Sun COO Schwartz Promises Open Source Solaris 371
Alapan writes "According to C-Net Asia, Sun plans to make Solaris open source soon. While I hardly expect Sun to make it GPL compatible, I wonder how much restrictions Sun will place on distributing modified solaris systems. And will we some integration of Solaris' strong points into other open source OSes like Linux and BSD?" Update: 06/02 14:16 GMT by T : Correction: Schwartz is Sun's COO and President, but not CEO (as the headline originally had it).
comments to sun (Score:5, Informative)
Odd.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:porting (Score:3, Informative)
Re:porting (Score:2, Informative)
INCORRECT TITLE (Score:5, Informative)
Re:application incompatibilities? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I would be wary of this news (Score:5, Informative)
Sun is also producing turn key Linux cluster solutions for pharmaceutical companies. How does that say "don't use Linux"?
I think you're getting the wrong message. The message is, we've always prided ourselves on our committment to open standards and open source, and that trend will continue with Solaris.
I for one don't see anything bad coming from that.
Re:This would be welcome news (Score:2, Informative)
I'm sorry, but once you've used GNU/Linux, you'll find Solaris sucks very badly.
Basically they can make Solaris Free under a GPL license for all I care, and I still wouldn't touch it with a barge-pole, even on Sun hardware.
Re:This would be welcome news (Score:4, Informative)
Sun has announced that GNOME will be their new default desktop. In fact, I believe they are porting Java Desktop (which is GNOME with a Sun theme) to Solaris.
Regarding speed, have you checked out Solaris 10? It's a lot faster than 8 and 9. Sun is making the betas of 10 available for free - check out Solaris Express [sun.com].
Also, an Ultra 5 is hardly an ideal system to use. It's about 7 years old, and even then was extremely low-end. I used to use one as a Kerberos server. It worked fine as a lightweight server, but I'd never use it for interactive work. Linux is probably faster than Solaris on it, but Solaris is hardly optimized for that level of system.
Re:This would be welcome news (Score:3, Informative)
Re:This would be welcome news (Score:1, Informative)
And Sun recognizes this. Which is why since Solaris 8 Sun has shipped a CD with GNU tools/sources and in Solaris 10, many of those tools will be a part of the OS install itself.
Re:This would be welcome news (Score:3, Informative)
you'll find Solaris sucks very badly
As a desktop, maybe. But Solaris doesn't shine as a desktop O/S, it shines on a server where uptime, stability and scalability are the primary concerns.
now, apparently you get some ancient GNU software compiled on an extra CD these days - great leap forward guys
I personally install many of the GNU tools over their Solaris counterparts. However if Sun up and replaced the Solaris tools overnight then thousands of scripts would break because they depend on the behaviour and options of the Solaris tools.
No command-line editing anywhere in sight!
WTF? You can run any shell on Solaris that you can run on Linux. The Bourne shell is the default for root for historical compatability reasons.
The pkg format sucks ... Give me 'apt-get install ' any day
Solaris has other package formats (RPM), but moving away from pkg isn't something that can happen overnight. Installing the latest cool toy from some unstable repository isn't exactly the priority.
How do I keep Solaris up to date? By constantly manually checking for patches from some obscure place on Sun's site...
Boy, that was hard to find [sun.com] If you are running a Sun and you don't know about Sunsolve what planet are you living on?
It's sllloooowwwwww too. I had a Sun Ultra 5 running Solaris 9 for a while. When I replaced it with Debian...
Ah yes, 8 yeard old hardware that is pretty much a PC with a SPARC CPU. How did Debian install and perform on a 128-way system?
The default desktop system is Motif + CDE
Not any more [sun.com]
Solaris doesn't stack up very well against Linux on the desktop, no argument from me. But running a desktop with the latest bleeding-edge toys installed on it is hardly the only measure of an O/S.
Who said anything about "soon"? (Score:3, Informative)
Actually, despite the headline's claim, Schwartz never actually said "soon"; in fact, he was very vague: 'I don't want to say when that will happen. But make no mistake, we will open source Solaris.'
So, what does that mean? At the latest possible hour, when all other options are exhausted?
And before we get too excited about an open Solaris, consider this: "one problem that Schwartz wants to avoid is having Solaris splintered into different distributions like Linux" (Ong Boon Kiat). If that statement is true, then it doesn't portend well for modified versions of the operating system, does it? I'm hoping that the author merely extrapolated from Schwartz' dim view of Red Hat.
A variety of Solaris distributions would be excellent, but it's probably not going to happen. John Loiacono of Sun adds: "We have to consider what licensing model we use and what levels of free usage we want. Then we also need to consider if we want to [segment the licensing model to address] commercial, private and academic use."
These deliberations suggest that the community will not get anything close to ideal licensing terms.
It's a shame, because if they would truly open source Solaris and Java, the open source community would rally around both products and actually help Sun get out of the death spiral they seem to be in right now.
True, but it's probably a pipe dream. Call me cynical, but it almost seems like Sun just wants free labor to bolster a dying product. I would be surprised if the eventual licensing terms concur with the notion of being "truly open source"; more like, "just open source enough to extract some patches and drivers from the open source development community." How many video cards do they support now? Six?
Don't get me wrong, I would love for Sun to open Solaris, but consider the source (no pun intended).
Re:God, I hope not. (Score:3, Informative)
Tales of Net-SNMP and Sun's contributions (Score:3, Informative)
Unfortuantely, the tale turned sour when Sun downsized and the entire team that did all this wonderful work (and probably will have saved Sun money in the long run) got laid-off.
So, this story is both good and bad news. They've done smart things before in the OSS realm, but they've also laid off some of the people that really made it happen.