What Would You Do With a 92 TBps Router? 344
enodev writes "Cisco announces today it's new 'Carrier routing system' For a price tag starting at $450,000 it's able to route up to 92 Tbps. It also features IOS-XR and the first optical OC-768c/STM-256c optical Interface." update changed TBps to Tbps and suddenly things seemed less cool ;)
I would (Score:5, Insightful)
Obligatory grammar nazi (Score:2, Insightful)
It's "its," not "it's!" Sometimes I think the grammar behind this is starting to devolve... or at least I'm having difficulty parsing it now.
I would just go about everything like normal. (Score:3, Insightful)
Finding uses... (Score:2, Insightful)
And why do we need to route this much traffic? Because over 60% of all email is spam. Because unpatched systems are getting trojans, which in turn are contacting their makers.
Hook it to my analog modem (Score:5, Insightful)
They dont work in a vacuum.
Re:After Much Deliberation.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Vanquish [wallpaper.net.au]
It's people like you that probably think that Joe Camel had some sort of symbolism too!
Just a Camel [musculardevelopment.com]
;)
It's just a PR bid. (Score:2, Insightful)
This is a just a bid for PR.
Juniper's router interconnect product is being announced shortly, and will allow users to interconnect T640s already installed in their network - no forklift upgrade. Cisco just wants to get something in the news before it rolls out, so that they don't seem quite so much the technological also-rans that they are, in this space.
Considering the number of delays this box's development has undergone, one can only imagine how many exciting 'Cisco features' have been left in to make this rush to market possible.