Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
X GUI Operating Systems Software Unix

XOrg Foundation Opens Membership and Elections 197

XOrg Foundation writes "To active developers and users of the X Window System:You are invited to join and help shape the direction of the new X.Org Foundation. Membership in the X.Org Foundation is now open and free.Applications for membership are sought from all contributors to the X and Desktop communities." Read more below for the rest of the information from the foundation.


The Interim Board of directors has established that examples of acceptable
contributions that will qualify you for membership in the Foundation include
coding, bug-fixing, testing, design, documentation, translation,
administration or maintenance of project-wide resources, speaking at
conferences, and supporting bugzilla or release management.

Should you wish to apply for free membership in the X.Org Foundation, then
please visit:

http://www.x.org/XOrg_Foundation_Membership.html

All Members are eligible for election to the Board of Directors and the
Architecture Group of the XOrg Foundation. The XOrg Foundation is now
seeking nominations for candidates for election to these groups.

Nominations for each election are open until 23.59 PDT on Friday 30th April
2004 for those Members of the X.Org Foundation who wish to stand for
election. You may nominate yourself for election. You may not nominate any
other member.

There will be 8 people elected to each of the Board of Directors and the
Architecture Group. In this first year of the X.Org Foundation, the four
candidates polling the most votes in each election will be granted a two
year term of office (until June 2006), and the next four candidates will
receive 1 year term of office (until June 2005). In subsequent years, four
seats of each group will be re-elected in the annual elections.

It is permissible for a candidate to stand for election for both the Board
of Directors and the Architecture Group.

The responsibilities of an elected person are detailed in the current
Bylaws of the X.Org Foundation, which can be found at:

http://www.x.org/XOrg_ByLaws_17Sep03.pdf

In addition, an elected person will be required to attend the annual
meeting of the X.Org Foundation, which will be held a location determined
in advance by the Board of Directors.

Should you wish to enter your candidacy for these elections, then please
prepare a personal statement of up to 200 words that can be provided to
prospective voters. This statement, and the statement of contribution to
the X.Org Foundation (which you completed when applying for membership)
will be made available to all voters to help them make their voting
decisions.

Once you have completed your personal statement, then you may visit:

http://www.x.org/member/XOrg_Foundation_Election_N omination.tpl

to enter your candidacy for the X.Org Foundation elections.

We look forward to your membership and candidacy submissions,

The Interim Board
X.Org Foundation."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

XOrg Foundation Opens Membership and Elections

Comments Filter:
  • by lurwas ( 518856 ) on Monday April 19, 2004 @10:13AM (#8903910) Homepage
    Elections and official positions are decided by the community itself. It's called a democratic process.
    Hey, it even works sometimes ;)
  • Corp. Involvement? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by i.r.id10t ( 595143 ) on Monday April 19, 2004 @10:21AM (#8903971)
    Anyone know if NVidia or ATI is going to be involved with this? Sure would be nice to have stable drivers for 3d acceleration from the get-go...
  • by vidarh ( 309115 ) <vidar@hokstad.com> on Monday April 19, 2004 @10:22AM (#8903981) Homepage Journal
    Because obviously there is no infighting and bickering between companies that develop proprietary software?

    Dragging up these kinds of conflicts as a problem with open source projects is a lousy excuse at best.

    In the real world, if clients are "appalled by the infighting and bickering" what it really means is that they are appalled because they got to see what would otherwise to a large extent happen behind closed doors protected by ridiculous membership fees for industry consortiums, or they somehow see it as "infighting and bickering" when it happens on a mailing-list and serious, worthwhile competition when it happens in the form of press releases from large companies.

    If your clients can't handle that, they need to learn - openness means dirty laundry IS aired in public, and ultimately it's a strength that allow users to take organizational risk into account when choosing a software solution, something which is inherently hard to do with companies where all the nasty stuff happens behind the users backs.

  • by tahtalim ( 735164 ) on Monday April 19, 2004 @10:24AM (#8903997)
    Great... Whoever has more developpers can easily control X.Org. Donno if this is good or bad, but at least it won't be company oriented after all.
  • by gr8_phk ( 621180 ) on Monday April 19, 2004 @10:26AM (#8904020)
    "Consider the dozens of distributions, forks, and delays caused by a licence not being "free enough."

    "In the real world, good-quality software comes with no strings attached."

    Those 2 thing go together. "Free" as in freedom (as in GPL) gets you no-strings. The whole X fork happened because someone tried to add strings.

    "In short, please work on developing good software. As long as it's free as in $0.00, I'll be happy."

    This makes me want to call you all sort of nasty stuff. Why don't YOU go develop something I want and then give it to ME? I'll just sit here and bitch about your development process and complain if it isn't $0.00.

    Or was your post supposed to be a joke and I missed it?

  • Re:Rant time!! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by BlueWonder ( 130989 ) on Monday April 19, 2004 @10:39AM (#8904133)
    When are we going to see some real improvements to the X protocol??
    [...] Gripe 1: A packet gets sent EVERY TIME THE CURSOR BLINKS!!! Why the fsck is that needed?? Even when I am on a separate virtual desktop and not viewing the app the traffic is STILL SENT!!

    The latter is a problem with the app, not with the X protocol. The X protocol allows it to notify an app when its windows are mapped or unmapped, so the app needn't attempt to make the cursor blink in an unmapped window.

    Gripe 2: Why does the ENTIRE app need to redraw itself (using huge amounts of network bandwidth) every time I obscure it with a window or hop to another virtual desktop???

    That's a problem with the capabilities and/or configuration of the X server, but not with the X protocol. The protocol allows backing store and save under.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 19, 2004 @12:25PM (#8905533)
    I think the grandparent post refered to direct democracy, not representative democracy.
  • Re:Why would they? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by kundor ( 757951 ) <kundor AT member DOT fsf DOT org> on Monday April 19, 2004 @12:45PM (#8905885) Homepage
    Xfree86 and X.org are compatible. The current nvidia and ati drivers work fine on both. There is no need for them to change anything.

"When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest." -- Bullwinkle Moose

Working...