Sun & Fujitsu Team On SPARC Chips & System 121
An anonymous reader writes "Sun and Fujitsu just announced a 20-year partnership to jointly develop SPARC based technology and systems. It looks like the long-predicted partnership that was hinted at earlier has finally come to pass in a much more comprehensive manner than I've heard anyone predict, i.e. not just chips, but a unified range of systems. My guess: Sun drops Ultrasparc III to provide the Throughput computing chips for the low end / web / network stuff, and takes up the Fujitsu provided SPARC64 chips for the high end and workstation market. Will this spark a new RISC renaissance for Sun and Fujitsu? Or is it a last gasp before Opteron / PowerPC / Itanium crush them? I for one will be interested to see what systems and processors come out of this. This could really revitalize the SPARC system market, especially if Sun's work on Throughput computing proves out."
Throughput computing (Score:5, Interesting)
For thin-client stuff, while low power consumption is a priority, it's not a big enough one to warrant the amount of money that Sun and others have spent on it. Maybe, just maybe, as a spinoff.
These "find a market for our new processor" discussions are getting a little depressing. I remember being excited about the DEC Alpha for embedded applications, but since then it all feels hollow.
What's actually going on here... (Score:5, Interesting)
2) Fujitsu Sparc core spanks Suns own core.
My prediction? Sun will abandon its multi-core, asynchronous research pipedreams and farm out all CPU design to Fujitsu. CPU design is a very costly (comoditised) business for Sun to be in, and as Apple have shown its the system that matters, not the processor.
Throughput Computing and the Transputer (Score:5, Interesting)
provide the Throughput computing chips for the low (Score:1, Interesting)
It's more likely Sun will start using Opterons for the low-end. Why? Because (IIRC) Opterons scale much better than Intel chips in a multiple-CPU environment. And that multiple-CPU ability to scale damn near linearly is Sun's real strength in the computer market.
And they want to give that hardware away because they think people are clamoring to pay for the software they put out?!?!!??
Re:What's actually going on here... (Score:2, Interesting)
Regarding memory bandwidth: look at Sun's I/O bus architecture.
Re:What's actually going on here... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:What's actually going on here... (Score:2, Interesting)
So it does. There's more to life than apache though.
I dare you to look at this [sun.com]. Then, think for a minute about what sort of things you'd use it for.
Re:What's actually going on here... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:20 years? (Score:4, Interesting)
The reason Sun is losing is because the SparcV should be out that is comptetive agaisnt (theoritical) agaisnt the power, mips, and Opteron.
TI who actually fabricates teh chips is pulling a Motorolla in order to gain more profits by not upgrading their plants.
Either they innovate and skip the sparcIV and leep to the sparcV and develop the sparcVI or give in to Opteron now and save the company.
Open-source platform for games (Score:2, Interesting)
Problems of course:
- need an installed base to sell enough games
- state of the art engine does not grow on trees
- willingness of hardware types to work together
Possible Pros:
- open standard encourages performance improvements for the next generation that don't break older applications
- massively distributed bug fixing
Re:20 years? (Score:3, Interesting)
Sun are capable of having a strategy that can move with the market, as well as dictating to the market, as appropriate. I get tired of people on Slashdot claiming one company or product is 'dead' just because it has a competitor.
Sun also aren't particularly 'losing', as you put it. Unit shipments were up 26% for the first quarter of 2004, with the UIIIi systems selling extremely well - and they're positioned directly against the Xeon based stuff that Slashdot readers tell us is going to take over the world.
Re:What's actually going on here... (Score:3, Interesting)
Witness intel's recent change of direction regarding the future of Pentium. They've all but EOL's the Pentium 4 Netburst architecture and are now going multi-core. It took an anouncement from their competitors though, and lengthy explanations and analysis in the industry press, before they did, once it was absolutely clear that the clock frequency wars were over. Intel is well behind, but they have an absolutely astronomical R&D budget.
The best use for Solaris Zones: N1 Grid (Score:3, Interesting)
This is the story that needs to be told, but I sometimes think Sun is using Novell's old marketing team.
DISCLAIMER: I work for Sun but I try not to drink the company Kool Aid.