Google Updates Its Face 548
whereiseljefe writes "About 12:00 am Central Time, at least when I saw it, Google changed it's face. Before it was a simplistic search engine, with a minimal front page, and now has become even more so. Those pretty tabs we have become accustomed to are now gone, and in the search results, the "summary" section at the top is now a faded blue bar (see here with a search returning ads). And the ads are a little more low key. Nice to know they are cutting back on their interface rather than adding spastically like Yahoo." Other folks noted that they've added Froogle and Local Directory pages have now been given links on the front page. Which is good, since inclusion in the main page tends to mean ready for prime time.
Re:Why are they trying to look like Yahoo!? (Score:1, Informative)
Google Web Alerts (Score:5, Informative)
That has been around.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Definition (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Why are they trying to look like Yahoo!? (Score:3, Informative)
Wrong page brother. (Score:4, Informative)
You're thinking of Yahoo! the web portal. Yahoo!'s search engine page [yahoo.com] looks pretty plain to me. They haven't added anything to it.
Google Web Alerts & Personalised Search Page (Score:2, Informative)
Get your Google Account!! (Score:1, Informative)
sign up now!
updated adsense as well (Score:5, Informative)
P.S. Google Adsense is Ad banner engine, using which you can add Ads on your website and generate some ca$h
Re:I saw (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good! (Score:4, Informative)
Different versions of Google (Score:5, Informative)
I find it interesting to see the slight variations of Google...geeky although it might seem - when I type http://www.google.com/ [google.com] I am thrown to http://www.google.be/ [google.be], so when I really want http://www.google.com/ [google.com] I type http://www.google.com./ [www.google.com] instead of using the "Go to Google.com" button (which sends me to the google.com page with a "Go to Google Belgium" button.
The definitive address with the dot at the end introduces itself as Google English in the graphic, but still has a "Go to Google.com" button, whilst clearly being the genuine definitive http://www.google.com./ [www.google.com]...but this version doesn't have the link to Froogle [google.com]... :)
Phew - that's enough links to Google for one day!
-- Pete.
Lynx (Score:5, Informative)
Say what you want, I like it!
Re:Meanwhile... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:/. could learn from this (Score:3, Informative)
It more lean and clean that way and load a lot faster that the ugly default look.
Google News still has much of the old look (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Meanwhile... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Google Web Alerts (Score:2, Informative)
Linux Searches? (Score:3, Informative)
Definitely going to bookmark that one...Google has saved my butt many-a-time during while learning Linux (but I've had to wade through a lot of irrelvant search results to get to what I needed).
Re:New google fizzles (Score:2, Informative)
Re:New google fizzles (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Fatal Error (Score:5, Informative)
It may be that using the extra bandwidth is faster or more efficient than the extra http request for the external stylesheet.
That's extremely doubtful. In almost all cases, the stylesheet will not come from Google's servers. They are a popular website and the stylesheet rarely changes, so the chances of it being in somebody's browser cache are high, the chances of it being in their ISP's cache is high, the chance of it being in neither is extremely low.
Re:Before-After comparison somewhere?? (Score:5, Informative)
Before [google.com] link,
After [google.com] link.
Re:Good! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:About Face! (Score:5, Informative)
See this thread [webmasterworld.com] at WebMasterWorld - the Google rep is called GoogleGuy.
Re:Meanwhile... (Score:3, Informative)
But gave me a thought. Why not use the text only interface, shove some CSS over it, and make the page look like the bloated HTML code version. Thus, you could make
NeoThermic
directories (Score:3, Informative)
The one time I DON'T press preview... (Score:2, Informative)
Directory [google.com]
University [google.com]
Linux [google.com]
Mac [google.com]
BSD [google.com]
Mircosfot [google.com]
Re:That has been around..and here it is! (Score:2, Informative)
Interesting.
Re:Fake hits (Score:3, Informative)
Then do your part and Report a Spam Result [google.com].
Not new! (Score:3, Informative)
As for the gloom-and-doom, IMHO this is totally benign. Google is most likely using these statistics to do usability testing ("How many links do people need to click on for this search to get what they're looking for?") or algorithm tweaking (actually using click-thrus as an input for PageRank).
They've been testing this publicly for a while. (Score:4, Informative)
Calculator (Score:2, Informative)
Google Personalized Search (Score:4, Informative)
This is a sad day for the Internet: Google has truely shot itself in the foot. Where are the big banner ads? the pop-ups? Where are the unrelated search results, obfuscated by even more unrelated "sponsored" search "results"? And why is it useful? It's the sad truth, but alas Google is living in the past, instead of looking to the future. (- Insert obligotary "BSD is dead" parody here -)
Seriously though, wandering around on ZDNet [zdnet.com], I found that Google has launched a personalized search engine [google.com]. I tried it out, and I'll tell you what -- it kicks major ass. Let's say you are trying to look up information for a particular or specialized search term on the traditional Google, it may give you some random unrelated results, those of another domain you wish to consult about; on Google Personalized Search, you specify which domain you want to search about and it will provide you with more pertinent results. Kudos to Google, once again.
They are even cleaner! (Score:4, Informative)
Re:About Face! (Score:2, Informative)
Why not go the whole route like Yahoo did years ago and have NO linebreaks too? That would definitly save space. However, nothing saves spaces like writing proper code and using styles.
Re:Meanwhile... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Popup? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Definition (Score:4, Informative)
And if you search for define:something (like define:taoism), Google will gather definitions of that term from pages around the web. Handy if you are looking for a quick overview of what a term means in actual use, rather than in the dictionary.
huh ??? (Score:2, Informative)
Please. Could we get people who attended school beyond the second grade to post stories?
I'd hope that by now, everyone would know "it's" means "it is" and "its" is a possessive.
Let's hope this idiot doesn't spell this way on hi's (doesn't that look stupid?) resume.
Re:Popup? (Score:1, Informative)
Interface vs. Implementaiton Simplicity (Score:3, Informative)
Erm... I think the submitter was mistaking interface simplicity for implementation/functional simplicity. Google's a brilliant example of interface simplicity, but I doubt it's nearly so simple behind the facade. They also seem to nicely follow the rule of least suprise.
Re:Fatal Error (Score:2, Informative)
b4n
Re:About Face! (Score:2, Informative)
Look here [commnet.edu].
Putting punctuation inside of quotation marks is an American convention, but the British put them outside. I use a combination of the two styles, depending on the circumstances. If I quoting something directly, I will put the punctuation on the inside. Sometimes the American way of punctuating doesn't make any sense. For instance, take the following sentence:
Did she say "That woman is ugly"?
It doesn't make sense to put the punctuation inside of the quote, because the quotation was not itself a question.
Granted, I should probably try to stick to one style or the other for consistency's sake, but it's really correct either way.
Re:Meanwhile... (Score:2, Informative)
It occasionally sends HTML that's just completely wrong, and Mozilla doesn't guess at what the page is supposed to look like. It simply displays what it was given. Fixing this would require getting Mozilla to guess at things it really has no business guessing at.
There was a story [alistapart.com] demonstrating a cleaned-up version of Slashdot using valid XHTML 1.0, and sure enough it doesn't exhibit these table problems.
Re:Revolution (Score:3, Informative)
Note I didn't get any obvious DuPont Chemical hits by simply searching for "Dupont Circle" or including Washington in the query.
Perhaps you should question your own search skills rather than Google's engine?