • by intertwingled ( 574374 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:51AM (#8462182) Homepage
    Personally, I think that the union of computers and internal combustion engines is just plain stupid. One EMP burst and every automobile that has an Engine Control Computer within range of the EMP is dead. =/ Plus, I am mechanically inclined and often it is cheaper and easier for me to do my own maintenance and minor repairs. Welding the engine hood shut is doubly stupid. What if there is an engine fire?
  • just my opinion (Score:5, Insightful)

    by greechneb ( 574646 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:51AM (#8462187) Journal
    the article says only a volvo mechanic would be able to remove the bonnet... basically the whole front end. You think your mechanic will want to remove the whole front end just to replace a $5 part that would take 30 minutes, that will now take 2 hours? Of course they do get paid by the hour, so maybe it is a way of getting more shop time....
  • Screw That! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by xianzombie ( 123633 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:51AM (#8462188)
    >The whole front of the car is moulded in one >piece which can be removed only by a Volvo >mechanic.

    Great, so you can pay $40+ (USD) for an oilchange, along with god knows what a dealer charges for the rest of the routine maintence.

    I mean, ok, so the cars geared for women, and we know they can't do their own maintence, but what if they have an ounce of common sense and realize theres no reason to pay dealer prices?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:51AM (#8462189)
    Actually, the article just seems to be about the reinforcement of stereotypes that women don't want to get their hands dirty fixing the car. The concept car is supposed to be "feminine", and quotes some woman about how she never wants to go under the hood. Stereotypes flourish in Scandinavia!

  • Awful (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ThePretender ( 180143 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:52AM (#8462197) Homepage
    Now I can't be the only one who finds the generalizations made in the article offensive! And I'm not a woman and by no means some earthy-crunchy sensitive 90's-type guy.

    On top of that, the concept is stupid. There are things that people (yes, even women) can do themselves under the hood of their own car. What's next? Welding our computer cases shut? (or at least making better "void your warranty" stickers)
  • missing a step (Score:4, Insightful)

    by millahtime ( 710421 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:52AM (#8462198) Homepage Journal
    so, did the women who designed it think that something under the hood would never break or that the car is disposable? Were the women who designed this some high maintaince women whos daddys/husbands buy them everything?

    If it breaks under the hood how do you fix it????????????
  • by chabegger ( 232188 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:52AM (#8462200)
    There is no way I would buy a car with the hood welded shut. Even with non open source software, you can modify things a little bit - every program has preferences to change. For example, in Word I like the blue background with white text. In my car, I want to know I can change the oil, fill my windshield wiper fluid and change my coolant whenever I want to.
  • Simple Solution (Score:5, Insightful)

    by aliens ( 90441 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:52AM (#8462201) Homepage Journal
    Don't buy the car, it doesn't sell you won't see others like it.
  • That's just silly (Score:4, Insightful)

    by lovelee ( 133742 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:53AM (#8462212)
    Just because some woman's organization thinks the only reason some women want to look under the bonnet is to add washer fluid doesn't mean females want to trek their car into a mechanic to check their oil or change a fuse (my fuse box is under the bonnet!).

    Women gripe about how mechanics always treat them badly and try to take advantage of them anyway - why enable that by making a car that you can't check out, even if you wanted to?
  • by ponxx ( 193567 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:56AM (#8462242)
    I'm not particularly convinced by this car... what happens if it breaks down on the motorway? Do you have to call the Volvo break down service? How about a dead battery? Or just flat one when you need a jump-start? What if you want to get an oil-change at a garage round the corner? It strikes me as the kind of thing a car maker would do to increase their slice of the servicing market, much like some up-market cars that have rare or very odd parts so that only "authorised garages" are likely to be able to do anything beyond chancingin the oil...

    Most of the other design features also sound more like bunch of men were having a laugh as to what a woman wants in a car... like being able to colour-coordinate with your clothes... Please!!!

    I guess doing this kind of design study is a good way of getting publicity though, even made it onto slashdot...

    Robin
  • by The Wing Lover ( 106357 ) <awh@awh.org> on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:56AM (#8462245) Homepage
    "Women are soooo bad with cars that they can't even be trusted with a hood that can open!"

    Come on! Just because a lot of women don't do their own maintenance, does that mean that the hood should be locked shut? I mean, women who *don't* know how to do their own spark plug changes or oil changes would still be smart enough to just not open the hood, wouldn't they?

    'Sides, the car-repair show on the local radio program is hosted by a woman who is a genius when it comes to mechanics -- I wonder what she'd have to say about it.
  • .yawn. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by aixou ( 756713 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @09:58AM (#8462281)
    The analogy is flawed. Not having access to the source code of a program does not mean that you can not troubleshoot or perform basic maintenance on it.

    A car with a welded hood would be like having a harddrive that couldn't be defragged, it would be like not being able to use anti-virus software.

    Source code isn't everything. I perform basic maintenance on closed source programs everyday. It could be argued that a closed source easy-troubleshootable program is actually easy to fix than an opensource program whose developers don't give a crap about trying to help people troubleshoot.
  • Exactly. Nothing like a thermonuclear blast to wreck your day.

    Truth be told though, EMP isn't really a problem for microchips. It's generally a problem for electrical systems with long stretches of wire (like telephones and power grids.) What usually blows out a CMOS chips is static electricity, which you won't get from an EMP.

    TMYK

  • Re:Mechanics? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by blahlemon ( 638963 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:01AM (#8462306)
    The front molding is all one piece that comes off with a specialized tool. It said in the article that only a Volvo technician could take it off. Obvioiusly because they wouldn't sell the tools to the mass market.

    Not that specialized tools is a new idea. Car companies have been doing that for years to try and get people to bring their cars back to the dealer for repairs.

  • by cblguy ( 697834 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:01AM (#8462308)
    Modern auto engineering is about packing as many options in as little space as possible - all while allowing room to cool the engine.

    Many vehicles are designed to have "minor" service with "major" pain. Ever look under the hood of a minivan? Good luck changing the fuel injectors, or a spark plug. Most of these will require removal of at least the intake manifold's upper plenum (along with accessories), if not dropping the engine cradle.

    For many people, a "welded" hood already exists - they don't want to open it anyway. It's not for me (I wrench my own cars - rebuilding my own transmission this weekend). But for others, why not. A welded hood is not much of a difference than the way my father-in-law treats his Cadillac anyway.

  • As a woman... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by musingmelpomene ( 703985 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:02AM (#8462320) Homepage
    I think this is a terrible idea.

    Oh yeah, and as a woman who can't afford to go to a mechanic every time my car needs a fluid topoff, I think this would suck a lot.

    I think it would discourage people from doing routine maintenance on their vehicles and from being able to figure out problems before heading to the mechanic.

    When I go to mechanics, they often try to rip me off or tell me I need more parts than I do. One of them tried to get me to buy a new radiator when I already knew I only needed a coolant overflow tank (because the radiator was full and only the overflow tank was consistently empty).

    Sure, if a person's not going to do any maintenance anyway, whatever. But this is basically like saying "rip me off, pretty please, I have no idea what this car does or what's under the hood!"

    Additionally - what happens when you need a jump, or when your battery needs replaced? Even the most technologically inept woman I've ever met can be talked through a battery installation. What happens if your battery dies a hundred miles from the nearest Volvo dealership?
  • by sielwolf ( 246764 ) * on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:03AM (#8462340) Homepage Journal
    that women would never want to open the hood to their car, or that women came up with the concept (that women would never want to open the hood)?

    Of course, from the article: The whole front of the car is moulded in one piece which can be removed only by a Volvo mechanic.

    Bull. This is up there with the three bits (or whatever) of encryption on DVDs as the lamest attempt at obfuscation. The next day, after hitting the showroom, Autozone would have a 3 dollar wrench to open this bastard. And I bet anyone with an IQ over 10 could pop this badboy off with a screwdriver and a little leverage. That's probably all this Volvo mechanic would do after tiring of this Feature.

    A clumsy kludge that has no point other than being a big pain in the ass. Really, does having access to you're car's naughty bits in any way effect driving? This is the New Coke of car innovations.

    Besides, the only Swedish vehicle worth sitting in is a Saab Draken. ;)
  • Re:Awful (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:05AM (#8462368)
    I'm in the exact situation that you are my friend. I'm a male, not entirely sensitive (or at all really ;) but I've found both Slashdot and Linux.com notorious for these types of slanders.

    Linux.com is by far the worst, and I can't bring myself to read it anymore. I certainly hope that the teenaged male Slashdot readers will grow up, get a damned life and cease to be so bloody sexist.
  • by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:06AM (#8462371) Homepage
    if you really desire the days of mechanical points for the ignition system then you can have them buddy.

    90% of all horsepower increase achievements have came from electronic and computerized engine management. There are things you CANNOT do with mechanical ignition timing and engine management.
  • Re:yup (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Jace of Fuse! ( 72042 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:07AM (#8462380) Homepage
    No.

    Plasma cutters.
  • by O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O ( 526718 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:08AM (#8462400) Homepage
    This is not a new development. While I have never heard about any manufacturer wanting to do away with the hood, the automotive industry is trying harder and harder to secure their marketshare not only when selling new cars but also when it comes to the maintenance market. As far as new cars are concerned, Volkswagen just got fined a huge sum by the European Union because they were threatening dealersips in the countries adjacent to Germany that they would lose their license if they sold cars to Germans (attempt to eliminate the reimport market, by which people by cheaper cars abroad due to tax differences). As far as the maintenance market is concerned automotive companies have had clauses in their warranty for some time, stating that the yearly inspection/oil change has to be performed by a dealership of the same brand. Furthermore, since cars are becoming more and more reliable on microprocessors (especially engine control), the firmware for these devices is encrypted to make it harder for other companies/garages to offer maintenance and repair services. Do not be surprised if this becomes more and more common place in the next years. It is up to the customer to voice his discontent with this development.

    Just my 2c
  • silly (Score:3, Insightful)

    by TheSHAD0W ( 258774 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:09AM (#8462405) Homepage
    The idea is simply silly. The fact that the hood opens isn't for women to pop open when their cars break down so they can stare at it and wonder why it's not running. (Men either...) It's for the MECHANIC's convenience. Even if it's a Volvo certified shop, to have to pull the vehicle into a bay and hook it up to some gizmo to lift off the front end to replace a plug wire that fell off the distributor is silly. Especially when the vehicle is still under warranty, and the manufacturer is footing the bill. I suspect if Volvo ever implemented this sort of scheme they'd wind up replacing the front ends with ones with standard bonnets just to eliminate the extra load on their dealers' mechanics.
  • Re:.yawn. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by microbox ( 704317 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:09AM (#8462408)
    Word just quit on me... some sort of internal error, okay, how to I troubleshoot it =)

    Source code isn't everything

    Why yes... there's configuration files, so if your programme crashes in 640x480 resolution then...

    I perform basic maintenance on closed source programs everyday

    What exactly to you mean my maintenance, and if it's so easy why do you do it every day?

    A car with a welded hood would be like having a harddrive that couldn't be defragged

    Defragging a HD is one operation. Having the hood open lets you change many things. Do you see the distinction?

    The analogy is flawed

    Smiles politely. Oh all right, I fell down laughing =) =) =) =)
  • by G4from128k ( 686170 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:11AM (#8462432)
    While I doubt that cars have reached this point, there will come a time when it makes economic sense to "weld the hood shut." Building a nice easy-open car hood does cost money. If a car were as reliable as most consumer electronics, there would be little reasons for most people to get inside the hood on a routine basis. Cars are n't there yet, but as engine reliability increases, there will be less reason to get under the hood and thus less reason to pay for all the parts and mechanisms needed to made a door on the front of the car.

    When was the last time you needed get inside your car's radio? (OK, I know I posting on /. and someone hacker out their will have done something interesting inside their car radio)

    The point is that if the cost of providing access exceeds the benefits of providing access, then you get products with "no user servicable parts inside."
  • by cbiltcliffe ( 186293 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:17AM (#8462473) Homepage Journal
    This won't cost more - it'll cost less. At least for those of us buying relatively new vehicles. For the rest of you saps buying 5-10 year old vehicles - EAT MY SEALED CARS DUST!!!

    And if the person who's going to buy your car off you when it's 5 years old can't open the hood to fix it themselves, how much do you think they're going to pay you for it? You'll buy a nice shiny new plastic piece of crap with zero resale value.

    The vision just popped into my head of dozens of these cars at 10 years old or so driving around major cities with no hood, because the owner ripped it off and left it off.
    Volvo hot-rod, anyone? Problem is, I'm sure the practical V6 with hundreds of wires and sensors, so cluttered that you can't even see the engine, won't look nearly as impressive as a chromed 396 big block chevy.
  • Re:Not a new idea (Score:5, Insightful)

    by checkyoulater ( 246565 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:22AM (#8462522) Journal
    I'd cut a hatch and add a latch and some hinges so I could access the engine compartment. I like doing my own minor maintenance and repairs.

    OK, I let your first comment go, but this is the second time you have made this outrageous claim. Are you saying that you could open the hood of a 2004 Audi and diagnose even a small problem? Even the mechanics at the dealership need to hook the engine up to the diagnostic computers these days. I could understand doing repairs on older cars, say circa 1995 and older, but give me a break. I am mechanically inclined as well, but I wouldn't even attempt to repair anything inside the engine of a 2004 car. Expect maybe the washer fluid reservoir, or replace a broken cap. Exactly the parts you could access in this new Volvo.

  • by Moderation abuser ( 184013 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:23AM (#8462532)
    But it only makes sense if you only ever consider the first 3 years (i.e. the warranty period) of a car's life. After that the car gets passed on to the second user market, no longer with a warranty.

    How does the new owner of a perfectly good 3 year old car replace the battery? It becomes an hour labour for a mechanic plus the cost of the battery (90). And think about the amount of time you have to take out of your day to take the car to a dealer's garage, several hours. It only takes 10 mins to replace a battery normally (30). How about a new fan belt?

    The problem with manufacturers who think like this is that they only care about the first user who buys the car new from a showroom. The second and subsequent users are irrelevant to them. This will obviously affect the resale value of their cars.

  • by Squashee ( 573673 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:25AM (#8462548) Homepage
    Sure, welding the hood shut is a very provocative step, and the majority of the comments are about "stopping on a highway" etc. You think you can fix engine problems on new, modern cars yourself? Think again. I have many times over stripped my 90' volvo 245 EEC engine, and that I can fix, but my motherns new Renault? No way. Don't even know where to start. Modern car engines are extremly complicated and compact, and they contain a LOT of stuff that wasn't there on your ol' chevy. You might know the error, but you even can't find/reach the component! You actually do need specialist help to fix you'r car these days, or at least you need a extra trailer with equipment and tools. I doubt the majority of the people who talk about the "stranded on the side of a highway" actually have ever tried to fix something on a car built this millenium.
  • by jridley ( 9305 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:26AM (#8462568)
    I have to disagree. The advantages of modern engine control are huge. Computer control has given us tons in terms of increased efficiency and horsepower, decreased emissions, and increased integration between components; IE when you stomp on the gas, the computer turns off the A/C for a few seconds to divert power to the drivetrain.

    Computer engine control was kind of rough when it first started being used; the computers died a lot, they were susceptible to sensor failure, etc. Now they're way better, and engines are FAR more reliable than they were before computers.

    I for one don't want to go back to the days of carburetors and distributors. Fuel injection and coil packs or coil-on-plug, along with the computer(s) to control them, have made cars LOADS more reliable. Sure, it may be harder to work on them, but you don't NEED to work on them nearly as much.

    Try taking a 1969 car and driving it 120,000 miles without doing anything more than changing the oil.

    Also, I find that in most cases it's EASIER to work on my car with a computer. Without a computer you only know if there's something wrong if it's bad enough to cause serious performance degradation. With a computer, you can catch problems way before they become serious. I had a light a few months ago, went to the auto parts store, borrowed their scanner, saw that I had a stuck EGR valve, wrenched it off, cleaned it, and replaced it. Without the computer I'd never have had a clue, just kept polluting more than necessary, and possibly fouling my catalytic converter as well.

    I do have to agree about the shut hood though. I'd never even consider buying a car like this, or letting anyone in my family buy one.

    I think they're missing a bit by saying this is "for women" - most men never do anything under the hood, either; I know men that are more hopeless mechanically than many women I know. One of the best mechanics I've ever had was female. I think the whole thing is kind of insulting.
  • by dave420 ( 699308 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:27AM (#8462569)
    They'll put a fire-axe right through it, and pump water in. Simple. They're not trying to protect the paintwork, but stop it exploding. Dinging the hood is the least of their worries :-P
  • by Roblimo ( 357 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:27AM (#8462580) Homepage Journal
    I'd like a car with easily removable/exchangable seat cushions myself. I could have a plush set for regular/city use, and a vinyl set for when we go to the beach, head out to sail, going camping, or anything else that tends to get the interior dirty.

    Except sooner or later I'll probably moot this whole idea and replace my Cherokee with a Wrangler or old CJ with a totally washable "interior" and use it as our beach/tow/camping vehicle, with my wife's Hyundai reserved for "civilized" driving.

    (BTW, my wife checks oil and other necessary fluids often. I don't think she'd want a car where she couldn't do that easily.)

    - Robin
  • by Bendebecker ( 633126 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:33AM (#8462645) Journal
    I wonder if you their are other bodies you can fit on the cars fram. If so, you could pull a hood and front end off another car and put it on it. Sort of like the Alero and the '94 Mustang. It looks like the Alero ahs the same body design so you could probably use some parts interchangebly. Even if you couldn't, I can just see the future: instead of case mods you have hood mods. Clear ones, custom ones, '70's ones.
  • by jejones ( 115979 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:35AM (#8462671) Journal
    Panders to stereotypes about women a la the "Math is hard" Barbie.
    Seems to think women are vain creatures who want to be the Imelda Marcos of car seat covers.
    "The engine's on fire--quick, call the mechanic to open it up!"
    "That fender bender will run you $2000 to replace the one-piece front end..."
  • Re:Mechanics? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nizo ( 81281 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:36AM (#8462684) Homepage Journal
    There's something about trusting the mechanics to tell me when my car's broken that I don't really like...

    But how else would we know what our boss feels like when we say the harddrive just died on the RAID attached to the mailserver, and even though the machine is chugging along just fine, we really do need a new disk?

  • by The Tyro ( 247333 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:36AM (#8462686)
    but I'd never ask my wife to stand on the side of a US interstate with the hood up, waiting for who-the-hell-knows to stop... that's a recipe for disaster in some parts of the country. Now, I myself stop for people from time to time (it's my medic's instinct to see if they need help), but I don't expect them to trust me... and if they hint I should drive on, I always do so.

    That's what cell phones are for... I'm not trying to insult you here, so please don't take it that way, but I'd never leave my wife dependent on the kindness of strangers.

    Like I say, maybe it's different in England.
  • by tiled_rainbows ( 686195 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:44AM (#8462794) Homepage Journal
    "I'd never ask my wife to stand on the side of a US interstate with the hood up"

    Well, no, not if I was in the car, too. I'd probably and stand there with her for a bit, before suggesting we close the bonnet, find a pub and call the AA (like your AAA, not like your AA) from there.

    Seriously, though, I wasn't saying it was necessarily the best idea in the world, but she was just saying that in those cases when she was stranded at the side of the road with no-one to come to her aid, then she'd appreciate being able to raise the bonnet, if only for purely symbolic reasons.

    I don't know if there are fewer serial killers/rapists/whatever in England than in the US, but, based on my limited knowledge of US culture (mainly informed by Hollywood), I think there might be a greater fear of them over your side of the pond.
  • by BlackHawk ( 15529 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:46AM (#8462840) Journal
    • The scenario that comes most easily to mind is that of the car breaking down on the highway. What are you going to do, without a cellphone, without being able to access the hood?

    What are you going to do anyway? The overwhelming majority of people I know do not carry a full set of tools in their car, and even if they do, they carry little to no spare parts. So you break down. You can perform Manly Car Manuever #1: open the hood and stare at the engine. Even if you can diagnose the problem, what are you going to do without replacement parts?

    • What if the temp outside is subzero and you're 5 miles from the nearest inhabitant?

    And the ability to open the hood here means you can not only perform MCM #1 (detailed above), but you can do #'s 2 and 3: Freeze your ass off while doing it, and cuss at it.

    • Crits aside though, the car is pretty nice, and it is also good to see that we are able to make cars easier for the dumba^H^H^H^H^Hnormal people who drive cars and don't want to be concerned with how their car works.

    Oh, you're one of those zealots. Now I understand the basis for your objection. Religious issues...

    There's nothing that says a person can't know how the car works, and still not want to... or be able to, even!... perform their own maintenance on that car. The concepts here are, frankly, brilliant in that they take into account the existing desires of the target market. A lot has been written here about "reinforcing stereotypes", but the fact remains that most people (men and women) do not perform their own maintenance. Ergo, make the car so they don't have to.

    A better article on this project, which is called "Your Concept Car" or YCC, can be found at http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article= 6907 [thecarconnection.com] and explains some of the features in more detail, including the big one: the first maintenance stop is at 35,000 miles.

  • by hpulley ( 587866 ) <hpulley4&yahoo,com> on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:53AM (#8462930) Homepage

    Kids are crawling, walking, talking, oozing mess machines so parents could sure use washable seat covers. Vinyl seats were good for some things!

  • Re:Audi A2 (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Mr. Piddle ( 567882 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @10:55AM (#8462968)

    You know, there is a real advantage to a sealed hood/bonnet: stiffness. I would bet that the modern hood is a real PITA to car structural designers who look at that big unstressed hood and weep.
  • Re:Argh. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION ( 553878 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:00AM (#8463033)
    The headline suggests the engine is completely sealed off to prevent anyone but the manufacturer from touching the insides.

    So does the BBC article:

    The whole front of the car is moulded in one piece which can be removed only by a Volvo mechanic.

    The headline was only misleading to the extent that it didn't mention the "designed for women by women" angle--that it's not Volvo wanting to seal everyone's hood, just those of women. So they aren't attacking open source, they're attacking respect for women. Which is kind of worse if you stop and think about it.

  • by bluGill ( 862 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:00AM (#8463038)

    Cars manufactures have changed over the years. At one time Honda really was significantly more reliable than Ford. Many people have let Honda slide on this reputation for years, paying for more, for a car that isn't really any better than something that others can give.

    Hondas have problems too. Fords have problems. I don't know who builds the better car this year, and we can't know for 20 years. Until then it is just a guess. Some years Honda builds good cars, some years they don't. People are willing to forgive Honda for a bad car because "everyone has a few problems", but Ford with just as many problems just adds to their reputation of not building good cars. It isn't right.

  • by MKalus ( 72765 ) <mkalus@@@gmail...com> on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:05AM (#8463093) Homepage
    Well,

    if you have the money for a luxury car then you should also have the money to pay for repairs, no?
  • by fnj ( 64210 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:19AM (#8463262)
    "Are you saying that you could open the hood of a 2004 Audi and diagnose even a small problem?"

    Er, yes. Well, not literally yes, because mine is a 1999 VW, and I don't need to open the hood. I spent a couple hundred bux on something called a VAG-COM (VAG-COM [ross-tech.com]) that hooks up the OBD-II connector of any reasonably recent VW/Audi to a Windows notebook. It reads out the diagnostic codes in plain english - something like "temperature sensor shorted to ground" or "MAF signal intermittent" or whatever. It does a lot of other helpful stuff, too.

    Many other brands have similar tools available.

    The hood comes into the equation only because mine actually opens, and I can actually change out the temperature sensor after finding out that it is bad. But even if I had an Audi A2, if I knew a mechanic with the ability to get inside, at least I could tell him never mind the diagnosis, I want part such-and-such changed.

    Now, as it happens, I don't choose to do much of my own work, but I did find out my MAF was bad, and changed it out. I bought the part from the internet for 1/5 what the stealership would have charged, and changed it literally in 5 minutes, a pliers-only job which probably would have been at least $200 for diagnosis and labor, not counting parts, at the stealership.
  • by ichimunki ( 194887 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:20AM (#8463266)
    based on my limited knowledge of US culture (mainly informed by Hollywood), I think there might be a greater fear of them over your side of the pond.

    Greater fear, yes. Greater risk? Maybe not so much. Probably what is fair to say about both sides of the Atlantic is that we all spend too much time worrying about things that have very low probabilities but are shocking, rather than worrying about more realistic and common dangers that we have more control over.

    In any case, I don't have a car (by choice, you can't imagine how much money I save). So I guess I'll have to wait for the girls to make a bike where the gears are all encased in metal and where the seats come in different colors to match my riding gloves before I can get in on the smugness and macho superiority trip.
  • Re:Magnets? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jandrese ( 485 ) * <kensama@vt.edu> on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:23AM (#8463301) Homepage Journal
    I doubt it will do much to HDDs, they're reasonably well shielded from this sort of low level magnetic fields. I'd worry more about floppies, and much more about my credit cards.
  • by Aumaden ( 598628 ) <Devon.C.Miller@nOsPaM.gmail.com> on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:29AM (#8463387) Journal
    Proof positive that some people should not be allowed under the hood.

    I'd rather see a hood lock where you can only get the key if you pass a basic competency test.

    Out of curiosity, where's the battery in this car? How would one get a jump start if you need a mechanic to open the hood?

  • by Anita Coney ( 648748 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:48AM (#8463649) Homepage
    A lot of people here are saying, "What's the big deal, we never fix our own cars anyway?!" And they are mostly right. Other than changing my battery, I would never repair my own car.

    However, they are missing the larger picture. If the manufacturer is the only entity that can repair the vehicle, the profit will not come from the sale but from the repair.

    And once the repair of the vehicle becomes the means of profit, manufacturers will have NO incentive to make quality automobiles. They will have every incentive to create automobiles that WILL require repairs, because that would fit perfectly with their new business model.

  • by tiled_rainbows ( 686195 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @12:07PM (#8463903) Homepage Journal
    I dunno about you guys, but I'm paranoid enough not to call local law enforcement. I would sooner trust a random stranger than a copper.
  • Anger will prevail (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Explodo ( 743412 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @12:09PM (#8463925)
    I think it may happen for a certain class of throw-away cars, but it won't be norm for a very long time. There are just too many people who know how to get under their own hood to take that away. If you want to ensure that it never happens, make sure you make your kids do their own car work and instill in them the idea that being able to fix your own car is something to be proud of. The first time someone who actually knows how to replace their own air filter ($12-$15 for a standard one) has to pay the dealer $100 to do it, they'll never buy a car like that again.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 04, 2004 @12:48PM (#8464501)
    Or at least all the way to the end
    Volvo will never actually take this car into production, of course.

    So call off the boycotts, no one cares how much you would or wouldnt pay for this. It will never see the light of day..

  • by tazanator ( 681948 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @02:01PM (#8465497)
    I agree and find it odd that for my Class A CDL lic to drive semi (lowery in britian) I have to preform a 117 point inspection and log it and virfy/sign it before releasing the brakes. For the army I had a 23 page inspection list to follow. If you can't get in to look at it how do you know it is safe to operate?
  • by B3ryllium ( 571199 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @02:30PM (#8465872) Homepage
    Hmm, I sense wise description of how most people treat open source in that final paragraph ...
  • Re:Gas vs. petrol (Score:3, Insightful)

    by blincoln ( 592401 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @03:28PM (#8466689) Homepage Journal
    While this is true, it is also unfortunate. Cooking on an electric range top sucks.

    OTOH, electric range feed lines can't develop leaks of invisible, explosive gas.

    When I buy a house, I plan on switching to an induction range to get the best of both worlds.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 04, 2004 @06:07PM (#8469153)
    No, the reason motorheads drive cars is because they want to drive them.

    Regular people (many of whom couldn't give a flying nutsack what speed it reaches in 60 seconds, or what grade of oil it takes, or whether they can pull it to bits and reassemble it blindfolded) just want their cars so they can GET PLACES without having to deal with mediocre public transport. If I want to get to a friends house at 9pm, I don't want to have to catch a bus 2 hours earlier because the timetable doesn't coincide with my interests.

    People want cars for convenience, not because they see rednecks drive 500MPH in a bent circle at NASCAR.
  • Re:Gas vs. petrol (Score:2, Insightful)

    by SnappleMaster ( 465729 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @06:42PM (#8469585)
    "Gas appliances are fairly uncommon in North America. The majority of stoves, hot water heaters, etc, are electric."

    That depends where you live. In all the places I've lived in Canada and the US hot water has always been gas except in old cruddy student housing with ancient water heaters bought back in the day when electric was competitive. Electric furnaces are even more rare, and usually only found (where I've lived anyways) only in older houses.

    Stoves yes are mostly electric. Which is silly because a gas stove is just *so* much better!
  • by holizz ( 737615 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @08:13PM (#8470520) Homepage
    She can open it but it just has holes for oil and wiper fluid. Surely this is anti-competetive if only Skoda can open her bonnet (hood). (I'm just guessing that they can open it. I HOPE they can open it)
    It's a Skoda um... Fabia/Felicia maybe? It might start with a f...

    So we shifted the filling station for washer fluid to the side of the car, next to where you fill up fuel, and we closed the bonnet for good.

    Yeah that's nice that it's been moved to a convenient place so you don't need to open the bonnet but surely moving a few tubes doesn't mean the bonnet should be permanently closed. What possible reason do they have for welding the thing shut? Let's see... there's aesthetics and there's anti-competitive practices. I'm sure it'll be for aesthetics when the competition comission ask them.
  • by fishbowl ( 7759 ) on Thursday March 04, 2004 @11:25PM (#8471974)
    My Volvo, a 740 station wagon from 1991, is *extremely* simple and extremely shadetree-mechanic friendly. I put it in the same category as VW on this count. Or, 1950's - 60's American cars.

    I have, single handedly and without many tools:

    Changed (upgraded) the front and rear suspension, steering rods, and brakes.

    Installed aftermarket torsion bars.

    Changed the wheel geometry.

    Installed an exhaust header and modified throttle body.

    Upgraded the cooling system.

    Changed the timing belt.

    Now, granted, I'm something of an amateur mechanic with a good toolbox, but I didn't need anything special to do this stuff. There is NOTHING on this car that's at all mysterious. Even the electronics for the fuel injection aren't that strange. You open the hood, and it's *sparse* in there. There's no question what wires go where, what hoses are what, etc. And there's room to move around.

    What's my point? *ALL* Volvos share this design. If they mess up the design, they'll only mess it up for the US market. Canadian and European models won't get that treatment, nor will any car destined for Israel. (When you pay a 100% tax on a car, you expect to be able to maintain it forever.)

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...