Google IPO Swami 255
The Google IPO Swami writes: "I'm running an experiment and Slashdot readers would be good contributors. As you may know, Google recently announced that they will be using a unique dutch auction structure to price shares of their IPO. Instead of having the underwriters determine the opening price, the price will be set by the demand of investors that register to participate. I'm interested in how well the public can estimate this demand and the price of the shares to be offered. I'm giving away free shares in Google to find out. The person that comes closest to estimating the opening and closing price of the stock on the IPO date will win shares in the company."
Who knows? (Score:5, Insightful)
Macro-economic factors such as interest rates, price of oil, unemployment, and who the US President will be on the date of the IPO are still unknown. Hey, even the date of the IPO is still an unknown!
Bookmark the site and revisit it as Google gets further along the road to IPO. That's the only way to win at this game unless you're an extremely good guesser.
marketing scam? (Score:0, Insightful)
Maybe I'm too cynical.
Mike Hawk's guess (Score:5, Insightful)
Google = genius (Score:4, Insightful)
Guaranteed skew up (Score:5, Insightful)
If you made the choice of betting on $1, you would get $10 worth of stock. If you made the choice of betting on $200, you'd get $2000 worth of stock.
Now obviously you don't want to bet too high because if you do then you won't be right at all. But you will tend to bet on the high end, rather than the low end.
P.S. Everything I know about Economics I learned from The Price Is Right.
Higher price (Score:5, Insightful)
From my understanding, people bid on it at any price point. When they decide to create X shares, the top bidders will receive those shares, but will pay the price point of the lowest bidder. If this is true, what's to stop me from bidding $500/share to guarantee I get to take part in the IPO? Since I won't have to pay this price, and I probably won't increase the per-share price significantly, an individual doing this could easily be guaranteed as many shares as they like. What happens when a large number of people realize this and it artificially increases the price?
Is there something to prevent this? Is this a desired action (maybe from Google's perspective)? Or am I just completely missing something here....?
I think the real question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:WINNER! (Score:5, Insightful)
That's highly unlikely. There shouldn't be very many people wishing they had gotten in on the IPO and willing to pay more the same day just by the nature of this Dutch auction scheme. The whole point of choosing this method is to lock out the rich people who want to quickly double their money on same day turn arounds...
Re:Abuse? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Who knows? (Score:5, Insightful)
Because Google's stock has to compete in the universe of all investments. In short, the value of a share of Google will be in part influced by the value of all other potential investments available.
Each macro force has very little direct impact on the Google price, but there's a whole lot of them out there, and they all add up...
You know, he's doing a bayesian survey (Score:5, Insightful)
http://www.research.att.com/~volinsky/bma.html
There was a possibly apochryphal story about this. A plane went down in a large area, and they needed to find it. Nobody really knew what happened to it. The leader of the search team went and asked a bunch of pilots where they thought the plane was, after giving them the course, heading, speed, and whatever data was available.
Well, they took the answers, narrowed the search area, then found the plane pretty much where the consensus said it would be.
A bit of thought will give you the reason this might have worked...
Re:WINNER! (Score:3, Insightful)
I'd expect a close pretty close (+/-) to the open.
Re:Guaranteed skew up (Score:2, Insightful)
Like I learned from Echelon, the map is not the territory.
Re:Google = genius (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:You know, he's doing a bayesian survey (Score:2, Insightful)
experts don't determine prices in the stock market. The irrational public does.
Re:You know, he's doing a bayesian survey (Score:2, Insightful)
I have absolutely no numbers to back this up (and I'm too lazy to look), but I highly suspect that institutional and fund investors outnumber low-skill private investors on daily volume by a ratio of at least 100:1. It seems that for every Joe Average flipping a couple of shares in a couple of companies, there are hundreds of massive institution investors and fund managers flipping billions of shares.
I am, of course, talking about real companies with a real market, and not penny stock where only the low-skill investor is involved.
Bluff (Score:3, Insightful)
He is so sure he will be able to afford to buy them !!
Re:The un-PC point of view in re: Google IPO (Score:4, Insightful)
Like most things in this world, I'm sure that this approach is not completely equalitarian but it is sure a damn sight better than the current scum-bags-r-us method endorsed by all the big players (aka thieves).
Not worth the hassle (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Guaranteed skew up (Score:1, Insightful)