Nicholas Petreley Slams Gnome 818
FreeLinux writes "Mainstream computer rag ComputerWorld, has posted a review of Gnome 2.6 by Nicholas Petreley. This opinion piece review, titled Living Down to a Low Standard, positively lambastes Gnome 2.6 over the new spatial Nautilus and Gnome's design choices. The review is quite the opposite to a previously reported review from PCWorld, last month. While this latest review is bound to be a polarizing and heavily debated issue (read flamebait), it is important in that this review will be seen by so many mainstream readers and corporate types who may have been considering Gnome."
Vicious (Score:5, Funny)
Those poor gnomes.
Don't RTFA! (Score:5, Funny)
### Warning! ###
### CATCHPHRASE ALERT ###
Nicholas Petreley uses the tired term "paradigm shift" in his article!
[not that anyone will actually read the article...]
### CATCHPHRASE ALERT ###
### Warning! ###
(-1 Flamebait) (Score:-1, Funny)
KDE Kollusion? (Score:2, Funny)
(just a joke don't shoot)
Frost Pirst (Score:2, Funny)
And on that note...
KDE SuxXX0rz! GNOME 4Eva!!~!
Unbiased (Score:5, Funny)
I'm glad the author of the slashdot story managed to keep his biases concealed until the third word of the story. If the article had praised Gnome, however, why do I suspect we'd be hearing about "Esteemed technical journal ComputerWorld..."
Registry? (Score:1, Funny)
This article is about as scarce on details as it can be while still managing to blast a piece of software into little pieces...the entire article is about Nautilus. One single "feature" in Nautilus. This isn't a review, it's nonesense.
Re:No big surprise (Score:2, Funny)
Poetry (Freeform, of course...) (Score:4, Funny)
Little tunnels where I live.
Pointy hat. Pointy hat.
Pointy hat hides my secrets.
Damn the garden spade!
Damn the garden spade!
(Nods to the applause of a dozen hipsters snapping their fingers)
Re:Unbiased (Score:5, Funny)
I go to the cockfights when I need to make a decision on this sort of thing. I label one chicken Choice A and the other chicken is Choice B, and that has pretty much worked for me. This explains why I'm using a C-64 right now. That was one tough chicken.
Re:Don't RTFA! (Score:5, Funny)
So, it's safe to say that the paradigm shift was embedded in the article??
Re:and it's right (Score:1, Funny)
Where I come from, most people would consider "pissed" a swear in the context in which you used it.
Me, I could give a fuckin shit either way.
Re:Don't RTFA! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Please... (Score:2, Funny)
it would be a shame for this turn into a Gnome vs. KDE flamewar.
I use Windowmaker, you insensitive clod!
Reminds me of Bloom County... (Score:3, Funny)
"Hello!? Bloom Beacon?! This is Senator Bedfellow! What's with this *@#! HEADLINE?" ... just a headline!"
"Headline?"
"Yes! There's no story
"Which headline?"
"THE *BIG* HEADLINE ON THE FRONT PAGE!"
"Read it to me, Senator."
"BEDFELLOW: THE SECRET LIFE OF A WIFE-SWAPPING ATHEIST"
"Oh, that's just a typo."
I'm glad to see that slashdot is holds itself to the same high standards of journalism.
Re:Vicious (Score:5, Funny)
Dont drink and derive. Alcohol and calculus dont integrate!
Onion Story (Score:3, Funny)
Well, at least you're in good company. You pick a computer, they try to balance the budget. ("Get 'im Soybean Subsidies! Th' ayes! Th' ayes! Claw the ayes aught! Whooyah!! Lookee that! Aye tellya boys, they'rell be no raise for the Libraian of Congress this year.")
At long last!! (Score:5, Funny)
We have achieved GUI parity with the MAC!!
Re:Don't RTFA! (Score:5, Funny)
Gnome slamming? (Score:5, Funny)
(Oh, I see, the subject should read GNOME in capitals. very misleading.)
Re:Vicious (Score:5, Funny)
The horror! The horror! They came at me from every direction! There were sidebars everywhere! Pastel-colered icons went flying! When they were through, I was left without my precious KControls or KApps...
Re:Don't panic... it's not that bad (Score:3, Funny)
And toast is good! I mean, nothing like warm, slightly crunchy sourdough or rye, with a little butter and apple-mint jelly. MMMmmm! Gimme toast!
You can browse files graphically in Gnome???!!!!! (Score:3, Funny)
As an aside, I wan't aware that Gnome had a 'registry' (a la Windoze?)...I always thought you could just edit flat files...another shock for my delicate constitution.
Re:Don't panic... it's not that bad (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Don't RTFA! (Score:3, Funny)
It could be worse, he could have used "wake-up call".
Re:Don't RTFA! (Score:4, Funny)
Thinking OUTSIDE the box is last week's failed methods, all new leaders are clearly embedded Inside The Box(TM).
Tell your friends.
Re:Reply from one of the Ars Technica crew (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Don't panic... it's not that bad (Score:3, Funny)